SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS

32,354 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS and Intel Arc A570M form a laptop-class pairing that sits at an 86th combined percentile, indicating a system positioned for high-performance mobile computing. The data shows that this combination is a mobile platform (buildClass: "laptop") where the CPU and GPU each hold strong individual percentile rankings—83rd among all CPUs and 88th among all GPUs. This pairing is notable because it matches an 8-core Zen 3+ processor with a discrete Intel Arc graphics solution, creating a balanced platform for demanding tasks. The following analysis interprets the benchmark data, usage scenarios, and upgrade paths strictly from the provided FACT PACK, with all performance discussions framed as estimates due to the absence of measured FPS data for this exact combination.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 3+ architecture (codenamed Rembrandt), manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with a die size of 208 mm². It operates with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, within a 35 W TDP envelope. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. This processor supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, yielding a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, and it provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The integrated Radeon 680M graphics is present but secondary to the discrete Arc GPU.

Benchmark results place this CPU in a competitive position. In Cinebench R23, it scores 11992 points in multi-core and 1455 in single-core. The Geekbench scores are 9515 (multi-core) and 1652 (single-core). These numbers indicate strong multi-threaded throughput for a 35 W mobile part. The PassMark multi-thread score of 22801 and single-thread score of 3184 further corroborate this. Notably, the data shows a high floating-point math score of 47533, suggesting robust performance in scientific and engineering workloads. The integer math score of 84228 and extended instructions score of 20114 indicate solid general-purpose computation.

The CPU's percentile vs all CPUs is 83, and its average benchmark score is 32354. Its nearest rivals illustrate its standing: the Intel Core i5-14400F scores 32279 (0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 scores 32446 (0.3% higher), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U scores 32233 (0.4% lower), and the Intel Core i9-11900 scores 32226 (0.4% lower). These deltas are all within 0.4%, meaning the 6800HS delivers performance nearly identical to those desktop-class parts. For real-world workloads, this translates to a processor that can handle 8-core compilation, video encoding, and multi-tasking with ease, while the single-core score of 1455 in Cinebench R23 indicates responsive application launching and snappy day-to-day operation.

The 35 W TDP is crucial for laptop thermals, allowing sustained performance in thin chassis. The data implies that this CPU can maintain competitive multi-core performance against higher-power desktop rivals, as evidenced by the near-parity with the Core i5-14400F. The PassMark physics score of 1009 and find prime numbers score of 56 are modest, suggesting that while the CPU excels in parallel throughput, certain latency-sensitive integer operations are not its primary strength. Overall, the 6800HS is a high-efficiency workhorse, not a maximum-performance desktop replacement, but its benchmark scores show it punches above its power class.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is a mobile discrete GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture (codenamed Alchemist, Arc 5 Mobile), manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die. It features 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, along with 16 ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The pixel rate is 83.20 GPixel/s, texture rate is 166.4 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 5.325 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 10.65 TFLOPS (2:1). The TDP is 75 W, and it interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x8.

The GPU's benchmark score comes from Geekbench OpenCL, where it achieves 58239. This places it at the 88th percentile vs all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show a tight cluster: the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT scores 58392 (0.3% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58085 (0.3% lower), the NVIDIA P102-100 scores 58528 (0.5% higher), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58657 (0.7% higher). These deltas are minimal, indicating the A570M delivers compute performance comparable to a high-end desktop GPU like the RX 6950 XT in OpenCL workloads, despite being a mobile part. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for modern textures at 1080p and 1440p, while the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution assets.

The 16 ray tracing cores suggest hardware-accelerated ray tracing capability, a feature that enhances visual fidelity in supported games. The FP32 throughput of 5.325 TFLOPS is indicative of strong rasterization performance, while FP16 at 10.65 TFLOPS (2:1) implies good compute throughput for AI-assisted rendering or machine learning inference. The DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support ensures compatibility with the latest graphics features, and Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 provide broad API coverage. The 75 W TDP is higher than integrated graphics but still fits within a laptop power budget, allowing the GPU to sustain boost clocks under load. Benchmark results indicate that this GPU is a capable mid-range to upper-mid-range mobile solution, with compute performance that rivals desktop parts from a previous generation.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Intel Arc A570M's Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239 and 88th percentile placement suggest it can drive high-refresh 1080p gaming. The 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth handle modern game assets, while the 16 RT cores enable ray tracing effects. However, the CPU's single-core score of 1455 in Cinebench R23 may limit frame rates in CPU-bound titles, so high-refresh (144Hz+) gaming is achievable at 1080p with reduced settings, but 1440p high-refresh will strain the GPU.

Streaming: The 8-core, 16-thread CPU with a multi-core score of 11992 in Cinebench R23 provides ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark data encryption score of 18104 and data compression score of 292698 indicate strong throughput for stream encoding workloads. The GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 can offload some rendering tasks, but software encoding on the CPU is viable given its multi-threaded performance.

Video Editing: The CPU's floating-point math score of 47533 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 58239 combine to accelerate video effects and rendering. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K timeline scrubbing, and the 16 MB L3 cache aids in large file operations. The 76.8 GB/s memory bandwidth on the CPU side supports fast data movement, making this a capable laptop for 1080p and light 4K editing.

3D Rendering: The GPU's FP32 throughput of 5.325 TFLOPS and the CPU's multi-core score of 11992 indicate a balanced rendering platform. The 16 RT cores can accelerate ray-traced previews, while the CPU's 16 threads handle geometry and physics. The PassMark integer math score of 84228 suggests solid CPU-based rendering, making this suitable for moderate 3D scenes, though complex production renders will be slow.

Software Development: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, with a Geekbench multi-core score of 9515, handle compilation and parallel builds efficiently. The PassMark random string sorting score of 30266 indicates fast data processing for code analysis tools. The 35 W TDP allows sustained all-core loads without thermal throttling, making this ideal for developers who need a portable workstation.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's single-thread score of 3184 in PassMark ensures responsive productivity apps, while the GPU's 88th percentile handles occasional photo editing or CAD tasks. The 6 nm process and 35 W TDP mean long battery life potential, and the integrated Radeon 680M can handle light tasks when the discrete GPU is idle. This is a premium option for demanding academic workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a well-balanced pairing where neither component dramatically overshadows the other, but specific workloads will stress one more. The CPU's 83rd percentile and GPU's 88th percentile are close, suggesting equilibrium. In CPU-intensive tasks like physics simulation (PassMark physics score of 1009) or data compression (292698), the processor is the limiting factor, as the GPU idles. Conversely, in GPU-bound tasks like OpenCL compute (58239) or pixel-heavy rendering (83.20 GPixel/s), the Arc A570M becomes the constraint.

For gaming, the balance hinges on resolution and settings. At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance (1455 in Cinebench R23) may bottleneck the GPU in esports titles, preventing the GPU from reaching its full frame potential. At 1440p, the GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth become the limiting factor, as the CPU has enough headroom to feed frames. The 8 GB VRAM is a potential bottleneck for ultra textures at 1440p, as it may fill up, causing stutters. The 75 W GPU TDP versus 35 W CPU TDP means the GPU draws more power, so thermal throttling is more likely on the GPU side under sustained loads.

The memory bandwidth discrepancy is notable: the CPU has 76.8 GB/s while the GPU has 224.0 GB/s. This means the GPU can access its VRAM much faster, but when data must transfer over PCIe 4.0 x8, the CPU's slower memory can create a bottleneck for mixed workloads. The 20 CPU PCIe lanes provide adequate bandwidth, but the x8 interface for the GPU is narrower than x16, potentially limiting performance in data-heavy scenes. Overall, the balance is good for general use, but gaming at high resolutions and CPU-heavy productivity will each expose a different bottleneck.

Gaming Performance

Note: No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All FPS figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as qualitative expectations.

Based on the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239 (88th percentile) and the CPU's multi-core score of 11992 in Cinebench R23, this pairing is expected to deliver smooth 1080p gaming. The 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth support high textures at 1080p, and the 16 RT cores enable ray tracing at playable settings. At 1440p, the GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS will struggle with ultra settings in AAA titles, likely requiring medium presets to maintain 60 FPS. The CPU's single-thread score of 1455 in Cinebench R23 suggests that esports titles like competitive shooters can exceed 120 FPS at 1080p low settings.

The benchmark scores indicate that the GPU is the stronger component for gaming, as its percentile (88) exceeds the CPU's (83). This means frame rates will scale better with GPU-bound settings (resolution, shadows, textures) than CPU-bound settings (draw distance, physics). For 4K gaming, the 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient, likely producing sub-30 FPS in modern titles. The absence of measured FPS data means these are estimates, but the compute scores suggest a capable 1080p machine with occasional 1440p capability at reduced settings.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers who prioritize 1080p performance and portability. The GPU's 88th percentile and 8 GB VRAM make it suitable for high-refresh 1080p gaming, while the CPU's 83rd percentile handles modern game logic. Content creators who edit 1080p video or perform light 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 16 threads and the GPU's compute power. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 8-core CPU with a multi-core score of 11992, which shortens build times. Students in engineering or data science programs can leverage the CPU's floating-point math score of 47533 and the GPU's OpenCL performance for simulations. Small business workstations requiring multi-tasking capabilities will find the 16 threads and 8 GB VRAM adequate for spreadsheets, presentations, and light design work. This is not a workstation for heavy 4K rendering, as the GPU's 224.0 GB/s bandwidth and 5.325 TFLOPS are below professional thresholds.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 32354, placing it at the 83rd percentile vs all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14400F, scores 32279 with a delta of 0.2%, meaning the 6800HS is virtually tied with that desktop processor. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 scores 32446 (0.3% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U scores 32233 (0.4% lower). This tight clustering shows the 6800HS delivers desktop-class multi-threaded performance in a 35 W mobile package.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 58239, placing it at the 88th percentile vs all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, scores 58392 with a delta of -0.3%, meaning the A570M is nearly equivalent to that flagship desktop GPU in OpenCL compute. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58085 (0.3% lower), the NVIDIA P102-100 scores 58528 (0.5% higher), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58657 (0.7% higher). These deltas indicate the A570M is a high-performing mobile GPU that rivals desktop parts.

The combined percentile is 86, reflecting a balanced system where both components are above average. The CPU's 83rd and GPU's 88th percentiles are close, suggesting no single component dominates. The data shows a platform that excels in multi-threaded CPU tasks and GPU compute, with the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11992 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 58239 forming a potent combination for productivity and gaming.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 3+ architecture.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A570M have?

A: The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and how does it affect performance?

A: The CPU has a 35 W TDP, which allows sustained multi-core performance. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11992 is competitive with desktop parts like the Intel Core i5-14400F.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A570M has 16 ray tracing cores, supporting hardware-accelerated ray tracing in DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) titles.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 86, indicating the system outperforms the majority of laptops in the database.

Q: What memory type does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, yielding a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

Q: How does the GPU compare to desktop rivals in compute?

A: The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239 is within 0.3% of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, showing near-parity in compute workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built on AMD Socket FP7, which is specific to mobile processors. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, and the memory bus is dual-channel. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8. The CPU's TDP is 35 W, and the GPU's TDP is 75 W, but no suggested PSU is provided in the FACT PACK. The system is a laptop (buildClass: "laptop"), so upgrades are limited to memory and storage, not the CPU or GPU.

A sensible next upgrade would be increasing memory capacity or speed, as the CPU supports DDR5 and the dual-channel configuration can be maxed out. The 76.8 GB/s bandwidth is fixed by the memory bus, but larger capacity aids multi-tasking. For storage, the 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes allow for fast NVMe SSDs, which would accelerate load times. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is adequate, but future games with higher VRAM requirements may force lower texture settings. The CPU's 16 MB L3 cache is not upgradable. Given the tight benchmark scores, this platform is well-balanced, and any upgrade would be incremental rather than transformative.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS CPU with the Intel Arc A570M GPU. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 3+ part with a 35 W TDP, scoring 11992 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and placing at the 83rd percentile. The GPU is an Intel Arc A570M with 8 GB GDDR6, 16 RT cores, and an OpenCL score of 58239, placing at the 88th percentile. The combined percentile is 86, indicating a high-tier mobile platform. The CPU's performance is nearly identical to desktop rivals like the Intel Core i5-14400F (0.2% delta), and the GPU's compute is on par with the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (0.3% delta). This pairing is designed for high-performance gaming at 1080p, content creation, and software development, offering desktop-like performance in a portable form factor. The data shows a well-balanced system where the GPU slightly outpaces the CPU, making it suitable for graphics-intensive tasks while maintaining strong multi-threaded CPU capabilities.