SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7735H + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7735H

37,161 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735H and Intel Arc A350M form a laptop-class pairing that targets the upper-middle tier of mobile computing. The CPU, an 8-core/16-thread Zen 3+ part, delivers strong multi-threaded performance, while the GPU, an entry-level Arc 3 Mobile component, offers modest but capable graphics power. Together, they occupy the 78th percentile of all benchmarked CPU+GPU combinations. The data indicates a system built for productivity and mainstream gaming rather than extreme high-refresh-rate or 4K workloads, with the CPU clearly serving as the dominant component in the pairing.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7735H is a mobile processor built on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, and fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, a base clock of 3.20 GHz, and a boost clock of 4.75 GHz, all within a 35 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 16 MB of L3 cache. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s and offers PCIe Gen 4 connectivity with 20 lanes from the CPU itself.

Benchmark results show a balanced performer. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 10920 points in multi-core and 1536 points in single-core. The multi-core figure is particularly strong for a 35 W mobile part, indicating sustained throughput in rendering and compilation tasks. PassMark results reinforce this: the multithread score of 23765 and integer math score of 86788 point to solid compute capability, while the floating-point math score of 49260 suggests adequate performance for scientific and analytical workloads. The single-thread PassMark score of 3288 is respectable, and the data encryption score of 18990 indicates secure data handling is not a bottleneck.

The CPU's percentile rank of 85 places it above the vast majority of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals, all with average scores within 0.2% of the 7735H's average of 37161, include the Intel Core i7-13700, AMD Ryzen 7 160, Intel Core i9-12900T, and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450. The deltaPct values of 0.1 to 0.2 mean these are essentially statistical ties, so the 7735H trades blows with those desktop and high-end mobile parts in aggregate compute performance. For real workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10920 suggests the CPU can handle video editing timelines and multi-threaded code compilation with ease, while the single-core score of 1536 ensures responsive day-to-day application usage.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is an entry-level mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, generation Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile), built on a 6 nm TSMC process. The chip, designated DG2-128, contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs, with a base clock of 1150 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz. Memory consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. The GPU includes 6 RT cores for ray tracing and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Compute output is modest. The FP32 performance is rated at 3.379 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 6.758 TFLOPS (2:1). Pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 105.6 GTexel/s. In Geekbench compute tests, the GPU scores 24546 in OpenCL and 24747 in Vulkan, giving an average benchmark score of 24647. This places the GPU in the 70th percentile of all GPUs, which is respectable for a mobile entry-level part but far from high-end.

The nearest rivals show the Arc A350M in a tight cluster. The AMD Radeon RX 590 scores 24744 (-0.4%), the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile scores 24763 (-0.5%), the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT scores 24442 (+0.8%), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 scores 24277 (+1.5%). These deltas are all within 1.5%, meaning the Arc A350M's compute performance is statistically indistinguishable from a desktop RX 590 or a high-end mobile RTX A5000. For rendering, the 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 figure indicates the GPU can handle light 3D modeling and basic video effects, but ray tracing workloads will be limited by the 6 RT cores and 4 GB VRAM. The 112 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p textures but will constrain higher-resolution assets.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 7735H compare to the Intel Core i7-13700?

A: The two are effectively tied. The 7735H has an average benchmark score of 37161, while the Core i7-13700 scores 37135, a deltaPct of 0.1%. In Cinebench R23, the 7735H scores 10920 multi-core and 1536 single-core, indicating comparable raw throughput.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and why does it matter?

A: The Intel Arc A350M has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is adequate for 1080p gaming and light creative work, but the limited capacity may constrain texture loads in modern titles at higher settings.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU stronger in this pairing?

A: The CPU is substantially stronger. The 7735H sits in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the Arc A350M sits in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile is 78, reflecting the CPU's dominance in the overall score.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A350M includes 6 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate. However, given the 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance, ray tracing effects should be considered a feature for light use rather than a primary capability.

Q: What memory type does the CPU support?

A: The Ryzen 7 7735H supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. This is a modern standard, ensuring compatibility with current laptops and adequate bandwidth for the 8-core processor.

Q: How does the GPU's performance rank against all GPUs?

A: The Arc A350M ranks in the 70th percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 24647. It is within 0.5% of the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile in compute benchmarks, which is notable for an entry-level mobile part.

Q: Is the CPU production status active?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 7 7735H has an active production status. The GPU, however, is listed as end-of-life, which may affect long-term driver support and availability.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance in this pairing. The CPU's percentile rank of 85 far exceeds the GPU's rank of 70, indicating the processor is the stronger component. In workloads that are CPU-bound, such as multi-threaded rendering or code compilation, the 7735H will perform admirably, with Cinebench R23 multi-core of 10920 and PassMark multithread of 23765 providing ample headroom. The GPU, meanwhile, will be the limiting factor in graphics-heavy tasks. Its Geekbench scores of 24546 (OpenCL) and 24747 (Vulkan) are respectable for an entry-level part, but they place it in a cluster with desktop GPUs like the RX 590, which is not a high-end performer.

For gaming, the bottleneck is unambiguous: the GPU limits frame rates. With 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 and 112 GB/s bandwidth, the Arc A350M is suited for 1080p at medium settings, but it will struggle to push high refresh rates in demanding titles. The CPU's single-core score of 1536 in Cinebench R23 is more than sufficient to feed the GPU, so processor-side stuttering is unlikely. In productivity workloads, the balance flips: the CPU's 16 threads and high multi-core scores will accelerate tasks like video rendering and data compression (PassMark data compression score of 303502), while the GPU's modest compute is sufficient for basic display output and light acceleration. The combined percentile of 78 reflects this mixed profile—strong on the CPU side, moderate on the GPU side, with the GPU as the primary limiter in any graphics-bound scenario.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 7 7735H is built on AMD Socket FP7, a mobile platform. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which allows for fast NVMe storage and discrete GPU connectivity. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5, with ECC capability enabled, a feature that is unusual for a mobile part and useful for data integrity in workstation tasks. The 35 W TDP indicates efficient operation, making the platform suitable for thin-and-light laptops without extensive cooling.

Upgrades for this platform are limited because it is a laptop build. The CPU is not upgradeable, and the GPU is integrated into the board, so neither component can be swapped. The practical upgrade path is external: a user could connect an external GPU enclosure via PCIe, though the CPU's 20 lanes would need to be shared. Alternatively, the next sensible upgrade is to a newer laptop with a more powerful GPU, as the CPU's 85th percentile rank is still competitive, but the GPU's 70th percentile rank and end-of-life status will age faster. The suggested PSU is null, meaning no specific power supply was provided, but the combined TDP of 35 W (CPU) and 25 W (GPU) suggests a modest power budget, so battery life and thermal headroom in a laptop chassis are the primary constraints.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A350M's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 and 112 GB/s bandwidth are not sufficient for high-refresh 1080p gaming in demanding titles. The GPU's 70th percentile rank, while above average, places it near the RX 590, which is a 2018-era desktop part. Users should expect 60 FPS at best in esports titles, with lower settings required for modern AAA games.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10920, provide ample headroom for software encoding. The PassMark extended instructions score of 21214 indicates good AVX/AVX2 performance, which helps with x264 encoding. The GPU's lack of a dedicated encoder is not a concern, as the CPU can handle the load.

Video editing: The CPU excels here. The PassMark multithread score of 23765 and floating-point math score of 49260 accelerate timeline rendering and effects. The 16 MB L3 cache and 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth ensure smooth scrubbing. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM may limit preview quality for high-resolution footage, but the overall experience will be CPU-driven and positive.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 10920 means CPU-based rendering is fast for a mobile platform. The GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS is usable for OpenCL acceleration but not competitive with dedicated rendering GPUs. The 6 RT cores are present but too few for serious ray-traced work.

Software development: The CPU is a strong asset for compilation. The integer math score of 86788 and data compression score of 303502 indicate rapid code building and asset processing. The single-thread score of 3288 in PassMark ensures fast IDE responsiveness.

Student and office work: This pairing is overkill for basic tasks. The CPU's single-thread performance ensures snappy application launches, while the GPU handles 4K display output without strain. The 35 W CPU TDP and 25 W GPU TDP mean long battery life in a laptop, making it a solid choice for all-day campus use.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU performance over graphics. Gamers at 1080p with medium settings will find the Arc A350M adequate, but those seeking high refresh rates or 1440p should look elsewhere. Content creators, particularly video editors and software developers, will benefit most from the 7735H's 16 threads and high multi-core scores. The 85th percentile CPU rank makes it suitable for students in engineering or data science programs, where compilation and simulation workloads dominate. Small business workstations that run office suites and database applications will see excellent performance, with the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 23765 handling concurrent tasks easily. The GPU's 70th percentile rank is a secondary consideration, but it is sufficient for light CAD and graphic design.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") combining the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H with the Intel Arc A350M. The CPU is a 7000 series part from AMD, based on the Zen 3+ architecture, while the GPU is an Intel Arc 3 Mobile part on the Xe-HPG architecture. The combined percentile is 78, placing this build above more than three-quarters of all tested combinations. The CPU is the clear star, ranking in the 85th percentile, while the GPU ranks in the 70th percentile. This is a balanced productivity machine with modest gaming capability, suitable for users who need strong compute power in a mobile form factor.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 37161, with a percentile rank of 85. In Cinebench R23, it scores 10920 multi-core and 1536 single-core. PassMark results include a multithread score of 23765, integer math of 86788, floating-point math of 49260, and single-thread of 3288. The GPU's average benchmark score is 24647, with a percentile rank of 70. It scores 24546 in Geekbench OpenCL and 24747 in Geekbench Vulkan. There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance is estimated from these benchmark scores. The combined picture shows a system where the CPU outperforms its GPU counterpart by a significant margin, with the CPU near the top tier of mobile processors and the GPU in the upper-middle tier of all GPUs.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7735H + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 7735H

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds