SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS

26,402 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This is a mobile CPU and GPU pairing built around the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS and the Intel Arc A350M. The benchmark data indicates a system designed for balanced, mainstream laptop workloads rather than extreme high-end gaming or professional rendering. The CPU provides strong multi-threaded capacity, while the GPU offers entry-level discrete graphics performance that clears the bar for 1080p gaming at medium settings. This analysis breaks down what the numbers mean for real-world use, where the bottlenecks lie, and who should consider this configuration.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R. It is built on TSMC's 6 nm process node with a die size of 210 mm². The base clock is 3.10 GHz, and it can boost up to 4.50 GHz. This is a mobile part with a 45 W TDP, designed for the AMD Socket FP7 platform. The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 16 MB of L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a theoretical bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, and it includes ECC memory support. The CPU provides Gen 4 PCIe with 20 lanes.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales effectively with thread count. In 3DMark tests, the score climbs from 888 in single-thread to 1,752 in 2-thread, 3,374 in 4-thread, and 5,813 in 8-thread, reaching 6,900 at max threads. This scaling pattern indicates that the CPU can utilize all 16 threads efficiently, with a near-linear improvement from 8 to 16 threads (from 5,813 to 6,900). This is typical of a well-designed multi-core chip. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score is 19,873, while the single-core score is 2,805. This positions the chip in the 78th percentile against all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the majority of processors on the market.

The PassMark results reinforce this profile. The multithread score is 23,393, with integer math at 85,274 and floating-point math at 48,863. Data compression scores are particularly high at 310,038, and extended instructions (a proxy for AVX/AVX2 workloads) score 21,690. Single-thread performance is solid at 3,167. The average benchmark score across all tests is 26,402. The nearest rivals are extremely close: the AMD Ryzen 5 8640U scores 26,462 (-0.2%), the Intel Core i9-12900HK scores 26,469 (-0.3%), and the Intel Core i7-1280P scores 26,469 (-0.3%). The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 is 0.3% ahead at 26,324. This means the 7435HS is effectively tied with these competitors in aggregate performance, making the choice between them a matter of platform features rather than raw speed.

For real workloads, this CPU is a capable multi-tasker. The 16 threads handle video encoding, code compilation, and 3D rendering with ease, as evidenced by the strong Cinebench R23 multicore score. The single-core score of 2,805 is adequate for general responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications like web browsing and office software. The data compression score suggests it handles file archiving and database workloads well. The 45 W TDP is a key specification; it indicates this is a high-performance part for a laptop, requiring active cooling, but it is not an extreme HX-series chip.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 26,402, placing it in the 78th percentile. The GPU, an Intel Arc A350M, has an average benchmark score of 24,647, placing it in the 70th percentile. The combined percentile for this pairing is 74. This is a balanced setup where the CPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU.

Looking at the nearest rivals for the GPU provides context. The Arc A350M scores are comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 590 (24,744, 0.4% faster), the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (24,763, 0.5% faster), and the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (24,442, 0.8% slower). The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 is 1.5% slower at 24,277. These deltas show the A350M sits in a competitive performance envelope with these desktop and mobile parts from previous generations. This is an entry-level discrete GPU that punches at the level of a mid-range card from roughly three to four years ago.

The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score is 6,915, which is a strong result for a mobile chip. The combined picture is a system where the processor has enough headroom to feed the GPU in most gaming scenarios, but the GPU will likely be the limiting factor in graphically intense titles at high settings. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 23,393 indicates it will not bottleneck in productivity tasks like video editing or software development, where the GPU is less involved. The data points to a laptop that is well-suited for content creation and development, with gaming performance being a secondary, but viable, capability.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is a discrete mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, from the Alchemist generation (Arc 3 Mobile). It uses the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU has a base clock of 1150 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz. It features 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster output units. For ray tracing, it includes 6 dedicated RT cores.

Memory is a significant specification here. The A350M has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, running at an effective speed of 14 Gbps. This yields a memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. This is a narrow bus and a modest amount of VRAM, which will be a constraint for modern games at high textures and resolutions. The pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 105.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute is 3.379 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 6.758 TFLOPS. The GPU TDP is 25 W, making it an efficient part that does not require a large power supply or extensive cooling. It interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x8.

The API support is comprehensive, including DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This ensures compatibility with modern game engines and features like hardware ray tracing. Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 24,546 and a Vulkan score of 24,747. These are nearly identical, indicating good driver optimization for compute and graphics workloads. The GPU percentile is 70, meaning it outperforms 70% of all GPUs in the database.

For rendering, the FP32 performance of 3.379 TFLOPS is sufficient for light 3D modeling and rendering tasks, but it is not a powerhouse for heavy GPU rendering. The 4 GB VRAM will limit texture sizes and scene complexity. The RT cores are present, but with only 6 of them, ray-traced effects will need to be used sparingly or at lower resolutions. The memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s is the primary bottleneck; it restricts the GPU's ability to feed the shading units in bandwidth-intensive scenarios. For 1080p gaming at medium settings, this is adequate, but it will struggle with 1440p or high texture quality presets.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination. There is no `measuredFpsUltraByGame` data for this pairing. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores and the known behavior of the components relative to their nearest rivals. The data is not measured; it is inferred from the synthetic benchmark results.

Based on the GPU's average score of 24,647 and its proximity to the RX 590 and GTX 1630, this system is positioned for 1080p gaming. For esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, which are CPU-bound and not graphically demanding, the Ryzen 7 7435HS with its 16 threads and strong single-core performance (3,167 in PassMark) should drive frame rates well above 100 FPS at high settings. The CPU's 3DMark 2-thread score of 1,752 suggests it can handle the low-thread-count demands of these games effectively.

For AAA titles at ultra settings, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will cause stuttering and low frame rates in games with large textures. Expect high settings at 1080p to yield playable but not smooth frame rates in the 30-50 FPS range for the most demanding games. Medium settings are the sweet spot for this GPU, where it can likely achieve 60 FPS in most titles. The RT cores are present, but enabling ray tracing will likely halve frame rates, making it impractical for most games. The estimates suggest this is a 1080p medium-settings gaming laptop, not a high-refresh or high-resolution gaming machine.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a system that is well-balanced for its class, but with a clear performance ceiling set by the GPU. The CPU's 78th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 70th percentile shows the processor has more headroom relative to its peers. In gaming workloads, the Arc A350M will be the bottleneck in graphically intensive scenarios. The CPU's strong multi-thread scores (Cinebench R23 19,873) mean it can easily keep up with the GPU's frame production in most games.

Evidence from the FPS scaling expectations supports this. In CPU-bound games (esports), the system will perform well, with high frame rates driven by the CPU. In GPU-bound games (AAA titles), the frame rate will drop significantly, limited by the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS compute and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU is not the constraining factor in these scenarios; it will have spare capacity.

For productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU is the primary driver for tasks like video editing and software compilation, and its 78th percentile ranking indicates strong performance. The GPU assists with effects and rendering previews but is not the main compute engine. In this context, the CPU is the star, and the GPU is a helper. The 74th combined percentile suggests an overall capable system, but the user must accept that the GPU is the component to upgrade or adjust expectations for in future titles.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need a versatile laptop for work and play, with a lean toward productivity. The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads make it ideal for content creators who edit video in 1080p or 4K, as the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19,873 indicates it can handle multi-track timelines and encoding tasks efficiently. Software developers will benefit from the fast compilation times and the support for DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 4.

Students and small business users will find this a practical choice. The system handles office suites, web browsing, and data analysis (PassMark data compression of 310,038) without issue. The GPU provides enough power for light CAD work or occasional gaming. For gamers, this is a 1080p medium-settings machine. It is not suitable for 1440p or high-refresh gaming on demanding titles. The 4 GB VRAM is a hard limit for modern games at high textures. This is a mainstream laptop for users who prioritize CPU performance for work but still want a discrete GPU for entertainment.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on the AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile-specific socket. This means the CPU is likely soldered and not upgradeable. The system uses DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, and the memory is likely the primary upgradeable component, but users should verify the laptop's design. The PCIe Gen 4 support with 20 lanes provides ample bandwidth for high-speed NVMe SSDs. The GPU is a discrete mobile part, also typically soldered, so it is not upgradeable.

The suggested PSU is null, and the GPU TDP is 25 W, which is low. The CPU TDP is 45 W. Combined, this system has a modest power draw, meaning it can be powered by a standard laptop adapter. A sensible next upgrade would be to increase memory capacity or speed, as the CPU supports ECC DDR5. For storage, adding a Gen 4 NVMe drive would maximize the platform's capabilities. There is no upgrade path for the GPU or CPU within this laptop chassis; the user would need to purchase a new system for more graphics performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 3+ architecture.

Q: How does the CPU perform in multi-threaded tasks?

A: The Cinebench R23 multicore score is 19,873, and the PassMark multithread score is 23,393, indicating strong performance for video editing and compilation.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A350M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s.

Q: Is this system good for 1440p gaming?

A: No. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and benchmark scores suggest it is suited for 1080p gaming at medium settings, not 1440p.

Q: What is the GPU's average benchmark score and percentile?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 24,647, placing it in the 70th percentile against all GPUs.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the memory support specification indicates ECC memory is supported.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking?

A: The CPU is in the 78th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26,402.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: For esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, this system can drive frame rates beyond 100 FPS at 1080p, thanks to the CPU's single-thread score of 3,167 and 16 threads. The GPU's low latency and adequate compute for these light loads will not bottleneck the CPU.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads are sufficient for encoding a 1080p stream while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19,873 ensures the CPU can handle game logic and encoding concurrently. The GPU's encoder, part of the Arc architecture, can offload this task, but the CPU is capable of handling it alone.

Video Editing: The CPU is the star here. The PassMark multithread score of 23,393 and data compression score of 310,038 allow for smooth timeline scrubbing and fast export times in 1080p editing. The GPU accelerates effects and previews, but the CPU does the heavy lifting.

3D Rendering: This is a CPU-bound task. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19,873 will render scenes in Blender or similar software at a moderate pace. The GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS can assist with viewport rendering, but the 4 GB VRAM limits the complexity of scenes.

Software Development: Compilation is highly multi-threaded, and the 8-core, 16-thread CPU excels here. The PassMark integer math score of 85,274 and extended instructions score of 21,690 indicate strong performance for build processes and code execution.

Student and Office Work: This is an overqualified machine for word processing and spreadsheets, but the CPU's efficiency means long battery life potential. The GPU is idle for most tasks, and the CPU's single-thread performance of 888 in 3DMark ensures snappy application responses. The system handles multitasking with dozens of open tabs without breaking a sweat.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds