SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 6800U + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 6800U

27,887 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 6800U and Intel Arc A350M form a laptop pairing where the processing and graphics components occupy distinct performance tiers. The CPU sits at the 79th percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at the 70th percentile among all graphics cards. This gap suggests the system is engineered for balanced productivity rather than extreme gaming, but the data reveals a more nuanced relationship. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 27887 is nearly identical to the GPU’s 24647, yet these figures measure completely different workloads. The processor excels at sustained multi-threaded tasks, while the graphics chip handles parallel rendering. The combined percentile of 75 indicates the pairing outperforms most laptops, but the specific bottleneck depends entirely on the application.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates the CPU is the stronger component in this pairing, with a percentile rank of 79 versus the GPU’s 70. In CPU-bound tasks like data compression (244082 in Passmark) and integer math (77731), the Ryzen 7 6800U demonstrates capabilities that far exceed the GPU’s rendering throughput. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 3.379 TFLOPS, while respectable for its class, limits the system in graphics-heavy workloads. Benchmark results show the CPU’s multi-thread score of 20350 in Passmark, which is roughly 84% higher than the GPU’s OpenCL score of 24546 when adjusted for the different metrics. This suggests that in mixed workloads, such as gaming with background streaming, the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor.

The bottleneck shifts decisively to the GPU in gaming and 3D rendering scenarios. The Arc A350M’s 4 GB of VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth constrain texture-heavy applications, while the CPU’s 16 MB of L3 cache and 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth provide ample headroom. In productivity tasks like video editing, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10546 indicates it can handle encoding, but the GPU’s 6.758 TFLOPS FP16 performance may accelerate certain effects. The data shows a system where the CPU leads by a significant margin in general computation, but the GPU defines the ceiling for graphics-intensive work. The 0.3% delta between the CPU and its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-12600KF, highlights that the processor is a strong mid-range performer, while the GPU’s 1.5% delta over the GTX 1630 places it at the entry-level of discrete graphics.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s Geekbench multi-core score of 9002 and single-core score of 1742 position it firmly in the upper mid-range for laptops. Its Cinebench R23 results (10546 multi-core, 1506 single-core) confirm this, with the multi-core figure being 7 times higher than the single-core result, indicating strong parallel scaling. The Passmark single-thread score of 3166 is competitive, and the floating-point math score of 42246 suggests solid scientific computing capability. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 and Vulkan score of 24747 are nearly identical, showing consistent performance across APIs. The average benchmark score of 24647 for the GPU places it just 0.4% below the AMD Radeon RX 590 and 0.5% below the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, making it a capable entry-level discrete GPU.

The combined picture shows a system that excels in processor-heavy tasks but lags in pure graphics compute. The CPU’s percentile of 79 means it outperforms roughly four-fifths of all processors, while the GPU’s 70th percentile indicates it beats about two-thirds of all graphics cards. The gap between these percentiles is notable: the CPU is clearly the star of the show. For users running CPU-intensive applications like software compilation or spreadsheet analysis, this pairing delivers excellent performance. For gaming, the GPU’s scores suggest playable frame rates at lower settings, but the lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates. The 6.758 TFLOPS FP16 performance of the GPU is double its FP32, indicating strong potential for AI inference tasks that use reduced precision.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 6800U is built on the Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt codename, fabricated on TSMC’s 6 nm process. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The 15 W TDP is remarkably low for an 8-core processor, making it ideal for thin-and-light laptops. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. This configuration supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, which is essential for feeding the 8 cores. The processor uses AMD Socket FP7 and supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark scores reveal a processor that punches above its power class. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10546 is impressive for a 15 W part, rivaling desktop processors from a few generations ago. The Geekbench multi-core score of 9002 corroborates this, while the single-core score of 1742 shows strong per-thread performance. The Passmark data encryption score of 15601 and extended instructions score of 15935 indicate robust security and SIMD capabilities. The physics score of 984 in Passmark is notably lower than the integer math score of 77731, suggesting the CPU prioritizes general computation over physics simulation. The nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, has an average score of 27896, just 0% different, meaning the 6800U trades blows with a desktop gaming processor in aggregate benchmarks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile-specific socket. The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, and the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs. The 15 W TDP of the CPU combined with the 25 W TDP of the GPU means the total power draw is modest, allowing for compact cooling solutions. The suggested PSU is not listed, but the combined TDP of 40 W suggests a standard laptop power adapter is sufficient. The production status of the CPU is Active, while the GPU is End-of-life, which affects long-term availability.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU, as the CPU has headroom. The Arc A350M’s 4 GB VRAM is the primary limitation in modern games and rendering workloads. Swapping to a GPU with more VRAM would alleviate this bottleneck, though the PCIe 4.0 x8 interface limits the bandwidth to 112.0 GB/s. The CPU’s support for PCIe Gen 4 ensures that any modern GPU will function, but the laptop form factor restricts upgrades to what the manufacturer offers. The memory support for DDR5 means that upgrading RAM to higher capacities or speeds is possible, though the dual-channel configuration is already optimized. The 16 MB L3 cache is shared across all cores, which is adequate but not exceptional for an 8-core part. The lack of ECC memory support rules out certain workstation use cases.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is based on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-128 chip, fabricated on TSMC’s 6 nm process. It features 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs, along with 6 RT cores for ray tracing. The base clock is 1150 MHz with a boost clock of 2200 MHz. The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The FP32 performance is 3.379 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 6.758 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs. The transistor count is 7,200 million on a 157 mm² die, giving a density of 45.9M per mm².

Benchmark results show the GPU performs near the level of older desktop cards. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 is just 0.4% below the Radeon RX 590, a desktop GPU from 2018. The Vulkan score of 24747 is 0.5% below the RTX A5000 Mobile, a professional laptop GPU. These scores indicate the A350M is capable of 1080p gaming at medium settings, but the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus limit high-resolution textures. The RT cores provide ray tracing acceleration, but the low FP32 throughput means ray-traced scenes will be demanding. The pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s and texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s are modest, confirming the entry-level positioning. The GPU’s 25 W TDP is low, making it suitable for slim laptops, but the end-of-life status suggests it will be phased out.

FAQ

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-10900K?

A: The average benchmark score of the Ryzen 7 6800U is 27887, which is 0.1% higher than the Core i9-10900K’s 27872. This means they perform nearly identically in aggregate, despite the AMD being a mobile part.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance relative to the NVIDIA GTX 1630?

A: The Arc A350M has an average benchmark score of 24647, which is 1.5% higher than the GTX 1630’s 24277. This places it slightly ahead of the entry-level NVIDIA desktop card.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Ryzen 7 6800U does not support ECC memory. This limits its use in error-sensitive workstation environments.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The Arc A350M has a memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s, derived from 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with an effective speed of 14 Gbps.

Q: How many RT cores does the GPU have?

A: The Arc A350M features 6 RT cores for ray tracing acceleration, though the overall FP32 performance of 3.379 TFLOPS limits heavy ray-traced workloads.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock?

A: The Ryzen 7 6800U has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, up from a base clock of 2.70 GHz, enabling higher single-thread performance when needed.

Q: Is the GPU production status active?

A: No, the Intel Arc A350M is marked as End-of-life, meaning it is no longer in active production, though the CPU remains Active.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for the Ryzen 7 6800U and Arc A350M combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from benchmark scores. The GPU’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 24747 and the CPU’s strong multi-thread performance suggest the system can handle esports titles at high frame rates. For demanding AAA games, the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will be limiting at 1080p with high textures. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10546 ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios. The combined percentile of 75 indicates the system outperforms three-quarters of laptops, but gaming performance will vary by title.

The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 3.379 TFLOPS is comparable to a GTX 1650-class part, suggesting 1080p medium settings are achievable. The 6 RT cores provide ray tracing, but the low pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s means ray-traced effects will significantly reduce frame rates. For competitive shooters like Valorant or CS2, the high CPU single-thread score of 3166 in Passmark should drive high refresh rates. For story-driven games, users should expect 30-60 FPS at 1080p with reduced settings. The lack of measured data means these are educated estimates, not guarantees.

Build Overview

The AMD Ryzen 7 6800U and Intel Arc A350M form a laptop-class pairing designed for mobile productivity and light gaming. The build class is explicitly listed as "laptop," and the combined percentile of 75 places it above the median system. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread processor with a 15 W TDP, while the GPU is a 25 W discrete graphics chip. This is an ultraportable configuration where both components are optimized for power efficiency. The CPU’s 79th percentile ranking is strong for a mobile part, while the GPU’s 70th percentile is respectable for an entry-level discrete chip. The pairing is not designed for high-end gaming or professional rendering but excels in everyday tasks and moderate workloads.

The architecture combines AMD’s Zen 3+ cores with Intel’s Xe-HPG graphics, representing a cross-vendor collaboration in a single system. The CPU’s integrated Radeon 680M graphics provide a fallback for low-power tasks, while the discrete Arc GPU handles heavier loads. The 6 nm process for both components ensures efficient power draw, with the combined TDP of 40 W allowing for thin cooling solutions. This build targets users who need a balance of CPU and GPU performance without sacrificing portability.

Who Should Build It

This pairing suits gamers who play at 1080p with medium settings, as the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance handle esports and older titles well. Content creators working with 1080p video will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10546 for encoding, while the GPU’s 6.758 TFLOPS FP16 can accelerate effects. Software developers will appreciate the 8 cores and 16 threads for compilation, with the Passmark integer math score of 77731 indicating strong throughput. Students and office workers will find the 15 W TDP and low power draw ideal for all-day battery life, with the CPU’s single-thread score of 3166 ensuring snappy application response. Small business workstations requiring data compression (244082 in Passmark) or encryption (15601) will see solid performance.

The system is not suited for professional 3D rendering, as the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM is insufficient for large scenes. Similarly, high-refresh gaming at 1440p is beyond the GPU’s capabilities. However, for users who primarily work in productivity suites and occasionally game, this pairing offers a balanced experience. The CPU’s 79th percentile ensures future-proofing for multi-threaded applications, while the GPU’s 70th percentile will handle current titles at reduced settings. The end-of-life status of the GPU may concern some, but the CPU’s active status ensures continued driver support.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3166 and the GPU’s Vulkan score of 24747 suggest 60-100 FPS in esports titles at 1080p low settings. The 4 GB VRAM limits texture quality, but the 2200 MHz boost clock helps with frame pacing.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 threads handle encoding via x264, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10546 providing enough headroom for simultaneous gaming and streaming. The GPU’s 6.758 TFLOPS FP16 can offload some encoding tasks.

Video editing: The CPU’s Geekbench multi-core score of 9002 accelerates timeline scrubbing and export, while the GPU’s 112.0 GB/s bandwidth assists with effects. The 4 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p projects but not 4K.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 and 6 RT cores provide entry-level rendering, but the 4 GB VRAM becomes a bottleneck for scenes exceeding this limit. The CPU’s 42246 floating-point math score helps with CPU-based renders.

Software development: The 8 cores and 16 threads compile code efficiently, with the Passmark integer math score of 77731 indicating strong parallel build performance. The 16 MB L3 cache reduces latency for frequent recompilation.

Student and office work: The 15 W TDP enables long battery life, while the single-thread score of 3166 ensures responsive word processing and web browsing. The integrated Radeon 680M provides a low-power graphics fallback for basic tasks, extending battery further.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 6800U + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 6800U

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds