SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + AMD Radeon RX 6600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 7 5700

25,517 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600

19,036 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + AMD Radeon RX 6600 pairing represents a balanced desktop combination built around AMD's Zen 3 architecture and RDNA 2.0 graphics. The CPU carries eight cores and sixteen threads with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, placing it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU, built on the Navi 23 chip, features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and sits in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. Together, this pairing achieves a combined percentile of 71, and measured FPS data shows it handling a substantial library of modern titles at 1080p, while 1440p remains viable for many games.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data for this pairing, captured at ultra settings, demonstrates a clear resolution hierarchy. At 1920x1080, the pair delivers high frame rates in competitive and esports titles: Valorant hits 324.3 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 312.9 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 holds 140.9 FPS. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege logs 169 FPS. For multiplayer shooters, Call of Duty: Warzone delivers a respectable 128.5 FPS, while Minecraft runs at 140 FPS. These figures confirm that the RX 6600 is more than sufficient for high-refresh 1080p gameplay in less demanding or well-optimized titles.

On the single-player and AAA side at 1080p, performance remains playable but varies by title. Doom reaches 104.3 FPS, Assetto Corsa runs at 81.4 FPS, and Greedfall logs 61.4 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 manages 45.1 FPS, while Red Dead Redemption 2 is at 36.1 FPS. Heavier titles—Microsoft Flight Simulator (50.1 FPS), Control (57 FPS), and Call of Duty: Warzone (128.5 FPS)—sit within acceptable ranges, though users seeking higher refresh rates may need to adjust settings.

At 2560x1440, the pair's performance is still workable. Counter-Strike 2 drops to 94 FPS, Valorant to 279 FPS, and CS:GO to 216 FPS. Warzone remains high at 112.1 FPS. In demanding AAA titles, however, 1440p becomes a test: Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 32.6 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 27.8 FPS, and Control to 42.8 FPS. The numbers still show playable gameplay in most cases, provided the GPU is the main bottleneck. At 3840x2160, results are generally below the 60 FPS threshold for AAA games—Cyberpunk 2077 is 19.6 FPS, Control is 31.2 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 is 21.3 FPS—making 4K viable only for older or less demanding titles like Valorant (222.2 FPS) or CS:GO (126.7).

This is measured data, not estimates, so the FPS figures reflect the actual performance of this specific pair. The pair rank is 2891 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 94.6 across all tested games, which indicates the pair is positioned toward the higher end of tested configurations, matching many mid-range gaming setups.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 have?

A: It has 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 3 (Cezanne) architecture, fabricated on a 7 nm TSMC process with 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die.

Q: What is the boost clock of the Ryzen 7 5700?

A: The boost clock is 4.60 GHz. The base clock is 3.70 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 6600 have?

A: It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: Does this system support PCIe 4.0?

A: The CPU itself offers Gen 3 with 20 lanes (CPU only), but the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which means the graphics card can operate at Gen 4 speeds if the motherboard supports it.

Q: What is the average FPS across all measured games?

A: The pair reaches an average of 94.6 FPS across all games tested. This includes lighter esports titles and heavier AAA games.

Q: Is this a desktop or laptop build?

A: This is a desktop configuration, as indicated by the build class.

Q: What is the GPU's direct ray tracing support?

A: The RX 6600 has 28 RT cores and is based on RDNA 2.0, and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). However, measured FPS in games with heavy ray tracing is not provided in this data.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks show a CPU that is strong in multithreaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, it scores 20,655 in multi-core and 2,916 in single-core. The 3DMark multi-thread test scores 6,517, while single-thread scores 901. Geekbench scores are 9,959 multi-core and 1,907 single-core. PassMark scores show a multithread score of 24,303 and a single-thread score of 3,296. This places the CPU in the 78th percentile versus all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25,517. Nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon D-2752TER (score 25,530, delta -0.1%) and the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U (score 25,485, delta +0.1%), showing essentially parity with these parts.

