SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS

26,402 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS and Intel Arc A550M form a laptop pairing with no measured FPS rows in the benchmark database for this exact combination. All gaming performance estimates below are derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread mobile processor scoring in the 78th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is an Intel Arc A550M with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 and Vulkan score of 49580, placing it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. The combined system percentile is 82nd, indicating a high-tier portable configuration.

Gaming Performance

Because the database contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU pair, the following is an estimation based on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 86th percentile and its raw compute metrics—8.397 TFLOPS FP32, 16.79 TFLOPS FP16, and 16 ray-tracing cores—suggest strong performance in modern games at typical graphical settings. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth provides ample capacity for high-resolution textures and detail-heavy scenes. The CPU, with its 78th percentile and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2805, is sufficient to feed the GPU in most scenarios, though in CPU-bound situations it may cap frame rates. The GPU’s pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 262.4 GTexel/s indicate it can handle high fill-rate workloads, which translates to smooth rendering at high settings. Overall, the estimated gaming performance is strong, likely delivering high frame rates at common resolutions with quality settings turned up, but exact numbers are not available from the data.

Balance and Bottleneck

The percentile gap between the CPU (78th) and GPU (86th) reveals that the GPU is relatively more powerful than the processor. In games that rely heavily on single-thread performance, the CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 888 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2805 may become the limiting factor, especially when aiming for very high frame rates. Conversely, at higher graphical settings that stress the GPU, the 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth will be the primary constraint. The CPU’s multi-threaded performance—Cinebench R23 multicore 19873, 3DMark 16-thread 6915, and Passmark multithread 23393—allows it to handle background tasks like streaming, voice chat, or overlays without stealing frames from the GPU. The combined percentile of 82 suggests the pairing is well-balanced, with the GPU having a slight edge in relative performance. For CPU-light titles, the GPU will be the bottleneck; for CPU-heavy titles, the CPU will take that role. The GPU’s 16 RT cores and 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 also indicate it can accelerate ray tracing, though the CPU’s single-thread performance may limit overall frame consistency in those workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s 3DMark scores are: 16-thread 6915, 2-thread 1752, 4-thread 3374, 8-thread 5813, max-thread 6900, and single-thread 888. In Cinebench, it scores R15 multicore 2003, R15 singlecore 282, R20 multicore 8346, R20 singlecore 1178, R23 multicore 19873, and R23 singlecore 2805. Passmark results include multithread 23393, single-thread 3167, floating point math 48863, integer math 85274, data compression 310038, encryption 18648, extended instructions 21690, find prime numbers 54, random string sorting 31827, and physics 991. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 26402, placing it at the 78th percentile. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 8640U (average score 26462, 0.2% faster), Intel Core i9-12900HK (26469, 0.3% faster), Intel Core i7-1280P (26469, 0.3% faster), and AMD Ryzen 5 7600 (26324, 0.3% slower). The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 49894 and 49580, respectively, for an average of 49737, placing it at the 86th percentile. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti (average 49957, 0.4% faster), AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50001, 0.5% faster), AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (50951, 2.4% faster), and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (48477, 2.6% slower). The combined picture shows a laptop that sits in the top 18% of all systems (82nd percentile), with the CPU slightly below the GPU in relative standing but still within a few percentage points of several high-end desktop and mobile parts.

Who Should Build It

This is a laptop build, so the target users are those who need a portable system with strong gaming and productivity capabilities. Gamers who want high-quality settings in modern titles will benefit from the GPU’s 86th percentile and 8 GB of VRAM, which is sufficient for high-resolution textures. Content creators—video editors, 3D artists, and streamers—will appreciate the CPU’s multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 19873, Passmark multithread 23393) and the GPU’s compute power (8.397 TFLOPS FP32). The CPU’s support for ECC memory and DDR5 with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth makes it suitable for small business workstations or data analysis tasks. Students and office workers will find the 45W CPU TDP and 6 nm process node to be power-efficient, and the high percentile of the GPU ensures the system can handle any task thrown at it, from heavy multitasking to occasional gaming. The combination is also relevant for software developers who need a fast compiler and a GPU that can accelerate parallel workloads.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS is a 7000-series mobile processor built on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, using TSMC’s 6 nm process. It has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The cache layout is 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. It supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s and includes ECC support. The CPU has 20 PCIe Gen4 lanes and is on AMD Socket FP7. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not possible. Benchmark results show a strong multi-threaded capability: Cinebench R23 multicore 19873, 3DMark 16-thread 6915, and Passmark multithread 23393. Single-thread performance is moderate, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2805 and a 3DMark single-thread score of 888. The CPU sits at the 78th percentile, meaning it outperforms 78% of all CPUs. Its nearest rival comparisons show it is within 0.3% of the Intel Core i9-12900HK and i7-1280P, and 0.2% of the Ryzen 5 8640U, indicating it is competitive with many high-end laptop and desktop processors. The 6 nm process and 45W TDP make it a power-efficient part for a mobile system.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 86th percentile and 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 make it capable of driving high frame rates at typical settings. The CPU’s single-thread score of 2805 may limit absolute maximum frame rates in CPU-bound games, but the multi-thread headroom ensures smooth streaming and background tasks. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for high-quality textures, and the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth avoids bottlenecks.

Streaming: The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, with a Passmark multithread score of 23393, can handle encoding and game logic simultaneously. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 49894 indicates it can offload encoding if the software supports it. The combined 82nd percentile suggests the system can maintain stable frame rates while streaming.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19873 provides strong CPU rendering performance for video exports, and the GPU’s OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 49894 and 49580 accelerate effects and previews. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory is enough for 1080p and 1440p video projects.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 and 16.79 TFLOPS FP16 provide substantial compute for GPU-based rendering, while the 16 RT cores support ray tracing. The CPU’s multi-threaded performance handles scene complexity and pre-processing. The system is capable of handling moderate 3D rendering workloads.

Software development: The CPU’s balance of single-thread (2805) and multi-thread (19873) performance is well suited for code compilation, prototyping, and parallel builds. The dual-channel DDR5 memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s and ECC support are beneficial for large builds and data integrity. The GPU’s compute power can be used for GPU acceleration in scientific or machine learning tasks.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 45W TDP and 6nm process indicate power efficiency, which is beneficial for battery life (though exact battery duration is not specified). The GPU is overkill for office tasks but ensures smooth desktop rendering and future-proofing. The high percentile ratings guarantee that the system will not struggle with multitasking, document editing, or web browsing.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this system?

A: The combined percentile is 82nd.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-12900HK?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS has an average benchmark score of 26402, which is 0.3% lower than the i9-12900HK’s 26469.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A550M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket type?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FP7.

Q: What is the CPU’s architecture?

A: The CPU uses Zen 3+ (Rembrandt-R) on TSMC’s 6 nm process.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT?

A: The Arc A550M is 2.6% faster in average benchmark score (49737 vs 48477).

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is on AMD Socket FP7, a mobile socket, and supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen4 lanes, and the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The CPU has a TDP of 45W and the GPU has a TDP of 60W, but no suggested PSU is provided, so the power supply headroom is not specified. Since this is a laptop build, the upgrade path is limited to components that can be replaced—typically memory and storage. The platform supports DDR5 and PCIe Gen4, so future faster storage (e.g., NVMe SSDs) will be compatible. The CPU is multiplier-locked, so overclocking is not possible. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, so its availability may be limited, but the CPU remains active in production. For a sensible next upgrade within this platform, one could increase memory capacity or speed (within DDR5 dual-channel) or add a larger, faster SSD, as the CPU’s 20 PCIe Gen4 lanes and the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 interface are current-gen standards.

Build Overview

This is a laptop build combining an AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS (8-core, 16-thread, Zen 3+) with an Intel Arc A550M (Xe-HPG, 8 GB GDDR6). The CPU sits at the 78th percentile, the GPU at the 86th percentile, and the combined system at the 82nd percentile, placing it in the top tier of mobile systems. The CPU provides solid multi-threaded performance for content creation and productivity, while the GPU offers strong raster and ray-tracing performance for gaming. The pairing is well-balanced, with the GPU slightly more powerful relative to its peers. The system is best suited for gamers who want high frame rates at high-quality settings, content creators who need fast rendering and video editing, and professionals who require a portable yet capable workstation.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS + Intel Arc A550M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds