SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5825U + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5825U

25,446 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 5825U + Intel Arc A370M: A Laptop Pairing Analyzed

This analysis examines a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U processor with the Intel Arc A370M discrete GPU. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions herein are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores of each component rather than empirical game testing. The combined percentile ranking of 76 places this pairing above roughly three-quarters of all CPU and GPU configurations in the database, though the specific workload characteristics reveal a nuanced picture of strengths and limitations.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5825U is an 8-core, 16-thread mobile processor built on TSMC's 7 nm process, featuring the Zen 3 architecture under the Barcelo codename. It operates with a base clock of 2000 MHz and boosts up to 4.50 GHz, all within a 15 W TDP envelope that signals ultra-low-power design for thin-and-light laptops. The CPU contains 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die, with a cache hierarchy comprising 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes dual-channel DDR4 with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth and ECC capability, while the processor connects via PCIe Gen 3 with 16 CPU lanes. The integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics provide a fallback when the discrete GPU is not in use.

Benchmark results place this CPU at the 78th percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 25,446. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 10,152 demonstrates substantial throughput for a 15 W part, while the single-core score of 1,452 indicates respectable per-thread performance. The Geekbench results show 7,288 multi-core and 1,618 single-core, reinforcing the pattern of strong multi-threaded capability relative to single-threaded workloads. PassMark scores further detail the performance profile: multi-thread at 18,131, single-thread at 3,053, integer math at 72,577, floating-point math at 38,482, and extended instructions at 14,394.

The nearest rivals illuminate the competitive positioning. The AMD Ryzen 7 7840U scores 25,432, a mere 0.1% difference from the 5825U, indicating near-identical overall performance despite architectural generational differences. The Intel Core i7-11700KF matches at 25,423 (0.1% delta), while the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U scores 25,485 (-0.2% from the 5825U) and the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 scores 25,517 (-0.3%). This clustering within a 0.4% band suggests that the 5825U delivers mid-range desktop-class performance in a mobile form factor, though the data cannot distinguish meaningful real-world differences among these four rivals.

The real-world implications are clear: for multi-threaded productivity tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the 8-core/16-thread configuration with 16 MB L3 cache provides strong parallel throughput. The passmark data compression score of 221,938 and data encryption score of 14,088 reveal efficient handling of compression algorithms and cryptographic workloads, making this CPU suitable for file archiving and secure communications. However, the single-thread score of 3,053 and find prime numbers score of 48 indicate that lightly-threaded tasks will not see the same relative advantage, a typical trade-off for low-power mobile processors.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5825U compare to the Ryzen 7 7840U?

A: The average benchmark scores show a 0.1% difference, with the 5825U at 25,446 and the 7840U at 25,432. This places the two processors in a statistical tie, though the 5825U uses the older Zen 3 architecture while the 7840U is from a newer generation.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile?

A: The Intel Arc A370M sits at the 74th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29,175. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, scores 29,197, representing a -0.1% difference.

Q: Can this laptop handle 4K video editing?

A: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10,152 and the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 29,676 suggest adequate capability for 4K timeline editing, though the 4 GB VRAM on the GPU may limit effects-heavy workflows. No measured FPS data exists, so this is an inference from compute benchmarks.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the FACT PACK indicates ECC memory support is true, alongside dual-channel DDR4 memory with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. This is unusual for a mobile processor and may appeal to users requiring data integrity.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The Intel Arc A370M includes 8 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), indicating hardware-accelerated ray tracing. However, with only 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, ray tracing workloads will be modest compared to dedicated high-end GPUs.

Q: How does the CPU's single-thread performance compare to its multi-thread?

A: The Geekbench single-core score of 1,618 versus multi-core of 7,288 shows a 4.5x scaling factor, which is strong for an 8-core part. The Cinebench R23 ratio of 1,452 single to 10,152 multi demonstrates similar scaling, indicating efficient core utilization.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 76, meaning this configuration outperforms approximately 76% of all CPU and GPU combinations in the database. The CPU's 78th percentile and GPU's 74th percentile are closely aligned, suggesting balanced overall performance.

Gaming Performance

Since the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U with Intel Arc A370M combination, all frame rate figures presented here are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores. The GPU's average benchmark score of 29,175 with a 74th percentile ranking indicates mid-range gaming capability, while the CPU's 78th percentile ensures it will not be the primary bottleneck in most scenarios.

For 1080p gaming at ultra settings, the Arc A370M's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth suggest playable frame rates in esports titles and moderate settings in AAA games. The GPU's 8 RT cores enable ray tracing features, but the limited 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus will constrain texture-heavy scenes. The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads provide ample headroom for game logic and physics, with the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,452 indicating sufficient per-thread performance for most game engines.

At 1440p, the estimates become more conservative. The GPU's pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s suggest that resolution scaling will hit memory bandwidth limitations sooner than compute limitations. The 112.0 GB/s bandwidth is a fraction of what desktop GPUs offer, so frame rates at 1440p ultra will likely drop below 60 FPS in demanding titles. At 4K, the 4 GB VRAM becomes a significant constraint, potentially causing texture swapping and stutter in memory-intensive games.

The CPU's integrated Radeon Vega 8 provides a fallback for lightweight or older games, but the discrete Arc A370M is clearly the primary gaming GPU. The pairing's combined percentile of 76 suggests that users should target 1080p with medium-to-high settings for a smooth experience rather than pushing higher resolutions. Without measured FPS data, these estimates should be treated as rough guidance rather than definitive performance expectations.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Arc A370M's 74th percentile GPU ranking and 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput can drive 1080p esports titles at high frame rates, but the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth may cap performance in fast-paced competitive shooters with large texture packs. The CPU's 78th percentile ensures minimal bottlenecking in CPU-bound scenarios.

Streaming: The Ryzen 7 5825U's 8 cores and 16 threads, evidenced by the PassMark multi-thread score of 18,131, provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The GPU's support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 also enables hardware-accelerated encoding paths, though the lack of measured streaming benchmarks means quality expectations must be inferred.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10,152 and GPU OpenCL score of 29,676 indicate solid performance for 1080p and 1440p video editing timelines. The 16 MB L3 cache and 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth support smooth scrubbing, though 4K multi-layer projects may strain the 4 GB GPU memory.

3D Rendering: The CPU's 8-core/16-thread configuration with a PassMark floating-point math score of 38,482 excels at CPU-based rendering. GPU-accelerated rendering via OpenCL at 29,676 will help but the 4 GB VRAM limits scene complexity in GPU renderers.

Software Development: The 5825U's 16 threads and PassMark integer math score of 72,577 provide strong compilation throughput, while the data compression score of 221,938 accelerates build artifact packaging. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long compile sessions.

Student and Office Work: The 15 W TDP CPU with integrated Radeon Vega 8 offers excellent battery efficiency for document processing and web browsing. The discrete GPU remains idle for these tasks, preserving power, while the CPU's single-thread score of 3,053 handles office applications with ease.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a generally balanced pairing where the CPU and GPU occupy similar percentile positions (78th and 74th, respectively), but workload-specific bottlenecks emerge upon closer inspection. For CPU-intensive tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, the 5825U's 10,152 Cinebench R23 multi-core score becomes the limiting factor, while the GPU's 29,675 average benchmark score remains underutilized. Conversely, in GPU-bound gaming scenarios, the Arc A370M's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth create bottlenecks that the CPU's 8 cores cannot overcome.

The nearest rival data for the GPU shows the RX 6800M scoring 28,874 (1% lower than the A370M), which is counterintuitive given the 6800M's typically higher performance class. This suggests the benchmark methodology may favor certain workload types, and real-world gaming could diverge from these synthetic scores. The CPU's rivals all cluster within 0.3% of each other, indicating that the 5825U is well-optimized relative to its direct competitors.

The FPS scaling between 1080p and 1440p, while not measured, can be inferred from the GPU's memory subsystem. The 64-bit bus and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will cause frame rates to drop more steeply with resolution increases compared to GPUs with wider memory interfaces. The CPU's 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, while adequate for its own tasks, creates a system-level constraint when both CPU and GPU compete for memory access.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It features 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, 32 ROPs, and 8 RT cores, delivering 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 and 8.397 TFLOPS of FP16 performance. The memory subsystem comprises 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth at an effective 14 Gbps speed. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1550 MHz with a boost of 2050 MHz, and the TDP is rated at 35 W.

The benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29,676 and a Vulkan score of 28,673, placing the GPU at the 74th percentile. The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH at 29,197 (-0.1%), AMD FirePro W8000 at 29,211 (-0.1%), AMD Radeon RX 470 at 28,996 (0.6%), and AMD Radeon RX 6800M at 28,874 (1%). This clustering suggests the A370M's compute performance is competitive with older mid-range desktop GPUs, though the 4 GB VRAM and narrow memory bus limit its practical ceiling.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's 8 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, and the DirectX 12 Ultimate support with Shader Model 6.6 provides modern graphics API compatibility. The pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s indicate balanced rasterization throughput. However, the 4 GB VRAM is the primary constraint for high-resolution textures and complex 3D scenes, potentially requiring lower texture quality settings. The GPU's end-of-life production status suggests it will not receive future driver optimizations, though the current Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 support provide a solid foundation.

Who Should Build It

This laptop pairing targets users who need a balance of CPU and GPU performance in a portable, low-power package. Gamers at 1080p with medium-to-high settings will find the Arc A370M's 74th percentile performance adequate for current titles, though those seeking 1440p or 4K gaming should look elsewhere. Content creators working with 1080p video editing or light 3D rendering will benefit from the 5825U's 8-core/16-thread configuration and the GPU's OpenCL acceleration. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU's 72,577 integer math score and 16 MB L3 cache, while the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running processes.

Students and office workers will see the most value from the 15 W TDP CPU's efficiency, with the integrated Radeon Vega 8 handling daily tasks and the discrete GPU reserved for occasional creative or gaming workloads. Small business workstations requiring data encryption (PassMark encryption score of 14,088) and compression (221,938) will find this combination capable. Users who prioritize battery life over peak performance will favor the low-power CPU, while those needing sustained multi-threaded throughput for rendering or analysis may find the 15 W TDP limiting under prolonged load.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U mobile processor with the Intel Arc A370M discrete mobile GPU. The CPU's 78th percentile and GPU's 74th percentile combine for a 76th overall percentile ranking, placing this configuration in the upper-midrange tier of laptop performance. The 8-core/16-thread Zen 3 CPU with 4.5 GHz boost clock provides strong multi-threaded capability, while the Xe-HPG GPU with 8 RT cores and 4 GB GDDR6 delivers competent 1080p gaming and compute performance.

The pairing represents a deliberate choice of balanced components: neither the CPU nor GPU dominates the other in percentile terms, ensuring that most workloads will utilize both resources effectively. The 15 W CPU TDP and 35 W GPU TDP suggest a combined thermal envelope suitable for thin-and-light laptops, though sustained performance may be limited by chassis cooling. This build is best characterized as a versatile productivity and casual gaming machine rather than a high-performance gaming or workstation system.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen 7 5825U achieves an average benchmark score of 25,446, placing it at the 78th percentile among all CPUs. Key scores include Cinebench R23 multi-core at 10,152 and single-core at 1,452, Geekbench multi-core at 7,288 and single-core at 1,618, and PassMark multi-thread at 18,131 with single-thread at 3,053. The Intel Arc A370M reaches an average benchmark score of 29,175, at the 74th percentile among GPUs, with Geekbench OpenCL at 29,676 and Vulkan at 28,673.

The combined picture shows a configuration where the CPU slightly outperforms the GPU in percentile terms (78 vs. 74), indicating that the processor has more headroom relative to its peers than the graphics card. The CPU's nearest rival, the Ryzen 7 7840U, scores 25,432 (0.1% lower), while the GPU's nearest rival, the RX Vega M GH, scores 29,197 (-0.1% from the A370M). These tight deltas suggest that the 5825U and A370M are both well-positioned within their respective performance tiers, and the 76th combined percentile confirms a cohesive overall system.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 7 5825U uses the AMD Socket FP6 and supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel configuration with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU connects via PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes, while the Intel Arc A370M uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The 15 W CPU TDP and 35 W GPU TDP indicate a combined thermal design point of 50 W, which is modest for a laptop. The GPU's suggested PSU is not provided in the FACT PACK, and the slot width is listed as IGP, meaning the discrete GPU is integrated into the motherboard rather than replaceable.

Upgrade options for this laptop class are limited by the soldered nature of mobile components. The CPU cannot be swapped due to the FP6 socket's BGA mounting, and the GPU is similarly fixed. The primary upgrade path involves increasing memory capacity or storage, though the CPU's dual-channel DDR4 support means memory bandwidth is capped at 51.2 GB/s. The PCIe Gen 3 interface on the CPU side limits potential external GPU enclosures, while the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 connection is adequate for its 4 GB memory footprint. A sensible next upgrade would be a complete laptop replacement with a newer platform, as the end-of-life status of the Arc A370M and the 2022 release date of the CPU suggest limited future driver support and performance optimizations.