SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
86%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D

24,709 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D and Intel Arc A750 form a desktop pairing that targets high-performance 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming, with a combined percentile rank of 72 against all other CPU and GPU combinations. The CPU sits in the 77th percentile for all processors, while the GPU lands in the 66th percentile for all graphics cards, indicating a system where the processor holds a slight edge over the graphics solution in raw benchmark hierarchy. This is a pairing built around the Ryzen 7 5700X3D’s exceptional cache-heavy gaming performance and the Arc A750’s substantial memory bandwidth, but the data shows a clear performance ceiling defined by the GPU in modern titles. Importantly, no measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all in-game performance discussions herein are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores and their relative percentiles.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-512 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 2050 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, with memory clocked at 2000 MHz for 16 Gbps effective speed. The memory subsystem is a defining feature: 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus delivers 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is a substantial figure that rivals higher-tier cards and supports high-resolution textures and compute workloads. The GPU contains 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 112 ROPs, with 28 dedicated ray tracing cores. The FP32 compute throughput is rated at 17.20 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 34.41 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio. Pixel fill rate is 268.8 GPixel/s and texture rate is 537.6 GTexel/s, indicating strong rasterization throughput for its class.

Benchmark results show the Arc A750 achieves a Passmark G3D score of 12534, which places it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score across all tests is 20582, placing it in a tight competitive cluster. The nearest rival data shows it is virtually tied with the Intel Arc B570 (deltaPct 0.1), marginally ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (deltaPct 0.2), and slightly behind the AMD Radeon R9 M390X (deltaPct -0.4) and NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (deltaPct 0.5). This suggests the Arc A750 sits in a performance tier roughly equivalent to a mobile RTX 3070, which is a strong result for a desktop card. For ray tracing, the 28 RT cores provide hardware acceleration, and the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern rendering APIs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 indicates solid performance in DX12 titles, while Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 98554 and 85631, respectively, demonstrate robust compute and API-agnostic performance. For rendering workloads, the combination of 512 GB/s bandwidth and 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 means the GPU can handle real-time viewport rendering and moderate offline rendering tasks, though the 8 GB VRAM will cap texture sizes in heavy 3D scenes.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmark data paints a picture of a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads while maintaining respectable single-thread performance. The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22366 and a single-core score of 3157. In Geekbench, it scores 11086 multi-core and 1849 single-core. The 3DMark scores scale predictably with thread count: 804 single-thread, 1575 for 2 threads, 3097 for 4 threads, 5357 for 8 threads, 6764 for 16 threads, and 6755 for max threads, showing near-linear scaling up to 8 threads before plateauing. Passmark results are equally strong, with a multi-thread score of 26318 and a single-thread score of 2970. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 24709, placing it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D at 24728 (deltaPct -0.1), the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX at 24822 (deltaPct -0.5), the Intel Core i5-12450HX at 24576 (deltaPct 0.5), and the Intel Core i5-11600 at 24563 (deltaPct 0.6). This indicates the 5700X3D is essentially at parity with a newer 6-core X3D part and a mobile 8-core Ryzen 9, while slightly ahead of the Intel options.

The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 12534 and average benchmark score of 20582 position it in the 66th percentile, which is lower than the CPU’s 77th percentile. This discrepancy is the core of the system’s balance: the CPU is capable of feeding more performance than the GPU can render in many scenarios. The combined percentile of 72 reflects this, showing that the overall system is stronger than the GPU alone but weaker than the CPU alone. For gaming at 1080p, the estimated FPS will be GPU-limited in most modern titles, meaning the CPU’s headroom will not translate to higher frame rates unless the game is CPU-bound or the resolution is lowered. At 1440p, the GPU becomes even more of a limiting factor, and at 4K, the Arc A750’s 8 GB VRAM and 17.20 TFLOPS will struggle to maintain playable frame rates in demanding titles. The CPU’s strong multi-thread scores suggest it will handle streaming, background tasks, and content creation without bottlenecking the GPU, but the GPU will cap the gaming experience.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D uses the AMD Socket AM4 platform, which is mature and well-supported. The CPU supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The platform offers PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for the Arc A750’s PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, ensuring full bandwidth for the GPU. The CPU has a TDP of 105 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 225 W, but the suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W, which is the relevant figure for system power planning. This 550 W suggestion leaves headroom for the CPU and other components, but a higher wattage PSU would be advisable for overclocking or adding peripherals, though the CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, limiting CPU overclocking. The GPU requires 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors, which is standard for its class.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests the GPU is the primary bottleneck. Upgrading the Arc A750 to a higher-tier GPU would better utilize the Ryzen 7 5700X3D’s capabilities, as the CPU’s 77th percentile ranking indicates it can drive a faster graphics card without becoming a limiting factor in most games. The CPU’s 96 MB of shared L3 cache is a significant asset for gaming, and its multi-thread performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core 22366) ensures it will remain relevant for years. The AM4 socket is at the end of its upgrade path, so a CPU upgrade would require a new motherboard, but for this pairing, the CPU is not the weak link. The GPU’s end-of-life production status means it is no longer in active production, but its performance remains competitive in its tier. For memory, the system supports DDR4, and while the memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s is modest by modern standards, it is sufficient for the CPU’s architecture. A practical upgrade path would be to replace the GPU with a more powerful model, keeping the CPU and platform intact, as the 550 W PSU suggestion provides a baseline for higher-power GPUs.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance tier of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile rank is 72, placing this system above the majority of all CPU and GPU combinations, with the CPU in the 77th percentile and the GPU in the 66th percentile.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5700X3D compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 24709, which is virtually identical to the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D at 24728 (deltaPct -0.1) and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX at 24822 (deltaPct -0.5), while slightly ahead of the Intel Core i5-12450HX at 24576 (deltaPct 0.5) and Intel Core i5-11600 at 24563 (deltaPct 0.6).

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Arc A750, and why does it matter?

A: The Arc A750 has 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth from 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus. This high bandwidth is critical for high-resolution textures and compute workloads, and it is a key reason the GPU performs well in the 66th percentile despite its 8 GB VRAM capacity.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific CPU and GPU combination?

A: No, the data contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All FPS discussions are estimates based on the individual CPU and GPU benchmark scores and their percentiles.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this system, and what does it indicate?

A: The suggested PSU for the Arc A750 is 550 W, which accounts for the GPU’s 225 W TDP and the CPU’s 105 W TDP. This leaves headroom for the rest of the system, but it is a baseline recommendation rather than a maximum.

Q: Does the Ryzen 7 5700X3D support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation and server platforms, adding to its appeal for professional workloads.

Q: How does the Arc A750’s ray tracing performance compare to its overall rasterization performance?

A: The GPU has 28 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, but its Passmark G3D score of 12534 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 suggest that ray tracing performance is secondary to its strong rasterization and compute capabilities.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data clearly identifies the Intel Arc A750 as the primary bottleneck in this pairing. The CPU’s 77th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 66th percentile means the processor has more headroom than the graphics card can utilize in most workloads. In gaming, this manifests as a GPU-limited scenario at 1080p and above, where the Arc A750’s 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 and 8 GB VRAM will cap frame rates before the CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads are fully taxed. The CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 6764 and max-thread score of 6755 show it can handle heavy multi-threaded loads, but the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 12534 is the limiting factor for frame generation. Conversely, in CPU-bound scenarios like competitive esports titles at low settings or in physics-heavy simulations, the CPU’s strength will shine, but the GPU will still set the ultimate frame rate ceiling.

The FPS scaling, estimated from benchmark scores, indicates that at 1080p, the system will deliver playable frame rates in most titles, but the GPU will prevent the CPU from reaching its full potential in high-refresh scenarios. At 1440p, the GPU’s bandwidth and compute are sufficient for medium-to-high settings, but the 8 GB VRAM will be a constraint in texture-heavy games. At 4K, the GPU is outclassed, and the CPU’s performance advantage becomes irrelevant. The Passmark data compression score of 307237 and encryption score of 18788 show the CPU excels at data-intensive tasks, but these are not gaming workloads. The GPU’s passmark GPU compute score of 5368 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554 indicate it can handle compute tasks, but the CPU’s multi-thread performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core 22366) will dominate in CPU-bound rendering scenarios. Overall, the system is balanced for 1080p gaming, but for users seeking higher resolutions or frame rates, the GPU is the component to upgrade first.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is best suited for gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh-rate play, where the Ryzen 7 5700X3D’s 96 MB L3 cache and strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 3157) shine, and the Arc A750’s 512 GB/s bandwidth ensures smooth frame pacing. The system is also a solid choice for content creators who work in video editing and photo processing, as the CPU’s Passmark multi-thread score of 26318 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22366 handle encoding and rendering, while the GPU’s compute capabilities (Geekbench OpenCL 98554) accelerate effects and exports. Software developers will benefit from the CPU’s data compression score of 307237 and encryption score of 18788, which indicate fast compilation and cryptographic workloads. Students and small business users building a workstation will find the CPU’s 77th percentile ranking and ECC memory support appealing for reliability, though the GPU may be overkill for office tasks. For 3D rendering, the GPU’s 28 RT cores and 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 are adequate for entry-level work, but the 8 GB VRAM limits scene complexity, making this a better fit for hobbyists than professionals. The system is not ideal for 4K gaming or high-end compute, where the GPU’s 66th percentile and 8 GB VRAM become significant limitations.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D is a desktop processor from the 5000 series, based on the Zen 3 architecture with the Vermeer codename. It is manufactured on a 7 nm process at TSMC with 8,850 million transistors on a 74 mm² die. The CPU has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.10 GHz. The TDP is 105 W, and it is not multiplier-unlocked, meaning overclocking is limited. The cache hierarchy is the defining feature: 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and a massive 96 MB shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache is the reason for the CPU’s strong gaming performance, as it reduces memory latency and improves data access patterns. Memory support is DDR4 in a dual-channel configuration with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM4 and offers PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results confirm the CPU’s strengths. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22366 and single-core score of 3157 show a balanced profile, with multi-thread performance that rivals newer 6-core parts. The Passmark multi-thread score of 26318 and single-thread score of 2970 reinforce this, while the data compression score of 307237 and encryption score of 18788 highlight its throughput in data-heavy tasks. The 3DMark thread scaling is nearly linear up to 8 threads (5357 at 8 threads versus 804 at 1 thread), indicating good multi-core utilization. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 24709 places it in the 77th percentile, and its nearest rivals are all within a 1% deltaPct, showing it is a well-rounded performer in its tier. For real workloads, the 96 MB L3 cache provides a significant advantage in gaming, where data locality is high, and the multi-thread scores indicate it can handle video encoding (Cinebench R23 multi-core 22366), software compilation (Passmark integer math 81257), and scientific computing (Passmark floating point math 46492). The single-thread performance is modest by modern standards (Geekbench single-core 1849), but it is sufficient for most applications, and the cache compensates in latency-sensitive tasks.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D CPU with the Intel Arc A750 GPU. The CPU is a high-performance 8-core/16-thread processor from AMD’s 5000 series, launched on 2024-01-07 with a launch MSRP of $249. The GPU is Intel’s Arc A750, from the Alchemist generation (Arc 7), launched on 2022-10-11 with a launch MSRP of 289 USD, and it is now end-of-life with a successor in Battlemage. The combined percentile rank is 72, indicating the system outperforms 72% of all CPU+GPU pairings in the database. The CPU’s 77th percentile and GPU’s 66th percentile show a system where the processor is the stronger component, and the overall tier is upper-mid-range for desktop systems. The pairing is designed for 1080p gaming and productivity, with the CPU’s large cache and the GPU’s high bandwidth working together to provide a smooth experience. The system’s estimated FPS performance, based on benchmark scores, is expected to be strong in esports and moderate in AAA titles at 1080p, with 1440p possible at reduced settings. The 8 GB VRAM is a limitation for future high-texture games, and the GPU’s end-of-life status means driver support may taper off, but the CPU’s AM4 platform and 96 MB cache ensure it remains a capable foundation for years.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the Ryzen 7 5700X3D’s 96 MB L3 cache and single-thread score of 3157 (Cinebench R23) will drive high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, while the Arc A750’s 512 GB/s bandwidth ensures the GPU keeps up. Estimated performance is strong for competitive shooters and MOBAs, but the GPU’s 66th percentile will cap frame rates in demanding AAA titles at lower settings.

Streaming: The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22366, can handle encoding while gaming, but the GPU’s 225 W TDP and 17.20 TFLOPS will be taxed by both rendering and encoding. The system can stream at 1080p, but the GPU will be the limiting factor in maintaining high FPS while broadcasting.

Video editing: The CPU’s Passmark multi-thread score of 26318 and data compression score of 307237 excel at timeline scrubbing and export encoding, while the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554 accelerates effects and color grading. This handles 1080p and some 1440p editing, but the 8 GB VRAM limits 4K timeline performance.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 28 RT cores and 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced renders, but the 8 GB VRAM caps scene complexity. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22366 will handle CPU-based rendering, making this suitable for small projects and hobbyist work, not professional production.

Software development: The CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 81257 and floating point math score of 46492 indicate fast compilation and scientific computation, while the GPU’s Vulkan 1.4 support enables compute shaders. The system is well-suited for coding, testing, and running virtual machines, with the CPU’s 77th percentile ensuring responsiveness.

Student and office work: The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 2970 (Passmark) and the GPU’s 2D score of 732 handle everyday tasks with ease. The system is overkill for word processing and spreadsheets, but it provides a smooth experience for multitasking, research, and light creative work, with the GPU offering headroom for occasional graphics tasks.