SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5825U + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5825U

25,446 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The AMD Ryzen 7 5825U paired with the Intel Arc A350M presents a fascinating study in system balance, but the data reveals a clear asymmetry in capability. The CPU sits at the 78th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 70th percentile among all graphics cards. This 8-point gap suggests the processor is the stronger component in this pairing, meaning that in graphics-intensive workloads, the Arc A350M will likely be the limiting factor. However, the combined percentile of 74 indicates that, taken as a whole, this system lands solidly in the upper-middle tier of laptop configurations.

The bottleneck dynamics shift depending on the workload type. In CPU-bound tasks like data compression, encryption, or extended instruction processing, the Ryzen 7 5825U's eight Zen 3 cores can stretch their legs. The PassMark data compression score of 221,938 and encryption score of 14,088 are strong indicators that the processor handles these workloads with authority, and the GPU's role becomes secondary. Conversely, in gaming or 3D rendering, the A350M's 4 GB of GDDR6 memory and 64-bit bus width will constrain performance, making the GPU the clear bottleneck. The FPS scaling in such scenarios would be dictated by the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 compute rather than the CPU's multithreaded throughput.

What is particularly telling is the deltaPct values against nearest rivals. The CPU matches the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U within 0.1% and the Intel Core i7-11700KF within 0.1%, while slightly trailing the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U by 0.2% and the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 by 0.3%. These razor-thin margins indicate that the 5825U is exceptionally well-positioned in its performance class, punching above its 15 W TDP. The GPU, meanwhile, trails the AMD Radeon RX 590 by 0.4% and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile by 0.5%, while leading the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT by 0.8% and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 by 1.5%. These deltas suggest the Arc A350M competes in a strange neighborhood — some rivals are desktop parts, others are professional mobile GPUs, yet the performance clustering is remarkably tight.

The absence of measured FPS data for this exact combination means bottleneck analysis must rely on the component-level benchmark scores. The CPU's Geekbench multicore score of 7,288 versus the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 24,546 and Vulkan score of 24,747 paints a picture of a system where the GPU can deliver substantial compute throughput when properly utilized, but the 4 GB memory capacity will cap texture-heavy workloads. For productivity tasks that are memory-light but compute-heavy, the balance is favorable; for modern games with large texture pools, the bottleneck will be the GPU's memory subsystem.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-128 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors packed into a 157 mm² die. This transistor density of 45.9 million per square millimeter reflects the architectural efficiency, though the GPU's real-world position is defined by its benchmark results. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 24,546 and Vulkan score of 24,747 place it at the 70th percentile among all GPUs, a respectable position for a mobile part with modest specifications.

Memory configuration is a defining characteristic. The 4 GB GDDR6 capacity on a 64-bit bus delivers 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is adequate for 1080p gaming at medium settings but will struggle with high-resolution textures or heavy post-processing. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed, and the 64-bit interface is the primary constraint — a wider bus would have dramatically improved bandwidth, but the architecture's efficiency partially compensates. The pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s and texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s indicate that the 24 ROPs and 48 TMUs are well-matched to the 768 shading units.

Clock speeds are aggressive for a mobile GPU. The base clock of 1150 MHz boosts to 2200 MHz, allowing the 768 shading units to deliver 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The FP16 performance of 6.758 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio suggests the architecture can accelerate certain AI and compute workloads, though the lack of dedicated tensor cores (listed as null) means there is no specialized deep learning hardware. Instead, the 6 ray tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated RT support, and the DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) API compliance ensures compatibility with modern rendering features. The Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 support round out the API coverage.

The GPU's nearest rival data reveals interesting positioning. The Arc A350M trails the AMD Radeon RX 590 by 0.4% and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile by 0.5%, yet leads the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT by 0.8% and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 by 1.5%. This clustering around the 24,246 to 24,763 score range suggests that despite different architectures and target segments, these GPUs deliver broadly similar compute performance. The RX 590 is an older desktop part, the RTX A5000 Mobile is a professional workstation GPU, and the RX 6600 XT is a mainstream desktop card — the Arc A350M competes with all of them, which is remarkable for a 25 W mobile chip.

The GPU's TDP of 25 W and its "IGP" slot width classification indicate it is designed for thin-and-light laptops. The PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface provides ample bandwidth for the GPU's memory subsystem, and the display outputs being "Portable Device Dependent" means the manufacturer determines connectivity. The production status is listed as end-of-life, which suggests this is a first-generation Arc product that has been superseded, but its benchmark scores remain relevant for understanding its capability class.

# Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data for this pairing reveals a system that performs admirably in CPU-bound tasks while offering competent but not exceptional GPU performance. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 10,152 and single-core score of 1,452 place it firmly in the upper echelon of mobile processors. The Geekbench multicore score of 7,288 and single-core score of 1,618 corroborate this assessment. The PassMark multithread score of 18,131 and single-thread score of 3,053 further reinforce the picture of a well-rounded processor.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 25,446 places it at the 78th percentile of all CPUs, with the nearest rivals showing remarkable parity. The AMD Ryzen 7 7840U scores 25,432 (0.1% ahead), the Intel Core i7-11700KF scores 25,423 (0.1% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U scores 25,485 (0.2% behind), and the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 scores 25,517 (0.3% behind). This means the 5825U is effectively tied with its closest competitors, delivering performance within a fraction of a percent across the board. The practical implication is that users upgrading from any of these CPUs would see negligible real-world differences.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 24,647 places it at the 70th percentile of all GPUs. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 24,546 and Vulkan score of 24,747 are closely matched, indicating consistent compute performance across different API environments. The nearest rival data shows the GPU trailing the AMD Radeon RX 590 by 0.4% and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile by 0.5%, while leading the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT by 0.8% and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 by 1.5%. These narrow deltas suggest that the Arc A350M delivers performance in a very competitive band, though the RX 6600 XT being only 0.8% behind is notable given that the RX 6600 XT is a desktop card with significantly higher power draw.

The combined percentile of 74 for this CPU+GPU pairing indicates that the whole system sits in the upper-middle tier of laptop configurations. The CPU's 78th percentile and GPU's 70th percentile combine to create a system that is more capable than the majority of laptops on the market, but not at the top tier. For users coming from older dual-core or quad-core systems, this will feel like a substantial upgrade; for users accustomed to high-end desktop parts, the limitations will be apparent.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets a specific segment of laptop users who need strong CPU performance without sacrificing portability. The 15 W TDP of the Ryzen 7 5825U and the 25 W TDP of the Arc A350M combine for a total thermal envelope that is manageable in thin-and-light chassis, making this an attractive option for professionals who prioritize mobility.

Gamers at 1080p with medium settings will find the system adequate, though the 4 GB VRAM will limit texture quality in modern titles. The GPU's Vulkan score of 24,747 and OpenCL score of 24,546 suggest it can handle esports titles and older AAA games comfortably, but newer releases with high VRAM requirements will need reduced settings. Content creators working with photo editing or light video editing will benefit from the CPU's strong multicore performance, as the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 10,152 and PassMark multithread score of 18,131 indicate efficient handling of export and rendering tasks.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, which allow for fast compilation times and smooth operation of virtual machines. The PassMark data compression score of 221,938 and integer math score of 72,577 indicate strong performance in data-intensive workloads. Students and small business users will find the system more than sufficient for office productivity, web browsing, and light multimedia tasks, with the CPU's single-thread performance of 3,053 in PassMark ensuring responsive application launches.

The system is not well-suited for high-end 3D rendering or machine learning workloads, where the GPU's 4 GB memory and lack of dedicated tensor cores would be limiting. However, for users who need a balanced laptop for mixed workloads — some gaming, some productivity, some development — this pairing offers a compelling combination of CPU strength and GPU adequacy.

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5825U is a Zen 3 architecture processor built on TSMC's 7 nm process, with the Barcelo codename and part of the 5000 series. The 8 cores and 16 threads operate at a base clock of 2000 MHz, boosting up to 4.50 GHz. The 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die represent a mature design that balances performance and efficiency. The 15 W TDP is remarkably low for an 8-core processor, making it suitable for fanless or low-noise laptop designs.

The cache hierarchy is generous: 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. This 16 MB pool is critical for the processor's performance, as it allows frequently accessed data to remain on-die, reducing memory latency. The dual-channel DDR4 memory support with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s provides adequate memory throughput for the 8 cores, and ECC memory support is a notable feature for workstation use.

Benchmark results paint a picture of a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multithreaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,452 is strong for a mobile part, while the multicore score of 10,152 demonstrates that all 8 cores scale well under load. The Geekbench single-core score of 1,618 and multicore score of 7,288 corroborate this balance. The PassMark results show specific strengths: floating-point math at 38,482, integer math at 72,577, and extended instructions at 14,394. The find prime numbers score of 48 is modest, but this is a specific workload that benefits from certain instruction sets. The random string sorting score of 23,539 indicates solid memory management and cache efficiency.

The processor's percentile rank of 78 among all CPUs, combined with its average benchmark score of 25,446, places it in the upper tier of mobile processors. The nearest rival data shows it trading blows with the Ryzen 7 7840U, Core i7-11700KF, Ryzen 5 7640U, and Ryzen 7 5700, all within 0.3% of its average score. This near-parity with both newer and older parts speaks to the enduring competitiveness of the Zen 3 architecture. The integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics provide a fallback option when the discrete GPU is not needed, potentially extending battery life.

The processor's production status is active, and it was released on January 5, 2022. The socket is AMD Socket FP6, which is a mobile-specific interface. The PCIe Gen 3 support with 16 lanes from the CPU provides adequate connectivity for storage and expansion, though it is one generation behind the GPU's PCIe 4.0 interface.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 74, placing this laptop configuration in the upper-middle tier of systems. The CPU ranks at the 78th percentile while the GPU ranks at the 70th percentile.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5825U compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U?

A: The Ryzen 7 5825U has an average benchmark score of 25,446, while the Ryzen 7 7840U scores 25,432. The deltaPct is 0.1%, meaning the 5825U is effectively tied with the 7840U in overall performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A350M features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U supports ECC memory, which is a valuable feature for workstation and data-integrity-sensitive applications.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The Intel Arc A350M includes 6 ray tracing cores, providing hardware-accelerated ray tracing support. It is compliant with DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing and other advanced rendering features.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT?

A: The Arc A350M has an average benchmark score of 24,647, while the RX 6600 XT scores 24,442. The Arc leads by 0.8%, despite being a mobile part with significantly lower power consumption.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock and architecture?

A: The Ryzen 7 5825U has a boost clock of 4.50 GHz and is based on the Zen 3 architecture with the Barcelo codename. It features 8 cores and 16 threads on a 7 nm TSMC process.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the AMD Socket FP6, which is a mobile-specific socket. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The PCIe Gen 3 interface provides 16 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, meaning the GPU's bus is one generation ahead of the CPU's. This asymmetry is not a bottleneck in practice, as the GPU's 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is the limiting factor, not the bus interface.

The GPU's TDP of 25 W and the CPU's TDP of 15 W combine for a total of 40 W of power draw for the core components. The suggested PSU is not listed, but given the low power consumption, a standard laptop power adapter is sufficient. The GPU's production status is end-of-life, which means it is no longer being manufactured, but the CPU remains in active production. This suggests that upgrades would focus on replacing the entire laptop rather than swapping individual components, as mobile platforms rarely offer upgradeability for either CPU or GPU.

For users considering a future upgrade, the data suggests that the CPU's performance is already at parity with newer parts like the Ryzen 7 7840U, so CPU upgrades would yield minimal gains. The GPU, however, has room for improvement — a newer mobile GPU with more VRAM and higher bandwidth would address the current bottleneck. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is compatible with newer GPUs, but the laptop form factor limits options. The presence of the integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics provides a fallback if the discrete GPU fails or if power savings are needed.

The platform's memory support for DDR4 is a generational limitation, as newer platforms have moved to DDR5. This means that users are on a mature platform with stable drivers and broad compatibility, but without access to the bandwidth improvements of newer memory standards. The 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for the CPU's needs, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM cannot be supplemented by system memory without significant performance penalties.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U with the Intel Arc A350M in a laptop form factor. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 3 part with a 15 W TDP, while the GPU is an Xe-HPG architecture mobile chip with a 25 W TDP. The combined percentile of 74 places this system in the upper-middle tier of laptop configurations, with the CPU at the 78th percentile and the GPU at the 70th percentile.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 25,446 and the GPU's average score of 24,647 indicate a system where both components are competitive within their respective classes. The CPU is effectively tied with the Ryzen 7 7840U, Core i7-11700KF, Ryzen 5 7640U, and Ryzen 7 5700, all within 0.3% of its score. The GPU trails the RX 590 and RTX A5000 Mobile by less than 0.5% while leading the RX 6600 XT and GTX 1630 by 0.8% and 1.5%, respectively.

This is a balanced system for a laptop, with the CPU being the stronger component. The 4 GB VRAM on the GPU is the primary limitation, capping graphics performance in memory-intensive scenarios. The system is well-suited for productivity, development, and light gaming, but not for high-end gaming or professional 3D rendering. The production status of the GPU is end-of-life, while the CPU remains active, suggesting this is a mature platform that has been on the market for some time.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A350M's 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth can drive 1080p gaming at medium settings in esports titles, likely achieving high frame rates. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 1,452 in Cinebench R23 ensures that frame pacing remains stable, but the 4 GB VRAM will limit texture quality in modern titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, as the PassMark multithread score of 18,131 indicates robust multi-tasking capability. The GPU's lack of dedicated tensor cores means no specialized encoding hardware, but the CPU can handle x264 encoding at reasonable bitrates.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 10,152 and PassMark floating-point math score of 38,482 suggest efficient handling of video effects and exports. The GPU's OpenCL score of 24,546 can accelerate certain effects, but the 4 GB VRAM will limit timeline resolution and effect complexity.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will be strong, as the PassMark integer math score of 72,577 and data compression score of 221,938 indicate fast scene processing. GPU-based rendering will be constrained by the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus, making this system unsuitable for complex scenes or high-resolution outputs.

Software development: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a Geekbench multicore score of 7,288, ensure fast compilation and build times. The data encryption score of 14,088 indicates strong performance in security-related tasks, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running builds.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance of 3,053 in PassMark ensures responsive application launches and smooth multitasking. The integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics provide a low-power option for basic display tasks, potentially extending battery life during note-taking or document editing.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores, not from direct testing of this pairing.

Based on the GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 24,747 and OpenCL score of 24,546, and its position relative to the RX 590 (0.4% behind), RTX A5000 Mobile (0.5% behind), RX 6600 XT (0.8% ahead), and GTX 1630 (1.5% ahead), the Arc A350M is likely capable of 1080p gaming at medium settings in most titles. Esports games such as Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant should achieve 60+ FPS at high settings, given the GPU's compute throughput and the CPU's strong single-thread performance.

Older AAA titles from the PS4/Xbox One era should run well at 1080p high settings, as the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is comparable to console-class GPUs. However, modern AAA releases with high VRAM requirements (8 GB or more) will exceed the 4 GB memory capacity, causing texture pop-in and stuttering at higher settings. Users will need to reduce texture quality and possibly resolution to maintain playable frame rates.

The CPU's performance is more than sufficient for gaming, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,452 that will not bottleneck any current GPU at 1080p. The 16 MB of L3 cache and 8 cores ensure smooth frame pacing in CPU-intensive scenes. The combination of a capable CPU and a modest GPU means that gaming performance will be GPU-limited in most scenarios, which is the expected and desirable configuration for consistent frame rates.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5825U + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 5825U

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds