SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

76%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS

4,827 Benchmark Score

Top 24% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS and Intel Arc A370M form a laptop pairing that targets a specific middle ground in mobile computing. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 3 part from the 5000 series, built on TSMC’s 7 nm process, while the GPU is Intel’s entry-level Alchemist discrete graphics chip. This combination sits at the 67th percentile overall among all tested system pairings, indicating a configuration that is above average but not at the top of the performance stack. The CPU alone ranks at the 59th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks higher at the 74th percentile, suggesting the graphics side is comparatively stronger relative to its own field. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussion in this analysis is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay testing.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS is a mobile processor with 8 cores and 16 threads, running at a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. It belongs to the 5000 series and uses the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Cezanne, fabricated on a 7 nm process by TSMC. The chip contains 10,700 million transistors on a die size of 180 mm². Its cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a 35 W TDP part, designed for thin-and-light laptops that still need substantial multi-threaded horsepower.

Benchmark results show a strong single-core performer. In Cinebench R15, the CPU scores 237 points in single-core and 1682 in multi-core. Cinebench R20 delivers 989 single-core and 7009 multi-core, while Cinebench R23 shows 2356 single-core and 16690 multi-core. These numbers place the 5800HS at an average benchmark score of 4827, which is effectively neck-and-neck with its nearest rivals. The AMD Ryzen 7 4700GE scores 4836, just 0.2% higher, while the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X scores 4807, which is 0.4% lower. The Intel Xeon E-2386G is 0.6% behind at 4799, and the Intel Core i5-1350P trails by 1.1% with 4776. This means the 5800HS is virtually identical in aggregate performance to a desktop-class Ryzen 9 from the previous generation, despite being a 35 W mobile part.

For real workloads, the 8-core/16-thread configuration with a 4.40 GHz boost clock handles multi-threaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and code compilation with ease. The single-core score of 2356 in Cinebench R23 indicates snappy responsiveness in everyday applications and lightly threaded software. The L3 cache of 16 MB is shared across all cores, which helps reduce latency in workloads that access the same data repeatedly. The architecture is Zen 3, which brought a significant IPC improvement over its predecessor, and the 7 nm process keeps power draw manageable within the 35 W envelope. This is a CPU that can sustain productivity workloads on battery without thermal throttling, making it suitable for mobile professionals.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS uses the AMD Socket FP6, which is a BGA-style socket that is soldered to the motherboard. This means the CPU itself is not upgradeable in a traditional sense; it is permanently attached to the laptop logic board. Memory support is limited to DDR4, running on a dual-channel bus with a theoretical bandwidth of 68.3 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported. The platform provides PCIe Gen 3 connectivity, which is one generation behind the newer PCIe Gen 4 standard found in more recent platforms. The integrated graphics are Radeon Vega 8, which serves as a fallback when the discrete GPU is not in use or for basic display output.

The GPU, Intel Arc A370M, connects via a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is faster than the CPU’s PCIe Gen 3. This creates an interesting mismatch: the CPU can only provide PCIe Gen 3 lanes, so the GPU will run at PCIe Gen 3 speeds despite being designed for Gen 4. In practice, this bandwidth difference is unlikely to be a bottleneck for a 4 GB GPU with a 64-bit memory bus, but it does cap the theoretical transfer rate. The suggested PSU is not specified in the data, but the CPU and GPU both have a 35 W TDP, so the combined thermal budget is 70 W for the two primary processors. This is a modest figure that allows for a relatively small power adapter and efficient cooling solution in a laptop chassis.

A sensible next upgrade path on this platform is limited. Since the CPU is soldered and the platform is tied to the FP6 socket, there is no option to swap in a higher-tier processor without changing the entire motherboard. The GPU is also integrated into the system board, so it cannot be replaced. The most meaningful upgrade would be increasing system memory from a single-channel to dual-channel configuration if not already done, and ensuring the SSD is a fast PCIe Gen 3 NVMe drive. Beyond that, the platform is what it is — a fixed mobile solution. Users looking for more performance would need to move to a newer laptop with a newer socket and a more recent CPU generation.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS and Intel Arc A370M combination has a combined percentile of 67, meaning it outperforms roughly two-thirds of all tested laptop pairings. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 4827, which places it at the 59th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 29175, placing it at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. This discrepancy is notable: the GPU is significantly stronger relative to its peers than the CPU is relative to its own peers.

Looking at the CPU’s nearest rivals, the performance is tightly clustered. The AMD Ryzen 7 4700GE scores 4836, a delta of -0.2% from the 5800HS, meaning the 5800HS is essentially tied with it. The AMD Ryzen 9 3950X, a desktop flagship with 16 cores, scores 4807, which is 0.4% lower. The Intel Xeon E-2386G scores 4799, 0.6% lower, and the Intel Core i5-1350P scores 4776, 1.1% lower. This indicates that the 5800HS delivers performance on par with a high-end desktop CPU from a few years ago, despite its mobile form factor and lower TDP.

For the GPU, the Intel Arc A370M’s nearest rivals are similarly close. The AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH scores 29197, just 0.1% higher, while the AMD FirePro W8000 scores 29211, also 0.1% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 470 scores 28996, which is 0.6% lower, and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M scores 28874, which is 1.0% lower. The fact that the A370M is within 1% of an RX 6800M in these aggregate benchmarks is surprising, given that the RX 6800M is a high-end mobile GPU. However, these scores are based on compute-oriented tests (Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan) that may not fully represent gaming performance. The A370M’s average score of 29175 is derived from a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 28673.

The combined picture is a system where the GPU is the stronger component relative to its competition, while the CPU is competent but not exceptional. In workloads that rely heavily on the GPU, this system will punch above its weight class. In CPU-bound tasks, it will perform at a level consistent with a mid-range desktop CPU from 2020.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU-GPU combination. There are no entries in the measuredFpsUltraByGame field, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores, not direct gameplay measurements. The GPU’s Geekbench scores of 29676 (OpenCL) and 28673 (Vulkan) provide a basis for these estimates, but they are compute benchmarks and do not directly translate to in-game FPS.

Based on the GPU’s 74th percentile ranking and its proximity to the AMD Radeon RX 470 (which scores 0.6% lower), the Arc A370M is likely capable of running esports titles at 1080p with high settings and achieving playable frame rates above 60 FPS. For more demanding AAA games, it would likely require lowering settings to medium or high to maintain smooth gameplay at 1080p. At 1440p, the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth would become limiting factors, and users would likely need to reduce settings to low or medium. At 4K, the GPU would struggle to maintain playable frame rates in most modern titles, given its 64-bit memory bus and relatively low bandwidth.

The CPU’s single-core performance, as measured by the Cinebench R23 score of 2356, is sufficient to avoid bottlenecking the GPU in most gaming scenarios. The 8-core/16-thread configuration also provides headroom for background tasks like streaming or voice chat while gaming. However, the PCIe Gen 3 connection between the CPU and GPU, while not a major bottleneck, does limit the theoretical data transfer rate compared to a PCIe Gen 4 setup. Overall, this system is best suited for 1080p gaming with medium-to-high settings, and users should not expect high-refresh-rate performance at 1440p or above.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who need a balance of CPU and GPU performance for a variety of tasks. The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16690, make it suitable for content creators who edit video, render 3D scenes, or compile large codebases. The single-core score of 2356 ensures that everyday tasks like web browsing, office applications, and software development run smoothly. The GPU’s 74th percentile ranking and 4 GB of VRAM support moderate gaming at 1080p and light GPU-accelerated workloads.

Gamers who primarily play at 1080p with medium-to-high settings will find this system adequate, though they should not expect to max out the latest AAA titles at high frame rates. Content creators working with video editing software that leverages GPU acceleration will benefit from the Arc A370M’s compute performance, as indicated by its Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676. Software developers will appreciate the fast compile times from the multi-core CPU, and students or small business workstations will find the combination of 8 cores and a discrete GPU sufficient for multitasking and occasional media creation. This is not a high-end gaming rig or a professional rendering workstation, but it is a versatile laptop for a broad range of users.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is based on the DG2-128 chip, using the Xe-HPG architecture from the Alchemist generation. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process by TSMC, with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU has a base clock of 1550 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). It features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation units, along with 8 ray tracing cores.

The pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 4.198 TFLOPS, while FP16 is 8.397 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it feature-complete for modern gaming APIs. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, though the CPU only provides PCIe Gen 3, limiting the effective bandwidth.

In benchmark terms, the GPU scores 29676 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28673 in Geekbench Vulkan, for an average of 29175. This places it at the 74th percentile, with its nearest rival being the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH at 29197 (0.1% lower). The 4 GB VRAM is a limitation for modern games that increasingly require 6 GB or more at higher resolutions, but for 1080p gaming with reduced textures, it is workable. The 8 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the relatively low FP32 throughput means ray tracing performance will be modest. For rendering tasks, the FP32 and FP16 performance is sufficient for entry-level 3D work, but not for professional-grade rendering.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 74th percentile ranking and 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest it can handle 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings, likely achieving frame rates in the 60-90 FPS range for esports titles. High-refresh 144 Hz monitors may be underutilized in demanding games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16690, provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The GPU also supports hardware encoding, which can offload the CPU. The combined TDP of 70 W keeps the system cool enough for sustained streaming sessions.

Video editing: The GPU’s OpenCL score of 29676 indicates strong compute performance for GPU-accelerated effects and rendering in software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The CPU’s multi-core score of 7009 in Cinebench R20 supports fast timeline scrubbing and export times.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 1682 and R23 score of 16690 make it capable of CPU-based rendering in Blender or similar software. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM limits the size of scenes that can be rendered on the GPU, but smaller scenes will benefit from the 8.397 TFLOPS FP16 performance.

Software development: The 8-core/16-thread CPU with a 4.40 GHz boost clock provides fast compilation times, as evidenced by its benchmark scores. The 16 MB L3 cache reduces latency for iterative builds, and the 35 W TDP allows for sustained performance on battery.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-core score of 2356 in Cinebench R23 ensures snappy performance in word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The integrated Radeon Vega 8 GPU provides a fallback for basic display tasks when the discrete GPU is idle, extending battery life.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 3 architecture with a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A370M have?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth and a boost clock of 2050 MHz.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU-GPU pair?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS and Intel Arc A370M combination has a combined percentile of 67, meaning it outperforms 67% of all tested laptop pairings.

Q: Does this system support PCIe Gen 4?

A: The GPU supports PCIe 4.0 x8, but the CPU only provides PCIe Gen 3, so the effective connection runs at Gen 3 speeds.

Q: What is the CPU’s performance relative to the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800HS has an average benchmark score of 4827, which is 0.4% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X’s score of 4807.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this system?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU’s FP32 performance?

A: The Intel Arc A370M delivers 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, with FP16 performance at 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance between the AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS and Intel Arc A370M is skewed toward the GPU. The GPU ranks at the 74th percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU ranks at the 59th percentile among all CPUs. This means that in GPU-intensive workloads like gaming, the GPU is the stronger component relative to its competition, while the CPU is merely average. In CPU-bound tasks like compilation or rendering, the CPU will be the limiting factor, but its 8-core/16-thread configuration ensures it is not a severe bottleneck.

The CPU’s benchmark scores are tightly clustered with its nearest rivals, with a maximum delta of only 1.1% from the Intel Core i5-1350P. This suggests that the CPU is well-balanced within its class. The GPU, however, shows a more interesting pattern: its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 6800M, which scores 1.0% lower despite being a high-end part. This indicates that the A370M, in compute benchmarks, punches above its weight class.

In gaming, the GPU is likely the bottleneck at higher resolutions due to its 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-core performance of 2356 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient to feed the GPU, so the GPU will be the primary limiter in most games. At lower resolutions or with reduced settings, the CPU may become the bottleneck if the GPU is not fully utilized. The combined TDP of 70 W (35 W CPU + 35 W GPU) means the system is power-constrained, so sustained performance in both CPU and GPU simultaneously will be limited by thermal and power headroom. Overall, the GPU is the more capable component, and users should expect GPU-bound performance in most gaming and graphics workloads.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS + Intel Arc A370M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds