SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
98%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D

24,709 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

79,842 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 represents a striking combination of a last-generation platform with a current-generation flagship GPU. The benchmark data shows a desktop build that sits at the 85th combined percentile, with the CPU at the 77th percentile and the GPU at the 92nd percentile. This is a system where the graphics card is clearly the dominant component, but the 3D V-Cache equipped processor provides enough gaming muscle to keep up in most scenarios, even if its older architecture shows limitations in heavily threaded workloads.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is the defining feature of this build, and its specifications place it firmly in the enthusiast tier. It is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB202 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The GPU packs 21,760 shading units, 680 texture mapping units, and 176 ROPs, which are substantial figures that drive its raw rasterization power. The data shows a pixel rate of 423.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 1,636.8 GTexel/s, indicating its capability to fill frames at very high resolutions and detail levels.

Memory is a major strength of this GPU. It comes with 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s. This is a significant amount of memory bandwidth and capacity, which allows for high-resolution textures and large datasets without bottlenecking. The memory clock is listed at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed. For rendering workloads, this combination means the GPU is unlikely to be constrained by memory capacity or throughput, even in the most demanding 4K scenarios or when using large render scenes.

The core clock speeds are listed with a base of 2017 MHz and a boost of 2407 MHz. While these are high figures, the sheer number of cores is what drives the performance. The RT cores number 170, and the tensor cores number 680, which are critical for the GPU’s performance in ray-traced and AI-accelerated workloads. The FP32 performance is rated at 104.8 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 104.8 TFLOPS (1:1), showing a massive computational throughput for both standard and AI-related tasks.

Benchmark results confirm the GPU’s high standing. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test yielded a score of 18,355, which is a strong result for a modern GPU. In Geekbench compute tests, it scored 334,370 in OpenCL and 376,728 in Vulkan. The Passmark G3D score of 39,650 and GPU Compute score of 26,756 further illustrate its capabilities. The GPU holds the 92nd percentile among all GPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of its peers. Its average benchmark score is 79,842, which puts it just ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB, with a deltaPct of 0.3 percent, and 1.1 percent ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT. This data indicates that while the RTX 5090 is a top-tier consumer card, its average score is closely matched by some professional and mobile solutions in the database, though its feature set and memory capacity are distinct advantages.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU and GPU deliver very different benchmark profiles, which paints a picture of an imbalanced but effective system. The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D has an average benchmark score of 24,709. This places it at the 77th percentile of all CPUs, making it a strong performer. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D with an average score of 24,728, a deltaPct of -0.1 percent, showing they are statistically tied. It is also 0.5 percent behind the Intel Core i5-12450HX and 0.6 percent ahead of the Intel Core i5-11600.

The CPU’s multi-threaded scores are respectable. In Cinebench R23, it scored 22,366 in multi-core and 3,157 in single-core. Geekbench results show 11,086 in multi-core and 1,849 in single-core. These numbers position it as a capable processor for productivity, but they are not class-leading. The single-threaded score of 804 in 3DMark is notably lower, which can impact performance in lightly threaded tasks.

The GPU, as mentioned, is in a different class. With a 92nd percentile ranking and an average score of 79,842, it is a monster. The combined percentile for this build is 85, which reflects the high GPU score pulling up the overall average. The pair rank by FPS is 235 out of 3,861 pairs, with an average FPS across games of 202.6. This suggests that when the CPU is not the limiting factor, the system can achieve very high frame rates. The combined picture is one of a system that excels in GPU-bound tasks and can deliver exceptional gaming performance, but the CPU will be the bottleneck in CPU-heavy scenarios.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D is a desktop processor from the 5000 series, based on the Zen 3 architecture with the codename Vermeer. It is manufactured on a 7 nm process at TSMC, with 8,850 million transistors on a 74 mm² die. This is an 8-core, 16-thread processor with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.10 GHz. The TDP is rated at 105 W, and it is not multiplier unlocked, meaning overclocking is limited.

The key feature of this CPU is its 96 MB of shared L3 cache, which is the 3D V-Cache technology. This large cache is designed to reduce memory latency and improve gaming performance. The CPU supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory. It uses the AMD Socket AM4 and provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

Benchmark scores for the CPU show its strengths and weaknesses. The 3DMark results are revealing: 6,764 in the 16-thread test, 5,357 in the 8-thread test, and 6,755 in the max-thread test. The single-thread score is 804, and the 2-thread score is 1,575. This indicates that the CPU scales well with threads up to a point, but the single-thread performance is modest. In Passmark, the multithread score is 26,318, with strong results in integer math (81,257) and floating-point math (46,492). The data encryption score is 18,788, and the compression score is 307,237.

For real workloads, this CPU is a strong performer in gaming and moderately threaded applications. The large L3 cache helps in games that are sensitive to memory latency. However, for heavily threaded productivity tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, its 8 cores and 16 threads are adequate but not top-tier. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,366 is good, but it is behind newer 12- and 16-core processors. The single-core score of 3,157 is also modest, which means tasks that rely on single-thread performance, such as some older games or spreadsheet calculations, may not see the highest possible performance.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance analysis is clear: the GPU is the performance driver, and the CPU is the limiting factor in many scenarios. The GPU’s 92nd percentile and the CPU’s 77th percentile create a significant gap. In GPU-bound workloads, such as high-resolution gaming or rendering, the RTX 5090 will be fully utilized, and the CPU will be less of a factor. However, the data shows that this is not always the case.

Looking at the measured FPS at 1080p versus 4K provides evidence of this bottleneck. In a game like Counter-Strike 2, the FPS drops from 372.6 at 1920x1080 to 135.7 at 3840x2160. The high 1080p score suggests the CPU is able to feed the GPU enough frames. However, in a game like Ark: Survival Ascended, the 1080p score is 55.3, which is low for such a powerful GPU. This indicates that the CPU is severely limiting the frame rate, as the GPU is not being fully utilized even at lower resolutions. The 4K score of 18.8 is also very low, suggesting the game is not well-optimized and is heavily CPU-bound.

This pattern is seen in other games. In Cyberpunk 2077, the FPS at 1080p is 77.6, and at 4K it is 54.1. The relatively small drop from 1080p to 4K suggests that the CPU is the primary limiter at 1080p, and as resolution increases, the GPU starts to become more of a factor. In contrast, a game like Assetto Corsa shows a 1080p score of 186.8 and a 4K score of 94.2, indicating a more balanced scaling where the GPU becomes the bottleneck at higher resolutions. The data shows that the CPU will limit performance in less optimized or CPU-intensive games, particularly at lower resolutions. For games that are well-optimized and heavily multi-threaded, the system will perform much closer to the GPU’s potential.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The data provided is measured, with a `dataIsMeasured` flag set to true. The measured FPS at ultra settings across a wide range of games shows a system capable of high frame rates but with significant variability depending on the title. The average FPS across all tested games is 202.6, placing this pair at rank 235 out of 3,861. This average is inflated by very high scores in some titles, but the lows are also notable.

At 1920x1080, the system excels in esports and older titles. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 824.5 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X reaches 438.4 FPS. These are excellent results for high-refresh-rate monitors. More demanding modern titles show the CPU bottleneck. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 77.6 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 102.9 FPS. These are playable, but they do not reflect the full potential of the RTX 5090. The most demanding game tested, Ark: Survival Ascended, only manages 55.3 FPS, showing a clear CPU limitation.

At 2560x1440, the performance is generally smoother. The FPS scores are lower than 1080p but remain high. For example, Counter-Strike 2 runs at 243.5 FPS, and Fortnite at 114 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 71.2 FPS, and the CPU-bound Ark: Survival Ascended falls to 32.7 FPS. This resolution is a good balance for this pairing, as the GPU is more involved, but the CPU can still be a limiting factor in some games.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck in most cases. The RTX 5090’s power is evident, with games like Assetto Corsa hitting 94.2 FPS and Call of Duty: Warzone at 89 FPS. However, the CPU still restricts performance in some titles. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 54.1 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 drops to 46.5 FPS. The extremely demanding Ark: Survival Ascended runs at just 18.8 FPS. The data shows that for 4K gaming, this system is capable, but the CPU will prevent it from achieving the highest possible frame rates in the most demanding games.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build has a combined percentile of 85, meaning it performs better than 85 percent of all CPU and GPU pairs in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in terms of average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D has an average score of 24,709, which is 0.1 percent lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D, making them effectively tied in performance.

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games for this pairing?

A: The pair rank by FPS is 235 out of 3,861 pairs, with an average FPS across all tested games of 202.6.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 has a memory bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s, using 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus.

Q: Is the CPU's single-thread performance a limiting factor?

A: Yes, the CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score is 804, which is modest. This can limit performance in lightly threaded tasks and some games, as seen in the lower FPS in some titles.

Q: What is the CPU's L3 cache size?

A: The CPU has a 96 MB shared L3 cache, which is the 3D V-Cache feature designed to improve gaming performance by reducing memory latency.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 holds the 92nd percentile among all GPUs, indicating it is a top-tier performer.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This system is excellent for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, particularly in esports titles. The measured FPS shows Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 824.5 FPS and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X at 438.4 FPS at 1080p, making it ideal for 240Hz or faster monitors. Even at 1440p, these games maintain very high frame rates.

Streaming: The GPU is well-suited for streaming. With 680 tensor cores and a high FP16 performance of 104.8 TFLOPS, it can handle hardware encoding and AI-enhanced streaming features. The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads are sufficient for a game and encoding workload, though the modest single-thread performance might require adjusting in-game settings to maintain a stable stream.

Video Editing: The CPU and GPU combination is capable for video editing. The GPU’s high compute performance will accelerate effects and rendering, while the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,366 provides adequate processing power for timeline editing and export. The 32 GB of GPU memory is a major advantage for working with high-resolution footage and complex projects.

3D Rendering: In 3D rendering, the GPU is the workhorse. Its 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 32 GB of memory will dramatically accelerate renders. The CPU plays a supporting role, and its rendering performance, as shown by the Cinebench scores, is respectable but will not be the primary driver of performance in GPU-accelerated render engines.

Software Development: For software development, the CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads are adequate for compilation and running virtual machines. The Passmark multithread score of 26,318 indicates it can handle multi-threaded build processes. The GPU is overkill for this workload, but its presence does not hinder development tasks.

Student and Office Work: This system is vastly overqualified for student and office work. Tasks like word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing will be handled with ease by the CPU. The Passmark single-thread score of 2,970 ensures snappy responsiveness. The high power draw and cost of the GPU make this a less practical choice for this scenario.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that combines the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D, a 5000-series processor on the AM4 socket, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090, a GeForce 50-series GPU. The CPU is based on the Zen 3 architecture and features 8 cores and 16 threads. The GPU is based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and features 32 GB of GDDR7 memory. The build’s combined percentile of 85 places it in the upper tier of systems. The CPU is at the 77th percentile, and the GPU is at the 92nd percentile. This pairing is characterized by a very high-performance GPU that is paired with a mid-to-high-range CPU. The system is capable of excellent gaming performance, especially at lower resolutions, and is a powerhouse for GPU-accelerated workloads. The main limitation is the CPU’s performance in heavily threaded and single-threaded tasks, which can bottleneck the GPU in certain games and applications.

Who Should Build It

This system is for users who prioritize GPU performance above all else. It is ideal for gamers who play at 1440p or 4K with high refresh rates and want to max out graphical settings. The measured FPS data shows that it can deliver high frame rates in most titles at these resolutions, though it will struggle with the most CPU-intensive games. It is also a strong choice for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, and other GPU-accelerated applications. The 32 GB of VRAM and the GPU’s compute power make it a professional-grade tool. Software developers who work with large codebases and run virtual machines will find the CPU sufficient, and the GPU is a bonus. For students and small business workstations, this build is overkill and the cost is not justified by the performance in office applications. The target user is an enthusiast or professional who demands the absolute best in GPU performance and is willing to accept the CPU’s limitations in other areas.