SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5825U + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5825U

25,446 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 5825U + Intel Arc A550M

This pairing combines a 15-watt mobile processor built on AMD's Zen 3 architecture with a discrete Intel Arc graphics solution from the Alchemist generation, targeting the laptop segment. The CPU, part of the 5000 series and released on January 5, 2022, offers eight cores and sixteen threads with a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 4500 MHz. The GPU, based on the DG2-512 chip with Xe-HPG architecture, provides 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus. Benchmark data shows the processor sits at the 78th percentile among all CPUs, while the graphics card reaches the 86th percentile among all GPUs, placing the combined system at the 82nd percentile overall. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 7 5825U uses the AMD Socket FP6, a mobile-specific socket that ties the processor to laptops rather than desktop motherboards. This means users cannot upgrade the CPU independently; the socket is soldered in most implementations, and the platform is designed around the entire laptop chassis. Memory support is limited to DDR4 with a dual-channel memory bus, delivering a maximum bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. This is the last generation for this platform type, as the processor's production status is listed as active, but the socket itself is not forward-compatible with newer AMD mobile platforms.

The CPU supports PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes available from the processor itself, which is sufficient for the Arc A550M's PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, though the link will operate at Gen 3 speeds due to the CPU's limitation. The GPU's bus interface indicates PCIe 4.0 x16, but the actual throughput will be constrained by the CPU's older PCIe generation. For storage and other peripherals, users must work within the Gen 3 bandwidth envelope. The memory controller supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a mobile part and suggests potential workstation use cases, though the dual-channel DDR4 configuration limits overall memory bandwidth compared to newer DDR5 platforms.

Power delivery is a critical consideration for this pairing. The CPU has a TDP of 15 watts, while the GPU has a TDP of 60 watts, totaling 75 watts for the core compute components. The GPU's suggested PSU is not specified in the data, and the power connectors are listed as portable device dependent, meaning the actual power delivery depends on the laptop's internal design. Given the 15-watt CPU, this pairing is clearly intended for thin-and-light or mainstream laptops where thermal headroom is limited. The CPU's low TDP means it can sustain boost clocks without excessive cooling, but the GPU's 60-watt envelope will require adequate thermal management to maintain the 2050 MHz boost clock.

A sensible next upgrade path for users on this platform is limited by the socket's mobile nature. Since the CPU is soldered, the only meaningful upgrade is the laptop itself. Users looking for more CPU performance would need to move to a newer AMD platform with a different socket, such as the Ryzen 7 7840U, which has an average benchmark score of 25432, nearly identical to this CPU's 25446. For GPU upgrades, the Arc A550M is already end-of-life, so users cannot swap the graphics chip. The practical upgrade is to a new laptop with a more powerful discrete GPU, though the 86th percentile GPU performance here leaves room for improvement at the top end.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a well-balanced pairing in terms of benchmark scores, but workload-specific analysis shows different bottleneck patterns. The CPU's average benchmark score is 25446, while the GPU's average is 49737, placing both components in similar percentile ranges (78th for CPU, 86th for GPU). The CPU's nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, has an average score of 25432, just 0.1% lower, indicating that this older Zen 3 chip remains competitive with newer parts in aggregate. The GPU's nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, scores 49957, only 0.4% higher, positioning the Arc A550M remarkably close to a much newer flagship.

In gaming workloads, the GPU is likely the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions due to its 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus. The GPU's FP32 performance of 8.397 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s suggest it can handle 1080p gaming well, but at 1440p or 4K, the memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s may limit performance. The CPU's single-thread performance, with a Geekbench single-core score of 1618 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1452, is adequate for most games, but the PassMark single-thread score of 3053 indicates it is not a top-tier gaming CPU. For CPU-bound titles, the processor could become the limiting factor, especially at lower resolutions where frame rates are high.

For productivity workloads, the CPU's 16 threads provide strong multi-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10152 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 7288. The PassMark multithread score of 18131 further confirms this. In these scenarios, the GPU is less relevant, and the CPU is the primary driver. The data shows the CPU's multi-core performance is within 0.1% of the Ryzen 7 7840U, suggesting that the 5825U does not bottleneck multi-threaded tasks compared to newer parts. However, the 15-watt TDP means sustained multi-core loads may cause thermal throttling, reducing performance over time.

The memory subsystem could be a bottleneck in mixed workloads. The 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is modest by modern standards, and the dual-channel DDR4 configuration may limit data-intensive tasks. The CPU's L3 cache is 16 MB shared, which is smaller than some desktop parts, potentially affecting cache-sensitive workloads. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for most games at 1080p, but texture-heavy titles at higher settings may exceed this capacity, causing performance drops. Overall, the balance favors CPU-heavy workloads, with the GPU being the limiting factor in gaming, particularly at higher resolutions.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A550M's 86th percentile GPU score and 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest it can handle 1080p gaming at high refresh rates, but the 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit settings at 1440p. The CPU's single-thread score of 3053 in PassMark indicates it can feed the GPU in most titles, though very CPU-intensive games might see frame rate caps. Estimated frame rates in esports titles could exceed 100 FPS at 1080p, while AAA games might range from 60 to 90 FPS depending on settings.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10152 provide enough headroom for software encoding while gaming, though the 15-watt TDP may cause thermal constraints. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, enabling hardware-accelerated encoding if the software supports it. The PassMark data encryption score of 14088 indicates reasonable performance for encryption tasks, which is relevant for stream security. However, the combined CPU and GPU load may exceed the laptop's thermal capacity, potentially reducing stream quality.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-core performance, with a Geekbench multi-core score of 7288 and PassMark integer math score of 72577, handles video encoding and rendering tasks well. The GPU's FP16 performance of 16.79 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) accelerates effects that use half-precision, and the 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p timelines. The PassMark floating point math score of 38482 indicates strong compute for filters and transitions. The 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth may be a constraint for 4K timelines, but the system should handle 1080p editing smoothly.

3D rendering: The GPU's 2048 shading units and 16 ray tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the FP32 performance of 8.397 TFLOPS is modest for professional rendering. The CPU's 16 threads contribute to CPU-based rendering, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10152. The PassMark find prime numbers score of 48 is low, indicating weak integer-heavy workloads, but rendering is typically floating-point intensive, where the CPU scores 38482. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity for GPU rendering.

Software development: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads handle compilation and parallel builds efficiently, with a PassMark multithread score of 18131. The data compression score of 221938 indicates strong performance for archive operations. The single-thread score of 3053 in PassMark is adequate for code editing and IDE responsiveness. The 16 MB L3 cache and 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth support moderate-sized projects, though very large codebases may experience slower builds due to memory constraints.

Student and office work: This pairing is overkill for typical productivity tasks. The CPU's single-thread performance handles office suites and web browsing effortlessly, while the GPU's capabilities are largely unused. The 15-watt CPU TDP means excellent battery life for all-day use, and the 60-watt GPU can be disabled or put into low-power states when not needed. The PassMark single-thread score of 3053 ensures snappy application launches, and the 16 threads allow smooth multitasking with many browser tabs and documents open.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, all frame rate figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 and Vulkan score of 49580 place it in the 86th percentile, suggesting strong DirectX 12 and Vulkan performance. The GPU's 2048 shading units and 64 ROPs, with a pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s, indicate it can fill frames quickly at 1080p. The 128 TMUs provide a texture rate of 262.4 GTexel/s, which is sufficient for detailed textures at moderate resolutions.

At 1080p with ultra settings, estimated frame rates would vary by game genre. Esports titles like competitive shooters and MOBAs should see high frame rates, potentially exceeding 120 FPS, given the GPU's compute capabilities. AAA titles with heavy graphics effects might range from 50 to 80 FPS, depending on optimization. The 8 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for games with large texture packs, and users may need to reduce texture quality to avoid stuttering. The GPU's support for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) means it can handle ray tracing and mesh shaders, but the 16 ray tracing cores will impact performance when enabled.

At 1440p, estimated frame rates would drop by 30-40% compared to 1080p, with AAA titles likely falling into the 40-60 FPS range. The memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s becomes a bottleneck at this resolution, and the 8 GB VRAM may be insufficient for ultra settings. At 4K, the GPU is likely not viable for smooth gameplay, with estimated frame rates below 30 FPS in most titles. The CPU's performance is sufficient at all resolutions, as the GPU becomes the limiting factor above 1080p. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 49580 suggests good API-level performance, but real-world results depend on driver maturity, which is not captured in the data.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets gamers who primarily play at 1080p and are willing to adjust settings for demanding titles. The GPU's 86th percentile performance and CPU's 78th percentile position mean the system can handle modern games at medium to high settings, with esports titles running at high refresh rates. Users who prioritize competitive gaming over maximum visual fidelity will find this combination suitable, especially in a laptop form factor where desktop-level performance is not expected.

Content creators working with 1080p video or moderate 3D scenes will benefit from the CPU's 16 threads and the GPU's compute capabilities. The PassMark data compression score of 221938 indicates fast file operations, while the floating point math score of 38482 supports rendering workloads. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p editing timelines, and the CPU's multi-core performance handles encoding tasks. Developers compiling code or running virtual machines will appreciate the 16 threads and the single-thread performance for IDE responsiveness.

Students and office workers will find this system more powerful than needed, but the low 15-watt CPU TDP translates to long battery life, and the GPU can be left idle for most productivity tasks. The ECC memory support adds reliability for data-sensitive work, and the DDR4 memory is cost-effective. Small business workstations that occasionally need GPU acceleration for presentations or light rendering would benefit from this pairing, though it is not optimized for such use cases. The combined percentile of 82 indicates a system that is better than most, but not at the enthusiast level.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a modest memory configuration for a discrete GPU, and it will be a limiting factor for high-resolution textures and large datasets. The memory clock is 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed, which is standard for GDDR6. The GPU's base clock is 900 MHz with a boost clock of 2050 MHz, providing a significant frequency headroom for performance scaling.

The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with a pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 262.4 GTexel/s. These specifications place it in the mid-range tier of mobile GPUs. The FP32 performance of 8.397 TFLOPS is the key compute metric, while FP16 performance of 16.79 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) indicates strong half-precision throughput for AI and certain rendering effects. The 16 ray tracing cores support hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the overall compute power limits ray-traced performance.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 and Vulkan score of 49580 are nearly identical, suggesting balanced performance across compute APIs. The GPU's percentile of 86 places it ahead of most GPUs, with the nearest rival being the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti at 49957, just 0.4% higher. This is a surprising result, given the RTX 5070 Ti is a much newer and larger GPU, but the benchmark scores indicate the Arc A550M holds its own in compute workloads. The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT scores 50951, 2.4% higher, while the RX 6800 XT scores 48477, 2.6% lower.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern games and applications. The 6 nm process node from TSMC with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die represents a dense design with a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². The GPU is listed as end-of-life, meaning driver support may become limited over time, but the current API support is comprehensive. The 60-watt TDP is reasonable for a laptop discrete GPU, though it requires adequate cooling to maintain boost clocks.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 25446, placing it at the 78th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U with an average score of 25432, a delta of 0.1%, meaning the 5825U is essentially tied with a much newer processor. The Intel Core i7-11700KF scores 25423, also 0.1% lower, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U scores 25485, 0.2% higher. The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 scores 25517, 0.3% higher. This clustering indicates that the 5825U is performance-competitive with a range of processors from different generations and segments.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 49737, placing it at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti scores 49957, 0.4% higher, while the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 scores 50001, 0.5% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT scores 50951, 2.4% higher, and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT scores 48477, 2.6% lower. The GPU is clearly positioned in the upper-mid range, outperforming the RX 6800 XT but slightly trailing the RX 6900 XT in these benchmarks.

Individually, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10152 and single-core score of 1452 show a balanced design. The Geekbench multi-core score of 7288 and single-core score of 1618 follow the same pattern. The PassMark tests reveal strengths in integer math (72577) and floating point math (38482), while the find prime numbers score of 48 is notably low, indicating weak integer-heavy scalar workloads. The combined percentile of 82 for this pairing suggests a system that is well above average, though not at the top tier. The data implies that this laptop can handle most tasks users throw at it, with the GPU being the stronger component relative to its peers.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's socket and can it be upgraded?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FP6, which is a mobile-specific socket. The processor is typically soldered to the motherboard, so the CPU cannot be upgraded independently. Users would need to replace the entire laptop for a CPU upgrade.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and is it sufficient?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is sufficient for 1080p gaming and most content creation tasks, but may be limiting for 4K textures or large 3D scenes.

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5825U has 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 3 architecture with a 7 nm process node. It has a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 4500 MHz.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A550M has 16 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing. However, the FP32 performance of 8.397 TFLOPS limits ray-traced performance.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the CPU?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus, providing 51.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth. It also supports ECC memory, which is uncommon in mobile processors.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the RTX 5070 Ti?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 49737, while the RTX 5070 Ti scores 49957, a delta of 0.4%. The Arc A550M is essentially tied with the RTX 5070 Ti in these benchmarks, despite being an older, end-of-life product.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this system?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 82, with the CPU at the 78th percentile and the GPU at the 86th percentile. This indicates a system that performs better than most, with the GPU being the stronger component.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5825U is a mobile processor from the 5000 series, built on the Zen 3 architecture with the codename Barcelo. It uses a 7 nm process node from TSMC, containing 10,700 million transistors on a die size of 180 mm². The CPU has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 4500 MHz. The TDP is 15 watts, which is typical for ultraportable laptops, and the production status is listed as active.

The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration is standard for Zen 3 based mobile parts, providing a balance between latency and capacity. The memory support is DDR4 with a dual-channel bus, delivering 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. The PCIe support is Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is older than the GPU's PCIe 4.0 interface but sufficient for most applications.

The benchmark scores show a processor that excels in multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10152 and Geekbench multi-core score of 7288 indicate strong parallel performance. The PassMark multithread score of 18131, integer math score of 72577, and floating point math score of 38482 further confirm this. The data compression score of 221938 is particularly high, suggesting excellent performance for file archiving and compression tasks. The data encryption score of 14088 and extended instructions score of 14394 are moderate, indicating reasonable security and SIMD performance.

The single-thread performance is less impressive but still adequate. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1452 and Geekbench single-core score of 1618 are typical for a 15-watt mobile chip. The PassMark single-thread score of 3053 places it in the mid-range for single-threaded tasks. The find prime numbers score of 48 is notably low, which could affect certain scientific or financial workloads that rely on prime number calculations. The CPU's performance relative to rivals is remarkably close, with the nearest rival being the Ryzen 7 7840U at a delta of 0.1%, indicating that this older chip remains competitive.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U with the Intel Arc A550M in a laptop form factor, as indicated by the build class of "laptop". The CPU is a 15-watt mobile processor from the 5000 series, while the GPU is a 60-watt discrete graphics solution from Intel's Alchemist generation. The combined TDP of 75 watts is modest, making this suitable for mainstream laptops that balance performance and portability.

The CPU's 78th percentile and GPU's 86th percentile place the system at the 82nd combined percentile, which is above average but not at the top tier. The CPU's performance is nearly identical to the Ryzen 7 7840U, a much newer part, while the GPU's performance is within 0.4% of the RTX 5070 Ti, a flagship desktop GPU. This creates an interesting dynamic where older components deliver competitive performance against newer hardware.

The system is best suited for 1080p gaming, content creation, and productivity tasks that benefit from 16 threads. The 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus are the primary limitations for higher resolutions and demanding textures. The CPU's 15-watt TDP ensures good battery life, while the GPU's 60-watt TDP requires adequate cooling to maintain boost clocks. This pairing represents a balanced mid-range laptop that can handle most tasks users require, with the GPU being the stronger component relative to its peers. The overall tier, based on the 82nd percentile, places this system in the upper-mid range, suitable for users who need a versatile laptop for gaming and work without requiring top-tier performance.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5825U + Intel Arc A550M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 5825U

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds