SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 9600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 9600X

29,713 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

54,247 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 form a desktop pairing that sits at the 84th percentile overall, a high-tier combination where the GPU’s raw power meets a modern six-core processor. The RTX 4080 is the dominant force in this duo, landing in the 86th percentile among all GPUs, while the 9600X holds an 81st percentile position among CPUs. This creates an asymmetric relationship: the graphics card is the clear performance anchor, while the processor provides enough single-thread strength to keep up in most scenarios, though the data shows the CPU can become the limiting factor in specific titles.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X is a six-core, twelve-thread processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge, and fabricated on TSMC’s 4 nm process. It belongs to the 9000 series and fits the AMD Socket AM5 platform. The chip houses 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die, with a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. Its 65 W TDP is notably modest for a desktop part, and the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking headroom. Cache is arranged as 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3. Memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, offering 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes and includes integrated Radeon Graphics.

Benchmark results show a processor that is exceptionally strong in lightly-threaded workloads. The single-thread score in 3dmark is 1253, and Cinebench R23 single-core reaches 2183.5. Geekbench single-core scores 2923, while Passmark single-thread hits 4570. These figures place the 9600X near the top of the single-thread leaderboard, which translates directly to snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and strong performance in games that rely on a few fast cores. Multi-threaded scores are solid but less spectacular relative to its single-thread prowess. The 3dmark max-threads score is 7590, Cinebench R23 multi-core is 17528.5, and Geekbench multi-core is 14438. The Passmark multithread score of 30027 and an average benchmark score of 29713 place it slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE by 0.2% and slightly behind the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H by 0.5%, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT by 0.6%, and the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS by 0.8%. For a six-core part, this level of multi-threaded performance is competitive, but it clearly trails higher-core-count rivals in heavily parallel tasks.

The 65 W TDP is a key differentiator. This processor delivers top-tier single-thread speed and respectable multi-thread output while drawing a fraction of the power that higher-core-count alternatives require. The data suggests that for workloads that are primarily single-threaded or lightly-threaded—such as web browsing, office applications, and many games—this CPU will feel exceptionally fast. For content creation tasks that scale across all cores, the 9600X will hold its own but will not lead the pack. The integrated Radeon Graphics provide a basic display output and a fallback for troubleshooting, though the dedicated RTX 4080 will handle all demanding graphics work.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark profile is defined by a massive gap between single-thread and multi-thread scaling. In 3dmark, the score for 2 threads is 2456, which rises to 4649 for 4 threads, 6726 for 8 threads, and 7585 for 16 threads. The max-threads score of 7590 is nearly identical to the 16-thread result, indicating that the processor is fully saturated by 12 threads and adding more workload does not yield significant gains. This scaling pattern is typical of a six-core, twelve-thread part: it excels in tasks that use a handful of cores but hits a wall when all cores are maxed out. Cinebench R15 scores are 2691 for multi-core and 342 for single-core, while R23 multi-core is 17528.5 and single-core is 2183.5. Passmark results include data compression at 341021, data encryption at 16638, extended instructions at 28023, floating point math at 60081, integer math at 89918, find prime numbers at 233, physics at 2012, and random string sorting at 35946.

The GPU side of the equation is where this build dominates. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 scores 6567 in 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12, 214739 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 263779 in Geekbench Vulkan. Passmark results show a G3D score of 34457, a G2D score of 1239, and a GPU compute score of 20671. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 54247, placing it in the 86th percentile. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, which is 0.1% faster, making the two effectively identical in performance. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is 1.1% faster, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB and AMD Radeon 8060S are 2.6% and 2.7% faster, respectively. This places the RTX 4080 in a very tight cluster of high-end GPUs where the differences are within a few percentage points.

The combined picture is one of a system that is heavily GPU-bound. The CPU’s 81st percentile is respectable, but the GPU’s 86th percentile is higher, and the combined percentile of 84 reflects that the GPU is the stronger component. In terms of measured FPS, this pairing achieves an average of 202 FPS across all tested games, ranking 240th out of 3732 pairs. This means it outperforms the vast majority of CPU+GPU combinations in the database, though it is not at the absolute top. The high average FPS is driven by the GPU’s ability to push very high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p in most titles, while the CPU ensures that frame times remain consistent in less demanding scenes.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a system where the GPU is the primary bottleneck in most gaming scenarios, but the CPU can become the limiting factor in specific titles. The measured FPS across a wide range of games shows that at 1920x1080, the system often achieves very high frame rates, such as 717 FPS in CS:GO and 573 FPS in Valorant. These numbers are far beyond what most displays can show, indicating that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU enough data in these esports titles, and the GPU is not the constraint. However, at 3840x2160, the same games see a dramatic drop: CS:GO falls to 292 FPS and Valorant to 504 FPS. This scaling is primarily due to the GPU’s workload increasing at higher resolutions, but the CPU’s single-thread performance also plays a role in maintaining high frame rates.

In more demanding titles, the bottleneck shifts. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 96 FPS at 1080p, 71 FPS at 1440p, and 47 FPS at 4K. Red Dead Redemption 2 achieves 87 FPS at 1080p, 65 FPS at 1440p, and 43 FPS at 4K. These figures show a clear GPU limitation, as the frame rates scale down with resolution in a way that is consistent with the GPU being the primary constraint. The CPU is not the bottleneck here, as even the lowest 4K scores are well above 30 FPS, and the frame rate drop from 1080p to 4K is proportional to the increased pixel count. However, there are exceptions. Ark: Survival Ascended runs at 47 FPS at 1080p, 30 FPS at 1440p, and 16 FPS at 4K. The dramatic drop to 16 FPS at 4K suggests a scenario where both the CPU and GPU are struggling, but the CPU’s multi-threaded performance might be the limiting factor given its relatively modest core count for this heavily threaded title.

The percentile data supports the notion of a GPU-heavy build. The GPU’s 86th percentile versus the CPU’s 81st percentile means that in most workloads, the GPU will be the component that runs at or near 100% utilization while the CPU has headroom. This is a balanced pairing for gaming at 1440p and 4K, where the GPU is the limiting factor. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread strength becomes more relevant, and in some light esports titles, the system is CPU-bound, as evidenced by the extremely high FPS that the GPU can easily achieve. The average FPS across games of 202 is heavily skewed by these high-refresh esports results, and the rank of 240 out of 3732 pairs indicates that this system is better than most but not the absolute best, largely because the CPU is not a top-tier 16-core part.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets a specific user: someone who wants maximum GPU performance for gaming and creative work without the need for a top-of-the-line 16-core CPU. The 81st percentile CPU is sufficient for most users, and the 86th percentile GPU is the star of the show. Gamers playing at 2560x1440 will find this to be an excellent combination, as the data shows most titles run at high frame rates at this resolution. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 158 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 at 215 FPS, and Fortnite at 99 FPS. At 3840x2160, the system is still very capable, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 47 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 43 FPS, which are playable but not high-refresh. Content creators who work primarily in single-threaded applications or lightly-threaded tasks, such as video editing with a focus on timeline responsiveness, will benefit from the CPU’s strong single-core scores. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2183.5 is among the best, which helps with tasks like effects rendering that rely on a few fast cores.

Software developers who compile code will find the multi-threaded performance adequate, with Passmark data compression at 341021 and integer math at 89918, though a higher-core-count CPU would be faster for parallel builds. Students and small business users running office applications, web browsing, and spreadsheet work will see exceptional responsiveness due to the high single-thread scores. The integrated Radeon Graphics on the CPU provide a fallback for basic tasks if the discrete GPU is not needed. However, this build is not for users who prioritize multi-threaded rendering or heavy 3D simulation, as the six-core CPU will be a bottleneck compared to higher-core-count alternatives. The data clearly shows that the GPU is the primary investment here, and the CPU is a capable companion that will not hold back the GPU in most gaming scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this system is overkill in the best way. The data shows CS:GO at 717 FPS and Valorant at 573 FPS, which are far beyond any monitor’s refresh rate, ensuring that the CPU and GPU are never the limiting factor. At 1440p, the system still delivers exceptional performance, with Overwatch-style titles like Rainbow Six Siege at 253 FPS and Assetto Corsa at 134 FPS. Streaming while gaming is feasible due to the GPU’s robust feature set, though the CPU’s six cores may require careful encoding settings; the GPU can handle the encoding workload, leaving the CPU free for game logic.

Video editing benefits from the GPU’s compute power, with Geekbench OpenCL at 214739, which accelerates effects and rendering. The CPU’s single-thread performance ensures smooth scrubbing and preview in editing software. 3D rendering in applications like Blender or Cinema 4D will be limited by the CPU’s multi-threaded score of 17528.5 in Cinebench R23, which is good but not class-leading; the GPU can accelerate rendering in some engines, and the RTX 4080’s compute score of 20671 in Passmark indicates strong parallel processing. Software development tasks like code compilation will see moderate performance, with the CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities providing a decent build time, though not as fast as a 16-core part.

Student and office work is where this system shines in terms of responsiveness. The single-thread score of 4570 in Passmark means that opening applications, navigating documents, and running spreadsheets will feel instant. The 65 W TDP of the CPU also means the system runs cool and quiet under light loads, making it a pleasant workstation. For gaming at 4K, the system is playable but not high-refresh, with most titles hovering between 40 and 60 FPS, as seen in Control at 69 FPS and Microsoft Flight Simulator at 70 FPS. This is a versatile system that excels at high-refresh 1440p gaming and professional work that benefits from a fast GPU.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD103 chip fabricated on TSMC’s 5 nm process. It houses 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.1M per mm². The GPU clock speeds are 2205 MHz base and 2505 MHz boost, with memory running at 1400 MHz, which translates to 22.4 Gbps effective. The 16 GB of GDDR6X memory is connected via a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s. The GPU has 9728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output processors. It also includes 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores, which are dedicated to ray tracing and AI workloads. The pixel rate is 280.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 761.5 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 48.74 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at the same 48.74 TFLOPS (1:1). The card has a 320 W TDP and requires a 700 W power supply, using a single 16-pin power connector. It is a triple-slot card, measuring 310 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width.

The benchmark data shows a GPU that is exceptionally fast in raw compute and rasterization. The Passmark G3D score of 34457 places it in the 86th percentile, and its average benchmark score of 54247 is nearly identical to the RTX 4080 SUPER, which scores 54209. This means the RTX 4080 is essentially a peer of the 4080 SUPER, with a 0.1% difference. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is 1.1% faster, and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 2.6% faster, but these are professional and mid-range parts respectively, not direct competitors. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 263779 and OpenCL score of 214739 indicate strong performance in compute-heavy workloads, which is relevant for rendering and AI tasks. The 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6567 reflects modern DirectX 12 gaming performance.

For rendering, the 16 GB of VRAM is a significant advantage, allowing large textures and complex scenes to fit in memory. The 716.8 GB/s of bandwidth ensures that the GPU can move data quickly, which is important for high-resolution textures and ray tracing. The RT cores and tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and DLSS, which can boost frame rates in supported games. The data shows that this GPU is capable of running most games at high settings at 1440p, and even at 4K in many titles, though frame rates will drop. The 320 W TDP is high, but the performance justifies the power draw for users who demand top-tier graphics.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X is built for the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is a forward-looking socket that supports DDR5 memory. The CPU’s 65 W TDP is low, leaving significant headroom for a future upgrade to a higher-core-count CPU on the same socket, such as a Ryzen 9 part, without needing to change the motherboard or memory. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 24 lanes ensures that the system is ready for the fastest NVMe SSDs and future GPUs. The RTX 4080 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and there is no performance penalty for using a PCIe 4.0 GPU on a PCIe 5.0 slot.

The suggested PSU for the RTX 4080 is 700 W, and the CPU’s 65 W TDP means that a 700 W power supply is sufficient for this pairing, leaving some headroom for overclocking the CPU or adding additional drives. The GPU is already end-of-life, meaning that a future upgrade would involve moving to the GeForce 50 series, which is its successor. The platform, however, is not end-of-life, as the AM5 socket is likely to support future generations of AMD CPUs. The memory support for DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, and the ability to use ECC memory, makes this a solid foundation for a workstation that can be upgraded over time.

A sensible next upgrade would be to move to a higher-core-count CPU on the same AM5 socket, which would improve multi-threaded performance without requiring a new motherboard. The GPU, while powerful, is at the end of its production life, so a future upgrade to a newer generation GPU would be the next major step, though the current RTX 4080 will remain relevant for several years. The platform’s support for PCIe Gen 5 means that future GPUs and storage devices will be fully utilized. The 700 W PSU recommendation provides enough headroom for a future CPU upgrade with a higher TDP, though a more power-hungry GPU might require a PSU upgrade.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080. The CPU is a six-core, twelve-thread Zen 5 part that excels in single-threaded tasks and offers solid multi-threaded performance for its class. The GPU is an Ada Lovelace-based card with 16 GB of GDDR6X memory that provides top-tier rasterization and ray tracing performance. The combined percentile of 84 places this build in the upper echelon of all desktop configurations in the database, though it is not at the very top. The CPU’s 81st percentile and the GPU’s 86th percentile show that the GPU is the stronger component, and the system is designed for users who prioritize graphics performance over raw CPU throughput.

The measured average FPS across games of 202, and a rank of 240 out of 3732 pairs, confirms that this is a high-performance gaming system. It will handle esports titles at extremely high frame rates and AAA games at high settings at 1440p, with playable performance at 4K. The build is not a workstation monster for 3D rendering, as the six-core CPU will be a bottleneck in heavily threaded workloads, but it is a versatile system for gaming and professional work that benefits from a fast GPU. The data shows that this is a well-balanced pairing for most users, with the GPU being the primary investment and the CPU providing enough single-thread speed to keep up. This is a desktop system that will not become obsolete quickly, thanks to the AM5 platform’s upgrade path and the GPU’s strong performance.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 9600X compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The 9600X has an average benchmark score of 29713, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE and 0.5% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H. It also trails the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT by 0.6% and the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS by 0.8%.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking and how close is it to the RTX 4080 SUPER?

A: The RTX 4080 is in the 86th percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 54247. The RTX 4080 SUPER scores 54209, which makes it 0.1% faster, indicating they are effectively identical in performance.

Q: What is the average frame rate across all tested games for this pairing?

A: The measured average FPS across all games is 202, and this system ranks 240th out of 3732 pairs, placing it in the top 6.5% of all tested configurations.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the CPU and the GPU?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, providing 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, offering 716.8 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and the GPU, and what PSU is suggested?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 320 W. The suggested PSU for this pairing is 700 W.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 9600X includes integrated Radeon Graphics, which can provide a display output without a discrete GPU installed.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the GPU?

A: The launch MSRP of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is 1,199 USD.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 9600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 9600X

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds