SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

25,147 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS + Intel Arc A370M: A Balanced Mobile Duo

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS paired with the Intel Arc A370M represents a mid-range laptop configuration that prioritizes efficiency and balanced performance across CPU- and GPU-bound tasks. Based on the available benchmark data, this pairing sits at the 76th percentile overall, indicating it outperforms roughly three-quarters of all tested laptop configurations. The CPU is a strong 8-core, 16-thread mobile processor built on TSMC's 6 nm process, while the GPU is a 4 GB entry-level Arc discrete part. This combination is designed for users who need solid multi-threaded processing power for productivity and creative work, alongside competent 1080p gaming at medium settings. It is important to note that no measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination; all gaming performance figures in this analysis are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of each component.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A370M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture and uses the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process. The die contains 7,200 million transistors across a 157 mm² area, yielding a transistor density of 45.9 million per square millimeter. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1550 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz. It packs 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units, providing a pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s. Compute throughput is rated at 4.198 TFLOPS for FP32 and 8.397 TFLOPS for FP16 (at a 2:1 ratio). The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, running at an effective 14 Gbps, which yields a memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s.

For ray tracing, the A370M includes 8 dedicated RT cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray-traced effects in supported titles, though the modest FP32 throughput and limited memory bandwidth will constrain RT performance to lower resolutions and settings. The GPU does not list dedicated tensor cores; instead, it relies on the Xe-HPG architecture's general-purpose Xe cores for AI and upscaling tasks. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern rendering APIs. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is adequate for a GPU of this class.

In benchmark terms, the A370M scores 29,676 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28,673 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its average benchmark score is 29,175, placing it at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. This means it outperforms 74% of tested GPUs, which is a strong result for an entry-level mobile part. The nearest rivals show how tight the competition is: the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH scores 29,197 (0.1% ahead), the AMD FirePro W8000 scores 29,211 (0.1% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 470 scores 28,996 (0.6% behind), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M scores 28,874 (1.0% behind). Notably, the A370M is essentially on par with the RX Vega M GH and FirePro W8000, and slightly ahead of the RX 470 and the much larger RX 6800M. For rendering workloads, the 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance, combined with 112 GB/s of bandwidth, indicates the GPU can handle 1080p rendering tasks, but it is not suited for high-resolution or high-complexity scenes that would stress its 4 GB VRAM capacity.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The following gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the GPU's benchmark scores and its relative position among rivals. The Intel Arc A370M's Geekbench Vulkan score of 28,673 and its 74th percentile ranking suggest it is capable of delivering playable frame rates at 1080p with medium to high settings in most modern titles. Given that the GPU sits between the RX Vega M GH and RX 470 in raw compute, users can expect performance similar to those parts.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the A370M will likely struggle to maintain 60 FPS in demanding AAA titles, given its 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth. However, at 1080p with medium settings, the GPU should deliver smooth frame rates in esports and less demanding games. For competitive titles like CS, Valorant, or Fortnite, the 4.198 TFLOPS compute and 65.60 GPixel/s pixel rate should be sufficient for frame rates well above 60 FPS at medium-to-high settings. For story-driven games, the 4 GB VRAM may become a limiting factor in textures and draw distances, but the 8 RT cores could enable ray-traced effects at reduced resolutions. At 1440p, the A370M is likely not viable for high-refresh gaming; the bandwidth and VRAM constraints would push settings to low or force resolution scaling. Overall, the gaming experience is best described as entry-level 1080p, with the CPU providing enough headroom to avoid bottlenecking the GPU in most scenarios.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS is an 8-core, 16-thread mobile processor based on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R. It is part of AMD's 7000 series and is manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with a die size of 210 mm². The base clock is 3.20 GHz, with a boost clock up to 4.75 GHz. The processor has a TDP of 35 W, making it suitable for thin-and-light laptops. Cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s and includes ECC memory support. The CPU is mounted on AMD Socket FP7 and offers PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. It also integrates Radeon 680M graphics, which can serve as a fallback iGPU.

Benchmark results show a strong multi-threaded performance profile. In 3DMark, the CPU scores 6,870 with 16 threads, 5,697 with 8 threads, 3,382 with 4 threads, and 1,773 with 2 threads, with a single-thread score of 912. Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 13,106, while single-core is 1,546; Cinebench R15 multi-core is 2,153.4 and single-core is 248. Geekbench multi-core is 8,114 and single-core is 1,699. Passmark scores include a multi-thread score of 23,166 and a single-thread score of 3,296. The average benchmark score is 25,147, placing the CPU at the 77th percentile among all CPUs.

Real-world workload analysis shows the 7735HS excels at multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13,106 indicates strong performance in video rendering, 3D modeling, and software compilation. The Passmark integer math score of 85,309 and floating-point math score of 47,865 further confirm its capability in scientific and engineering applications. Data compression and encryption scores are particularly high: 293,278 and 18,237 respectively, indicating fast file archiving and secure data handling. The CPU's single-thread performance is comparatively modest, with a Geekbench single-core score of 1,699, but this is expected for a 35 W mobile part. The nearest CPU rivals show the 7735HS is well-positioned: the AMD EPYC 9474F scores 25,103 (0.2% behind), the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H scores 25,201 (0.2% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS scores 25,284 (0.5% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F scores 25,005 (0.6% behind). This suggests the 7735HS is effectively a peer of high-end desktop and mobile parts in average benchmark scores, making it a versatile processor for demanding workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ryzen 7 7735HS and the Arc A370M is crucial for understanding real-world performance. The CPU's 77th percentile ranking is higher than the GPU's 74th percentile, indicating the CPU has a slight performance advantage over the GPU. In CPU-bound workloads, such as video encoding, software compilation, or multi-threaded data processing, the 7735HS will be the primary driver, and its 8 cores and 16 threads will ensure high throughput without GPU intervention.

In gaming, the GPU is likely the limiting factor. The A370M's 74th percentile ranking and its modest 4.198 TFLOPS compute mean that at 1080p, the GPU will be the bottleneck in most graphically intensive titles. The CPU's strong multi-threaded scores, such as the 23,166 Passmark multi-thread score, indicate it can feed the GPU with frames without stuttering. The FPS scaling, estimated from benchmark scores, shows that the CPU is unlikely to constrain gaming performance at 1080p; the GPU will reach its limits first. However, at lower resolutions or with reduced graphics settings, the CPU's single-thread score of 912 in 3DMark could become a factor in CPU-bound scenarios, such as large multiplayer battles or physics-heavy games.

For mixed workloads, the balance is favorable. The CPU's 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 MB L3 cache are adequate for the GPU's 112 GB/s bandwidth, meaning data transfer between CPU and GPU over PCIe 4.0 x8 will not be a severe bottleneck. The combined percentile of 76 indicates that the system as a whole is well-matched, with neither component drastically outclassing the other. In productivity tasks where both CPU and GPU are used, such as video editing with hardware acceleration, the system should perform consistently without one component waiting on the other. Overall, the bottleneck profile is workload-dependent: CPU-bound tasks leverage the 8-core processor fully, while gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering will be limited by the A370M's 4 GB VRAM and bandwidth.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS is mounted on AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile-specific socket. This means the CPU is not upgradeable in a traditional desktop sense; users are limited to the laptop's integrated design. The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported, which is beneficial for professional workstations. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, allowing for fast NVMe SSDs and a discrete GPU. The Intel Arc A370M uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is compatible with the CPU's lane allocation.

The system's 35 W TDP for the CPU and 35 W TDP for the GPU suggest a total power draw of around 70 W for these components, leaving headroom for other components like the display, storage, and memory. The GPU's suggested PSU is not listed, but the low TDPs indicate that the laptop's power adapter is likely sufficient for the entire system. The GPU is marked as production status "End-of-life," and its release date is March 2022, meaning it is a mature product. The CPU is still "Active" in production, with a release date of March 2023.

For upgrades, the most sensible path is to invest in additional DDR5 memory, as the dual-channel support and 76.8 GB/s bandwidth are already robust, but more capacity will help with multi-tasking and large datasets. Storage upgrades via PCIe Gen 4 NVMe drives are also viable, given the 20 available lanes. The GPU, however, is not upgradeable in a laptop form factor, and its end-of-life status suggests that users should not expect driver improvements to significantly boost its performance. A future upgrade would involve moving to a new laptop with a more powerful GPU, rather than modifying this configuration. The platform's strengths lie in its efficiency and memory support, making it a solid foundation for a mobile workstation, but its upgrade ceiling is defined by the laptop chassis.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 76, indicating the system outperforms 76% of tested laptop configurations.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A370M support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 8 dedicated RT cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray-traced effects, though performance will be limited by the 4 GB VRAM and 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 compute.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance compared to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 7735HS has an average benchmark score of 25,147, which is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, and 0.6% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does the Ryzen 7 7735HS support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s and includes ECC memory support.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A370M still in production?

A: No, the GPU is marked as "End-of-life" in production status, with a release date of March 2022.

Q: What is the GPU's average benchmark score and percentile?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 29,175, placing it at the 74th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics as a fallback?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 7 7735HS includes Radeon 680M integrated graphics, which can be used when the discrete GPU is not needed or for power saving.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing is suited for users who require strong multi-threaded CPU performance in a laptop form factor, with enough GPU capability for moderate gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks. Gamers targeting 1080p at medium settings will find the A370M adequate, especially in esports titles where the 4.198 TFLOPS compute and 65.60 GPixel/s pixel rate can deliver high frame rates. Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D modelers, will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13,106 and Passmark floating-point math score of 47,865, which accelerate rendering and effects processing. Software developers can leverage the 8 cores, 16 threads, and 16 MB L3 cache for fast compilation, with the Passmark data compression score of 293,278 indicating rapid build and archive operations.

Students and professionals in fields like engineering, data analysis, and finance will appreciate the CPU's ECC memory support and dual-channel DDR5 bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, which ensure data integrity and fast access. Small business workstations that run multi-threaded applications, such as accounting software or database management, will see strong performance from the 77th percentile CPU. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM is sufficient for office productivity, 2D design, and light 3D work, making this a versatile system for mixed-use environments. However, users who need high-refresh 1440p gaming or heavy 3D rendering with large textures should look elsewhere, as the A370M's bandwidth and memory capacity are limiting factors.

Build Overview

This configuration pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, an 8-core, 16-thread mobile processor from the 7000 series, with the Intel Arc A370M, an entry-level discrete GPU from Intel's Arc 3 Mobile line. The build class is laptop, indicating a portable, integrated design rather than a desktop setup. The CPU is built on the Zen 3+ architecture (Rembrandt-R) using a 6 nm process, with a 35 W TDP, while the GPU is based on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist) with a 35 W TDP. Combined, these components deliver a 76th percentile overall ranking, meaning the system outperforms 76% of tested configurations.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 25,147 places it at the 77th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU's average score of 29,175 places it at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. This indicates a slight CPU advantage, which is typical for a laptop design where the processor handles a broader range of tasks. The pairing is a mid-range mobile solution, suited for users who want a balance of CPU-heavy productivity and moderate GPU acceleration. The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with the GPU's 1,024 shading units and 8 RT cores, make this a capable system for 1080p gaming, content creation, and professional applications, all within a power-efficient 35 W envelope for each component.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS demonstrates strong benchmark performance across a variety of tests. In 3DMark, the CPU scores 6,870 with 16 threads and 912 in single-thread, showing a significant multi-threading advantage. Cinebench R23 results include a multi-core score of 13,106 and a single-core score of 1,546, while Cinebench R15 shows 2,153.4 multi-core and 248 single-core. Geekbench scores are 8,114 multi-core and 1,699 single-core. Passmark tests reveal a multi-thread score of 23,166, a single-thread score of 3,296, and specialized scores such as 85,309 for integer math, 47,865 for floating-point math, 293,278 for data compression, and 18,237 for data encryption. The CPU's average benchmark score is 25,147, placing it at the 77th percentile.

The Intel Arc A370M achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29,676 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 28,673. Its average benchmark score is 29,175, placing it at the 74th percentile. The GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (0.1% ahead), AMD FirePro W8000 (0.1% ahead), AMD Radeon RX 470 (0.6% behind), and AMD Radeon RX 6800M (1.0% behind). Combined, the CPU's 77th percentile and GPU's 74th percentile yield a system that is well-balanced, with the CPU slightly ahead in relative performance. The combined percentile of 76 reflects a cohesive unit where neither component is a glaring weakness, making it a reliable choice for a wide range of applications.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Intel Arc A370M is capable of delivering high frame rates in esports titles at 1080p with medium settings, given its 4.198 TFLOPS compute and 65.60 GPixel/s pixel rate. The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance ensures the GPU is fed with data, preventing frame drops in CPU-bound scenarios.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13,106, can handle both game encoding and streaming software simultaneously, while the GPU's 8 RT cores and 1,024 shading units manage the game rendering, providing a smooth streaming experience.

Video Editing: The CPU's Passmark floating-point math score of 47,865 and multi-thread score of 23,166 accelerate video encoding and effects, while the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth support hardware-accelerated previews and exports in editing software.

3D Rendering: With a Passmark integer math score of 85,309, the CPU handles complex geometry and physics calculations, while the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance is sufficient for 1080p renders; however, the 4 GB VRAM limits texture sizes and scene complexity.

Software Development: The CPU's 8 cores, 16 threads, and 16 MB L3 cache provide fast compilation times, and the Passmark data compression score of 293,278 ensures quick build and archive operations, making this ideal for developers working with large codebases.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's single-thread performance of 1,699 in Geekbench and 3,296 in Passmark handles everyday tasks with ease, while the GPU's 4 GB VRAM supports multiple displays and light 2D/3D design work, and the 35 W TDP ensures long battery life for portability.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds