SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5700U + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

83%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5700U

18,176 Benchmark Score

Top 17% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700U and Intel Arc A370M form a laptop pairing that targets the upper-middle tier of mobile performance. The CPU, built on the Zen 2 architecture (codename Lucienne), is a 7 nm part from TSMC with 9,800 million transistors on a 156 mm² die. It offers 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 1800 MHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The GPU is Intel's Alchemist-generation Arc A370M, a 6 nm DG2-128 chip with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The combined 73rd percentile ranking across all laptop builds places this configuration in the upper third of mobile systems, though the data set contains no measured FPS results for this exact combination.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 7 5700U is a mobile processor designed for a 15 W TDP, which classifies it as an ultra-low-power part. Despite this modest power envelope, the 8-core/16-thread configuration provides substantial multi-threaded capability for its class. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 8650 points in multi-core and 1258 points in single-core. The multi-core result is particularly telling: it represents an 8-core part operating within a 15 W constraint, meaning sustained all-core workloads will benefit from the efficiency of the 7 nm process. The single-core score of 1258 indicates a maximum boost of 4.30 GHz that is typical for this architecture, though sustained single-thread performance may vary depending on thermal headroom.

The 3DMark thread scaling tests reveal the CPU's multi-threading behavior. The score progression from 1345 (2 threads) to 2357 (4 threads) to 3685 (8 threads) to 4330 (16 threads) shows that scaling is not linear. The jump from 8 to 16 threads yields only a 17.5% improvement (from 3685 to 4330), which suggests that the 15 W power limit constrains performance when all cores are active. This is a classic signature of a low-TDP mobile part: the core count is there for throughput, but the power budget limits how much of that throughput can be realized simultaneously. The 3dmark_max_threads score of 4331 is nearly identical to the 16-thread result, confirming that the CPU cannot extract additional performance beyond its 16 threads.

In Geekbench, the CPU scores 5323 multi-core and 1278 single-core. The PassMark suite provides additional context: multi-thread score of 15623, single-thread score of 2560, integer math at 60037, floating point math at 33151, and data compression at 218853. The data encryption score of 12549 and extended instructions score of 13519 indicate that the CPU handles AES-NI and other instruction extensions competently, which matters for workloads like VPNs or encrypted storage. The find prime numbers score of 29 is notably low, reflecting the lack of AVX-512 support in Zen 2, but this is rarely a bottleneck in mobile workloads.

The CPU sits at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 18176. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core i7-1365U (18177, 0% delta), Intel Core i7-9700 (18180, 0% delta), AMD Ryzen 3 8300G (18169, 0% delta), and Intel Core 5 315 (18188, -0.1% delta). This positioning means the 5700U is statistically indistinguishable from these parts in aggregate performance. The practical takeaway is that for a 15 W part, the 5700U delivers performance comparable to higher-TDP desktop parts like the i7-9700, which confirms the efficiency of the Zen 2 architecture at 7 nm.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. All FPS figures in this section are therefore estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components, not from direct testing of this pairing. Readers should treat these as directional expectations rather than verified results.

The Intel Arc A370M GPU scores 29676 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28673 in Geekbench Vulkan. These scores place it at the 74th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29175. The nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (29197, -0.1% delta), AMD FirePro W8000 (29211, -0.1% delta), AMD Radeon RX 470 (28996, 0.6% delta), and AMD Radeon RX 6800M (28874, 1% delta). The close clustering with the RX 470, a desktop GPU from 2016, suggests that the A370M offers roughly desktop GTX 1650-class performance in aggregate compute tasks.

For gaming, this translates to 1080p at medium-to-high settings for most modern titles. The 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus provides 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for 1080p but will become a limiting factor at higher resolutions or with texture-heavy games. The GPU has 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with a pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS is competitive for its class. The 8 ray-tracing cores provide hardware RT support, but the 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 rate means ray-traced workloads will be heavy; expect to use RT only at lower settings or with upscaling.

The CPU's single-thread score of 1258 in Cinebench R23 will not bottleneck the GPU in most games at 1080p, but the 15 W TDP means sustained gaming loads may cause the CPU to throttle, which could reduce frame rates in CPU-bound titles. For esports titles like CS, Valorant, or Rocket League, the pairing should deliver high frame rates at 1080p with competitive settings. For AAA games, expect 30-60 FPS at 1080p medium depending on the title. At 1440p, the 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth will likely cap performance, and the GPU's 74th percentile ranking suggests it is better suited to 1080p gaming than higher resolutions.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 18176, placing it at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs. The GPU's average benchmark score is 29175, placing it at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for this build is 73rd, which reflects a balanced pairing where neither component drastically outclasses the other. This is unusual in mobile systems, where one component often dominates the other.

Examining the CPU benchmarks in detail: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 8650 and single-core of 1258 show a ratio of 6.9:1, which is typical for an 8-core part. The Geekbench multi-core of 5323 and single-core of 1278 show a ratio of 4.2:1, which reflects the lower single-core score relative to the multi-core peak. The PassMark multi-thread score of 15623 versus single-thread of 2560 shows a ratio of 6.1:1. These ratios indicate that the CPU scales well with thread count but that individual core performance is modest, consistent with a 15 W mobile part boosting to 4.30 GHz.

The GPU benchmarks show a different pattern. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 is only 3.5% higher than the Vulkan score of 28673. This narrow gap suggests that the GPU's compute performance is consistent across APIs, with no major driver inefficiency in Vulkan. The GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, scores 29197, which is 0.1% lower. The fact that the A370M slightly edges out a Vega-based mobile GPU with higher power draw indicates the efficiency of the Xe-HPG architecture at 6 nm.

The combined picture is a system that performs at the 73rd percentile overall. For CPU-heavy tasks like compilation or video encoding, the 5700U will hold its own against much higher-TDP parts due to its core count. For GPU-heavy tasks like 3D rendering, the A370M provides respectable compute but will trail dedicated gaming GPUs that sit at higher percentiles. The balance is such that neither component will consistently be the bottleneck across all workloads; instead, it depends on the specific task.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is suitable for users who need a laptop that handles both productivity and light gaming without excelling at either. The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a 72nd percentile ranking, make it suitable for software developers who compile code, run virtual machines, or juggle multiple containerized services. The 15 W TDP means it can sustain these workloads on battery better than higher-TDP parts, which is a practical advantage for mobile developers.

Content creators who work with 1080p video editing will find the CPU's multi-core performance adequate for rendering timelines, while the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth can handle GPU-accelerated effects in programs like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The GPU's 74th percentile ranking places it above integrated graphics for CUDA-accelerated workloads, though it lacks the tensor cores found in NVIDIA parts, so AI-accelerated features will be slower.

Students and small business users who need a machine for office work, web browsing, and light multitasking will find this pairing more than sufficient. The CPU's single-thread score of 1258 in Cinebench R23 handles office applications with ease, and the GPU's compute capability is irrelevant for these tasks. The system's 73rd combined percentile means it outperforms the majority of laptops on the market, which is valuable for users who want headroom beyond basic tasks.

Gamers at 1080p who play at medium settings will find this pairing workable, but those expecting high refresh rates on AAA titles will be disappointed. The 4 GB VRAM limits texture quality, and the 112 GB/s bandwidth limits high-resolution rendering. Esports gamers who prioritize frame rates over visual fidelity will see good results, as the CPU's single-thread performance is adequate for games that rely on CPU physics and game logic.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP6, which is a mobile-specific BGA socket. This means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded in a traditional sense. The memory support is DDR4 with dual-channel configuration, providing 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a mature platform with no forward-looking upgrade path; users are effectively locked into the 5700U for the life of the laptop.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 and is also soldered, given the laptop build class. The GPU's TDP is 35 W, which is modest, and there is no suggested PSU listed because this is an integrated part of a portable device. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides sufficient bandwidth for the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s memory bandwidth, so there is no interface bottleneck.

A sensible next upgrade for a user with this system would be a complete platform change to a newer CPU and GPU generation. The 5700U's Zen 2 architecture is two generations behind the current Zen 4/5 parts, and the A370M is already marked as end-of-life in production status. Users who need more performance should look for laptops with newer CPUs that support DDR5 memory and PCIe 5.0, as the DDR4 and PCIe Gen 3 limitations of this platform will increasingly become bottlenecks.

The 15 W CPU TDP and 35 W GPU TDP mean the total system power draw is low, which is an advantage for battery life in a laptop. However, this also means there is no headroom for overclocking or performance tuning; the multiplier is locked, and the GPU has no additional power connectors. Users should treat this as a fixed-performance platform.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 74th percentile and the CPU's 72nd percentile suggest that 1080p gaming at high refresh rates is possible in esports titles. The CPU's single-thread score of 1258 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient for games like CS:GO or Valorant, but the 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth will cap frame rates in visually demanding games.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores provide enough headroom for x264 encoding at 1080p while gaming, but the 15 W TDP means sustained all-core load will throttle. The GPU lacks dedicated hardware encoders like NVIDIA's NVENC, so streaming will rely on the CPU, which may reduce gaming frame rates.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-core score of 8650 in Cinebench R23 handles 1080p timeline renders adequately. The GPU's 29676 OpenCL score accelerates effects and transitions, but the 4 GB VRAM limits working with 4K footage or complex compositions.

3D rendering: The GPU's FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS is modest for rendering workloads. The CPU's 16 threads will help with CPU-based renderers like Blender's Cycles, but the 15 W TDP limits sustained performance.

Software development: The CPU's 16 threads and PassMark multi-thread score of 15623 make compilation times reasonable for small-to-medium projects. The 8 MB L3 cache helps with repeated compilation patterns, and the 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for most development workloads.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 2560 in PassMark handles web browsers, office suites, and PDF viewers with ease. The system's 73rd combined percentile means it will remain responsive for years of typical student use, and the low TDP contributes to long battery life.

FAQ

Q: What is the socket and memory type for the Ryzen 7 5700U?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FP6, which is a mobile BGA socket. It supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A370M support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 8 dedicated ray-tracing cores. It also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. However, the FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS limits ray-tracing performance to lower settings.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 73rd across all laptop builds. The CPU sits at the 72nd percentile among CPUs, and the GPU sits at the 74th percentile among GPUs.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5700U compare to the Intel Core i7-1365U?

A: The two CPUs have nearly identical average benchmark scores: 18176 for the 5700U and 18177 for the i7-1365U, representing a 0% delta. They are statistically indistinguishable in aggregate performance.

Q: What is the GPU memory size and bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked. The CPU has a base clock of 1800 MHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz, but these are fixed limits. The 15 W TDP also leaves no thermal headroom for overclocking.

Q: What is the production status of the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A370M is listed as end-of-life. It was released on 2022-03-29, while the CPU was released on 2021-01-11 and remains active in production.

Build Overview

This is a laptop build (buildClass: laptop) that pairs an AMD Ryzen 7 5700U mobile processor with an Intel Arc A370M mobile GPU. The CPU is an 8-core/16-thread Zen 2 part on TSMC's 7 nm process, designed for a 15 W TDP. The GPU is an Intel Alchemist-generation Xe-HPG part on TSMC's 6 nm process, with a 35 W TDP, 4 GB GDDR6 VRAM, and 1024 shading units.

The combined performance percentile is 73rd, which places this system in the upper tier of laptop hardware. The CPU's 72nd percentile and the GPU's 74th percentile are closely aligned, indicating that this is a balanced configuration rather than one where a high-end CPU is paired with a weak GPU or vice versa. The GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, is 0.1% behind, while the CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-1365U, is exactly matched at 0% delta.

This pairing represents a mid-to-upper-tier mobile configuration that is well-suited for users who need a laptop for productivity, light gaming, and content creation. The low TDPs of both components suggest good battery life, which is a key advantage for mobile use. The system is not designed for high-refresh 1440p gaming or heavy 3D rendering, but it handles 1080p gaming at medium settings and multi-threaded productivity tasks competently.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between CPU and GPU is unusually even for a laptop. The CPU's average benchmark score of 18176 and the GPU's average benchmark score of 29175 correspond to percentiles of 72 and 74, respectively. This means that in aggregate, neither component is dramatically stronger than the other. The combined percentile of 73 confirms this equilibrium.

In CPU-bound workloads like compilation, data compression (PassMark score of 218853), or integer math (60037), the CPU will be the limiting factor, but the GPU will not interfere. The CPU's 16 threads provide sufficient parallelism for these tasks, and the 15 W TDP is the primary constraint on sustained performance. In GPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering or gaming, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth will be the bottleneck, particularly at higher resolutions or with larger textures.

The FPS scaling between the two components shows that the CPU's single-thread performance (1258 in Cinebench R23) is adequate to feed the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput in most games. However, the 15 W CPU TDP means that in CPU-intensive game scenes, the CPU may throttle, reducing frame rates. The GPU's 74th percentile is slightly higher than the CPU's 72nd, suggesting that the GPU is marginally the stronger component, but the difference is small enough that workloads will shift bottlenecks depending on their nature.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation, and uses the DG2-128 chip. It is manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². The GPU has 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with a base clock of 1550 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz.

The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, running at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a modest bandwidth figure that will limit performance in memory-intensive workloads. The GPU also has 8 ray-tracing cores, but no tensor cores are listed, meaning AI-accelerated features like DLSS equivalent technologies are not available.

In compute benchmarks, the GPU scores 29676 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28673 in Geekbench Vulkan. These scores place it at the 74th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29175. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, scores 29197, which is 0.1% lower. The GPU also closely matches the AMD FirePro W8000 (29211, -0.1% delta), a workstation part, and the AMD Radeon RX 470 (28996, 0.6% delta), a desktop GPU.

The pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s indicate that the GPU can handle 1080p rendering with moderate settings. The FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS is competitive for a 35 W mobile part, and the FP16 throughput of 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1) doubles the compute capability for workloads that support FP16. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 and is marked as end-of-life, meaning it is no longer in production.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM is the primary limitation. 3D scenes that require large texture sets or high-resolution geometry will exceed this capacity, forcing the system to use system memory over PCIe, which is slower. The 112 GB/s bandwidth also caps performance in scenes with high memory traffic. The GPU is best suited for 1080p rendering with moderate settings, where its compute throughput and ROP count can be fully utilized.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5700U + Intel Arc A370M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 7 5700U

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds