SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5800 + Intel Arc A770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5800

27,535 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770

68,809 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 and Intel Arc A770 pairing represents a high-end desktop configuration built around a proven 8-core processor and a graphics card with substantial memory and compute resources. The data indicates a desktop-class system with a combined performance percentile of 85, placing it well above the majority of configurations in the database. This analysis draws exclusively from the provided benchmark figures to interpret what this pairing delivers for various workloads.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer. Built on TSMC's 7 nm process with 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die, this chip represents the mature generation of AMD's AM4 platform. The base clock is 3.40 GHz with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, and the processor operates within a 65 W TDP envelope, making it a notably power-efficient desktop part.

Benchmark results show a strong scaling pattern across thread counts. The 3DMark scores progress from 916 in single-thread to 1,795 in 2-thread, 3,443 in 4-thread, 5,692 in 8-thread, and 7,138 in max-thread tests. This near-linear scaling from 8 to 16 threads indicates the simultaneous multithreading implementation is effective, with the 8-thread score reaching approximately 80% of the max-thread result. The single-thread score of 916 suggests solid per-core performance for everyday responsiveness.

Cinebench results reinforce the multi-core capability. The R20 multicore score of 9,220 and R23 multicore score of 21,953 illustrate that this processor handles heavily threaded workloads with composure. The R23 single-core score of 3,099 indicates that lightly threaded tasks, such as general desktop usage and legacy applications, remain responsive. PassMark results further characterize the workload profile: integer math scores 92,843, floating-point math scores 51,588, and extended instructions score 21,297, showing robust ALU and FPU throughput.

The processor sits at the 79th percentile against all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 27,535. Its nearest rivals reveal a tightly contested performance tier. The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H scores 27,507, a delta of 0.1% ahead, while the Intel Core i5-12600K and AMD Ryzen 7 5700X both score 27,578, placing them 0.2% ahead. The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X scores 27,636, leading by 0.4%. These sub-1% deltas indicate that the Ryzen 7 5800 is effectively interchangeable with these competitors in aggregate performance, with differences that would be imperceptible in real-world use.

Memory support includes DDR4 with dual-channel configuration, providing 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory support is present, which broadens the appeal for workstation-adjacent tasks. The 32 MB shared L3 cache aids in reducing memory latency for frequently accessed data. The processor also features PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and expansion cards.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5800 compare to its closest rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800 has an average benchmark score of 27,535. The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H scores 27,507 (0.1% ahead), while the Intel Core i5-12600K and AMD Ryzen 7 5700X both score 27,578 (0.2% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X scores 27,636 (0.4% ahead). These differences are negligible.

Q: What is the memory configuration and bandwidth of this CPU?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800 supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, delivering 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth. It also supports ECC memory, which is useful for error-sensitive workloads.

Q: What is the power draw of the processor?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800 has a TDP of 65 W, which is relatively modest for an 8-core desktop processor. This low power envelope contributes to its efficiency.

Q: What PCIe capabilities does the CPU offer?

A: The processor provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU itself. This supports high-speed NVMe storage and modern graphics cards.

Q: How does the processor perform in multi-threaded workloads?

A: The Cinebench R23 multicore score is 21,953, and the 3DMark max-thread score is 7,138. These results indicate strong performance for rendering, compilation, and other parallel tasks.

Q: What is the process node and transistor count?

A: The CPU is fabricated on a 7 nm TSMC process with 4,150 million transistors. The die size is 74 mm².

Q: Is the processor multiplier unlocked?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking on compatible AM4 motherboards, though the base and boost clocks are already set at 3.40 GHz and 4.60 GHz.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and the `dataIsMeasured` flag is false. All frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components.

The Intel Arc A770's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,969 indicates strong rasterization performance. The GPU sits at the 90th percentile against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 68,809. Geekbench scores of 109,175 in OpenCL and 94,284 in Vulkan corroborate substantial compute throughput. The CPU's 3DMark scores suggest it can feed the GPU adequately: the 8-thread score of 5,692 and max-thread score of 7,138 show sufficient multi-core headroom for modern game engines.

Estimated gaming performance would be strong at 1080p and 1440p, with the 16 GB VRAM buffer providing ample capacity for high-resolution textures. At 4K, the GPU's 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 throughput would allow for playable frame rates in most titles, though the exact figures would vary by game. The CPU's single-thread score of 916 and R23 single-core score of 3,099 suggest that frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios would be consistent, though the 8-core architecture ensures that background tasks do not interfere with gaming performance.

Given the GPU's 90th percentile ranking, the system would likely deliver high frame rates in esports titles at maximum settings and maintain respectable performance in AAA games at high presets. The lack of measured data means these are directional estimates, not guaranteed results.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 85 for this pairing, coupled with the CPU at the 79th percentile and GPU at the 90th percentile, indicates a system where the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. The delta between the CPU and GPU percentiles suggests that in GPU-bound scenarios, the Arc A770 would be the limiting factor, which is typical for gaming at higher resolutions. Conversely, the CPU's lower percentile implies that in CPU-bound workloads, such as physics simulations or heavy game logic, the Ryzen 7 5800 would be the constraint.

The nearest rival deltas for the CPU are all under 0.5%, meaning the processor is not a performance outlier in either direction. This positions it as a dependable middleweight that pairs well with a high-end GPU. The GPU's nearest rivals show a wider spread: the NVIDIA CMP 90HX scores 69,000 (0.3% ahead), the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 scores 68,562 (0.4% behind), the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 scores 69,870 (1.5% ahead), and the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 scores 69,986 (1.7% ahead). The Arc A770 holds its ground within a tight band of professional and enthusiast cards.

The CPU's memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s is a potential bottleneck for the GPU in data-intensive scenarios, as the GPU itself has 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. However, for gaming, the 32 MB L3 cache mitigates some of this discrepancy by keeping frequently used data closer to the cores. The PCIe Gen 4 x16 interface for the GPU provides ample bandwidth for data transfer, so the interconnect is not a limiting factor. In practical terms, the system is well balanced for 1440p gaming, where the GPU is typically the primary constraint, while the CPU provides sufficient headroom for frame generation and streaming overhead.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 27,535, placing it at the 79th percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H at 27,507, a delta of 0.1%, which is statistically insignificant. The Intel Core i5-12600K and AMD Ryzen 7 5700X are both 0.2% ahead, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X is 0.4% ahead. This cluster indicates that the Ryzen 7 5800 delivers performance parity with these popular alternatives.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 68,809, placing it at the 90th percentile of all GPUs. The NVIDIA CMP 90HX is 0.3% ahead at 69,000, while the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 is 0.4% behind at 68,562. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 are 1.5% and 1.7% ahead, respectively. The Arc A770 is thus firmly in the upper echelon of graphics cards, trailing only specialized workstation and mining parts.

The combined picture shows a CPU that is solidly above average and a GPU that is near the top of its class. The combined percentile of 85 reflects this asymmetry. For tasks that leverage the GPU heavily, such as rendering or machine learning inference, this system would perform exceptionally well. For CPU-bound tasks, the performance is adequate but not spectacular, as evidenced by the tight clustering with mid-range rivals. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21,953 and the 3DMark max-thread score of 7,138 confirm the CPU's capability in multi-threaded scenarios, while the single-thread score of 916 shows it is not a weakness in lightly threaded work.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize GPU-accelerated workloads and high-resolution gaming. The GPU's 90th percentile ranking and 16 GB VRAM make it suitable for 1440p and 4K gaming, where texture quality and memory capacity are paramount. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,969 indicates strong DirectX 12 performance, which benefits modern game titles. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will find the GPU's OpenCL score of 109,175 useful for GPU-accelerated effects, while the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21,953 supports CPU-based rendering tasks.

Developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 8-core, 16-thread configuration, as the PassMark integer math score of 92,843 and data compression score of 316,429 indicate efficient parallel processing. Students and small business workstations would benefit from the ECC memory support, which enhances data integrity for long-running computations. The CPU's 79th percentile and the GPU's 90th percentile suggest that this system is overqualified for basic office tasks but excels in environments where computational density is required.

The low 65 W TDP of the CPU makes it an excellent choice for compact builds where thermal management is a concern. Gamers at 1440p would see the most balanced performance, as the system would rarely be bottlenecked by either component. For 4K gaming, the GPU would be the primary driver, and its 16 GB memory pool provides a future-proofing buffer for increasingly demanding textures.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM4 platform, which supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU allows for high-speed NVMe SSDs and expansion cards. The motherboard should be chosen based on the need for PCIe Gen 4 support, as older AM4 boards may only offer Gen 3. The memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s is fixed by the DDR4 standard, so the primary upgrade path for memory would be increasing capacity rather than bandwidth.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and requires a 550 W suggested PSU. The power connectors are 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin, so the PSU must have these available. The GPU has a TDP of 225 W, while the CPU has a TDP of 65 W, leaving substantial headroom for additional components. A sensible next upgrade would be a larger capacity SSD or additional storage, as the system's compute capabilities are already well matched. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, with a successor named Battlemage, so a future GPU upgrade would be the most impactful change, though the current Arc A770 remains competitive at the 90th percentile.

The platform's AM4 socket has been in use for several generations, meaning there is a wide selection of compatible coolers and motherboards. The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, though the 65 W TDP suggests the stock cooling solution would likely suffice for standard operation. For a more significant upgrade, moving to a higher-core-count AM4 processor would be possible, but the current 8-core configuration is already well balanced with the GPU.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 with the Intel Arc A770. The CPU is a 5000-series Zen 3 part with 8 cores and 16 threads, while the GPU is an Alchemist-generation Arc 7 part with 16 GB of memory. The combined percentile of 85 indicates that this system outperforms the vast majority of configurations in the database.

The CPU's 79th percentile and the GPU's 90th percentile place this build in the upper-middle to high-end tier. The system is not a flagship configuration, but it offers a compelling balance of multi-core processing and GPU computing power. The 65 W CPU TDP and 225 W GPU TDP suggest a total system draw that is manageable with a standard 550 W PSU, making this a practical choice for a high-performance desktop without exotic cooling requirements.

The pairing is slightly GPU-heavy, meaning that in mixed workloads, the GPU will often be the deciding factor in performance. For gaming, this is advantageous, as the Arc A770's 16 GB VRAM and high bandwidth provide a solid foundation for current and upcoming titles. For productivity, the CPU's 8 cores are sufficient for most tasks, though users with heavily threaded workloads may find the CPU to be the limiting factor relative to the GPU's capabilities.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770 is based on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-512 chip, fabricated on a 6 nm TSMC process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The transistor density is 53.4 million per mm². The GPU has 4,096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation units, providing a pixel rate of 307.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 614.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 19.66 TFLOPS, with FP16 reaching 39.32 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.

Memory consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed. The base clock is 2100 MHz with a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The GPU has 32 ray tracing cores, though tensor cores are not specified. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs.

The benchmark scores show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,969, which indicates strong performance in the latest DirectX 12 workloads. Geekbench OpenCL score of 109,175 and Vulkan score of 94,284 demonstrate substantial compute capability for general-purpose GPU tasks. The GPU sits at the 90th percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 68,809.

The nearest rivals are professional and specialized cards. The NVIDIA CMP 90HX scores 69,000, a 0.3% lead, while the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 scores 68,562, a 0.4% deficit. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 score 69,870 and 69,986, respectively, leading by 1.5% and 1.7%. This indicates the Arc A770 competes directly with high-end workstation cards, though it is positioned as a consumer product. For rendering workloads, the 16 GB VRAM and high bandwidth allow for large scenes and high-resolution textures, while the FP32 throughput supports compute-heavy tasks like simulation and video encoding. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, with the successor Battlemage expected to replace it, but the current performance remains competitive at the 90th percentile.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5800 + Intel Arc A770

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 5800

Intel Arc A770

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds