SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

25,147 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS + Intel Arc A550M: A Mobile Powerhouse Analysis

This laptop-class pairing combines AMD's 8-core Zen 3+ processor with Intel's Arc A550M discrete GPU, placing the system at the 82nd percentile overall. The CPU achieves a 77th percentile ranking among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 86th percentile among all graphics cards. This configuration targets mobile users who need substantial multi-threaded compute capability alongside competitive rasterization performance, though no measured frame-rate data exists for this exact combination in the database.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A550M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-512 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process. The die contains 21,700 million transistors across a 406 mm² area, yielding a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². This is a substantial GPU with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective data rate, which is adequate for 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming but may constrain performance at higher resolutions in texture-heavy titles.

The GPU's compute configuration includes 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operations pipelines. Clock speeds are rated at 900 MHz base and 2050 MHz boost, producing a pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 262.4 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance reaches 8.397 TFLOPS in FP32 and 16.79 TFLOPS in FP16 with a 2:1 ratio, indicating strong throughput for both traditional rendering and compute workloads. The 16 ray tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated RT support, though the overall RT throughput will be modest compared to higher-tier desktop GPUs.

Benchmark results show the A550M scoring 49,894 in Geekbench OpenCL and 49,580 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average benchmark score of 49,737. This places the GPU at the 86th percentile overall, a remarkably strong showing for a mobile part. The nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (average score 49,957, only 0.4% higher), the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50,001, 0.5% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (50,951, 2.4% higher). Interestingly, the A550M outperforms the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT by 2.6% (that card scores 48,477). These comparisons suggest the A550M delivers desktop-class compute performance in a mobile form factor, though architectural differences mean gaming performance may not scale identically.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs including ray tracing and mesh shaders. Display outputs are portable device dependent, typical for laptop implementations. The 60 W TDP is notably efficient for the performance level, making this a strong choice for thin-and-light gaming laptops that prioritize battery life alongside graphics capability.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What are the CPU and GPU percentile rankings in the database?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS ranks at the 77th percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel Arc A550M ranks at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. The combined system sits at the 82nd percentile overall.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The Arc A550M's average benchmark score of 49,737 places it 0.4% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49,957), 0.5% behind the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50,001), and 2.4% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (50,951). It is 2.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (48,477).

Q: What memory does the CPU support and what is the bandwidth?

A: The Ryzen 7 7735HS supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing 76.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth. It also supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a mobile consumer processor.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The CPU has 16 MB of shared L3 cache, with 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 cache per core. This is a standard configuration for an 8-core mobile processor.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A550M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) and a total bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

Q: Is this CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is unlocked is false, meaning the Ryzen 7 7735HS does not support overclocking. It operates at a fixed base clock of 3.20 GHz with a boost clock of 4.75 GHz.

Q: What is the production status of the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A550M is marked as "End-of-life" in the database, while the CPU is listed as "Active" production status. This may affect long-term availability and driver support considerations.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 86th percentile ranking and 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggest strong 1080p performance, likely exceeding 60 FPS in most titles at high settings. The CPU's 77th percentile ranking with a max-thread score of 6,872 and single-thread score of 912 in 3DMark indicates sufficient headroom for high-refresh gaming, though the 60 W GPU TDP may limit sustained boost clocks in demanding scenes.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads provide substantial headroom for encoding workloads alongside gaming. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 6,870 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13,106 suggest the processor can handle simultaneous game rendering and x264 encoding without significant frame drops, while the GPU's 16 RT cores and Vulkan 1.4 support enable hardware-accelerated encoding paths.

Video editing: The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 23,166 and integer math score of 85,309 indicate strong performance for video codec operations and timeline scrubbing. The GPU's 16.79 TFLOPS FP16 throughput (2:1 ratio) accelerates effects rendering and color grading, while the 8 GB VRAM accommodates 4K timelines with multiple effects layers.

3D rendering: The GPU's OpenCL score of 49,894 and Vulkan score of 49,580 place it in the same performance class as the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (0.5% to 2.4% difference), making it viable for GPU-accelerated renderers. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13,106 and Geekbench multi-core score of 8,114 provide capable CPU-based rendering for scenes that favor ray-traced workloads.

Software development: The CPU's 16 threads and 16 MB L3 cache deliver strong compilation performance, with PassMark data compression score of 293,278 and extended instructions score of 20,050 indicating efficient handling of build tools and code analysis. The 6 nm process node and 35 W TDP make this suitable for sustained developer workloads on battery power.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread PassMark score of 3,296 and Geekbench single-core score of 1,699 handle everyday productivity with ease. The integrated Radeon 680M graphics provide a fallback for light tasks when the discrete GPU is idle, while the 35 W CPU TDP ensures reasonable battery life for all-day academic use.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The system's balance favors GPU-intensive workloads, given the GPU's 86th percentile ranking versus the CPU's 77th percentile. In gaming scenarios, the A550M will likely be the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, as its 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM may limit texture streaming and frame buffer performance. The CPU's 3.20 GHz base and 4.75 GHz boost clocks, combined with a 912 single-thread 3DMark score, provide adequate frame pacing for most titles, but CPU-bound scenarios (e.g., simulation-heavy games) may see the processor become the limiting factor.

The CPU's 77th percentile ranking, with an average benchmark score of 25,147, places it 0.2% behind the AMD EPYC 9474F (25,103) and 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (25,201). This tight clustering indicates the 7735HS is a solid mid-range mobile processor, but not a top-tier performer. In multi-threaded productivity workloads, the CPU's 16 threads will scale well up to 8-10 active threads, after which diminishing returns set in — the 3DMark scores show 6,870 at 16 threads versus 5,697 at 8 threads, a 20.6% gain from doubling thread count.

The GPU's 49,737 average benchmark score, while 86th percentile, shows notable variance against rivals: 2.6% ahead of the RX 6800 XT but 2.4% behind the RX 6900 XT. This suggests the A550M has performance headroom that depends on driver optimization and workload characteristics. For rendering tasks using OpenCL or Vulkan, the GPU will likely be the dominant contributor, while the CPU handles scene management and physics. The 35 W CPU TDP and 60 W GPU TDP create a combined thermal envelope that prioritizes sustained GPU boost clocks over CPU multi-core performance in thermally constrained laptop chassis.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the database; the measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty, and dataIsMeasured is false. All gaming performance figures presented here are estimates based on the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximate expectations rather than verified results.

Based on the GPU's 86th percentile ranking and its proximity to the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (2.4% lower score) and RX 6800 XT (2.6% higher score), the A550M likely delivers 1080p high-ultra settings performance in the 60-100 FPS range for most AAA titles. At 1440p, frame rates would drop to approximately 40-70 FPS depending on the title's memory bandwidth requirements, as the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may become a limiting factor. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p ultra textures but may require texture quality reductions at 1440p in VRAM-heavy titles.

The CPU's single-thread performance (912 in 3DMark single-thread, 1,546 in Cinebench R23 single-core) should not bottleneck the GPU at 1080p in most titles, but esports titles running at very high frame rates (200+ FPS) may see CPU limitations. The 16-thread 3DMark score of 6,870 indicates strong multi-core scaling for games that utilize more than 8 threads, but the 3.20 GHz base clock may limit frame pacing in lightly-threaded scenes. Ray tracing performance will be modest given the 16 RT cores, with estimated 30-50 FPS at 1080p in RT-enabled titles, and the GPU's 60 W TDP will cause boost clock throttling under sustained load.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This mobile platform suits gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh experiences, as the GPU's 86th percentile benchmark position (49,737 average score) aligns with desktop-class performance in the RX 6800 XT range (2.6% difference). Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 16 threads and the GPU's 16.79 TFLOPS FP16 throughput, with PassMark multi-thread score of 23,166 supporting sustained render workloads.

Software developers compiling large codebases will leverage the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, with PassMark integer math at 85,309 and extended instructions at 20,050 indicating strong performance for build tools. Students and office workers get a dual-purpose machine: the CPU's 35 W TDP and integrated Radeon 680M graphics enable battery-efficient productivity, while the discrete GPU handles occasional gaming or creative tasks. Small business workstations requiring ECC memory support (a feature of the CPU) and GPU acceleration for compute tasks would find this configuration viable, though the GPU's end-of-life status warrants consideration for long-term deployments.

The system is less suited for users needing maximum multi-threaded CPU performance, as the 77th percentile ranking places it behind higher-core-count mobile or desktop processors. Similarly, users targeting 4K gaming would find the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM insufficient, making 1080p and entry-level 1440p the realistic sweet spot. The 82nd combined percentile indicates a well-matched pair for mainstream gaming and productivity, not extreme high-end workloads.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS is an 8-core, 16-thread processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt-R codename. It uses AMD Socket FP7 and is manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with a die size of 210 mm². Base clock is 3.20 GHz with a boost clock of 4.75 GHz, operating within a 35 W TDP. The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 at 76.8 GB/s with ECC capability, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

Benchmark data shows a processor that scales effectively with thread count: 3DMark scores progress from 1,773 at 2 threads to 3,382 at 4 threads, 5,697 at 8 threads, and 6,870 at 16 threads. The max-thread score of 6,872 nearly matches the 16-thread result, indicating the processor's multi-threading overhead is minimal. Single-thread performance is 912 in 3DMark and 1,546 in Cinebench R23, which is competitive for a mobile part but not class-leading — the CPU's 77th percentile ranking reflects this balance.

In real workloads, the Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2,153.4 and R23 multi-core score of 13,106 indicate strong sustained multi-threaded performance for a 35 W part. Geekbench scores of 1,699 single-core and 8,114 multi-core corroborate this. PassMark results show specialized strengths: data compression at 293,278 and random string sorting at 30,388 suggest excellent database and archival workloads, while floating-point math at 47,865 and integer math at 85,309 indicate solid general compute. The physics score of 1,073 and find prime numbers score of 59 are modest, reflecting the CPU's mobile positioning.

The nearest CPU rivals in the database are the AMD EPYC 9474F (average score 25,103, 0.2% higher), AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (25,201, 0.2% lower), AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (25,284, 0.5% lower), and AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (25,005, 0.6% higher). These deltas are all within 0.6%, indicating the 7735HS performs nearly identically to its closest competitors in aggregate benchmark terms, with architectural differences manifesting in workload-specific variations.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: laptop) pairing an AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS mobile processor with an Intel Arc A550M discrete GPU. The CPU is a mainstream 8-core, 16-thread part from the 7000 series, while the GPU is an Alchemist-generation Arc 5 Mobile chip. Combined, the system ranks at the 82nd percentile overall, indicating a well-above-average configuration for gaming and productivity tasks.

The CPU's 77th percentile ranking and the GPU's 86th percentile ranking create a system that is slightly GPU-heavy in its performance profile. This means the A550M will be the primary driver of gaming and rendering performance, while the CPU provides sufficient, but not exceptional, multi-threaded compute. The 35 W CPU TDP and 60 W GPU TDP suggest a total system power budget of roughly 95 W for the core components, which is typical for a performance laptop.

The GPU's "End-of-life" production status is notable, as it indicates the A550M is no longer in active production. This may affect driver support longevity and availability. The CPU is marked as active, so replacements and system servicing will be easier for the processor. The 82nd combined percentile places this build in the upper tier of laptop configurations, suitable for demanding applications but not at the extreme high end represented by flagship desktop or mobile parts.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's average benchmark score is 25,147, placing it at the 77th percentile among all processors. Key individual scores include: 3DMark 16-thread at 6,870, 3DMark single-thread at 912, Cinebench R23 multi-core at 13,106, Cinebench R23 single-core at 1,546, Geekbench multi-core at 8,114, Geekbench single-core at 1,699, and PassMark multi-thread at 23,166. The nearest CPU rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H with an average score of 25,201 (0.2% lower), and the AMD EPYC 9474F with 25,103 (0.2% higher).

The GPU's average benchmark score is 49,737, placing it at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. Specific scores are Geekbench OpenCL at 49,894 and Geekbench Vulkan at 49,580. The nearest GPU rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti with an average score of 49,957 (0.4% higher), followed by the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at 50,001 (0.5% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT at 50,951 (2.4% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT at 48,477 (2.6% lower).

The combined picture shows a system where the GPU outperforms the CPU in relative terms by 9 percentile points. This imbalance suggests that the GPU will be the primary bottleneck in GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high resolutions, while the CPU will be sufficient for most productivity tasks. The 82nd combined percentile indicates that, despite the GPU's end-of-life status, this pairing delivers strong overall performance for a laptop. The tight clustering of GPU rivals (all within 2.6% of each other) suggests the A550M's performance is well-established and consistent across benchmark runs.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP7, which is specific to mobile platforms and does not support desktop AM5 or AM4 processors. The memory support is dual-channel DDR5 at 76.8 GB/s with ECC capability, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16. Since this is a laptop build, the upgrade path is limited by the motherboard's integrated nature — users cannot swap the CPU or GPU independently in most designs.

The GPU has a 60 W TDP with no suggested PSU listed, and the CPU has a 35 W TDP, totaling 95 W for the core components. A laptop power adapter in the 120-150 W range would provide adequate headroom for the rest of the system (display, storage, cooling fans, and other peripherals). Since the GPU is end-of-life and the CPU is active, the most sensible upgrade path is to replace the entire laptop with a newer platform when performance demands exceed this configuration.

For users seeking incremental improvements, the primary upgrade would be increasing system memory to the maximum supported capacity, as the CPU's dual-channel DDR5 bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s is a potential bottleneck for integrated graphics and memory-intensive workloads. Storage upgrades via PCIe Gen 4 NVMe drives would also yield tangible benefits for load times and file operations. However, given the GPU's end-of-life status and the combined 82nd percentile performance, a full platform upgrade to a newer laptop with more recent CPU and GPU generations would be the most impactful change for users who have outgrown this system's capabilities.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS + Intel Arc A550M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds