SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7700 + Intel Arc B580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7700

40,081 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B580

23,021 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and Intel Arc B580 form a desktop pairing that targets high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming and balanced productivity. The CPU, a Zen 4 Raphael part on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, provides 8 cores and 16 threads with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. Built on a 5 nm TSMC process with 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die, it supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth and includes 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The GPU, an Intel Battlemage part on the Xe2-HPG architecture, features the BMG-G21 chip with 2,560 shading units, 160 TMUs, 80 ROPs, and 20 ray tracing cores. It operates at a base and boost clock of 2670 MHz with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus delivering 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The data shows this is a capable combination for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with the CPU’s 87th percentile ranking among all CPUs and the GPU’s 68th percentile ranking among all GPUs placing the pair at the 78th combined percentile.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 7 7700 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor that balances multi-threaded throughput with strong single-core performance. Its 5.30 GHz boost clock is a key factor in its benchmark results, particularly in single-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 18,760 in multi-core and 1,930 in single-core, indicating a substantial multi-thread advantage that is roughly 9.7 times its single-core score, reflecting efficient scaling across all 16 threads. The Geekbench scores of 15,371 multi-core and 2,525 single-core reinforce this pattern, with the multi-core result being about 6.1 times the single-core figure. The 3DMark results show scaling from 1,049 in single-thread to 8,484 in 16-thread and 8,479 in max-thread tests, meaning the processor effectively utilizes all available threads, with the 16-thread score being 8.1 times the single-thread score.

The PassMark suite provides insight into specific workload characteristics. The multi-thread score of 34,470 is substantial, but the integer math score of 110,295 and floating-point math score of 66,246 highlight the CPU’s arithmetic strength. Data compression scores 405,084, while encryption scores 23,858, showing a strong disparity that suggests the CPU handles compression tasks much more efficiently than encryption workloads. The single-thread PassMark score of 4,063 indicates solid per-core performance, which is critical for lightly-threaded applications like older games or certain office software. The CPU’s percentile of 87 versus all CPUs means it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market, and its average benchmark score of 40,081 places it in a tight cluster with rivals such as the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (average score 40,048, delta 0.1%), the Intel Core 5 221E (average score 40,144, delta -0.2%), and the AMD Ryzen 9 270 (average score 40,246, delta -0.4%). This indicates the 7700 is essentially performance-equivalent to these parts, with differences under 1% in either direction.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, which is confirmed as measured rather than estimated, shows a clear picture of this pairing’s gaming capabilities at ultra settings. At 1920x1080, the system delivers high frame rates in competitive titles: Valorant runs at 344 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 326.4 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 178 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone achieves 160.9 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 hits 149.8 FPS. These numbers indicate the build is well-suited for high-refresh-rate monitors at 1080p in esports and fast-paced shooters. For less demanding or older titles, Minecraft runs at 148 FPS, Roblox at 194 FPS, and To The Core at 150 FPS, all exceeding the 144 Hz threshold for smooth gameplay.

However, more demanding AAA titles show lower performance at 1080p. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 44 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 42.7 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 22 FPS, which are below the ideal 60 FPS target for smooth single-player experiences. Control runs at 62 FPS, which is playable but not high-refresh. At 2560x1440, the frame rates scale down predictably: Valorant drops to 293 FPS, Warzone to 139.3 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 to 98.7 FPS, while Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 33 FPS and Ark: Survival Ascended to 14 FPS. At 3840x2160, the system struggles with modern AAA titles—Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 22 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 18.3 FPS, and Ark at 7 FPS—but still manages 235 FPS in Valorant and 116.7 FPS in Warzone, indicating 4K is only viable for lighter or older games. The average FPS across all tested games is 98.6, with the pair ranking 2,813 out of 3,732 pairs, placing it in the lower-middle tier of all CPU+GPU combinations.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B580 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture and represents the Battlemage generation. It has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is a significant asset for texture-heavy workloads and higher resolutions. The GPU’s memory clock runs at 2375 MHz with 19 Gbps effective speed. The shading units number 2,560, with 160 TMUs and 80 ROPs, and the pixel rate is 213.6 GPixel/s with a texture rate of 427.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 13.67 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 27.34 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, indicating strong compute capability for both gaming and general-purpose GPU tasks.

The GPU includes 20 ray tracing cores, which supports hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the measured FPS in games with heavy ray tracing demands, such as Cyberpunk 2077 at 44 FPS at 1080p, suggests the RT performance is moderate rather than class-leading. The GPU’s benchmark scores show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,068, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 92,821, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 109,672, with the Vulkan score being about 18% higher than OpenCL, indicating better performance in Vulkan-API games. The PassMark G3D score is 15,748, and the GPU compute score is 7,729. The GPU’s percentile of 68 versus all GPUs places it above the majority of discrete graphics cards, and its average benchmark score of 23,021 is nearly identical to rivals such as the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (average score 23,061, delta -0.2%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (average score 22,895, delta 0.6%), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (average score 23,172, delta -0.7%). This is remarkable: the B580 performs on par with the RTX 2080 and RTX 3080 in these aggregate benchmarks, despite being a newer and more efficient part. The GPU has a TDP of 190 W and requires a 450 W power supply, with a single 8-pin power connector, and it is a dual-slot card measuring 272 mm in length.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this build excels in competitive titles, with Valorant at 344 FPS, CS:GO at 326.4 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 178 FPS, all well above 144 Hz. For 1440p gaming, the system remains strong in esports, but AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 at 33 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 33 FPS fall short of 60 FPS, so users should expect to lower settings or use upscaling. For streaming, the CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,760, provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, though the GPU’s compute scores (Geekbench OpenCL 92,821) suggest it can also handle encoding tasks if needed.

For video editing, the CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 110,295 and floating-point score of 66,246 indicate strong processing power for rendering and effects, while the GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM and 456 GB/s bandwidth are beneficial for timeline scrubbing and GPU-accelerated effects. For 3D rendering, the CPU’s multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 18,760) is solid for CPU-based rendering, and the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 13.67 TFLOPS and Vulkan score of 109,672 support GPU-accelerated renderers. For software development, the CPU’s balanced performance across single-thread (Geekbench 2,525) and multi-thread (Geekbench 15,371) tests handles compilation, while the GPU is less critical but adequate for UI rendering and testing. For student and office work, the CPU’s single-thread PassMark score of 4,063 ensures responsive application performance, and the integrated Radeon Graphics on the CPU provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed, with the 65 W TDP keeping power consumption modest for daily tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores paint a picture of a high-performing mid-range processor. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 18,760 is about 9.7 times the single-core score of 1,930, demonstrating excellent multi-threading scaling across the 16 threads. The Geekbench multi-core score of 15,371 is 6.1 times the single-core score of 2,525, confirming this trend. The 3DMark results show a scaling factor of 8.1 from single-thread (1,049) to 16-thread (8,484), and the max-thread score of 8,479 is nearly identical, indicating no additional benefit beyond 16 threads. The PassMark multi-thread score of 34,470 is complemented by a single-thread score of 4,063, and the data compression score of 405,084 is particularly high, suggesting the CPU excels in file archiving and compression tasks. The CPU’s percentile of 87 and average benchmark score of 40,081 place it just above the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (40,048) and just below the Intel Core 5 221E (40,144) and AMD Ryzen 9 270 (40,246), with deltas all under 1%, meaning these processors are functionally interchangeable in performance.

The GPU’s benchmark scores show a different strength profile. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,068 is a modern DirectX 12 test, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 109,672 is markedly higher than the OpenCL score of 92,821, indicating that the GPU performs better in Vulkan-optimized titles. The PassMark G3D score of 15,748 and GPU compute score of 7,729 are moderate, and the DirectX 11 score of 128 is higher than the DirectX 10 (76) and DirectX 12 (76) scores, suggesting older DirectX 11 titles may run relatively well. The GPU’s percentile of 68 and average benchmark score of 23,021 place it on par with the RTX 2080 (22,895) and RTX 3080 (23,172), which are older, higher-tier cards, indicating the B580 offers performance in a higher class than its position suggests. The combined picture is a CPU that is in the top 13% of all processors and a GPU that is in the top 32% of all GPUs, resulting in a combined percentile of 78.

Who Should Build It

This build is for gamers who primarily play at 1080p and want high frame rates in competitive titles, as evidenced by the 344 FPS in Valorant and 326.4 FPS in CS:GO at that resolution. It is also suitable for gamers at 1440p who play esports or older titles, with Warzone at 139.3 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 at 98.7 FPS, but they should be prepared to lower settings for AAA games. Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s multi-threaded strength (Cinebench R23 18,760) and the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM, which is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p editing timelines. Software developers will find the CPU’s balance of single and multi-thread performance (Geekbench 2,525 and 15,371) suitable for compilation and development tasks. Students and office workers building a dual-purpose machine will appreciate the CPU’s responsive single-thread performance (PassMark 4,063) and the option to use the integrated Radeon Graphics for basic tasks, while the discrete GPU provides gaming capability when needed. Small business workstations that require occasional gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks can leverage this build, though the GPU’s 68th percentile suggests it is not intended for heavy compute workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 24 CPU lanes, providing ample bandwidth for modern storage and GPUs, though the B580 itself uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, which is modest, and the GPU has a TDP of 190 W, with a suggested power supply of 450 W, meaning there is headroom for a more powerful GPU without necessarily upgrading the PSU, though a higher-wattage unit would be advisable for future high-end cards. The memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s is standard for DDR5 dual-channel, and the platform supports ECC memory, which is a feature for workstation users. A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU’s 87th percentile suggests it has headroom to drive a faster graphics card without bottlenecking. The CPU’s unlocked multiplier also allows overclocking to extract additional performance, though the data does not specify overclocked results. The platform’s AM5 socket is current, and the CPU’s production status is active, suggesting ongoing availability and support.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc B580 have, and what is its memory bus width?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU’s performance percentile compared to all CPUs?

A: The CPU is in the 87th percentile, meaning it outperforms 87% of all CPUs.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance percentile compared to all GPUs?

A: The GPU is in the 68th percentile, meaning it outperforms 68% of all GPUs.

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games for this CPU+GPU pair?

A: The average FPS across all tested games is 98.6, with the pair ranking 2,813 out of 3,732 pairs.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the maximum FPS seen in the measured data?

A: The maximum FPS is 344 in Valorant at 1920x1080 resolution.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates that the GPU is the primary limiting factor in most gaming workloads. The CPU’s 87th percentile is significantly higher than the GPU’s 68th percentile, suggesting the CPU has more performance headroom than the GPU can utilize. In CPU-bound games like Valorant and CS:GO, the system achieves very high frame rates (344 FPS and 326.4 FPS at 1080p), showing that the CPU can feed the GPU effectively. However, in GPU-bound titles like Cyberpunk 2077 and Red Dead Redemption 2, the frame rates drop to 44 FPS and 42.7 FPS at 1080p, respectively, indicating the GPU is the bottleneck. At 1440p, the frame rates drop further (Cyberpunk 2077 at 33 FPS), which is consistent with the GPU being the limiting factor as resolution increases. The CPU’s multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 18,760) is sufficient for gaming, but the GPU’s 68th percentile and its performance parity with the RTX 2080 and RTX 3080 in aggregate benchmarks suggest it is a mid-range part that will struggle with high-fidelity settings at higher resolutions. For non-gaming workloads like video editing or 3D rendering, the balance shifts: the CPU’s strong multi-thread scores (Geekbench 15,371) are critical for CPU-based tasks, while the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and compute scores (Geekbench OpenCL 92,821) support GPU acceleration, but the GPU may be the bottleneck in GPU-heavy renders due to its lower percentile. Overall, the GPU is the bottleneck for AAA gaming at 1440p and 4K, while the CPU is more than adequate for all but the most extreme multi-threaded workloads.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 with the Intel Arc B580. The CPU is a Zen 4 part on the AM5 socket with 8 cores and 16 threads, a 5.30 GHz boost clock, and a 65 W TDP, placing it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU is an Intel Battlemage part on the Xe2-HPG architecture with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory, a 2670 MHz boost clock, and a 190 W TDP, placing it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile is 78, indicating this system is above average overall. The pair’s average FPS across games is 98.6, with a rank of 2,813 out of 3,732 pairs, meaning it sits in the lower-middle tier of all CPU+GPU combinations. The build is best suited for 1080p high-refresh gaming and 1440p esports, as well as productivity tasks that benefit from the CPU’s multi-threading. It is not a high-end 4K gaming system, as AAA titles at that resolution fall below 30 FPS in many cases. The CPU launch MSRP is $329, and the GPU launch MSRP is 249 USD. This pairing offers a balanced mid-range desktop solution with strong CPU performance and adequate GPU performance for the target resolutions, though users seeking higher frame rates in AAA titles at 1440p or above would need to consider a more powerful GPU.