SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5825U + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5825U

25,446 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 5825U and Intel Arc A570M form a laptop-class pairing that sits at the 83rd percentile overall, a strong position for a mobile platform. The CPU holds the 78th percentile among all processors, while the GPU reaches the 88th percentile among all graphics cards, indicating that the graphics component is relatively more powerful than the processing unit in this combination. This dynamic suggests a system designed to favor visual and parallel workloads over purely computational tasks, and the benchmark data provides a clear picture of where the performance boundaries lie.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a distinct performance imbalance between the CPU and GPU, with the graphics card holding a higher percentile rank (88th) than the processor (78th). This indicates that in graphically intensive tasks, the CPU is more likely to become the limiting factor, as the GPU has more relative headroom to execute its work. The CPU's multi-threaded score of 10,152 in Cinebench R23, while respectable for a 15-watt mobile part, is not in the same league as the GPU's raw compute capability, which sits near the top-tier desktop graphics cards in its benchmark percentile.

Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU clarifies this bottleneck. The Ryzen 7 5825U is effectively tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (deltaPct of 0.1), the Intel Core i7-11700KF (deltaPct of 0.1), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U (deltaPct of -0.2). This means that despite its 8-core/16-thread configuration, its average benchmark score of 25,446 is virtually identical to these other processors, suggesting that its performance ceiling is constrained by its power envelope and memory bandwidth rather than core count alone. The GPU, by contrast, is within 0.3% of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT and 0.5% of the NVIDIA P102-100, placing it in a significantly higher performance tier relative to its peers.

The FPS scaling story is absent from the data, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, meaning all gaming frame rate discussions must be framed as estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The implication is that at lower resolutions, where the CPU must feed frames to the GPU more quickly, the processor's single-thread performance of 1,452 in Cinebench R23 will likely cap frame rates. At higher resolutions, the GPU's workload increases, and the bottleneck shifts toward the graphics card, though the CPU's relatively lower percentile suggests it will still be a constraint in many scenarios.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5825U is a mobile processor built on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Barcelo, and manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process node. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2,000 MHz and a boost clock of 4,500 MHz. The chip integrates 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die, with a 16 MB shared L3 cache, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 64 KB of L1 per core. Its 15-watt TDP is a defining characteristic, emphasizing efficiency over raw performance.

The benchmark scores reflect this efficiency focus. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10,152 and single-core score of 1,452 indicate a processor that can handle moderate multi-threaded workloads, such as compiling code or batch photo editing, but will not compete with higher-power desktop parts. The Geekbench scores of 7,288 multi-core and 1,618 single-core reinforce this picture, showing a balanced but modest capability. The Passmark suite provides more granular data: integer math at 72,577, floating-point math at 38,482, and extended instructions at 14,394 all point to a chip that is competent for everyday tasks and light productivity, but the prime number finding score of just 48 and physics score of 774 reveal weaknesses in specific algorithmic workloads.

The data compression score of 221,938 is notably strong, suggesting that the CPU handles file archiving and data transfer tasks efficiently. The encryption score of 14,088 is also respectable, which is relevant for VPN usage or disk encryption. However, the memory support is limited to DDR4 with dual-channel configuration, providing 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a potential bottleneck for a system paired with a powerful GPU, as the CPU may struggle to feed data to the graphics card quickly enough in memory-intensive scenarios. The processor supports ECC memory, a feature typically valued in workstation environments, and its PCIe Gen 3, 16-lane interface is adequate but not state-of-the-art.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as expectations rather than verified results.

Based on the GPU's 88th percentile ranking and its proximity to the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (within 0.3%), the Arc A570M is expected to deliver high frame rates at 1080p ultra settings in most modern titles. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming, though texture-heavy games at higher resolutions may exceed this capacity. The CPU's single-thread performance, which is tied with the Ryzen 7 7840U and Core i7-11700KF, should be adequate for most game engines, but its 15-watt power envelope may lead to sustained clock speeds below the 4.5 GHz boost in demanding scenarios.

At 1080p ultra, the estimated frame rates are likely to be high, potentially exceeding 60 FPS in most titles, given the GPU's raw compute performance. The CPU may become a limiting factor in CPU-bound games, particularly those with heavy physics or AI calculations, where the Passmark physics score of 774 suggests potential stutters. At 1440p, the GPU will be more fully utilized, and the estimated frame rates remain playable, though the 8 GB memory capacity may cause texture pop-in in some games. At 4K, the system is likely to struggle, as the GPU's memory bandwidth and capacity are not sufficient for ultra settings, and the CPU's relative weakness will further constrain performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance tier of this CPU+GPU combination?

A: The combined percentile is 83, placing it in the upper tier of laptop systems. The CPU is at the 78th percentile among all processors, and the GPU is at the 88th percentile among all graphics cards.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 5825U has an average benchmark score of 25,446, which is 0.1% higher than the Ryzen 7 7840U and Core i7-11700KF, and 0.2% higher than the Ryzen 5 7640U. It is 0.3% lower than the Ryzen 7 5700.

Q: What is the GPU's performance relative to desktop cards?

A: The Arc A570M has an average benchmark score of 58,239, which is 0.3% lower than the Radeon RX 6950 XT and 0.5% lower than the NVIDIA P102-100. It is 0.3% higher than the Radeon RX 5600 OEM.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is a feature often used in workstation environments for data integrity.

Q: What is the memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Is there measured gaming performance data?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this combination. All gaming performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU's rendering capability in terms of ray tracing?

A: The GPU has 16 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), indicating it is capable of hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though performance specifics are not provided.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 25,446, placing it at the 78th percentile. Its closest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U with a score of 25,432 (deltaPct of 0.1), followed by the Intel Core i7-11700KF at 25,423 (deltaPct of 0.1). On the lower side, the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U scores 25,485 (deltaPct of -0.2), and the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 scores 25,517 (deltaPct of -0.3). This clustering within a 0.5% range indicates that the 5825U is performance-equivalent to a wide range of both mobile and desktop processors from different generations, which confirms its architectural efficiency despite its low power draw.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 58,239, placing it at the 88th percentile. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT with a score of 58,392 (deltaPct of -0.3), a high-end desktop card. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58,085 (deltaPct of 0.3), the NVIDIA P102-100 scores 58,528 (deltaPct of -0.5), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58,657 (deltaPct of -0.7). The fact that a mobile GPU is within 0.7% of these desktop and workstation cards is remarkable, suggesting that the Arc A570M delivers desktop-class graphics performance in a laptop form factor.

The combined picture is one of a system where the GPU significantly outclasses the CPU in relative terms. The 10-percentage-point gap between their percentiles (88 vs 78) means that in gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks, the CPU will likely be the limiting factor. In CPU-bound workloads like data compression (221,938 in Passmark) or encryption (14,088), the system performs well, but tasks that require sustained multi-threaded CPU performance, such as video encoding, will be constrained by the 15-watt TDP.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed Alchemist, and manufactured on a 6 nm process node at TSMC. The chip, designated DG2-256, contains 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, with a transistor density of 42.8 million per square millimeter. It has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units, along with 16 dedicated ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 1,300 MHz, with memory clocked at 1,750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a moderate configuration that is well-suited for 1080p gaming and light 1440p workloads, but it may struggle with 4K textures or large datasets in AI inference. The GPU's pixel rate is 83.20 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 166.4 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill rates for its class. It delivers 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 10.65 TFLOPS of FP16 (2:1 ratio), which positions it as a capable processor for compute tasks that leverage mixed precision.

The API support is comprehensive, including DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The presence of 16 RT cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate means the GPU is hardware-ready for ray tracing and mesh shaders, a feature set that is relatively rare in the mobile segment. The OpenCL benchmark score of 58,239, which is its only listed benchmark, places it at the 88th percentile, confirming its strong compute capabilities. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for most workloads, and its 75-watt TDP is typical for a mobile discrete graphics solution.

Who Should Build It

This system is designed for users who prioritize graphics performance in a mobile form factor without requiring extreme CPU compute power. The GPU's 88th percentile ranking makes it an excellent choice for gamers who play at 1080p with high or ultra settings, as the estimated performance is well above the threshold for smooth gameplay in most titles. The 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for current game releases, and the ray tracing cores provide future-proofing for titles that utilize this feature.

For content creators, the system is well-suited for GPU-accelerated workflows such as video editing with hardware encoding, 3D rendering with ray tracing, and photo editing that leverages OpenCL. The CPU's strong data compression score of 221,938 helps with file management, while its 16 threads handle multitasking effectively. However, software developers working on large codebases may find the CPU's 15-watt TDP limiting for long compile times, though the system is adequate for lighter development tasks.

Students and professionals who need a portable workstation for general productivity, web browsing, office applications, and light media creation will find this system more than capable. The ECC memory support is an added benefit for those working with financial data or scientific calculations where data integrity is critical. Small business workstations that require reliable graphics performance for tasks like CAD or data visualization would also benefit, though the CPU is not designed for heavy server-side workloads.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build that pairs an AMD Ryzen 7 5825U mobile processor with an Intel Arc A570M mobile graphics card. The CPU is from the 5000 series, based on Zen 3 architecture, and the GPU is from the Arc 5 Mobile generation, based on Xe-HPG architecture. The system's combined percentile of 83 places it in the upper-middle tier of overall performance, with the GPU being the dominant component.

The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with its 4.5 GHz boost clock, provide solid multi-threaded performance for a 15-watt part. The GPU's 2048 shading units and 16 RT cores deliver graphics performance that rivals high-end desktop cards from the previous generation, as evidenced by its proximity to the Radeon RX 6950 XT in benchmark scores. This pairing is unusual in that the graphics card is significantly more powerful relative to its peers than the CPU, suggesting a design philosophy that favors gaming and visual workloads over pure computational tasks. The system is not a top-tier enthusiast build, but it is a high-performing laptop configuration that balances portability with substantial graphics power.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP6, which is a mobile platform with soldered components, meaning the processor is not upgradeable in a traditional sense. The memory support is limited to dual-channel DDR4, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes, though the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is backward compatible. The system's upgrade path is therefore primarily limited to storage and memory, as the CPU and GPU are typically fixed in a laptop chassis.

The GPU has a 75-watt TDP and is listed as an IGP (integrated graphics processor) in terms of slot width, which is unusual for a discrete chip, but it is likely soldered to the motherboard. No suggested PSU is provided, but the combined TDP of the CPU (15 W) and GPU (75 W) suggests a total system power draw of around 90-100 watts for the core components, which is typical for a thin-and-light gaming laptop. A sensible next upgrade would be to ensure the system has sufficient RAM (at least 16 GB) and a fast NVMe SSD to avoid storage bottlenecks, as the CPU and GPU cannot be swapped.

The platform's future-proofing is limited by its DDR4 memory and PCIe Gen 3 CPU lanes, though the GPU's PCIe 4.0 interface ensures that the graphics card is not the limiting factor. For users considering a new build, moving to a newer platform with DDR5 and PCIe Gen 4 or 5 would provide more headroom, but within this laptop's constraints, the performance is well-balanced for its intended use case.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 88th percentile ranking suggests it can drive high frame rates at 1080p, likely exceeding 100 FPS in esports titles and maintaining 60+ FPS in AAA games at ultra settings. The CPU's 4.5 GHz boost clock is sufficient for most game engines, though the 15-watt TDP may cause frame rate dips in CPU-bound scenes.

Streaming: The GPU's hardware encoding capabilities, implied by its modern architecture, offload the encoding workload from the CPU, allowing the 8-core/16-thread processor to focus on the game. The CPU's data encryption score of 14,088 suggests it can handle stream encoding software, though the overall system may be constrained by memory bandwidth (51.2 GB/s) when running a game, encoder, and streaming software simultaneously.

Video editing: The GPU's FP16 performance of 10.65 TFLOPS accelerates effects and color grading, while the CPU's 16 threads handle timeline scrubbing and export. The system is well-suited for 1080p editing, with the 8 GB VRAM providing sufficient headroom for effects layers, though 4K projects may be limited by the 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth.

3D rendering: The GPU's 16 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, making this system viable for architectural visualization or product rendering. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10,152 indicates it can handle scene preparation, but final renders will be GPU-accelerated, where the card's 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will be the primary driver.

Software development: The CPU's Passmark integer math score of 72,577 and data compression score of 221,938 make it capable for compiling code and managing repositories. The 16 threads allow for parallel builds, though the 15-watt TDP may lead to thermal throttling during long compilations, and the lack of a measured FPS for gaming is irrelevant here.

Student and office work: The system is overkill for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, but its performance headroom means it will never feel sluggish. The ECC memory support is a bonus for data-heavy coursework, and the GPU can accelerate any CUDA-dependent or OpenCL-based assignments, though students should verify software compatibility with the Arc GPU's drivers.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5825U + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 5825U

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds