SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT

29,879 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

26,011 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT form a coherent desktop pairing that delivers strong 1080p and 1440p gaming performance, with the CPU providing excellent multi-threaded throughput for productivity. The combination sits at the 76th percentile overall, indicating a well-balanced system that outperforms the majority of tested configurations. Benchmark data confirms the CPU’s standing at the 81st percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 71st percentile among all graphics cards, making the CPU the stronger component relative to its peers.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer, and fabricated on TSMC’s 7 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, drawing a 105 W TDP. The chip integrates 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die, with a cache hierarchy comprising 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 pool. This is a desktop-class part with an unlocked multiplier, allowing for user overclocking, and it supports DDR4 memory through a dual-channel interface with a theoretical bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, including ECC memory support.

Benchmark results show the 5800XT’s multi-threaded capabilities are its primary strength. In Cinebench R23, it scores 23,794 points in multi-core and 3,359 points in single-core. The Cinebench R20 results echo this pattern with 9,993 multi-core and 1,410 single-core scores. PassMark’s multi-thread test yields 28,053 points, while single-thread performance is 3,535 points. The 3DMark suite shows strong scaling from 1,879 points with 2 threads to 7,680 points with maximum threads, demonstrating that the processor efficiently utilizes all 16 threads. The 8-thread score of 6,141 points indicates that even with half the threads active, performance remains substantial, which is relevant for games that primarily use fewer cores.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 29,879, placing it at the 81st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H with an average score of 29,868 (a 0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and Ryzen 7 7840HS both at 29,955 (a -0.3% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X at 29,713 (a 0.6% delta). These deltas are marginal, meaning the 5800XT performs essentially on par with these mobile and desktop alternatives, despite being a last-generation architecture. For real workloads, this means the 5800XT handles video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease, as evidenced by the PassMark data compression score of 352,002 and floating-point math score of 53,808. The integer math score of 93,942 further underscores its capability in general-purpose computing tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 7 5800XT uses the AMD Socket AM4 platform, which is a mature ecosystem. It supports dual-channel DDR4 memory, with ECC support available, and offers PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. This provides a solid foundation for current storage and graphics solutions. The platform’s memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s is adequate for the CPU’s needs, and while newer platforms offer faster memory, the performance difference in most applications is modest.

The system’s power requirements are straightforward. The CPU has a 105 W TDP, and the GPU has a 250 W TDP, with the manufacturer recommending a 600 W power supply for the whole system. The GPU requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector, which is a common configuration for mid-range cards. The suggested PSU wattage provides headroom for the combined load of the CPU and GPU, along with other system components, without being excessive.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests that the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, being at the 81st percentile versus the GPU’s 71st percentile. Therefore, the most impactful upgrade path would be to replace the GPU with a higher-tier model to better match the CPU’s capabilities, particularly for higher resolutions. Conversely, upgrading the CPU would yield diminishing returns in gaming scenarios where the GPU is already the limiting factor. The AM4 socket supports newer Ryzen 5000 series parts, but the 5800XT is already near the top of that lineup, so a CPU upgrade would likely require a platform change to AM5, which would also necessitate new memory. The existing platform with PCIe Gen 4 support is not a bottleneck for the current GPU, which uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined system percentile is 76, with the CPU at 81 and the GPU at 71, indicating that the GPU is the more likely bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads. This is a typical configuration for a gaming system where the graphics card is the primary determinant of frame rates. The average FPS across all tested games is 128.3, and the pair ranks 1,664 out of 3,732 pairs, placing it in the 55th percentile of all CPU-GPU combinations by FPS.

The bottleneck shifts depending on the resolution. At 1920x1080, the CPU is more likely to be the limiting factor in lighter titles. For example, in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, the system achieves 432.7 FPS, and in Valorant, it reaches 443.3 FPS. These high frame rates suggest the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU adequately, but the GPU’s performance ceiling is not being fully tested. At 2560x1440 and 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, as seen in Cyberpunk 2077 where the frame rate drops from 57.6 FPS at 1080p to 44.2 FPS at 1440p and 30.8 FPS at 4K. This scaling pattern is consistent with a GPU that has 12 GB of VRAM and a 192-bit memory bus, which is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p but struggles at 4K in demanding titles.

The CPU’s single-thread performance is strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,359 and a 3DMark single-thread score of 959. This ensures that games with heavy physics or AI calculations, like Microsoft Flight Simulator (72.5 FPS at 1080p), run smoothly without the CPU being a significant hindrance. The PassMark physics score of 1,355 further confirms the CPU’s ability to handle simulation workloads. Overall, the system is balanced for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where the GPU and CPU complement each other, but at 4K, the GPU’s limitations are exposed.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of gaming performance across three resolutions: 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160. All figures are measured, not estimated, ensuring accuracy.

At 1920x1080, the system excels in esports and lighter titles. Valorant leads with 443.3 FPS, followed by Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 432.7 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege X at 232.9 FPS. These results are well above the 144 Hz threshold for high-refresh monitors. In more demanding AAA games, the system still delivers playable frame rates: Call of Duty: Warzone hits 137 FPS, Assetto Corsa reaches 118.7 FPS, and Fortnite runs at 93.4 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 is a heavier load, yielding 57.6 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for high-refresh gaming. The system also handles sandbox titles well, with Minecraft achieving 192 FPS and Roblox at 252 FPS.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong for most games. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 132.2 FPS, Call of Duty: Warzone at 122 FPS, and Assetto Corsa at 84.2 FPS. Esports titles like Valorant still hit 380.1 FPS, ensuring smooth competitive play. However, demanding titles show a noticeable drop: Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 44.2 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 40.3 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 20.7 FPS. These are playable but may require settings adjustments for smoother gameplay. The average FPS across all games at this resolution would be lower than at 1080p, but the system is capable of driving most titles at high settings.

At 3840x2160, the GPU’s limitations are evident. Only lighter titles maintain high frame rates: Valorant reaches 303.1 FPS, Roblox at 95 FPS, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 173.9 FPS. Most AAA games fall below 60 FPS, with Call of Duty: Warzone being an exception at 104 FPS, likely due to its scalability. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 30.8 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 27 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 11.6 FPS. These figures indicate that 4K gaming is not a viable option for this system without significant graphical compromises. The data clearly shows that the system is optimized for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K being a stretch goal.

Who Should Build It

This system is best suited for gamers who primarily play at 1920x1080 or 2560x1440 resolutions. The measured FPS data shows that the system can drive high-refresh monitors at these resolutions in most titles. For example, at 1080p, the system achieves over 100 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone, Counter-Strike 2, and Assetto Corsa, making it ideal for competitive gamers. At 1440p, it still delivers over 100 FPS in less demanding titles like Valorant and Rainbow Six Siege, but AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 will require a 60 Hz monitor or settings adjustments.

Content creators and developers will also find value in this system. The CPU’s multi-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,794, is well-suited for video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The PassMark data compression score of 352,002 indicates efficient handling of archive operations, while the floating-point math score of 53,808 supports scientific and engineering applications. The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and 1440p video editing and light 3D work, though professionals requiring higher resolutions may need more VRAM.

Students and small business workstations would benefit from the system’s balanced performance. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3,535 in PassMark ensures responsive everyday use, while the GPU can handle light gaming and graphics tasks. The system’s power requirements, with a 600 W suggested PSU, are manageable for most office environments. However, the GPU’s end-of-life production status may be a concern for those seeking long-term warranty support.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The system excels at 1080p with measured frame rates exceeding 200 FPS in esports titles like Valorant (443.3 FPS) and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (432.7 FPS). At 1440p, it still maintains over 100 FPS in many competitive games, making it suitable for 144 Hz monitors. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 959) ensures minimal bottlenecking in these scenarios.

Streaming: The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23,794 suggests that the CPU can handle game capture and encoding simultaneously without significant frame drops, although dedicated streamers may prefer a separate capture card for optimal quality.

Video editing: The CPU’s multi-threaded performance is adequate for 1080p and 1440p video editing. PassMark’s integer math score of 93,942 and data encryption score of 21,461 indicate strong processing power for rendering and exporting. The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM supports hardware acceleration in editing software, though 4K editing may be sluggish given the GPU’s performance at that resolution.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9,993 places it in a good position for CPU-based rendering. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 13.31 TFLOPS, with 40 ray tracing cores, supports GPU-accelerated rendering in applications that use RDNA 2.0 features. The system can handle architectural visualization and product design, but professional studios may require more powerful hardware.

Software development: The CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities are ideal for compiling large codebases. The PassMark multi-thread score of 28,053 and floating-point math score of 53,808 indicate strong performance for build processes. The 32 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency, benefiting performance in interpreted languages and virtual machines.

Student and office work: The system is overkill for basic tasks but provides a smooth experience. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3,535 in PassMark ensures snappy application loading, while the GPU can handle occasional gaming or graphics projects. The ECC memory support is a bonus for data integrity in research and financial applications.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with the Navi 22 chip, fabricated on TSMC’s 7 nm process. It contains 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² die, with a transistor density of 51.3 million per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 2150 MHz, a game clock of 2495 MHz, and a boost clock of 2600 MHz. The memory runs at 2250 MHz or 18 Gbps effective, providing 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s.

The GPU has 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. It includes 40 ray tracing cores, supporting hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The pixel rate is 166.4 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 416.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 13.31 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 26.62 TFLOPS (2:1). The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs. It has a 250 W TDP and requires a 600 W power supply, with one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector. The card is dual-slot, measuring 267 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, with display outputs including 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Benchmark scores show the GPU’s strengths. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2,548 points. Geekbench results are 137,249 in Metal, 16,360 in OpenCL, and 98,089 in Vulkan. PassMark’s G3D score is 20,700, with a GPU compute score of 9,550. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 26,011, placing it at the 71st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R9 M395X (average score 25,891, 0.5% delta), AMD FirePro W7100 (25,856, 0.6% delta), AMD FirePro D700 (25,842, 0.7% delta), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile (25,740, 1.1% delta). These deltas are small, indicating that the RX 6750 XT performs similarly to these older or mobile parts in synthetic benchmarks, although its real-world gaming performance is better suited to modern titles.

For rendering, the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for most 1080p and 1440p textures. The ray tracing cores enable effects in supported games, but the performance is not top-tier, as seen in Cyberpunk 2077’s 44.2 FPS at 1440p with ultra settings. The FP32 performance is adequate for GPU rendering in Blender and similar software, though professionals may prefer a higher-end card.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the GPU’s VRAM capacity and memory type?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus.

Q: What is the system’s combined percentile ranking?

A: The combined system percentile is 76, with the CPU at 81 and the GPU at 71.

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games?

A: The average FPS across all games is 128.3, with the pair ranking 1,664 out of 3,732 pairs.

Q: What is the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score?

A: The CPU scores 23,794 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Q: What is the GPU’s FP32 performance?

A: The GPU delivers 13.31 TFLOPS of FP32 performance.

Q: What is the recommended power supply wattage?

A: The suggested PSU for the system is 600 W.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket and memory support?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket AM4 and supports DDR4 memory with ECC capability.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 29,879, placing it at the 81st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H with a score of 29,868, a delta of 0%, indicating identical performance. The AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and Ryzen 7 7840HS both score 29,955, with a -0.3% delta, meaning the 5800XT is slightly slower. The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X scores 29,713, a 0.6% delta, indicating the 5800XT is slightly faster. These results show that the 5800XT is competitive with newer mobile and desktop parts, despite being a 2024 release based on older Zen 3 architecture.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 26,011, placing it at the 71st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon R9 M395X (25,891, 0.5% delta), AMD FirePro W7100 (25,856, 0.6% delta), AMD FirePro D700 (25,842, 0.7% delta), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile (25,740, 1.1% delta). The positive deltas mean the RX 6750 XT is slightly faster than these parts in average benchmark scores, but the differences are within a percentage point, suggesting similar synthetic performance.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. The CPU’s 81st percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 71st percentile suggests that for CPU-bound tasks, the system performs above average, while for GPU-bound tasks, it performs slightly above average. The measured FPS data confirms this, with high frame rates in CPU-light titles and lower frame rates in GPU-heavy titles at higher resolutions. The system’s overall percentile of 76 indicates a well-rounded configuration that is better than most, but not exceptional. The pair’s FPS rank of 1,664 out of 3,732 places it in the 55th percentile, meaning it outperforms more than half of all tested CPU-GPU pairs but is outclassed by many high-end configurations. The data suggests that for 1080p and 1440p gaming, this is a capable system, but for 4K or maximum settings in the most demanding titles, users will need to adjust expectations or upgrade the GPU.