SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5700G + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5700G

27,051 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G and Intel Arc B570 pairing represents a curious blend of an older, highly capable APU with a modern, dedicated graphics card. The data reveals a system where the GPU is almost certainly the primary driver of gaming performance, but the CPU’s architecture and memory support create specific boundaries that define the overall experience.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data clearly indicates that the Intel Arc B570 is the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions. The CPU’s multi-threaded score of 6629 in 3dmark_16_threads and a PassMark multithread score of 24419 show a processor with substantial headroom for modern titles. However, the GPU’s performance, which places it at the 65th percentile of all GPUs, creates a clear ceiling. This is most evident in the FPS scaling across resolutions; for example, in Counter-Strike 2, the system delivers 133 FPS at 1080p, but this drops to 88 FPS at 1440p and 49 FPS at 4K. This steep decline points to the GPU being saturated as pixel count increases, rather than the CPU struggling to feed frames.

The CPU’s single-thread performance, with a 3dmark_single_thread score of 899, is sufficient to keep up with the GPU in most titles, but there are signs of potential imbalance in lighter, CPU-bound games. In Valorant, the system achieves 304 FPS at 1080p, which is exceptionally high, but the 1440p and 4K scores of 259 and 207 FPS respectively suggest that even at these high frame rates, the GPU is starting to become a constraint. The data suggests that for the vast majority of games, the Arc B570 is the bottleneck, but the Ryzen 7 5700G’s older Zen 3 architecture and DDR4 memory support may prevent the system from reaching the absolute highest frame rates possible with a newer, faster CPU. The system’s average FPS across all tested games is 86, which is a solid figure but not top-tier, reinforcing that the pair is balanced toward a mid-range 1080p and entry-level 1440p experience.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 27051, placing it at the 79th percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong showing for a processor released in 2021. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i9-9900K, which scores 27097, a negligible 0.2% difference. This puts the 5700G in the same performance class as a former flagship Intel chip, which is impressive for a processor with integrated graphics. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 20556, placing it at the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest competitor is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which scores 20534, a 0.1% difference, and the Intel Arc A750, which scores 20582, a -0.1% difference. This indicates that the B570 is a solid mid-range performer, matching the previous generation’s desktop and mobile offerings.

The combined percentile for this build is 72, which reflects a system that is well above average but not in the enthusiast tier. The data shows a CPU that outperforms its class and a GPU that is a competent mid-range part. The pair’s 3dmark steel nomad score of 2649 for the GPU is a specific DX12 measure, and when combined with the CPU’s strong multi-threaded scores, the overall picture is one of a balanced system that can handle a wide variety of tasks, from productivity to gaming, without a clear, crippling weakness in either component.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G is built on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Cezanne, and fabricated on a 7 nm process at TSMC. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, a configuration that provides robust multi-tasking capabilities. The base clock is 3.80 GHz with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, and it has a 65W TDP, making it an efficient part. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core, with a total of 16 MB of L3 cache. This cache configuration is typical for the Zen 3 generation and contributes to its solid performance.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a CPU that excels in multi-threaded workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12830.5 is strong, while the single-core score of 1494 is respectable but not class-leading. The Geekbench multicore score of 9950 and single-core score of 1894 further corroborate this. The PassMark tests reveal interesting strengths: a data compression score of 318262 and an integer math score of 91541 indicate heavy processing capability, while a floating point math score of 51296 and extended instructions score of 21847 show versatility. The CPU’s 16 threads ensure that tasks like video encoding or software compilation, which can utilize multiple cores, will see significant performance benefits. The 65W TDP also means that it can be cooled effectively, making it a practical choice for a workstation where sustained load and thermal management are considerations. Its memory support is for DDR4, with a dual-channel bus and a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, which is a potential limitation compared to newer platforms but is adequate for its performance class.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need a strong all-around desktop for both productivity and gaming, without the need for the absolute highest-end components. The CPU’s 79th percentile ranking and 8-core/16-thread configuration make it ideal for content creators who run multi-threaded applications like video editors or 3D renderers. The GPU’s 65th percentile ranking and 10 GB of VRAM make it suitable for gamers playing at 1080p and 1440p resolutions, as seen in the measured FPS data. The system is also a good fit for software developers who need to compile code, a task that will benefit from the CPU’s strong PassMark integer math score of 91541. Students and small business users will find the system more than capable for office applications, web browsing, and multitasking, given the CPU’s high PassMark multithread score of 24419. The overall combined percentile of 72 places this build in a comfortable mid-to-upper range for a desktop, suggesting it is a versatile machine that can handle most tasks a user would throw at it without feeling underpowered. It is not designed for 4K gaming at ultra settings, as the FPS data shows, but it is a very capable machine for more common resolutions.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the system delivers excellent frame rates in competitive titles, with Valorant hitting 304 FPS and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaching 293 FPS. This makes it an excellent choice for esports and fast-paced shooters where a high refresh rate monitor is a priority.

Streaming: The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads provide a solid foundation for encoding a stream while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 24419 suggests it can handle the extra load of x264 encoding, though the GPU’s performance may take a slight hit in demanding games, as seen in Cyberpunk 2077's 39 FPS at 1080p.

Video editing: The combination of the CPU’s strong multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12830.5) and the GPU’s compute capabilities (Geekbench OpenCL score of 83514) will accelerate timeline rendering and effects processing. The 10 GB of VRAM on the GPU is also beneficial for handling larger projects.

3D rendering: The CPU’s high thread count makes it a capable renderer on its own, but the GPU’s 18 ray-tracing cores and 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 performance can also be used for GPU-accelerated rendering, offering a significant speedup for compatible software.

Software development: The CPU’s high integer math score of 91541 and data encryption score of 20325 indicate strong performance for code compilation and cryptography. The 16 threads allow for fast parallel builds, and the system’s memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s is sufficient for most development workflows.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for basic tasks like word processing and spreadsheets, but its performance ensures a smooth, lag-free experience even with dozens of browser tabs open. The CPU’s integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics also provides a useful fallback if the dedicated GPU is ever unavailable, though it is far less powerful than the Arc B570.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage, and is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It has 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output pipelines. The GPU is equipped with 18 ray-tracing cores, which is a modest number for hardware-accelerated ray tracing. It has no dedicated tensor cores, but its FP16 performance of 23.04 TFLOPS (2:1) can be used for some AI-accelerated workloads. The memory subsystem is a 10 GB GDDR6 configuration on a 160-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s.

The GPU’s clocks are listed at 2500 MHz for both base and boost, with memory running at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). This configuration yields a pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s, with an FP32 compute of 11.52 TFLOPS. The 10 GB of VRAM is a key feature, offering more capacity than many cards in its class, which is beneficial for modern games with high-resolution textures. The benchmark scores show a PassMark G3D score of 14195, which is its primary gaming metric, and a PassMark GPU compute score of 7281 for non-gaming tasks. Its 65th percentile ranking places it in the mid-range category, sitting between the RTX 3070 Mobile and the Arc A750. The GPU’s support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6 ensures broad software compatibility. With a 150W TDP and a suggested 450W PSU, it is a power-hungry card that requires a dedicated power connector.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data shows that this system is primarily a 1080p gaming machine, with strong performance in many titles. In esports and lighter games, it excels: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive runs at 293 FPS, Valorant at 304 FPS, and Roblox at 171 FPS at 1080p. Even at 1440p, these games remain highly playable, with scores of 201, 259, and 114 FPS respectively. For more demanding AAA titles, the performance is playable but not exceptional. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 39 FPS at 1080p, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 36 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at a low 19 FPS. These numbers suggest that ultra settings at 1080p are too much for the most graphically intensive games, and settings would need to be lowered for a smoother experience.

At 1440p, the system struggles more, with most AAA titles falling below 60 FPS. For example, Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 29 FPS, and Control to 42 FPS. At 4K, the system is only suitable for less demanding games or those with lower settings, as most titles fall below 30 FPS. Interestingly, some games scale surprisingly well, like Call of Duty: Warzone, which maintains 96 FPS at 4K. The data shows a clear trend: the Arc B570 is a capable 1080p card for most games, a decent 1440p card for lighter titles, and not a 4K gaming solution.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance tier of this CPU and GPU combination?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 72, indicating it is a solidly above-average desktop configuration, but not in the top tier of performance.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5700G compare to its closest rival in CPU benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700G has an average benchmark score of 27051, which is nearly identical to the Intel Core i9-9900K's score of 27097, showing a -0.2% difference.

Q: What is the GPU's closest rival based on average benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Arc B570, with an average score of 20556, is closely matched with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which scores 20534, a 0.1% difference.

Q: Is this system capable of 4K gaming at ultra settings?

A: The measured FPS data indicates that 4K gaming is generally not viable for demanding titles, with most falling below 30 FPS. For example, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 19 FPS at 3840x2160.

Q: What is the CPU's memory and PCIe support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s and provides PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity and bus width?

A: The Intel Arc B570 has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the recommended power supply for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Intel Arc B570 is 450 W, and it requires a single 8-pin power connector.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G, an 8-core/16-thread processor from the 5000 series, with the Intel Arc B570 graphics card. The CPU, based on the Zen 3 architecture, is a mature and well-performing part that ranks at the 79th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU, based on the newer Xe2-HPG Battlemage architecture, ranks at the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Together, they form a system with a combined percentile of 72, which places it in the upper-mid range of desktop performance. This pairing is a logical match, as the CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance complements the GPU’s solid 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming capabilities. The build is best characterized as a versatile, high-performance desktop for a wide range of tasks, from gaming to content creation, without the premium cost or power requirements of a top-tier enthusiast rig.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The foundation of this build is the AMD Socket AM4 platform. The Ryzen 7 5700G supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration and provides PCIe Gen 3 lanes from the CPU. This is a significant point to consider, as the Intel Arc B570 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. When installed in a PCIe Gen 3 slot, the GPU will operate at a reduced bandwidth, which can impact performance in some scenarios, though the benchmark data does not quantify this specific effect. The CPU’s 65W TDP is low, and the GPU has a 150W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 450W. This leaves little headroom for overclocking or adding power-hungry peripherals, but it is sufficient for the current configuration.

The upgrade path is limited by the AM4 platform. The most sensible upgrade would be to a newer CPU on the same socket, such as a Ryzen 5000 series part with more cores, but the PCIe Gen 3 limitation would remain. A more substantial upgrade would involve moving to a newer platform with PCIe Gen 4 or 5 support to fully utilize a next-generation GPU. Given the GPU’s performance, the most logical next step would be to upgrade the graphics card first, perhaps to a model with higher performance, while keeping the CPU. However, the CPU’s memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s and PCIe Gen 3 support may become a bottleneck for a much more powerful GPU. The system’s 10 GB of VRAM is a current strength, but future games may demand more, making a GPU upgrade a consideration before a platform change.