SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7700

40,081 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

54,247 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 pairing represents a high-end desktop configuration that targets the upper echelon of both compute and gaming performance. The data places this combination at the 87th percentile against all CPU and GPU pairings, underscoring its position as a premium solution for demanding workloads. The foundation is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 4 processor built on TSMC's 5 nm process, paired with a flagship Ada Lovelace GPU that delivers exceptional rasterization and ray tracing capabilities. This analysis breaks down the benchmark results, measured gaming performance, and platform characteristics to determine exactly where this build excels and where its limits lie.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 is a desktop-class processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Raphael codename. It operates on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, featuring a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The silicon integrates 6,570 million transistors across a 71 mm² die, manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process node. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 cache, providing a robust foundation for both latency-sensitive and throughput-oriented tasks.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales well across thread counts. In 3DMark tests, the CPU scores 1,049 in single-thread, 2,043 in 2-thread, 3,931 in 4-thread, 6,933 in 8-thread, and 8,484 in 16-thread (max threads) scenarios. This scaling pattern indicates that the 8-core, 16-thread configuration extracts nearly linear gains up to 8 threads, with the 16-thread score being only about 0.1% higher than the 8-thread result, suggesting that the extra threads from SMT provide marginal benefits beyond the physical cores. The Cinebench R23 results reinforce this picture: a multicore score of 18,760 and a single-core score of 1,930, which positions the CPU well for both heavily threaded productivity and lightly threaded responsiveness.

The processor's average benchmark score is 40,081, placing it at the 87th percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong showing, but the nearest rivals highlight the competitive landscape. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 scores 40,048, a delta of 0.1% ahead, making the two statistically indistinguishable. The Intel Core 5 221E is just 0.2% behind, while the AMD Ryzen 9 270 trails by 0.4%, and the Intel Core i9-13905H is 0.6% behind. These close margins indicate that the Ryzen 7 7700 sits at a performance parity point with several modern mobile and desktop chips, meaning that real-world differences will be minimal in mixed workloads.

In PassMark tests, the CPU demonstrates specific strengths: a multithread score of 34,470, a floating-point math score of 66,246, and an integer math score of 110,295. The data compression score of 405,084 and encryption score of 23,858 suggest that the processor handles data-intensive operations efficiently. For software development workloads, the extended instructions score of 96,902 and random string sorting score of 101,836 indicate solid performance in code compilation and parsing tasks. The single-thread score of 4,063 confirms that the boost clock of 5.30 GHz translates into responsive application behavior.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 7700 compare to its closest rivals in average benchmark scores?

A: The Ryzen 7 7700 has an average benchmark score of 40,081, which is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 at 40,048 (0.1% ahead). The Intel Core 5 221E is 0.2% behind, the AMD Ryzen 9 270 is 0.4% behind, and the Intel Core i9-13905H is 0.6% behind, indicating a tight performance cluster.

Q: What is the gaming performance at 4K resolution for this build?

A: Measured FPS at 3840x2160 on ultra settings varies widely by title. For example, Counter-Strike 2 hits 120 FPS, Call of Duty: Warzone reaches 119 FPS, and Valorant achieves 448 FPS. However, heavier titles like Cyberpunk 2077 run at 47 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 43 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 16 FPS.

Q: What memory and storage expansion options does the CPU platform provide?

A: The Ryzen 7 7700 supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s and ECC memory support. It provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, enabling high-speed NVMe storage and future graphics cards.

Q: How does the RTX 4080's benchmark score position it against the RTX 4080 SUPER?

A: The RTX 4080 has an average benchmark score of 54,247, which is only 0.1% behind the RTX 4080 SUPER at 54,209. This makes the two cards effectively identical in average performance, despite the SUPER's newer release.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for this GPU?

A: The RTX 4080 requires a suggested PSU of 700 W and uses a single 16-pin power connector. The GPU has a TDP of 320 W, meaning the system's total power draw will depend on the CPU and other components.

Q: Is the CPU good for productivity tasks like video editing?

A: Yes, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18,760 and Geekbench multicore score of 15,371 indicate strong multi-threaded performance. The PassMark multithread score of 34,470 supports this, making the CPU capable for rendering and encoding workloads.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU+GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 87 out of 100, indicating it outperforms 87% of all CPU and GPU pairings tracked in the database.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is the current mainstream desktop socket for AMD. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s and ECC memory, making it suitable for workstations that require data integrity. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, allowing for high-bandwidth expansion cards and NVMe storage devices. The integrated Radeon Graphics provide a basic display output for troubleshooting or non-discrete GPU configurations.

For the GPU, the RTX 4080 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots. The GPU's dimensions are 310 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width, requiring a triple-slot case with adequate clearance. The power delivery system uses a single 16-pin connector, and the suggested PSU is 700 W, which provides headroom for the 65 W CPU plus the 320 W GPU and other components. The GPU's TDP is 320 W, so a 700 W power supply is sufficient for a typical system with this CPU and GPU.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on increasing memory capacity or speed, as the DDR5 platform supports high-bandwidth modules. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes also enable future storage upgrades to NVMe SSDs that can exceed current Gen 4 speeds. The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, though the 65 W TDP suggests that the stock cooler is designed for efficient operation rather than extreme performance. For users seeking more GPU compute, the RTX 4080's successor, the GeForce 50 series, is listed as its successor, but that would require a full GPU swap rather than a platform change.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data across 51 games at three resolutions provides a comprehensive view of this build's gaming capabilities. At 1920x1080, the average FPS across games is 198.4, with a pair rank of 277 out of 3,732 pairs, placing it in the top 7.4% of all tested pairings. This resolution is where the CPU's single-thread performance shines, with esports titles hitting extremely high frame rates. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 717 FPS, Valorant hits 509 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege achieves 386 FPS. Even demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 run at 96 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone maintains 158 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains strong, with an average that exceeds 100 FPS in most titles. Counter-Strike 2 hits 215 FPS, Valorant reaches 482 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 140 FPS. The RTX 4080's 16 GB of VRAM and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth ensure that texture-heavy games like Cyberpunk 2077 (71 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (65 FPS) remain playable. The resolution scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a typical 30-40% drop in frame rate, indicating that the GPU is the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions.

At 3840x2160, the build begins to show its limits in the most demanding titles, but still delivers playable frame rates in most games. Valorant achieves 448 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 292 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone reaches 119 FPS. However, AAA titles at ultra settings struggle: Ark: Survival Ascended runs at 16 FPS, Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 47 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 hits 43 FPS. These results indicate that 4K gaming is possible but requires lowering settings or using upscaling technology for the most demanding titles.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This build excels at high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming. At 1920x1080, the average FPS of 198.4 exceeds the 144 Hz refresh rate of most monitors, and titles like Valorant (509 FPS) and CS:GO (717 FPS) can drive 360 Hz panels. At 2560x1440, the average remains above 144 FPS in many titles, making this a top-tier choice for competitive gamers.

Streaming: The 8-core, 16-thread CPU with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18,760 can handle encoding and game rendering simultaneously. The RTX 4080's tensor cores support hardware-accelerated encoding, offloading the streaming workload from the CPU. The PassMark multithread score of 34,470 indicates sufficient headroom for overlays and chat applications.

Video editing: The CPU's Geekbench multicore score of 15,371 and PassMark floating-point math score of 66,246 support complex timeline operations and effects. The GPU's FP32 performance of 48.74 TFLOPS accelerates rendering and export, making 4K video editing smooth. The 16 GB of GDDR6X VRAM allows for large color grading caches and multiple video streams.

3D rendering: In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 18,760 multicore, which is competitive for CPU-based rendering. The RTX 4080's 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 and 76 RT cores accelerate GPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles or V-Ray. The PassMark GPU compute score of 20,671 confirms strong compute capability, suitable for final frame rendering.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 405,084 and extended instructions score of 96,902 indicate fast code compilation and parsing. The 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the single-thread score of 4,063 ensures responsive IDE interactions. The 32 MB L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed code segments.

Student and office work: The CPU's 65 W TDP makes it efficient for daily use, and the integrated Radeon Graphics provide a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed. PassMark single-thread score of 4,063 ensures snappy application launches, while the multithread score of 34,470 handles multitasking with many browser tabs and office applications.

Who Should Build It

This build targets desktop users who demand high performance across both gaming and productivity workloads. Gamers at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 resolutions will benefit from the measured FPS exceeding 144 in most titles, with esports games reaching 300+ FPS. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software development will find the CPU's multi-threaded scores and the GPU's compute capabilities well-suited to their tasks. The 16 GB VRAM is particularly valuable for users working with large 3D scenes or high-resolution textures.

Small business workstations that require ECC memory support and PCIe Gen 5 expansion will appreciate the platform's flexibility. The CPU's 65 W TDP keeps cooling requirements modest, allowing for quieter builds in office environments. The RTX 4080's 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores make this a viable workstation for AI inference and ray-traced visualization, though the end-of-life production status means buyers should check current availability.

For students, the build offers a long lifecycle with DDR5 memory support and an upgrade path within the AM5 socket. The integrated graphics provide a backup if the GPU fails or is uninstalled. However, the cost of the platform and GPU may exceed typical student budgets, and the 310 mm GPU length requires a full ATX case.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a well-balanced pairing for most workloads, but the bottleneck shifts depending on resolution and application type. At 1920x1080, the CPU's single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1,049) is sufficient to drive high frame rates, but the GPU becomes the limiting factor in CPU-bound games. In CS:GO at 717 FPS, the CPU is the primary bottleneck, as the GPU is likely idle-waiting for draw calls. At 4K, the GPU is the clear bottleneck, with the CPU's 8-thread score of 6,933 providing ample headroom for the GPU to work at its maximum.

The pairRankByFps of 277 out of 3,732 pairs indicates that this combination outperforms 92.6% of all tested pairs in average FPS across games. This suggests that the balance is skewed toward the GPU, which is typical for gaming-focused builds. The CPU's 87th percentile and GPU's 86th percentile are nearly identical, meaning neither component is significantly stronger or weaker than the other in their respective markets. However, in productivity workloads, the CPU's average score of 40,081 is only 0.1% ahead of the Ryzen AI 9 365, indicating that the CPU may be the limiting factor in heavily threaded applications that scale beyond 8 cores.

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a 30-40% drop across most games, which is consistent with GPU-bound scenarios. From 1440p to 4K, the drop is more dramatic, with Cyberpunk 2077 falling from 71 FPS to 47 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 from 65 FPS to 43 FPS. This indicates that at 4K, the RTX 4080's 16 GB VRAM and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for ultra settings in the most demanding titles, requiring settings reductions.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080. The CPU is a 65 W, 8-core, 16-thread Zen 4 processor, and the GPU is a 320 W Ada Lovelace card with 16 GB of GDDR6X memory. The combined percentile of 87 places this build in the upper tier of all configurations, with the pair ranking 277th out of 3,732 for average FPS.

The build is designed for high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming, as well as productivity tasks like video editing and 3D rendering. The 87th percentile for both CPU and GPU individually confirms that this is a balanced, high-end configuration. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 320 W TDP, with a 700 W suggested PSU, indicate a power draw that requires a quality power supply but is manageable for most mid-tower cases. The triple-slot GPU and 310 mm length necessitate a case with adequate clearance.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 40,081, ranking at the 87th percentile of all CPUs. This places it in a tight cluster with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (40,048, +0.1%), Intel Core 5 221E (40,144, -0.2%), AMD Ryzen 9 270 (40,246, -0.4%), and Intel Core i9-13905H (40,313, -0.6%). The GPU's average score is 54,247, ranking at the 86th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the RTX 4080 SUPER, scores 54,209, a 0.1% difference, while the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is 1.1% behind at 54,828, and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 2.6% behind.

Combined, the build achieves an 87th percentile ranking, with a pair rank of 277 out of 3,732 for average FPS. The average FPS across all tested games is 198.4 at 1920x1080. This combined picture shows a system that is consistently in the top 15% of all configurations, with the CPU and GPU performing at near-parity with their closest competitors. The GPU's 0.1% lead over the RTX 4080 SUPER is within measurement error, but the 2.7% deficit to the AMD Radeon 8060S suggests that some competing GPUs offer higher raw compute scores.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is based on the AD103 chip with the Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process. The GPU integrates 45,900 million transistors across a 379 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.1 million per mm². The core configuration includes 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster operation pipelines. The memory subsystem features 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s and a memory clock of 1,400 MHz (22.4 Gbps effective).

The GPU's clock speeds are a base of 2,205 MHz and a boost of 2,505 MHz, delivering a pixel rate of 280.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 761.5 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute performance is 48.74 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 48.74 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS, making this a strong card for supported games.

In benchmark tests, the GPU scores 6,567 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 214,739 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 263,779 in Geekbench Vulkan. The PassMark G3D score is 34,457, and the GPU compute score is 20,671. The DirectX 12 score is 132, while DirectX 11 and DirectX 10 scores are 314 and 204, respectively, and DirectX 9 scores 370. These numbers indicate strong performance in modern APIs but weaker results in legacy DirectX 12 tests, which may be due to driver optimization or test methodology.

The GPU's 86th percentile ranking and average score of 54,247 make it a top-tier card, though it is statistically tied with the RTX 4080 SUPER. The 16 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 4K gaming in most titles, but measured FPS shows that ultra settings at 4K can push the card to its limits. The 320 W TDP and 700 W suggested PSU are consistent with its high-performance positioning. The GPU's end-of-life production status and 1,199 USD launch MSRP indicate it is a previous-generation flagship, but its benchmark performance remains competitive with current offerings.