SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5825U + Intel Arc A530M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5825U

25,446 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A530M

46,614 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 5825U and Intel Arc A530M form a laptop-class pairing that lands in the 82nd combined percentile, indicating a system positioned above most peers in overall capability. This analysis draws exclusively from the provided benchmark data, with no measured FPS rows existing for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from the CPU and GPU scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between this CPU and GPU is best understood by comparing their percentile positions and raw compute outputs. The Ryzen 7 5825U sits at the 78th percentile among all CPUs, while the Arc A530M achieves an 85th percentile among all GPUs. That seven-point gap suggests the GPU is the stronger component relative to its own field, meaning in most mixed workloads the processor is more likely to become the limiting factor first.

Benchmark data reinforces this interpretation. The CPU’s multi-threaded Cinebench R23 score of 10152 is respectable for a 15 W TDP part, but the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 49735 and Vulkan score of 43492 indicate a graphics solution that can push substantial arithmetic throughput. In gaming, where GPU load dominates, the Arc A530M will typically be the performance driver, while the CPU handles physics, AI, and frame pacing. However, in productivity tasks like data compression or encryption, the CPU’s Passmark scores — 221938 for compression and 14088 for encryption — show that the processor can saturate its own capabilities without GPU assistance.

The FPS scaling story is inferred rather than measured. At lower resolutions, the CPU’s single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1452, Geekbench single-core of 1618) becomes more relevant because frame rates rise and draw calls multiply. At higher resolutions, the GPU’s 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 3.994 TFLOPS FP32 performance become the dominant constraint, meaning the CPU bottleneck diminishes. The absence of measured FPS data means these are projections, but the percentile delta and compute ratios point to a system where the GPU leads in graphics-heavy scenarios and the CPU leads in logic-heavy ones.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 25446, placing it at the 78th percentile. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, scores 25432, a delta of just 0.1% — essentially a statistical tie. The Intel Core i7-11700KF also matches at 25423 (0.1% delta), while the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U (25485, -0.2%) and AMD Ryzen 7 5700 (25517, -0.3%) fall slightly behind. This clustering shows the 5825U sits in a dense performance band where small workload differences decide the winner.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 46614, at the 85th percentile. Its closest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 5600M, scores 46601 with a 0% delta — a dead heat. The AMD Radeon RX 6550M is marginally ahead at 46702 (-0.2% delta), while the NVIDIA RTX A2000 (46043, 1.2%) and NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation (45972, 1.4%) trail by more noticeable margins. The GPU’s individual scores — 49735 in Geekbench OpenCL and 43492 in Geekbench Vulkan — show strong compute performance that exceeds many older desktop cards despite being a mobile part.

Combined, the system’s 82nd percentile indicates that the pairing outperforms roughly eight out of ten laptop configurations in the database. The CPU and GPU scores are closely matched in relative terms, with neither component dramatically outclassing the other, which suggests a balanced platform for typical usage.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5825U is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Barcelo. It operates with a base clock of 2000.00 MHz and boosts up to 4.50 GHz, all within a 15 W TDP. This low power envelope is notable because it delivers desktop-class core counts in a mobile form factor, built on a 7 nm TSMC process with 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. This large L3 helps with multi-threaded workloads that share data, which is reflected in the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10152. The single-core score of 1452 in Cinebench R23 and 1618 in Geekbench indicate that boost clocks are effective for lightly-threaded tasks. Passmark results further break down the CPU’s strengths: integer math scores 72577, floating point math scores 38482, and extended instructions score 14394, showing strong general-purpose compute.

Data-centric workloads are particularly telling. The Passmark data compression score of 221938 is exceptionally high, while data encryption scores 14088. Random string sorting hits 23539, which suggests the CPU handles memory-intensive operations well. The find prime numbers score of 48 is lower, but that test is single-threaded and latency-bound, so it does not diminish the overall picture. The CPU supports DDR4 memory with dual-channel configuration and a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, plus ECC memory, which makes it suitable for reliability-focused tasks. The integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics provide a fallback display output, though the discrete Arc A530M will handle most graphics work.

Who Should Build It

This laptop-class pairing targets users who need a balance of CPU and GPU power without extreme power draw. Gamers at 1080p resolution will find the Arc A530M’s 85th percentile GPU position sufficient for most titles, while the CPU’s 78th percentile ensures no major frame pacing issues. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration is well-suited for content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering, as the multi-threaded Cinebench score of 10152 indicates solid parallel throughput.

Software developers benefit from the CPU’s strong integer math (72577) and data compression (221938) scores, which accelerate compilation and data processing tasks. Students and office workers get a system that handles everyday productivity without thermal or acoustic concerns, given the 15 W CPU TDP. Small business workstations that need ECC memory support and reliable encryption (14088 Passmark score) can leverage this platform for data-sensitive applications. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth also make it capable for light CAD or photo editing, though not for heavy simulation workloads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All frame-rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The GPU’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 43492 and OpenCL score of 49735 suggest strong DirectX 12 and Vulkan performance, supported by the DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) API support.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the Arc A530M’s 3.994 TFLOPS FP32 and 124.8 GTexel/s texture rate should handle esports titles and older AAA games comfortably, while the CPU’s single-core boost of 4.50 GHz keeps frame times stable. At 1440p, the GPU’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 128-bit bus width become more stressed, likely reducing frame rates by a significant margin. The pixel rate of 62.40 GPixel/s and 48 ROPs indicate decent fill-rate capability, but the 1300 MHz boost clock limits raw geometry throughput compared to higher-clocked rivals. Given the GPU’s 85th percentile position, users should expect high settings at 1080p for most games, with medium settings required at higher resolutions.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5825U compare to its closest CPU rival?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 25446, which is within 0.1% of the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (25432) and Intel Core i7-11700KF (25423). The AMD Ryzen 5 7640U scores 25485 (-0.2%) and the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 scores 25517 (-0.3%), meaning the 5825U sits in a very tight performance cluster.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance percentile and nearest rival?

A: The Intel Arc A530M is at the 85th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 46614. Its closest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 5600M at 46601 (0% delta), while the AMD Radeon RX 6550M is slightly ahead at 46702 (-0.2% delta).

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U supports ECC memory, along with DDR4 dual-channel configuration and a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The CPU has 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 3 architecture with a base clock of 2000.00 MHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU’s VRAM capacity and memory type?

A: The Intel Arc A530M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: How does the CPU perform in multi-threaded workloads?

A: The CPU scores 10152 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 7288 in Geekbench multi-core. Passmark multithread score is 18131, with integer math at 72577 and floating point math at 38482.

Q: Is measured FPS data available for this combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this exact CPU-GPU pairing. All frame-rate references are estimates based on benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A530M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-256 chip, using a 6 nm TSMC process with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die. It operates with a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The GPU has 1536 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 ROPs, along with 12 ray tracing cores.

Memory configuration is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is adequate for 1080p gaming and light 1440p, but not for heavy 4K texture loads. The pixel rate is 62.40 GPixel/s and texture rate is 124.8 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance at 3.994 TFLOPS and FP16 at 7.987 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring modern API compatibility.

In rendering workloads, the FP32 throughput places it near the AMD Radeon RX 5600M (0% delta) and slightly behind the AMD Radeon RX 6550M (-0.2% delta). The 12 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the 1300 MHz boost clock limits ray tracing performance relative to higher-clocked desktop parts. The 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is a bottleneck for texture-heavy scenes, but the 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for most current titles at 1080p. The GPU’s 85th percentile ranking indicates it outperforms most mobile GPUs, making it suitable for mid-range gaming laptops.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U CPU with the Intel Arc A530M GPU. The CPU is a mobile processor in the 5000 series, using the Zen 3 architecture (Barcelo) with 8 cores and 16 threads. The GPU is an Intel Arc 5 Mobile part based on the Alchemist generation, with 8 GB VRAM. Together, they achieve a combined percentile of 82, placing the system in the upper tier of laptop configurations.

The CPU’s 78th percentile and GPU’s 85th percentile indicate that the GPU is the stronger relative component, but the gap is modest. The CPU’s 15 W TDP and the GPU’s 65 W TDP suggest a thermal profile suitable for thin-and-light laptops, though sustained workloads will depend on cooling solutions. The pairing targets mainstream gaming and productivity, with the GPU handling graphics and the CPU managing general compute. The 82nd combined percentile means users get a system that outperforms the majority of laptops, but it does not compete with high-end desktop replacements with discrete flagship GPUs.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 7 5825U uses the AMD Socket FP6, which is a mobile-specific socket, meaning CPU upgrades are not feasible in most laptop designs. The memory support is DDR4 with dual-channel configuration, and the platform supports ECC memory, which is unusual for mobile parts. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, so the interface is not a bottleneck for the GPU’s bandwidth.

The GPU has a TDP of 65 W and is designated as IGP slot width, which suggests it is soldered or integrated into the motherboard, limiting upgradeability. The system’s PSU requirements are not specified in the data, but the combined TDP of 15 W (CPU) and 65 W (GPU) totals 80 W, which is modest for a laptop. A sensible next upgrade would be increasing system RAM (if user-accessible) to maximize the dual-channel DDR4 bandwidth, or adding external storage via PCIe. The CPU’s production status is active, and the GPU’s is also active, so software and driver support should continue.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 85th percentile and 3.994 TFLOPS FP32 performance can drive high frame rates at 1080p in esports titles, while the CPU’s boost clock of 4.50 GHz keeps frame times consistent. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for most competitive games, though the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit texture-heavy scenes.

Streaming: The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads provide enough headroom for encoding alongside gaming, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10152. The integrated Radeon Vega 8 could handle light encoding tasks, though the discrete GPU’s DirectX 12 Ultimate support enables modern features like ray tracing for visually richer streams.

Video editing: The CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 72577 and floating point math of 38482 help with timeline scrubbing and effects, while the GPU’s 12 RT cores and FP16 performance of 7.987 TFLOPS accelerate rendering and preview. The 16 MB L3 cache improves data reuse in multi-track projects.

3D rendering: The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 49735 indicates strong compute capability for renderers that use OpenCL, and the 8 GB VRAM handles moderate scene sizes. The CPU’s multi-threaded scores support CPU-based rendering, though the 15 W TDP limits sustained performance.

Software development: The CPU’s data compression score of 221938 and encryption score of 14088 accelerate build tools and data integrity checks. The 16 threads handle parallel compilation, while the 7 nm process keeps power draw low for long coding sessions.

Student and office work: The 15 W CPU TDP and 65 W GPU TDP combine for efficient operation, and the ECC memory support ensures data reliability. The GPU’s 85th percentile means even light graphics tasks like video playback or spreadsheet charts are handled smoothly, while the CPU’s single-core score of 1452 in Cinebench R23 ensures responsive application launches.