The GPU, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,492, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 28,850, and a Passmark G3D score of 15,096, sits in the 63rd percentile versus all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19,036. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (score 19,030, delta 0.0%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile (score 19,049, delta -0.1%), and the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation (score 18,954, delta +0.4%). The combined percentile for this pair is 71st, meaning that in the database of build combinations, this lands you above the median of all tested configurations.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a balanced system with the CPU being the stronger component. The CPU sits at the 78th percentile, indicating it is near the top of all CPUs, while the GPU at the 63rd percentile is further down the list. In terms of frames, the GPU is often the first limiter in demanding AAA titles. At 1080p, in an esport title like Valorant, the frame rate scales dramatically—324.3 FPS at 1080p—indicating the GPU is not a constraint, and the CPU is feeding frames efficiently. Yet in a title like Red Dead Redemption 2, the frame rate falls to 36.1 FPS, suggesting the GPU is the bottleneck.

Looking at the resolution scaling, the CPU's advantage takes a step back. At 1080p to 1440p, esport titles like CS:GO drop sharply from 312.9 to 216 FPS, but the percentage drop is less than for a less CPU-sensitive title. For Cyberpunk 2077, the drop is from 45.1 to 32.6 FPS. The CPU keeps up in multithreaded workloads—in Passmark, the multithread score of 24,303 is much higher than the single-thread score of 3,296, indicating the processor scales well across all cores. This means content creation or multi-tasking can happen without stealing frames from a game. Overall, the data shows the GPU limits the FPS in heavier titles; the CPU holds back the system in older or lighter games.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this pair is more than capable. At 1080p, Valorant hits 324.3 FPS, CS:GO 312.9 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege 169 FPS, easily capable of a 144 Hz monitor. At 1440p, those drops to 279 FPS, 216 FPS, and 111 FPS respectively, still within 144 Hz territory. For esports, this pair is strong.

For streaming, the CPU's 16 threads and 78th percentile placement handle the run at 1080p. With a passmark multithread score of 24,303, it has the extra headroom to encode while gaming. In a game like Call of Duty: Warzone, where FPS is 128.5 at 1080p, there is acceptable margin to encode without halving the frame rate.

For video editing, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20,655 indicates good render times. The GPU provides 8 GB of VRAM for effects and timeline acceleration, but the measured data focuses on gaming, so specific editor scores (Premiere Pro, DaVinci Resolve) are not present. However, the CPU's multi-core throughput is formizable.

For 3D rendering, this is a budget-to-midrange pick. The CPU is in the 76th percentile of all CPUs, so renders are faster than the mid-30th percentile CPU. The GPU, with 8.9 TFLOPS FP32, accelerates GPU-based renders in Blender or Octane, but 8GB VRAM doesn't handle heavy scenes at 4K comfortably. Cinebench R23 single-core 2,916 means does okay in viewport interaction.

For software development, the CPU’s 16 threads compile faster than 6-core “raw” setups. The 78th percentile means it’s near the top for desktop processors. The GPU is not critical for most dev tools; this system compiles and runs VMs well, with the CPU’s 3.7 GHz base to 4.6 GHz boost proving sharp for single-threaded syntax tasks.

For student and office work, this pair is overkill for most tasks. It does everything well—from spreadsheets to presentations—and the GPU accelerates graphical workloads. It draws power (TDP of 65W for the CPU), so it’s an energy-efficient option for an all-day machine.

Who Should Build It

If you’re a gamer targeting 1080p high-refresh play, this pair is well-matched. The data shows over 140 FPS in most esports, and over 60 FPS in many AAA titles at 1080p. It suits gamers who do not demand max settings at 4K.

If you play at 1440p, this system works if you accept high settings and a 60 FPS target. The data shows 61 FPS in Assetto Corsa, 46.2 FPS in Fortnite, and 42.8 in Control; these are playable, but you visit a few titles.

Content creators and multi-threaded developers—video editors, 3D modelers, streamers—see value in the CPU’s 16 threads. The 8 cores and 16 threads outpace a 6-core/12-thread desktop CPU for render jobs, and the 65W TDP means it’s cool to cool.

Budget-minded builders seeking a 1080p gaming + productivity machine will find this an efficient pairing. The CPU’s low power draw allows smaller cooling solutions—a capable air cooler is enough, and the GPU is a 132W power part that requires a 300W or higher PSU. Students or office workers who need a quiet, responsive machine for coursework or clerical tasks get more than enough home, though they might prefer a part with integrated graphics if they never play games. Small business workstations that run databases or moderately threaded business software will run well on this 16-thread chip.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on the Zen 3 (Cezanne) architecture. The base clock is 3.70 GHz, the boost goes up to 4.60 GHz, and it runs at a 65W TDP. The socket is AMD AM4, and it supports DDR4 memory on a dual-channel interface with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. It has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a total 16 MB of L3 cache (with no 3D V-Cache variant listed). The process is 7 nanometers with 10,700 million transistors on a 180 mm² die. It uses PCIe Gen 3 with a total of 20 lanes (CPU only) available. The listing shows a launch MSRP of $179 and a production status of Active for this desktop part.

In terms of scores, the Cinebench R23 multi-core of 20,655 is a strong mid-range to high mid-range result. The single-core score of 6,957 in 3DMark single-thread is decent for gaming. The CPU scored a multi-thread passmark of 24,303 and encryption of 20,096. In the percentile ranking, 78% of all CPUs scored lower. Rivals like the Xeon D-2752TER are 0.1% faster on average, which is a negligible difference. In real workloads, this CPU is a top-tier mainstream chip. The Ryzen 7 5700 (without X) is a lower-power but still capable of handling high-core workloads. The 3.70 base and 4.60 boost clock are plenty for gaming, and the 16 threads will stream/export folder.

Build Overview

This is a desktop base build from the “Combined” configuration, pitting the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 against the AMD Radeon RX 6600. The pair achieves a combined percentile of 71, meaning it outperforms 71% of the 3,732 recorded pairs in the database when measuring average FPS across all games (94.6 FPS). The build is a mid-upper tier desktop that competes in the 1080p-1440p level. The CPU is the strongest part in the combo—ranking in the top 22% of all CPUs—while the GPU is in the top 37% of all GPUs. The GPU has 8 GB of VRAM and a 128-bit interface, which is typical of a mainstream desktop segment. This pair is suitable for a mid-range gaming desktop, but the GPU will be the first thing to upgrade if you want high frame rates at 1440p in the heaviest titles.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 is a desktop RDNA 2.0 graphics card. It is 7 nanometers and has transistor count of 11,060 million on a die size of 237 mm². It is identified as the Navi 23 chip, and it’s the successor to the RDNA 1.0. The card has a base clock of 1626 MHz, a game clock acceleration to 2044 MHz, a boost frequency reaching 2491 MHz, and a memory clock of 1750 MHz effective (14 Gbps). The 88GB VRAM is GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, giving it 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. It has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. For ray tracing, the data shows 28 RT accelerators. The card is capable of 8.928 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 17.86 TFLOPs of FP16 (at a 2:1 ratio). Its pixel rate exceeds 159.4 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 279.0 GTexel/s. The card uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which is rated with a TDP of 132 W, and supports a 1x 8-pin power connector.

In terms of performance, the GPU sits at the 63rd percentile out of all GPUs. It performs close to the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (delta 0.0%), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile (0.1% faster),, and NVIDIA Tesla RTX 2000 Ada (0.4% lower). For a mid-range card, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,900 suggests it’s competitive with lower-tier high-end cards. The Passmark G3D score of 15,096 is strong, and the OpenCL score of 28,850 shows compute ability. The data shows the card’s FPS scaling at 1440p across modern titles, where it loses roughly 30-40% of her 1080p performance, which is expected. For 1080p, the GPU is well above the comfortable 80 FPS in many non-demonic titles; at 1440p, it reaches a playable 60 FPS regime, but in the heaviest titles (Cyberpunk, Control, RDR) it sits in the 30-40 FPS range. For 4K, it is not your card. The Radeon RX 6600 is a rade that balances the 8-core CPU well.