SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT + Intel Arc A350

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

82 Score

Top 18% Ranking

82 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 18% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT

29,879 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and Intel Arc A350 pairing represents a significant mismatch in compute capability, creating a desktop system where the CPU vastly outperforms the GPU in nearly every measurable way. The data shows a combined percentile of 66 against all builds, but this figure masks the extreme disparity between the components: the CPU alone sits at the 81st percentile, while the GPU is exactly at the 50th percentile. This is not a balanced system; it is a high-end processor strapped to an entry-level graphics card, and every workload that touches the GPU will be limited by it.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck analysis here is unambiguous: the Intel Arc A350 will be the limiting factor in any graphics-intensive workload. The CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 7683 and multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 23794 place it in a performance tier far above what the GPU can feed. The GPU, with a 25 W TDP and only 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, is designed for basic acceleration, not high-end gaming or rendering. In CPU-bound tasks like data compression (Passmark score of 352002), encryption (21461), or integer math (93942), the Ryzen 7 5800XT will operate at full capacity, but the moment the workload shifts to rendering frames, the GPU becomes a hard ceiling.

The CPU’s threading scaling tells a clear story about its capabilities: the 3DMark single-thread score of 959 rises to 1879 with 2 threads, 3603 with 4 threads, 6141 with 8 threads, and 7683 with 16 threads. This near-linear scaling up to 8 threads indicates the 8-core/16-thread design is well-utilized in multithreaded applications. However, the FPS in games will not scale this way — the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will saturate quickly. The CPU can prepare frames at a rate the GPU cannot match, so expect the GPU to be pinned at 100% utilization while the CPU idles in most gaming scenarios.

The effective memory bandwidth of the CPU is 51.2 GB/s over dual-channel DDR4, which is modest by modern standards but irrelevant in this context; the GPU’s 124.0 GB/s is the number that matters for visual output. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface for the GPU provides sufficient bandwidth for its 4 GB frame buffer, but this does not alleviate the core compute limitation. In short, the system is balanced only for office productivity and light 2D work; any 3D application will be GPU-bound.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350 is a 6 nm TSMC chip with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, based on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation). It features 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs, with 6 dedicated ray tracing cores. The clock speeds are fixed at 2000 MHz for both base and boost, which is a modest frequency for this class. The memory subsystem is the most notable limitation: 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus yields 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a figure that is adequate for 1080p esports titles but will choke on modern AAA textures and high-resolution assets.

The FP32 throughput is 3.072 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 6.144 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). This places the A350 in the same league as integrated graphics from a few generations ago, not a discrete card meant for serious gaming. The pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s are similarly entry-level. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, meaning it has the API feature set for modern games, including hardware ray tracing via its 6 RT cores. However, with only 3.072 TFLOPS of compute, ray tracing performance will be poor; expect to disable RT effects for playable framerates.

The 25 W TDP is remarkably low, and the suggested PSU is 200 W, confirming this is not a performance part. The card is single-slot with no display outputs, which is unusual — it appears designed for OEM systems or as an accelerator rather than a primary graphics solution. The memory clock is 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective), and the 64-bit bus width means the 4 GB VRAM is the primary constraint for modern games. The GPU has no benchmark scores in the FACT PACK, so its percentile of 50 is a positional estimate, not a measured result. In rendering workflows, the 3.072 TFLOPS will handle basic 1080p encodes and light 3D scenes, but anything complex will be painfully slow.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks are extensive and tell a consistent story. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 23794, with a single-core score of 3359. The R20 scores are 9993 multi-core and 1410 single-core. The R15 scores are 2398 multi-core and 338 single-core. These numbers place the Ryzen 7 5800XT firmly in the upper tier of desktop processors, just behind the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H (deltaPct 0) and AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (deltaPct -0.3), and slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X (deltaPct 0.6). The Passmark multi-thread score of 28053, single-thread score of 3535, and physics score of 1355 reinforce this position.

The GPU has no benchmark scores, so the combined picture relies on the CPU’s strength. The CPU’s 3DMark max-thread score of 7680 is nearly identical to the 16-thread score of 7683, indicating the processor is fully utilized at 16 threads with no hyperthreading overhead. The 8-thread score of 6141 shows good scaling, and the 4-thread score of 3603 indicates solid per-core performance. The single-thread score of 959 is the weakest relative number, but still competitive for a Zen 3 part.

The combined percentile of 66 reflects the CPU’s high position weighted against the GPU’s mediocre one. In practical terms, this system will excel at CPU-heavy tasks like compilation, spreadsheet analysis, and video encoding (if the GPU is not involved), but will fall short in any GPU-accelerated application. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 29879 is nearly identical to the Ryzen 7 7840H (29868), confirming it is a top-tier part for its socket.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need a powerful CPU for productivity but have minimal graphics demands. Gamers at 1080p playing esports titles like CS:GO or League of Legends will get acceptable performance, but the 4 GB VRAM and 3.072 TFLOPS will limit settings to medium or low in modern AAA games. Content creators working with CPU-based rendering (e.g., handbrake encodes, Photoshop filters) will see excellent performance from the 8-core/16-thread CPU, but GPU-accelerated effects in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will be sluggish.

Software developers will benefit most from this pairing. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23794 translates to fast compilation times, and the Passmark data compression score of 352002 indicates strong archiving and build tool performance. Students working with code, spreadsheets, and web browsers will never notice the GPU limitation. Small business workstations running accounting software, database queries, or office suites will find the CPU overkill but the GPU adequate for 2D displays.

This is not a build for 3D artists or video editors working with heavy timelines. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM will fail on 4K timelines or complex Blender scenes. However, for a developer who games lightly on the side, or a data analyst who needs fast number crunching, the Ryzen 7 5800XT provides the compute while the Arc A350 handles basic display output. The production status of the GPU is end-of-life, so buyers should consider this a stopgap or secondary system component.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU can push high framerates in CPU-bound titles, but the GPU caps performance. Expect 60+ FPS in esports at 1080p low settings, but the 124.0 GB/s bandwidth and 4 GB VRAM will cause stutters in modern titles with high-resolution textures.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 threads can handle x264 encoding at reasonable presets, but the GPU has no dedicated encoder performance data in the pack. Use CPU encoding (NVENC is not available); the Cinebench R23 score of 23794 suggests adequate headroom for 1080p60 streams.

Video editing: CPU-based rendering is strong, but GPU-accelerated effects will struggle. The 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance is sufficient for basic color grading and 1080p proxies, but 4K timelines will be slow. The 4 GB VRAM is the hard limit.

3D rendering: Poor. The Arc A350’s 6 RT cores and 3.072 TFLOPS are insufficient for Blender Cycles or Octane. CPU rendering in Blender (using the Ryzen 7 5800XT) is the only viable path, leveraging the 16 threads for final renders.

Software development: Excellent. The Passmark integer math score of 93942 and multi-thread score of 28053 mean fast builds and test runs. The CPU’s 32 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases. The GPU is irrelevant for this workload.

Student and office work: Overkill CPU, adequate GPU. The single-thread score of 3535 handles spreadsheets and browsers smoothly. The 25 W GPU TDP keeps power low, and the 200 W PSU requirement means this system is cheap to run.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All FPS figures below are estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not measurements. The GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest that at 1080p ultra settings, modern AAA games will run between 20-35 FPS. Esports titles like Valorant or Counter-Strike 2, which are CPU-bound, may reach 60-90 FPS at low settings. At 1440p, expect sub-30 FPS in most games due to the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus. The CPU will not be the limiting factor in any gaming scenario; the GPU’s pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s is the bottleneck.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Arc A350 capable of ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 6 dedicated RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), but with only 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, ray tracing performance will be very low. Expect to disable RT for playable framerates in supported titles.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5800XT compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 29879, virtually identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H (29868, deltaPct 0) and AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (29955, deltaPct -0.3). It is 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X (29713).

Q: Can this system handle 4K video editing?

A: The CPU can handle 4K processing in software, but the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will cripple GPU-accelerated effects. Stick to 1080p timelines or use CPU-only rendering workflows.

Q: What is the CPU’s launch MSRP?

A: The launch MSRP is $249.

Q: Is the GPU upgradeable?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket AM4 with PCIe Gen 4 (20 lanes), and the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The GPU is end-of-life, but the slot is standard, so a different card can be installed. No measured FPS data exists for this pairing.

Q: What memory does this CPU support?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800XT supports DDR4 dual-channel memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. ECC memory is supported.

Q: How many cores and threads does the CPU have?

A: The CPU has 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 3 (Vermeer) architecture on a 7 nm TSMC process.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing an AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT CPU with an Intel Arc A350 GPU. The CPU is a high-end 8-core/16-thread part based on Zen 3 (Vermeer), manufactured on TSMC’s 7 nm process with 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die. The GPU is an entry-level Alchemist (Arc 3) part on TSMC’s 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The combined percentile is 66, but this is heavily skewed by the CPU’s 81st percentile position; the GPU sits at the 50th percentile. The CPU has a 105 W TDP, while the GPU has a 25 W TDP, making this a low-power GPU paired with a mid-range power CPU. The system is best described as a productivity workstation with basic graphics capability.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT is a desktop processor from the 5000 series, released on July 30, 2024. It has 8 cores and 16 threads with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The cache hierarchy is 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 32 MB shared L3. It uses DDR4 memory in dual-channel mode with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s and supports ECC. The CPU is unlocked (multiplier unlocked) and has a TDP of 105 W.

In benchmarks, the CPU shows strong multithreaded performance: Cinebench R23 multi-core is 23794, R20 multi-core is 9993, and R15 multi-core is 2398. Single-core scores are 3359 (R23), 1410 (R20), and 338 (R15). The Passmark suite confirms this with a multi-thread score of 28053, single-thread score of 3535, and notable results in data compression (352002), integer math (93942), and floating point math (53808). The 3DMark tests show scaling from 959 (single-thread) to 7683 (16-thread), indicating excellent multi-core utilization.

The CPU’s percentile of 81 versus all CPUs places it in the top quintile, and its average benchmark score of 29879 is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H (29868). The nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS at 29955, which is 0.3% faster. This CPU is a capable workhorse for any CPU-bound task, but in this build, its potential is untapped in graphics workloads due to the weak GPU. The 32 MB L3 cache and 7 nm process give it an efficiency advantage, and the 4.80 GHz boost clock ensures snappy single-thread response for everyday tasks. For users who prioritize CPU compute over graphics, this is a strong foundation.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT + Intel Arc A350

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT

Intel Arc A350

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds