SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 9500F + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

86%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 9500F

52,873 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 5 9500F + Intel Arc A380

This pairing combines a current-generation 6-core Zen 5 desktop processor with an entry-level Intel Arc discrete GPU, creating a system that is heavily skewed toward CPU-heavy productivity tasks rather than high-end gaming. The Ryzen 5 9500F sits in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the Arc A380 lands in the 44th percentile among all GPUs, making this a lopsided configuration where the processor vastly outperforms the graphics card in their respective benchmark hierarchies. The combined system percentile of 68 reflects this imbalance, and the fact pack contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A380 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation) using a DG2-128 chip fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process, with 7,200 million transistors across a 157 mm² die. It carries 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, yielding 186.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The GPU operates at a 2000 MHz base clock and 2050 MHz boost clock, with memory running at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). The memory subsystem is modest by modern standards, and the 96-bit bus width constrains bandwidth-sensitive workloads more than the clock speeds would suggest.

Compute resources include 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation units, along with 8 dedicated ray tracing cores. The card achieves pixel and texture rates of 65.60 GPixel/s and 131.2 GTexel/s respectively, with FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS and FP16 of 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The A380 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, meaning it can handle modern graphics APIs including hardware ray tracing, though the 8 RT cores are entry-level in capability. The absence of tensor cores in the fact pack means no AI-accelerated features like DLSS-style upscaling are available; any AI workloads run on the general-purpose shading units.

Benchmark results for the A380 show a Passmark G3D score of 6252, placing it in the 44th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 8558 is nearly tied with the AMD FirePro W5170M (8595, -0.4% delta), Radeon HD 8870M (8462, +1.1%), GeForce MX330 (8458, +1.2%), and Radeon 880M (8436, +1.4%). This cluster of similar scores indicates the A380 performs at roughly the level of a mid-range laptop GPU or an older entry-level discrete card. DirectX performance shows a narrow spread: Passmark scores of 37 for DX10, 38 for DX11, 35 for DX12, and 73 for DX9, suggesting the card handles legacy APIs relatively better than modern ones. Compute performance is weak at 2762 in Passmark GPU compute, and OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 38224 and 36736 respectively in Geekbench. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 reinforces the picture of a low-end rasterization performer.

For rendering workloads, the A380's 186.0 GB/s bandwidth and 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput are sufficient for light 1080p content creation but will struggle with complex scenes. The 8 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but their modest count means ray-traced rendering will be slow compared to higher-tier GPUs. The 6 GB VRAM is workable for 1080p textures but will limit larger projects. In short, this GPU is best suited for entry-level 1080p gaming at medium settings and light creative work, not for serious rendering or compute tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A380's 44th percentile standing and G3D score of 6252 indicate this is not a high-refresh gaming card. At 1080p with competitive settings, the A380 may reach playable frame rates in esports titles, but the lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 4258 can feed frames quickly, but the GPU becomes the bottleneck well before triple-digit refresh rates.

Streaming: The A380's hardware-accelerated encoders are not detailed in the fact pack, but its compute score of 2762 and low overall performance suggest it is not ideal for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The Ryzen 5 9500F with 12 threads and a multithread score of 28312 could handle software encoding at modest bitrates, but the GPU's weak compute makes hardware encoding the better path, albeit with quality trade-offs.

Video editing: The CPU excels here, with a floating-point math score of 56570 and integer math of 84198, which translate to smooth timeline scrubbing and fast effect processing. The A380's 6 GB VRAM and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p editing with basic color grading, but 4K timelines or heavy effects will strain the GPU. Export times will be CPU-bound, which is good, but preview rendering may be limited by the GPU.

3D rendering: This scenario is compromised by the GPU's low compute performance. The A380's FP32 of 4.198 TFLOPS and Passmark compute of 2762 will make GPU-accelerated rendering slow. CPU rendering using the Ryzen 5 9500F's 6 cores and 12 threads with a multithread score of 28312 would be more viable, but the lack of high core counts means complex scenes will take time. The physics score of 1851 suggests acceptable CPU-side simulation performance.

Software development: This is a strong scenario for this build. The CPU's single-thread score of 4258 (91st percentile overall) speeds up compilation of single translation units, while the multithread score of 28312 helps parallel builds. Data encryption at 15716 and compression at 325678 indicate fast file operations and secure data handling. The GPU is irrelevant here, allowing the CPU to shine.

Student and office work: The Ryzen 5 9500F's 65W TDP and efficient 4nm process make this a low-power, responsive system for document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The single-thread performance ensures snappy UI interactions, and the 32 MB L3 cache helps with repeated workloads. The A380's modest power draw of 75W keeps total system heat low, though its G2D score of 610 is unremarkable for 2D acceleration.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor based on the Zen 5 architecture (Granite Ridge codename), fabricated on TSMC's 4nm process with 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die. It runs at a 3.80 GHz base clock with a 5.00 GHz boost clock, and its 65W TDP makes it power-efficient for a modern high-performance desktop chip. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and it includes ECC memory support, which is a boon for workstation-style reliability. It connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, and it is multiplier-unlocked for overclocking. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB shared L3, which is a standard configuration for a 6-core Zen 5 part.

Benchmark scores reveal a processor that is extremely strong in single-threaded and lightly-threaded workloads. The Passmark single-thread score of 4258 places the CPU in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, and its average benchmark score of 52873 is within 1% of several much more expensive processors: the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 (52901, -0.1%), Intel Xeon 634 (52974, -0.2%), AMD EPYC 7313P (53206, -0.6%), and AMD Ryzen 9 7900X (53288, -0.8%). This is remarkable because the 7900X is a 12-core part, yet the 9500F nearly matches its average score, indicating that Zen 5's architectural efficiency compensates for fewer cores.

In specific workloads, the 9500F shows notable strengths. The integer math score of 84198 is strong for general productivity, while floating-point math at 56570 handles scientific and engineering calculations well. Data compression at 325678 is exceptional, making file archiving and database work fast. Random string sorting at 34174 and extended instructions at 26370 further demonstrate versatility. The find prime numbers score of 220 is a measure of pure integer throughput per core, and while it may seem low, it is consistent with Zen 5's design priorities. The physics score of 1851 and multithread score of 28312 show that while the CPU is not a multi-core monster, it holds its own in threaded workloads thanks to high per-core efficiency.

The 9500F's memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is adequate for its core count, and ECC support makes it suitable for error-sensitive tasks like financial modeling or scientific computing. The lack of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is mandatory, which this build provides. The 4nm process and 65W TDP mean cooling is straightforward — a capable air cooler suffices. For real-world workloads, this CPU will tear through compilation, spreadsheet recalculation, and single-threaded applications, while handling moderate multi-threaded tasks without complaint.

Gaming Performance

The fact pack contains no measured FPS data for the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F combined with the Intel Arc A380 — the measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures below are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU, and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

The Arc A380's Passmark G3D score of 6252 and 44th percentile standing strongly indicate that this GPU is entry-level. At 1080p with high/ultra settings, the A380 will likely struggle to maintain 60 FPS in demanding modern titles, given its 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth. In less demanding esports games like CS:GO or Valorant, the A380 might achieve 60-90 FPS at 1080p with medium settings, but this is speculative. The DirectX 12 score of 35 (Passmark) suggests that modern API-based games will be particularly challenging, while the DX9 score of 73 indicates older titles run relatively better.

