SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7730U + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7730U

25,625 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 7730U and Intel Arc A350M form a laptop pairing aimed at balanced everyday performance, but the data shows a clear split in their capabilities. The CPU is a strong 8-core workhorse with a 78th percentile ranking, while the GPU, though respectable at the 70th percentile, is the limiting factor in graphically intense tasks. This combination is best understood as a capable all-rounder for productivity and moderate gaming, rather than a high-performance gaming rig.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance in this pairing heavily favors the CPU. The Ryzen 7 7730U sits at the 78th percentile of all CPUs, a notably higher position than the Arc A350M's 70th percentile standing among GPUs. This 8-point percentile gap indicates that in most combined workloads, the GPU will reach its limits before the CPU does. For productivity tasks like compiling code or rendering spreadsheets, the CPU's 16 threads will keep things moving smoothly, but in gaming, the Arc A350M's 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth will cap frame rates.

The bottleneck dynamic shifts depending on the workload. In lightly threaded tasks, the CPU's single-core performance, evidenced by a Geekbench single-core score of 1541 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1454.5, is sufficient to feed the GPU. However, in high-FPS scenarios at lower resolutions, the GPU's 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus becomes a constraint. The 112.0 GB/s bandwidth is modest by 2024 standards, meaning texture-heavy scenes will likely cause frame drops or require lower detail settings to maintain smoothness.

The 15 W TDP of the CPU and 25 W TDP of the GPU suggest a thermally constrained laptop chassis. This means sustained loads will likely cause both components to operate near their efficiency curves, but the CPU's higher relative percentile suggests it has more headroom for bursty workloads. For users who prioritize multi-threaded productivity, this pairing is well-balanced; for those expecting high-refresh gaming, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers a strong multi-core showing with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10801.5, placing it within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 5 6600H and 0.4% of the Intel Xeon D-2752TER. Its single-core Geekbench score of 1541 is competitive, though not class-leading. In the Passmark suite, the CPU achieves a multi-thread score of 18037 and a single-thread score of 3004, with notable strengths in integer math (72352) and floating-point math (38460). Data encryption performance is solid at 14258, while find prime numbers is low at 45, indicating weak cryptographic prime-generation performance.

The GPU's benchmark results are anchored by a Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 and a Vulkan score of 24747. These scores place it just 0.4% behind the AMD Radeon RX 590 and 0.5% behind the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, but 0.8% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT. This is a tight cluster, suggesting the Arc A350M performs in the same league as those desktop and mobile GPUs in compute tasks. The average benchmark score for the GPU is 24647, versus the CPU's 25625, reinforcing that the CPU is the stronger component in raw compute terms.

The combined percentile for this build is 74, which means this laptop pairing outperforms roughly three-quarters of all tested CPU-GPU combinations. This is a solid mid-tier result, but not exceptional. The data shows a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks like video encoding or software compilation, while the GPU delivers acceptable but not outstanding graphics compute.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7730U is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Barcelo-R. It is built on TSMC's 7 nm process node with 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. The base clock is 2000 MHz with a boost clock of 4500 MHz, and it supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a peak bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. This is a mobile processor on the AMD Socket FP6 platform, featuring integrated Radeon Graphics with Vega 8 cores.

In real workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10801.5 indicates strong sustained performance for 3D rendering and video encoding. This score is essentially tied with the Ryzen 5 6600H (0.3% difference), which is notable because the 6600H has fewer cores but higher clocks. The Passmark multi-thread score of 18037 confirms this is a capable processor for parallel tasks. The data compression score of 225023 is particularly strong, suggesting good performance in file archiving and data-heavy applications.

The L3 cache is 16 MB shared, with 512 KB L2 per core and 64 KB L1 per core. This cache hierarchy is typical for Zen 3 and provides adequate latency hiding for multi-threaded loads. The 15 W TDP is low, indicating this CPU is designed for thin-and-light laptops where battery life and thermals are priorities. The lack of a vCache 3D option means no extra gaming cache, but the standard Zen 3 design is still efficient. Overall, the CPU is a well-rounded performer that punches above its TDP class in multi-threaded tasks.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need strong CPU performance for productivity but do not require high-end gaming graphics. Students and office workers will benefit from the 8 cores and 16 threads, which handle multitasking with many browser tabs, office suites, and light coding without strain. The Passmark data encryption score of 14258 and integer math score of 72352 show solid performance for data-heavy tasks like database management or financial modeling.

Content creators who edit photos or videos at 1080p will find the CPU sufficient for rendering and exporting, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM limits complex effects or 4K timelines. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the multi-core score of 10801.5 in Cinebench R23, which correlates with faster build times. Small business workstations that run accounting software, inventory systems, or light CAD tools will perform well, especially given the CPU's 78th percentile ranking.

For gamers, this build is suitable for esports titles and older games at 1080p medium settings, but it is not designed for AAA gaming at high detail. The GPU's 70th percentile means it will handle less demanding titles but struggle with modern releases. Users who prioritize portability and battery life over gaming will find this a balanced choice, as the 15 W CPU TDP is power-efficient.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is a mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors. It features 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster operation units. The GPU has 6 ray tracing cores, and while tensor cores are not listed, it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, indicating modern API readiness. The boost clock is 2200 MHz with a base clock of 1150 MHz.

Memory is a critical limitation: 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus yields 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is low by current standards and will bottleneck texture-heavy applications and high-resolution gaming. The pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s and texture rate is 105.6 GTexel/s, which are modest figures. FP32 performance is 3.379 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 6.758 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), indicating decent compute capability for its class.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 places it just 0.4% behind the Radeon RX 590 and 0.5% behind the RTX A5000 Mobile, which are both more powerful desktop parts. This suggests the Arc A350M has strong compute efficiency despite its memory constraints. The 25 W TDP is low, making it suitable for thin laptops, but this limits sustained performance. The GPU is end-of-life, meaning no future driver optimizations are guaranteed, though current driver maturity is adequate for basic tasks.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 24747 suggests it can handle DirectX 12 and Vulkan titles at 1080p, but the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will force lower texture quality in modern games. The CPU's strong single-core score of 1541 in Geekbench ensures it will not bottleneck most games.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS should deliver 60-100 FPS at 1080p medium settings, though high-refresh 144 Hz monitors will be difficult to drive consistently. In older AAA games from 2015-2018, the Arc A350M can achieve 40-60 FPS at 1080p high settings. For recent releases like Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield, expect 20-35 FPS at 1080p low settings, with ray tracing effectively unusable due to the 6 RT cores and limited bandwidth.

The 8-core CPU with 16 threads will help maintain frame pacing in CPU-bound scenes, but the GPU will cap performance in GPU-bound scenarios. Users should target 1080p resolution with adaptive sync enabled to smooth out frame drops. The lack of measured data means these figures are estimates based on the GPU's percentile rank and memory characteristics, not empirical testing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not recommended. The GPU's 112.0 GB/s bandwidth and 4 GB VRAM are insufficient for sustained high-FPS gaming. Expect 60-90 FPS in light esports titles at 1080p medium, but 144 Hz monitors will likely see dips below 100 FPS.

Streaming: Acceptable for 1080p streaming with x264 encoding on the CPU. The 8-core, 16-thread processor can handle encoding overhead, but the GPU lacks dedicated NVENC-like hardware, so stream quality will depend on CPU load.

Video editing: Good for 1080p editing in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10801.5 ensures fast export times, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM limits complex effects and 4K scrubbing.

3D rendering: Adequate for light rendering in Blender or Maya. The CPU's multi-thread score of 18037 in Passmark will handle CPU rendering, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 24546 offers hardware acceleration for viewport previews. Large scenes will exceed VRAM.

Software development: Excellent. The CPU's integer math score of 72352 and compression score of 225023 make it ideal for compiling code and managing version control. The 16 threads handle multiple containers or VMs efficiently.

Student and office work: Overkill for basic tasks, but the 15 W TDP ensures long battery life. The CPU's single-thread score of 3004 in Passmark will make spreadsheets and web apps feel snappy.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing an AMD Ryzen 7 7730U mobile CPU with an Intel Arc A350M mobile GPU. The combined percentile of 74 indicates this system outperforms 74% of tested configurations, placing it in the upper-mid tier of laptop performance. The CPU is a high-end mobile processor with 8 cores and 16 threads, while the GPU is an entry-level discrete mobile part that is now end-of-life.

The system is best described as a productivity-first laptop with light gaming capability. The CPU's 78th percentile rank makes it the primary driver of overall performance, while the GPU's 70th percentile is adequate for everyday graphics tasks and moderate gaming. This is not a gaming laptop, nor a workstation-grade GPU, but a balanced all-rounder for users who need solid CPU power without paying for a high-end GPU. The 15 W CPU TDP and 25 W GPU TDP suggest a thin-and-light chassis with good portability, though sustained loads will generate some heat.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7730U has 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 3 architecture with a boost clock of 4500 MHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A350M have?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is this build suitable for 4K gaming?

A: No. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for 4K gaming. The data suggests 1080p is the practical resolution limit, with medium settings for modern titles.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 6600H?

A: The Ryzen 7 7730U is 0.3% faster in average benchmark score than the Ryzen 5 6600H, making them statistically tied in performance.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A350M has 6 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, but the limited bandwidth will severely impact ray-traced performance.

Q: What is the CPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a peak bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, which is standard for mobile processors.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in gaming?

A: The GPU is the primary bottleneck. The CPU's 78th percentile rank outpaces the GPU's 70th percentile, so in gaming, the Arc A350M will cap frame rates before the CPU is fully utilized.