SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5825C + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
CPU Bottleneck
CPU
73%
VS
GPU
96%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5825C

3,579 Benchmark Score
Top 27% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 7 5825C + Intel Arc A550M

This pairing combines AMD's 8-core Zen 3 mobile processor with Intel's mid-range Arc 5 discrete GPU in a laptop configuration. The CPU sits at the 55th percentile among all processors, while the GPU reaches the 86th percentile among all GPUs, placing the overall build at the 71st combined percentile. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming performance discussion is estimated from benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5825C is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on TSMC's 7nm process, featuring the Zen 3 architecture under the Cezanne-U codename. It operates with a base clock of 2000 MHz and boosts up to 4.50 GHz, housed in the AMD Socket FP6 platform. The chip integrates 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die, with a 15W TDP that signals an efficient mobile design.

Cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. This 16 MB L3 pool is shared across all eight cores, which benefits workloads that require frequent data sharing between threads. Memory support is dual-channel DDR4 with a theoretical bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is not supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 3 with 8 lanes, which is a notable limitation for external GPU bandwidth but acceptable for integrated peripherals.

Benchmark results show a multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 12,376 and a single-core score of 1,747. The R20 multicore result is 5,197 with single-core at 733, while the older R15 test yields 1,247 multicore and 175 single-core. These numbers place the chip at the 55th percentile versus all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 3,579.

Comparing against nearest rivals, the Ryzen 7 5825C sits effectively tied with the Intel Core i9-9980HK, edging ahead by just 0.1%. It trails the AMD Ryzen 7 2700E by 0.7%, the Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 by 0.8%, and the Intel Xeon E-2286G by 0.9%. These margins are negligible — the 5825C is squarely in a performance class with these desktop and high-end mobile parts, despite its 15W TDP.

For real workloads, the 8-core/16-thread configuration with Zen 3 architecture handles multi-threaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation efficiently. The single-core boost of 4.50 GHz ensures responsive day-to-day operation and solid performance in lightly threaded applications. The integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics provide a fallback display output when the discrete GPU is not engaged, though the primary compute is handled by the Arc A550M.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Arc A550M GPU delivers strong compute results, scoring 49,894 in Geekbench OpenCL and 49,580 in Geekbench Vulkan, for an average benchmark score of 49,737. This places the GPU at the 86th percentile among all GPUs, a significantly higher standing than the CPU's 55th percentile position.

The combined build percentile is 71, reflecting the balanced but GPU-forward nature of this pairing. The GPU's nearest rivals illustrate its performance tier: it trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti by 0.4%, the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 by 0.5%, and the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT by 2.4%, while leading the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT by 2.6%. These deltas are small, meaning the A550M competes with high-end desktop GPUs from previous generations despite being a mobile part.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 3,579 against a GPU average of 49,737 creates a notable imbalance in raw compute, but the two components serve different roles. The CPU handles physics, game logic, and general processing, while the GPU manages rendering and parallel workloads. In CPU-bound scenarios, the 5825C's 55th percentile position may limit frame rates, but in GPU-bound scenarios, the A550M's 86th percentile performance will dominate.

The combined picture shows a system that excels at graphics-intensive tasks — the GPU is positioned among top-tier discrete graphics solutions, while the CPU provides adequate but not exceptional processing power. For gaming at high resolutions and detail settings, the GPU will be the primary driver of performance, with the CPU providing sufficient support for modern game engines.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 86th percentile ranking suggests strong potential for 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings, but the CPU's 55th percentile may constrain frame rates in CPU-heavy titles. The 4.50 GHz boost clock helps mitigate this, but esports titles at very high refresh rates could see CPU limitations.

Streaming: The 8-core/16-thread CPU can handle encoding workloads alongside gaming, with the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12,376 indicating solid multi-threaded throughput. The GPU's 16 RT cores and Xe-HPG architecture provide hardware acceleration for encoding tasks, though the combination is not specifically optimized for this use case.

Video editing: The combination of 8 cores and strong GPU compute (49,737 average benchmark score) supports timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export tasks. The 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth on the GPU handle 1080p and 1440p video projects comfortably, while the CPU's 16 MB L3 cache aids in multi-stream decoding.

3D rendering: The GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 16.79 TFLOPS FP16 performance make it capable for GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender or Octane. The CPU's 12,376 R23 multicore score provides adequate CPU-based rendering fallback, though this is not a top-tier rendering workstation.

Software development: The 8 cores and 16 threads handle compilation tasks efficiently, with the CPU's 55th percentile position indicating mid-range performance. The 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large codebases, and the dual-channel DDR4 configuration is sufficient for development workloads.

Student and office work: The 15W TDP CPU and 60W GPU create an efficient laptop platform for document editing, web browsing, and productivity suites. The CPU's single-core score of 1,747 in R23 ensures responsive application launches and smooth multitasking, while the GPU remains idle for most office tasks, preserving battery life.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for this pairing. All frame rate expectations are estimated from the benchmark scores of the individual components.

Based on the GPU's 86th percentile ranking and its proximity to the RTX 5070 Ti (0.4% slower) and RX Vega 64 (0.5% slower), the Arc A550M should deliver high frame rates at 1080p ultra settings in most modern titles. At 1440p, performance will remain strong but may require settings adjustments in the most demanding games. The 8 GB GDDR6 VRAM with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p textures, though 4K gaming may exceed this capacity in some titles.

The CPU's 55th percentile position means that at 1080p, where CPU overhead is more significant, frame rates in CPU-bound games could be lower than the GPU's potential. At 1440p and above, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and the CPU's 4.50 GHz boost clock will adequately feed the A550M.

Ray tracing performance is supported through 16 dedicated RT cores on the GPU, with DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) API support indicating full hardware ray tracing capabilities. Titles with heavy ray tracing effects will see reduced frame rates compared to rasterized rendering, but the hardware is present for those features.

Who Should Build It

This laptop build targets gamers seeking high-refresh 1080p or smooth 1440p gaming without stepping up to top-tier flagship GPUs. The GPU's 86th percentile performance puts it in range of high-end desktop parts, making this suitable for gamers who prioritize graphical fidelity over raw frame rates at the highest refresh rates.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D modeling, and GPU-accelerated rendering will benefit from the combination of 8 CPU cores and the A550M's compute capabilities. The 8 GB VRAM supports moderate-sized scenes and multi-track video projects, while the CPU's multi-threaded performance handles encoding and export tasks.

Software developers building and testing applications will find the 8-core/16-thread configuration adequate for compilation and testing, with the GPU available for compute-heavy development tasks like machine learning inference or graphics programming. The 15W CPU TDP suggests good battery life for on-the-go development work.

Students and professionals in office environments will appreciate the efficient 15W CPU paired with a capable GPU that can handle occasional gaming or creative tasks. The laptop form factor (buildClass: laptop) makes this a portable solution for campus or office use, with the GPU providing headroom for entertainment beyond productivity.

Small business workstations requiring occasional 3D visualization, CAD work, or video presentation creation would find this pairing suitable, with the GPU's 86th percentile performance handling graphics acceleration and the CPU providing dependable multi-threaded processing.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5825C has 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 3 architecture on a 7nm TSMC process.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A550M have?

A: The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Does this system support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A550M has 16 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in compatible games.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The Ryzen 7 5825C boosts up to 4.50 GHz, with a base clock of 2000 MHz.

Q: What memory type does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a theoretical bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and does not support ECC memory.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the RTX 5070 Ti?

A: The Arc A550M trails the RTX 5070 Ti by only 0.4% in average benchmark score, placing them in essentially the same performance tier.

Q: What is the overall performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined build is at the 71st percentile, with the CPU at the 55th percentile and the GPU at the 86th percentile.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP6 platform, which is a mobile-specific socket. This means the CPU is typically soldered to the motherboard in laptop designs, limiting upgradeability. The 5825C is part of the 5000 series on the Cezanne-U codename, and its production status is Active, indicating ongoing availability.

Memory support is limited to dual-channel DDR4, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 3 with 8 lanes. This is an older PCIe generation, which may constrain bandwidth for newer NVMe drives or external GPU docks. The GPU, however, uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is a newer interface and provides ample bandwidth for the A550M's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth.

The CPU has a 15W TDP, and the GPU has a 60W TDP, suggesting a combined thermal envelope of roughly 75W for the core compute components. No suggested PSU is listed, but the low TDPs indicate that this laptop platform does not require an oversized power supply — a standard mobile adapter should suffice.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing system RAM to the maximum supported by the dual-channel DDR4 controller, as the 51.2 GB/s bandwidth is a potential bottleneck for CPU-intensive workloads. Storage upgrades to faster NVMe drives are constrained by the PCIe Gen 3 interface, but Gen 3 speeds remain adequate for gaming and content creation.

The GPU's production status is End-of-life, meaning it is no longer in active manufacturing. This doesn't affect the current build's performance, but it does mean future driver support may eventually taper off. The CPU remains Active, providing a longer support window for the processor.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: laptop) combining the AMD Ryzen 7 5825C mobile processor with the Intel Arc A550M discrete GPU. The CPU is a 5000 series chip with 8 cores and 16 threads, while the GPU is an Alchemist-generation Arc 5 Mobile part based on the Xe-HPG architecture.

The overall tier of this system, based on the 71st combined percentile, places it in the upper-midrange of laptop configurations. The CPU's 55th percentile is mid-pack, while the GPU's 86th percentile is firmly in high-end territory. This creates a system that is stronger graphically than computationally, which suits gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads but may leave CPU-heavy tasks comparatively weaker.

The GPU's 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, combined with 16 RT cores, deliver 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 16.79 TFLOPS of FP16 performance. These specifications position the A550M as a capable 1080p and 1440p gaming GPU with ray tracing support, backed by the 8 GB GDDR6 memory.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear imbalance: the GPU operates at the 86th percentile while the CPU sits at the 55th percentile. This 31-percentage-point gap indicates that the CPU is the limiting factor in most gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads.

In gaming scenarios, this means that at lower resolutions (1080p), the CPU's mid-range position will cap frame rates in CPU-bound titles, preventing the GPU from reaching its full potential. At higher resolutions (1440p and above), the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, and the CPU's 4.50 GHz boost clock is sufficient to keep up.

For productivity workloads, the CPU's 16 MB L3 cache and 8-core/16-thread configuration handle multi-threaded tasks adequately, but the 55th percentile position means there are many faster processors available. The GPU's 86th percentile provides substantial acceleration for rendering, encoding, and compute tasks, shifting the balance toward GPU-accelerated workflows.

The memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s on the CPU side is modest by modern standards, potentially limiting performance in memory-intensive workloads. The GPU's 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is more robust, ensuring the 8 GB VRAM is fed efficiently. The PCIe Gen 3 x8 CPU interface is a potential bottleneck for data transfer between the CPU and GPU, though the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface compensates on the GPU side.

Overall, this system is GPU-forward, with the A550M providing high-end graphics performance while the 5825C offers dependable but not exceptional CPU throughput. For users prioritizing gaming and GPU compute, this is a well-balanced pairing; for CPU-heavy workloads, the processor will be the limiting factor.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is built on the DG2-512 chip using TSMC's 6nm process, packing 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die with a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². This is a large mobile GPU, reflecting the Alchemist architecture's focus on compute throughput.

Clock speeds are set at a 900 MHz base and 2050 MHz boost, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus delivers 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming but may be a limiting factor at 4K with high-resolution textures.

Compute resources include 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, producing a pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 262.4 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 8.397 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 16.79 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), indicating strong compute throughput for AI and general-purpose workloads.

The 16 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, and the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This API support ensures compatibility with modern games and graphics applications. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, providing ample bandwidth for the GPU's memory and compute resources.

Benchmark results show the A550M scoring 49,894 in Geekbench OpenCL and 49,580 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average of 49,737. This places it at the 86th percentile, just 0.4% behind the RTX 5070 Ti and 0.5% behind the RX Vega 64, while leading the RX 6800 XT by 2.6%. These results indicate that the A550M performs at a high-end level for both OpenCL and Vulkan workloads, making it suitable for gaming, rendering, and compute tasks.

The GPU's TDP is 60W, and it is classified as an IGP (integrated graphics processor) in terms of slot width, indicating it is designed for laptop integration. Display outputs are portable device dependent, and the production status is End-of-life, meaning this GPU is no longer in active manufacturing but remains available in existing laptop designs.