At 1440p, the A380's 6 GB VRAM and 96-bit bus become severe limitations; even if the GPU could render frames, memory bandwidth would likely cap performance. The 8 RT cores enable ray tracing, but with only 1024 shading units, enabling RT will likely cut frame rates to unplayable levels in most titles. The CPU side is more than capable — the 9500F's single-thread score of 4258 ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU at any resolution, but this advantage is moot because the GPU is the limiting factor. Essentially, this system is a 1080p gaming machine for older or less demanding titles, and even then, players should expect to lower settings to medium or low for consistent frame rates. For high-refresh (144Hz+) gaming, this GPU is not suitable; the data suggests it belongs in the 30-60 FPS range for most modern games at 1080p.

Balance and Bottleneck

The most striking aspect of this configuration is the massive performance gap between the CPU and GPU. The Ryzen 5 9500F sits in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the Arc A380 occupies the 44th percentile of all GPUs — a 47-point percentile spread. The CPU's average benchmark score of 52873 is roughly 6.2 times the GPU's average score of 8558, but these are not directly comparable metrics across different benchmark suites. Nevertheless, the combined percentile of 68 indicates that the system is dragged down significantly by the GPU.

In gaming workloads, the bottleneck is unequivocally the GPU. The A380's G3D score of 6252 is below the median GPU, so frame rates will be limited by the graphics card in virtually every scenario. The CPU's single-thread score of 4258 means it can process game logic and physics far faster than the GPU can render frames, so there is no CPU-side constraint. Even at 1080p with low settings, where CPU bottlenecks are most common, the A380's compute and bandwidth limitations will bind first. In CPU-intensive games with heavy simulation (e.g., strategy titles), the 9500F's strong single-thread performance (4258) and physics score (1851) will help, but the GPU still sets the ceiling.

In productivity workloads, the balance flips. The CPU's multithread score of 28312 and integer math of 84198 dominate, while the GPU's compute score of 2762 is almost irrelevant for tasks like compilation, data processing, or spreadsheet work. For video encoding, the CPU handles x264/x265 software encoding with its 12 threads, while the GPU's encoding capabilities (not specified in the fact pack) are supplementary. The memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s on the CPU side and 186.0 GB/s on the GPU side are both acceptable for their respective roles, but the GPU's 96-bit bus limits its effective bandwidth in practice. This is a build where the user must accept that gaming performance will be modest, while CPU-heavy professional work will be excellent.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize CPU performance for productivity but need a discrete GPU for basic display output and light graphics tasks. Students and office workers using spreadsheets, word processors, and web applications will find the 9500F's single-thread score of 4258 makes everything feel instant, while the 65W TDP keeps electricity costs low. Software developers will benefit from the 91st percentile CPU ranking, with fast compilation times and smooth multitasking across 12 threads; the data encryption score of 15716 also helps with secure coding workflows.

Content creators working in 2D graphics or audio production will appreciate the CPU's floating-point math (56570) and integer math (84198), but video editors should note that 4K timelines will be GPU-limited. Small business workstations handling databases will see excellent performance from the data compression score of 325678, and ECC memory support adds reliability for financial data. Gamers, however, should only consider this build if they play older titles or are willing to run games at 1080p low/medium settings — the A380's 44th percentile ranking makes it unsuitable for modern AAA gaming at high settings. This is not a high-refresh gaming rig; it is a productivity workstation with entry-level gaming capability.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F are consistently strong across all tests. Passmark scores include data compression at 325678, data encryption at 15716, extended instructions at 26370, find prime numbers at 220, floating-point math at 56570, integer math at 84198, multithread at 28312, physics at 1851, random string sorting at 34174, and single-thread at 4258. The average benchmark score is 52873, placing the CPU in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 (52901, -0.1%), Intel Xeon 634 (52974, -0.2%), AMD EPYC 7313P (53206, -0.6%), and AMD Ryzen 9 7900X (53288, -0.8%). The fact that the 9500F trails the 12-core 7900X by only 0.8% reflects Zen 5's per-core efficiency.

The GPU benchmarks for the Intel Arc A380 show a much weaker profile. 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 scores 808, Geekbench OpenCL scores 38224, and Geekbench Vulkan scores 36736. Passmark tests show DirectX 10 at 37, DirectX 11 at 38, DirectX 12 at 35, DirectX 9 at 73, G2D at 610, G3D at 6252, and GPU compute at 2762. The average GPU score is 8558, placing it in the 44th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are AMD FirePro W5170M (8595, -0.4%), AMD Radeon HD 8870M (8462, +1.1%), NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (8458, +1.2%), and AMD Radeon 880M (8436, +1.4%). This clustering shows the A380 is equivalent to a mid-range mobile GPU from several generations ago.

The combined picture is a system in the 68th percentile overall, dragged down by the GPU's below-median performance while the CPU boosts the total. The 91st percentile CPU and 44th percentile GPU create a 47-point gap, meaning the system's overall ranking is far closer to the GPU's percentile than the CPU's. For users who benchmark primarily CPU workloads, this system will feel exceptional; for GPU-bound tasks, it will feel dated.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F uses the AM5 socket, which is the current mainstream platform for AMD. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and ECC memory support, and it provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU. The 65W TDP means the stock power delivery is modest, but the multiplier-unlocked design allows overclocking if the motherboard and cooling support it. The GPU, Intel Arc A380, is end-of-life (production status), uses PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, and requires a 250W suggested PSU, with a 75W TDP and a single 8-pin power connector. The system's total power draw is low, so the PSU requirement is modest.

The most sensible next upgrade is the GPU. The A380's 44th percentile ranking is the clear performance limiter, and swapping it for a higher-tier card would immediately improve gaming and GPU compute performance. The CPU has headroom — its 91st percentile standing and strong single-thread score of 4258 mean it can drive significantly more powerful GPUs without bottlenecking. The PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU side is future-proof, though the current GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is fine. Memory upgrade potential is limited by the dual-channel configuration, but moving to higher-speed DDR5 kits could improve bandwidth-sensitive workloads. The CPU's 65W TDP and socket AM5 mean it could be replaced with a higher-core-count Zen 5 part in the future, but the current 6-core/12-thread configuration with 28312 multithread score is already capable for most tasks.

FAQ

Q: Is this system good for gaming at 1080p?

A: The data suggests it is only suitable for light gaming. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 6252 and 44th percentile ranking indicate it will handle older or less demanding titles at medium settings, but modern AAA games will require low settings for playable frame rates. The CPU is not the limiting factor — its single-thread score of 4258 is well above average.

Q: Can this system handle video editing?

A: Yes, for 1080p projects. The CPU's multithread score of 28312 and floating-point math of 56570 will handle timeline processing and effects well, but the GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit 4K work or heavy color grading. Export times will be CPU-bound, which is a positive.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X?

A: The Ryzen 5 9500F has an average benchmark score of 52873, which is only 0.8% lower than the Ryzen 9 7900X's 53288. Despite having 6 cores versus 12, the 9500F nearly matches the 7900X in average performance, demonstrating Zen 5's high per-core efficiency.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A380 good for ray tracing?

A: The A380 has 8 dedicated ray tracing cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate. However, with only 1024 shading units and 4.198 TFLOPS FP32, ray tracing performance will be very limited. Expect significant frame rate drops when enabling RT in supported games.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 9500F supports ECC memory per the fact pack. This makes the system suitable for error-sensitive workloads like financial modeling, scientific computing, or database servers where data integrity is critical.

Q: What is the power draw of this system?

A: The CPU has a 65W TDP and the GPU has a 75W TDP, so the total component power draw is relatively low. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 250W, meaning a modest power supply is sufficient for this build, leaving room for a GPU upgrade later.

Q: Is the GPU end-of-life?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A380 has a production status of "End-of-life" per the fact pack. Its successor is Battlemage. This means it is a legacy product, so users should consider this when planning long-term support and driver updates.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 9500F + Intel Arc A380

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 9500F

Intel Arc A380

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds