SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS

26,402 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS and Intel Arc A370M pairing represents a mid-range mobile configuration designed for laptops, combining an 8-core CPU with a dedicated entry-level discrete GPU. This analysis is based solely on the provided benchmark data. It is important to note that the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination; therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores and percentile rankings.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A370M is a mobile discrete GPU built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 157 mm² containing 7,200 million transistors. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1550 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Memory configuration consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. This is a modest amount of VRAM and bandwidth, which will likely be a limiting factor for high-resolution textures or heavy asset streaming in modern titles. The GPU has 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 render output units. Importantly, it includes 8 dedicated ray tracing cores, providing hardware-accelerated ray tracing support, a feature typically found in higher-tier graphics cards. The GPU also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs.

In terms of compute throughput, the A370M delivers 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 8.397 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (2:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. These figures suggest that the GPU is capable of handling light 3D rendering and 1080p gaming at medium settings, but it is not designed for heavy compute tasks or high-fidelity rendering workloads.

The benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 28673. The OpenCL score indicates strong general-purpose compute performance for a GPU in this class, while the Vulkan score confirms its capability in modern graphics APIs. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 29175, placing it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. This places it in a competitive position against similar mobile and older desktop parts. The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH with a score of 29197 (deltaPct -0.1%), the AMD FirePro W8000 with 29211 (deltaPct -0.1%), the AMD Radeon RX 470 with 28996 (deltaPct 0.6%), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M with 28874 (deltaPct 1%). The data shows that the A370M is within 1% of these parts, indicating a performance tier that is competitive with mid-range GPUs from previous generations. For rendering, the ray tracing cores and Vulkan support make it suitable for light real-time visualization, but the 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth will restrict complex scene sizes.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU and GPU each have distinct benchmark profiles that define the system's overall capabilities. The AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS achieves an average benchmark score of 26402, which places it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs. In 3DMark tests, it scores 6915 with 16 threads, 5813 with 8 threads, 3374 with 4 threads, 1752 with 2 threads, and 888 with a single thread. The maximum thread score is 6900, showing that the processor scales well up to its full thread count. In Cinebench tests, the CPU scores 2003 in R15 multi-core and 282 in single-core, 8346 in R20 multi-core and 1178 in single-core, and 19873 in R23 multi-core and 2805 in single-core. These scores indicate strong multi-threaded performance for a mobile chip, with the R23 multi-core score being particularly high. PassMark results show a multithread score of 23393, a single-thread score of 3167, and a physics score of 991. The data compression score is 310038, and the integer math score is 85274, highlighting solid computational throughput.

The nearest CPU rivals demonstrate the 7435HS’s position in the market. The AMD Ryzen 5 8640U has an average score of 26462, which is 0.2% higher. The Intel Core i9-12900HK and Intel Core i7-1280P both score 26469, 0.3% higher. The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 scores 26324, which is 0.3% lower. This indicates that the 7435HS is virtually tied with these parts in overall CPU performance, despite being a mobile processor competing with desktop and high-end mobile parts.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 29175, placing it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for this build is 76, which reflects a balanced pairing where neither component significantly outclasses the other. The data shows that the CPU and GPU are well-matched in their respective performance tiers, with the CPU slightly higher in its percentile ranking compared to the GPU. The combined picture is a system that offers solid multi-threaded CPU performance for productivity tasks and a GPU capable of light to medium gaming and rendering workloads. Since no measured FPS data exists for this combination, gaming performance must be inferred from these scores; the CPU’s strong multi-threaded scores suggest it will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios, but the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM will limit settings and resolutions.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS is an 8-core, 16-thread processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 3+ architecture with the codename Rembrandt-R. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 210 mm². The base clock is 3.10 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 4.50 GHz. The CPU has a TDP of 45 W, making it a standard power envelope for high-performance mobile chips. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU is mounted on AMD Socket FP7 and provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. It is part of the mobile market segment and is currently an active production part.

The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and a 16 MB shared L3 cache. This configuration is typical for a Zen 3+ mobile chip, providing adequate cache for multi-threaded workloads. The CPU’s performance in benchmarks reflects its architecture. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19873 is particularly impressive, indicating strong sustained performance across all cores. The single-core score of 2805 is competitive, suggesting that the CPU can handle lightly-threaded tasks efficiently. The 3DMark scores show scaling from 888 in single-thread to 6915 in 16-thread, demonstrating good multi-threading efficiency. PassMark results further reinforce this, with a multithread score of 23393 and a single-thread score of 3167. The floating-point math score of 48863 and integer math score of 85274 indicate robust computational capabilities for scientific and financial workloads.

The nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 8640U (a lower-core-count mobile chip), the Intel Core i9-12900HK (a high-end mobile part), the Intel Core i7-1280P (a mid-range mobile part), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 (a desktop chip). The fact that the 7435HS is within 0.3% of these parts in average score shows that it is a well-rounded performer. For real workloads, the 8 cores and 16 threads make it well-suited for video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where multi-threaded performance is critical. The 45 W TDP suggests it can sustain these workloads in a laptop form factor without excessive thermal throttling, though the data does not provide specific thermal performance. The lack of an unlocked multiplier means overclocking is not an option, but the boost clock of 4.50 GHz provides adequate single-thread performance for everyday tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the Ryzen 7 7435HS and the Arc A370M is a key consideration for understanding system behavior. The CPU is in the 78th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. This close alignment suggests a well-balanced system where neither component is expected to be a severe bottleneck in most workloads. However, the nature of the workloads matters. In CPU-bound tasks, such as software compilation or heavy multitasking, the CPU will be the primary driver of performance. The CPU’s strong multi-threaded scores, such as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19873, indicate it can handle demanding production tasks without issue. The GPU will be less relevant in these scenarios, and its 74th percentile ranking will not limit CPU performance.

In GPU-bound tasks, such as gaming or 3D rendering, the Arc A370M will be the limiting factor. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth are modest by modern standards, and its FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS is entry-level. The data shows that the GPU is competitive with parts like the AMD Radeon RX 470, which is a desktop GPU from 2016, and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M, which is a high-end mobile part. This suggests that the A370M will be the bottleneck in gaming at higher resolutions or with high texture quality. Since no measured FPS data exists, we must estimate from the scores. The GPU’s Vulkan score of 28673 suggests it can handle modern APIs well, but the VRAM limitation will likely force lower settings at 1080p. The CPU will not bottleneck the GPU in this scenario; its 78th percentile ranking means it can feed the GPU adequately. However, in CPU-heavy games with many AI agents or physics calculations, the CPU’s single-thread score of 888 in 3DMark and 2805 in Cinebench R23 will be the determining factor, and it is competitive with similar parts.

The combined percentile of 76 suggests that the system is balanced overall. The data indicates that in productivity workloads, the CPU will be the star, while in gaming, the GPU will set the ceiling. The system is unlikely to have a significant bottleneck in either direction, but the GPU’s VRAM will be the most likely constraint in modern games. The FPS scaling, estimated from the benchmark scores, would show that the system performs best in lighter titles or at lower settings, where the CPU’s strength can compensate for the GPU’s limitations.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: This is a challenging scenario for this system. The Arc A370M’s average benchmark score of 29175, placing it in the 74th percentile, suggests it can handle 1080p gaming, but the 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth will limit texture quality and resolution. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (3167 in PassMark single-thread) will support high frame rates in less demanding titles, but the GPU will likely cap performance below what is needed for high-refresh 144Hz gaming in modern AAA titles. Estimated FPS would be in the 60-90 range in esports titles at medium settings, but lower in demanding games.

Streaming: The CPU is well-equipped for streaming. With 8 cores and 16 threads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19873 indicates ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The 45 W TDP suggests it can sustain this workload in a laptop. The GPU’s support for modern APIs like Vulkan 1.4 and DirectX 12 Ultimate will handle the rendering side, but the 4 GB VRAM may limit the game’s settings while streaming. The system can handle 1080p streaming with a software encoder, relying on the CPU’s multi-threaded strength.

Video editing: The CPU’s multi-threaded performance is a strong asset here. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 8346 and PassMark multithread score of 23393 indicate it can handle video encoding and rendering tasks efficiently. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 29676 provides some acceleration in effects and rendering, but the 4 GB VRAM may limit the size of projects. The combination is suitable for 1080p editing with moderate effects, where the CPU does the heavy lifting and the GPU assists with previews and rendering.

3D rendering: The CPU is the primary workhorse for 3D rendering. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19873 shows strong performance for CPU-based rendering. The GPU’s 8 ray tracing cores and Vulkan support can accelerate real-time viewports, but its 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest for GPU rendering. The 4 GB VRAM will be a significant limitation for complex scenes. This system is best suited for light 3D work or scenes that fit within the GPU’s memory constraints.

Software development: The CPU’s balanced performance makes it ideal for development. The PassMark integer math score of 85274 and data encryption score of 18648 indicate strong compilation and encryption capabilities. The 16 threads and 16 MB L3 cache will handle parallel builds and virtual machines well. The GPU is less relevant here, but its 74th percentile ranking ensures it can handle basic graphics requirements. The 78th percentile CPU ranking means it will not be a bottleneck in most development workflows.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for basic office tasks, but the performance is there. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3167 in PassMark ensures snappy responsiveness in word processors and spreadsheets. The GPU’s capabilities are unused in these scenarios, but the system’s combined 76th percentile ranking means it will handle multitasking with ease. The 45 W TDP is reasonable for a laptop, and the 6 nm process node suggests good power efficiency for all-day battery life in lighter workloads.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build is targeted at users who need a balanced laptop for both productivity and light gaming. The CPU’s 78th percentile ranking and strong multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 19873) make it suitable for content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering on a budget. The GPU’s 74th percentile ranking and Vulkan score of 28673 mean it can handle 1080p gaming at medium settings, making it a choice for casual gamers who do not require high-refresh rates or maximum quality. The 4 GB VRAM is a limiting factor, so gamers targeting 1080p at high settings will find this system insufficient.

For developers, the CPU’s 16 threads and PassMark integer math score of 85274 make it a solid choice for software compilation and running virtual machines. The 45 W TDP and 6 nm process node suggest it is suited for a portable laptop that can be used for coding on the go. Students will benefit from the CPU’s single-thread performance (3167 in PassMark single-thread) for everyday tasks and the multi-threaded strength for research and data analysis. Small business workstations would find this system capable of handling office productivity, light database work, and financial modeling, given the CPU’s data compression score of 310038 and floating-point math score of 48863.

The build is not intended for high-end gaming or professional 3D rendering, as the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance will be a bottleneck. Users in these fields should look for a system with a higher-tier GPU. The target audience is therefore the mid-range market: gamers at 1080p with medium settings, content creators working on shorter projects, developers needing multi-threaded performance, and students or professionals requiring a versatile laptop.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS is in the 78th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26402.

Q: How does the GPU’s OpenCL score compare to its Vulkan score?

A: The Arc A370M scores 29676 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28673 in Geekbench Vulkan, showing slightly higher performance in OpenCL.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has a memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s, utilizing 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The Ryzen 7 7435HS has a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, with a base clock of 3.10 GHz.

Q: Which rival GPU is closest in performance to the Arc A370M?

A: The AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH has an average score of 29197, which is 0.1% higher than the A370M’s 29175, making it the closest rival.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 7 7435HS supports ECC memory, along with dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking for this CPU+GPU build?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 76, reflecting a balanced pairing of the CPU and GPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The CPU is mounted on AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile-specific socket. This limits the upgrade path for the CPU, as it is not swappable in most laptops. The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, which is sufficient for a single GPU and NVMe storage. The GPU has a TDP of 35 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 45 W, making a combined TDP of 80 W. The FACT PACK does not include a suggested PSU, but this power draw is typical for a laptop and does not require a discrete PSU.

The upgrade path is primarily through the GPU, but since this is a laptop build (buildClass: laptop), the GPU is typically soldered and not upgradeable. The sensible next upgrade would be to a system with a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU’s 78th percentile ranking has headroom for a more powerful graphics card. The CPU’s performance is competitive with parts like the Intel Core i9-12900HK, indicating it is not a bottleneck. However, the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM is the primary limitation. A future laptop with the same CPU but a GPU with more VRAM and higher compute throughput would be a logical step. The PCIe Gen 4 interface ensures compatibility with the latest SSDs, and the 20 lanes provide adequate bandwidth for peripherals. The 6 nm process node for both CPU and GPU suggests good power efficiency, so a higher-tier GPU with a similar TDP could be accommodated in a future design. The platform’s memory support for DDR5 is modern, and the 76.8 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for the CPU’s needs.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This pairing is a laptop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field. It combines the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS, an 8-core mobile processor, with the Intel Arc A370M, an entry-level discrete mobile GPU. The combined percentile ranking is 76, placing this system in the upper-midrange tier of all benchmarked systems. The CPU is in the 78th percentile, and the GPU is in the 74th percentile, showing a balanced configuration. The system is designed for users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance for productivity tasks, with enough GPU capability for light gaming and rendering. The data indicates that the CPU is a standout performer, matching parts like the Intel Core i9-12900HK, while the GPU is adequate for 1080p gaming at medium settings. The 4 GB VRAM on the GPU is the most significant limitation, constraining texture quality and resolution. Overall, this is a versatile laptop configuration for students, professionals, and casual gamers who prioritize CPU performance and need a capable but not high-end GPU. The lack of measured FPS data means that gaming performance is estimated from the benchmark scores, which suggest a system that handles most tasks without severe bottlenecks, but will not excel in demanding gaming scenarios.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds