SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 9500F + Intel Arc B770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

95%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 9500F

52,873 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B770

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F and Intel Arc B770 combination is a desktop build that targets a balanced mid-range experience, with the processor delivering strong single-threaded performance and the graphics card providing a substantial 16 GB frame buffer. This pairing is designed for users who want a capable system for both productivity and gaming, though it is important to note that no measured frame-rate data exists for this exact combination. All gaming performance figures discussed in this analysis are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not from direct testing of this specific pairing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F is built on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is the current mainstream desktop socket from AMD. This socket supports the 9000 series processors, and the 9500F specifically uses the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge. The platform is designed for DDR5 memory, with the CPU supporting a dual-channel memory bus and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. This is a modern memory standard, and the CPU also supports ECC memory, which is a useful feature for workstation or small business environments where data integrity is critical. The memory support is exclusive to DDR5, so users upgrading from older platforms will need to purchase new memory modules.

For expansion, the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes available from the CPU itself. This is a high-bandwidth interface that supports the fastest available NVMe storage drives and graphics cards. The Intel Arc B770, however, uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots, though it will operate at PCIe 4.0 speeds. This is not a bottleneck for the GPU, as the bandwidth of PCIe 4.0 x16 is sufficient for most workloads. The platform also has a 65 W TDP for the CPU, which is relatively low, meaning that a capable air cooler is sufficient for most users, and the power draw from the processor is modest.

The Intel Arc B770 has a TDP of 225 W and lists a suggested PSU of 550 W. This is a reasonable requirement for a mid-range graphics card, and most quality power supplies in that range will handle the combined load of the CPU and GPU. The CPU’s 65 W TDP adds minimal headroom requirements, so the 550 W suggestion is primarily driven by the GPU. The GPU requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector, so users should ensure their power supply has these connectors available. The combination of a 65 W CPU and a 225 W GPU means that the total system power draw is manageable, and a 550 W PSU provides adequate headroom for typical operation without over-provisioning.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to increase memory capacity or speed, as the dual-channel DDR5 support is the primary memory bottleneck for many workloads. The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads are solid for current applications, but users who need more multi-threaded performance could later upgrade to a higher-core-count AM5 processor, as the socket is designed for long-term support. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes also future-proof storage upgrades, allowing users to add the fastest NVMe drives as they become more affordable. The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on the GPU is a strong asset for 1440p gaming and some 4K workloads, so the GPU is less likely to be the first upgrade target.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Ryzen 5 9500F’s single-thread score of 4258 is a strong indicator for gaming performance, as many games are still heavily dependent on single-core performance. The CPU’s boost clock of 5.00 GHz further supports this, providing high frequency for latency-sensitive tasks. The Arc B770’s 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth suggest it can handle high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, particularly with the 16 GB frame buffer allowing for high-resolution textures. Estimated frame rates for this pairing would be well above 60 FPS in most esports titles at 1080p, and competitive at 1440p for less demanding games.

Streaming: The 6-core, 12-thread configuration of the 9500F is adequate for streaming while gaming, though it is not over-provisioned. The CPU’s multithread score of 28312 indicates it can handle encoding tasks, but users may prefer to use the GPU’s hardware encoding capabilities to offload the workload. The Arc B770 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, which are modern APIs that include hardware encoding features, though the lack of measured data for this specific pairing makes exact performance estimates uncertain. The 16 GB memory is beneficial when running a game, streaming software, and a browser simultaneously.

Video editing: The CPU’s integer math score of 84198 and floating point math score of 56570 suggest solid performance for video editing tasks that rely on CPU processing, such as timeline scrubbing and effect application. The GPU’s 256 TMUs and 128 ROPs provide strong texture and pixel processing rates, which are useful for GPU-accelerated effects and rendering. The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory is particularly advantageous for video editing, as it can hold large preview buffers and multi-layer compositions without spilling to system memory. The data compression score of 325678 indicates efficient handling of compressed video formats, which is common in editing workflows.

3D rendering: For 3D rendering, the CPU’s 12 threads will be the limiting factor in CPU-based renders, as the multithread score of 28312 is moderate compared to higher-core-count processors. However, the GPU’s 32 ray tracing cores and 4096 shading units make it capable for GPU-accelerated rendering in applications that support Intel’s API implementations. The FP32 throughput of 19.66 TFLOPS is substantial for a mid-range card, and the 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth ensures that geometry and texture data can be fed to the compute units efficiently. The combined percentile of 71 for this build indicates it sits above average, but for professional rendering workloads, users may want more CPU cores.

Software development: The CPU’s single-thread performance of 4258 is excellent for compilation tasks that are often single-threaded, such as many build systems. The L3 cache of 32 MB is shared across the 6 cores, providing fast access to frequently used code and data. The extended instructions score of 26370 suggests good support for modern instruction sets like AVX-512, which can accelerate certain compute-heavy development tasks. The 16 GB GPU memory is useful for developers working with large datasets or running local virtual machines, as it can offload some memory pressure from the system RAM.

Student and office work: For everyday productivity, this build is overkill, but it provides a smooth experience. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4258 ensures snappy application launches and responsive multitasking in office suites. The data encryption score of 15716 indicates capable performance for disk encryption and secure communications, which is relevant for privacy-conscious users. The 16 GB GPU memory is largely unused in office tasks, but it does not hurt performance. The low CPU TDP of 65 W means the system runs cool and quiet, which is beneficial for a shared or quiet office environment.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, built on a 4 nm process node at TSMC. The chip has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, which is a high maximum frequency for a mainstream desktop CPU. The processor is manufactured with 8,315 million transistors on a die size of 70.6 mm², which is a compact design that contributes to its efficient 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of L3 shared across all cores. This cache configuration is well-balanced for gaming and general productivity, with the shared L3 providing a large pool for frequently accessed data.

The benchmark scores for the 9500F show a strong overall profile. The average benchmark score is 52873, and the CPU sits in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, indicating that it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. The single-thread score of 4258 is particularly notable, as it places the CPU in the top tier for single-core performance, which is critical for gaming and legacy software. The multithread score of 28312 is respectable for a 6-core part, but it lags behind processors with more cores, as expected. The integer math score of 84198 and floating point math score of 56570 show that the CPU handles both integer-heavy and floating-point-heavy workloads competently.

The nearest rivals to the 9500F, based on average benchmark score, include the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 at 52901 (a -0.1% difference), the Intel Xeon 634 at 52974 (-0.2%), the AMD EPYC 7313P at 53206 (-0.6%), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X at 53288 (-0.8%). These deltas are all very small, meaning that the 9500F performs within 1% of these much more expensive or higher-core-count processors. The Ryzen 9 7900X, for example, is a 12-core part, yet the 9500F is only 0.8% behind in average score, which highlights the efficiency of the Zen 5 architecture and the strong single-thread performance of the 9500F. This is a significant advantage for users who primarily play games or run lightly threaded applications, as they get near-flagship performance without the cost of additional cores.

The CPU’s process node of 4 nm and 65 W TDP mean that it runs cool and draws little power, making it an excellent choice for compact builds or systems where thermal management is a concern. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking, though the boost clock of 5.00 GHz is already high, leaving limited headroom. The CPU has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory, which is already provided by the Arc B770 in this build.

Gaming Performance

It is crucial to note that the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The following gaming performance analysis is based on estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components, and the figures should be treated as approximations rather than verified results. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4258 and the GPU’s FP32 compute of 19.66 TFLOPS are the primary indicators used for these estimates.

For 1080p gaming at ultra settings, the combination of the 9500F’s high single-thread performance and the Arc B770’s 16 GB of memory is likely to deliver excellent frame rates in most titles. Esports games such as Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, which are CPU-bound, would benefit from the 5.00 GHz boost clock and should easily exceed 144 FPS. More demanding AAA titles at 1080p ultra would likely see frame rates in the 80-120 FPS range, depending on the game’s optimization for Intel GPUs. The 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth ensures that texture streaming is not a bottleneck at this resolution.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary limiter, but the Arc B770’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory is a strong asset. The 256-bit memory bus and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth allow for high-resolution textures without exceeding the frame buffer. Estimated frame rates at 1440p ultra would likely be in the 60-90 FPS range for most AAA titles, with lighter games hitting 100+ FPS. The 32 ray tracing cores provide some capability for ray-traced effects, though performance would be lower when enabling ray tracing, perhaps dropping to 40-60 FPS depending on the scene complexity.

For 4K gaming, the 16 GB memory is beneficial, but the GPU’s compute power of 19.66 TFLOPS is likely insufficient for ultra settings at 60 FPS in demanding titles. Estimated frame rates at 4K ultra would be in the 30-50 FPS range for most AAA games, which is playable but not ideal. Users could reduce settings to high or medium to achieve 60 FPS, and the 16 GB memory would help maintain high-resolution textures even at lower quality presets. The GPU’s pixel rate of 307.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 614.4 GTexel/s are high enough to handle 4K resolution, but the shading units are the limiting factor.

The lack of measured data means that these estimates carry some uncertainty, particularly for games that are known to have varying performance on Intel GPUs. However, the benchmark scores suggest that this pairing is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K being a stretch at ultra settings.

Who Should Build It

This build is ideally suited for gamers who primarily play at 1080p or 1440p and want to run games at high or ultra settings without breaking their power budget. The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs and the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicate that the processor is the stronger component in this pairing. Gamers who play fast-paced titles like first-person shooters or MOBAs will benefit most from the 9500F’s single-thread score of 4258, as these games are often CPU-bound. The 16 GB of GPU memory provides future-proofing for upcoming titles that may require more video memory at 1440p.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will find this build capable, though not at a professional level. The CPU’s floating point math score of 56570 and the GPU’s 4096 shading units make it a competent pair for short-form video editing or hobbyist 3D work. The 16 GB GPU memory is particularly useful for video editing, as it allows for large preview buffers. However, creators who render complex scenes or work with 4K timelines may want more CPU cores, as the 6-core, 12-thread configuration is the limiting factor.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s strong single-thread performance for compilation and scripting tasks. The extended instructions score of 26370 suggests good support for modern instruction sets, which can accelerate certain workloads like cryptography or scientific computing. The 32 MB L3 cache helps with data locality in large codebases. Students and office workers would find this build more than sufficient for their needs, providing a responsive system for web browsing, document editing, and light multitasking, though it is overkill for these tasks.

Small business workstations that run productivity software, manage databases, or handle moderate data processing would benefit from the CPU’s data compression score of 325678 and data encryption score of 15716. These scores indicate efficient handling of compressed and encrypted data, which is common in business environments. The ECC memory support is a bonus for data integrity, though it requires ECC-capable DDR5 modules, which are not standard in consumer builds.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F have integrated graphics?

A: No, the CPU has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is required. This build includes the Intel Arc B770, which fills that role.

Q: What memory type does this build support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel memory bus and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is also supported.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for this build?

A: The Intel Arc B770 has a suggested PSU of 550 W. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, so the 550 W suggestion is primarily driven by the GPU.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 9500F compare to the Ryzen 9 7900X?

A: The 9500F has an average benchmark score of 52873, which is 0.8% lower than the Ryzen 9 7900X’s score of 53288. Despite the 7900X having more cores, the 9500F performs nearly identically in average score.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and type?

A: The Intel Arc B770 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 256-bit memory bus and a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

Q: What PCIe interface does the GPU use?

A: The Intel Arc B770 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 lanes, but the GPU operates at PCIe 4.0 speeds.

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The Ryzen 5 9500F is in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, indicating it outperforms 91% of processors on the market.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F achieves an average benchmark score of 52873, which places it in the 91st percentile among all CPUs. This is a high ranking, indicating that the processor is in the top tier of available CPUs for overall performance. The single-thread score of 4258 is a standout figure, reflecting excellent per-core performance that is crucial for gaming and lightly threaded applications. The multithread score of 28312 is solid for a 6-core processor, though it is expected to be lower than parts with more cores. The CPU’s nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 (52901, -0.1%), Intel Xeon 634 (52974, -0.2%), AMD EPYC 7313P (53206, -0.6%), and AMD Ryzen 9 7900X (53288, -0.8%), all have average scores within 1% of the 9500F, which is remarkable given that some of these rivals are enterprise or higher-core-count parts.

The Intel Arc B770, on the other hand, has an empty benchmark list in the FACT PACK and an average benchmark score of 0, with a percentile ranking of 50 among all GPUs. This means the GPU sits at the median of all GPUs, indicating that it is an average performer in the current GPU landscape. It is important to note that the GPU’s percentile is based on available data, and the lack of specific benchmark scores makes it difficult to draw precise comparisons. However, the GPU’s specifications, such as 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, provide a basis for understanding its performance class.

The combined percentile for this build is 71, which puts it above the majority of systems. This combined figure is a weighted measure of the CPU and GPU performance, and it suggests that the build is well-balanced, with the CPU being the stronger component relative to its peers. The CPU’s 91st percentile and the GPU’s 50th percentile create a situation where the CPU is capable of driving the GPU to its limits in most workloads, but the GPU will be the first to become a bottleneck in graphically intensive tasks.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build, as indicated by the build class. The pairing consists of the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F, a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor from the 9000 series, and the Intel Arc B770, a graphics card based on the Xe2-HPG architecture (Battlemage generation). The CPU is a mainstream desktop part with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a dual-slot card with a 225 W TDP, requiring a 550 W power supply. The overall tier of this build, based on the combined percentile of 71, is above average, meaning it outperforms roughly 71% of all desktop configurations.

The CPU is the standout component in this build, with its 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs. This is a processor that offers near-flagship single-thread performance at a mainstream price point, as indicated by its launch MSRP of $219. The GPU, with its 50th percentile ranking, is an average performer, but its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory is a differentiating feature that provides more video memory than many competitors in its class. The combination of a top-tier CPU and a mid-tier GPU creates a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks while being adequate for GPU-bound workloads.

The build class is desktop, so it is intended for a stationary setup. The CPU’s low 65 W TDP makes it easy to cool, and the GPU’s 225 W TDP is manageable with a standard mid-tower case and a quality 550 W PSU. The system supports PCIe Gen 5 for storage and expansion, and it uses DDR5 memory, which is the current standard. Overall, this is a balanced desktop build that prioritizes CPU performance while providing a solid GPU foundation with generous memory capacity.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU in this build is skewed toward the CPU. The Ryzen 5 9500F’s 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs is significantly higher than the Arc B770’s 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs. This means that in most workloads, the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU without being a limiting factor, but the GPU will reach its performance ceiling before the CPU does in graphically intensive tasks. For example, in gaming at 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 4258 ensures that frame rates are not CPU-limited, but the GPU’s mid-tier compute power will cap the maximum frame rate. At 1440p, the GPU becomes even more of a bottleneck, as the resolution increases the workload on the shading units.

In CPU-bound workloads, such as data compression, the CPU’s score of 325678 indicates strong performance, and the GPU is largely idle. However, in GPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering with ray tracing, the GPU’s 32 ray tracing cores will be the limiting factor, and the CPU will have headroom to spare. The FPS scaling in games illustrates this bottleneck: at 1080p, the CPU can drive high frame rates, but the GPU limits absolute performance; at 1440p, the GPU’s workload increases, and frame rates drop; at 4K, the GPU is the clear bottleneck, with frame rates falling below 60 FPS in demanding titles.

The memory bandwidth is also a consideration. The CPU’s memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is significantly lower than the GPU’s 512.0 GB/s, but these are separate memory pools, so they do not directly compete. The GPU’s 16 GB frame buffer is ample for most games, but it is not a substitute for system memory. In mixed workloads, such as gaming while streaming, the CPU handles the encoding workload using its 12 threads, while the GPU handles rendering. The CPU’s multithread score of 28312 is sufficient for this, but users who stream and play demanding games may notice performance drops, as the CPU is doing double duty. Overall, the bottleneck analysis shows that the GPU is the limiting component for gaming at higher resolutions, while the CPU is more than adequate for all but the most extreme multi-threaded workloads.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 9500F + Intel Arc B770

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 9500F

Intel Arc B770

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds