SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 9500F + Intel Arc A350

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 9500F

52,873 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F and Intel Arc A350 form a desktop pairing that sits in a specific performance tier, with the CPU clearly outclassing the GPU in raw compute potential. The processor is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 5 part running on the AM5 platform, while the graphics card is an entry-level Alchemist architecture part with 4 GB of VRAM. This combination produces a notable performance imbalance, where the CPU's capability far exceeds what the GPU can display, making it a pairing suited for specific workloads rather than high-end gaming.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F is built on the Zen 5 architecture using the Granite Ridge codename, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process node. The chip integrates 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die, which is a remarkably dense design. It operates with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and can boost up to 5.00 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that keeps thermal requirements modest. The processor features 6 cores and 12 threads, with a cache hierarchy that includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 cache.

The benchmark data shows strong multi-threaded performance with a PassMark multithread score of 28,312, which positions the CPU in the 91st percentile among all CPUs. The single-thread score of 4,258 indicates excellent per-core performance, which is typical of the Zen 5 architecture's focus on IPC improvements. The floating-point math score of 56,570 and integer math score of 84,198 both reflect the processor's balanced compute capabilities, making it suitable for both general productivity and more demanding computational tasks. The extended instructions score of 26,370 suggests the CPU handles SIMD workloads well, which benefits applications that leverage AVX-512 or similar instruction sets.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 52,873 places it in close competition with several enterprise and high-end desktop processors. The nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 with an average score of 52,901, showing a delta of -0.1%. The Intel Xeon 634 scores 52,974, which is -0.2% relative to the 9500F. The AMD EPYC 7313P achieves 53,206, a -0.6% delta, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X scores 53,288, representing a -0.8% difference. This tight clustering means the 9500F performs within 1% of these processors in aggregate, despite being a lower-tier model in the 9000 series, indicating the architecture's efficiency is strong.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 5 9500F demonstrates a comprehensive benchmark profile across various workload types. The PassMark data compression score of 325,678 is exceptionally high, indicating rapid data handling for archival or database tasks. Data encryption scores 15,716, while random string sorting reaches 34,174, both showing solid performance in memory-bound operations. The physics score of 1,851 and the find prime numbers score of 220 are lower in absolute terms but still competitive for the processor's class.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 52,873 places it at the 91st percentile of all CPUs, which is a strong position for a mainstream desktop processor. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 71, which reflects the GPU's more modest standing. The GPU itself has a percentile rank of 50 among all GPUs, meaning half of all graphics cards perform better and half perform worse. This asymmetry creates a situation where the CPU is clearly the dominant component in terms of raw compute capability.

For real workloads, the CPU's multithread score of 28,312 suggests it can handle compilation tasks, video encoding, and 3D rendering at a competent level. The single-thread score of 4,258 is particularly important for applications that rely heavily on single-core performance, such as older games or certain productivity tools. The floating-point performance of 56,570 indicates the processor is well-suited for scientific computing and financial modeling, while the integer score of 84,198 supports general business applications and database operations.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, and the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All frame rate discussions must therefore be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The data clearly shows a significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU, with the processor's 91st percentile rank contrasting sharply with the GPU's 50th percentile rank.

Based on the benchmark scores, the Arc A350's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest it is suited for 1080p gaming at medium to low settings in modern titles. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 4,258 means it will not bottleneck the GPU at lower resolutions, but the GPU's modest compute capability will limit frame rates to the lower end of playable ranges. For esports titles with light graphical demands, the pairing might achieve high frame rates, but for AAA games, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM capacity will likely constrain texture quality and resolution.

The GPU's 6 ray tracing cores provide some hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, but the low overall compute throughput means ray tracing will have a significant performance impact. The graphics card's DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures compatibility with modern rendering features, but the limited bandwidth and VRAM will restrict actual performance. Estimated frame rates for most games at 1080p ultra settings would likely fall below 30 FPS, with some lighter titles potentially reaching 40-60 FPS at reduced settings.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this pairing is someone who needs strong CPU performance for productivity tasks but has modest graphics requirements. The Ryzen 5 9500F's 91st percentile CPU ranking makes it an excellent choice for software developers who compile code frequently, students running computational workloads, or small business users handling spreadsheets and database tasks. The processor's 6 cores and 12 threads, combined with a 5.00 GHz boost clock, provide responsive performance for daily computing and multi-tasking.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-intensive tasks like video encoding or batch photo processing would benefit from the processor's capabilities, though the GPU will limit any GPU-accelerated rendering. For gamers playing at 1080p with low to medium settings, the Arc A350 can handle less demanding titles, but users seeking high-refresh gaming or high-fidelity graphics would need to consider a more powerful GPU. The pairing is not suitable for users who require high-end gaming performance, 4K rendering, or GPU-accelerated machine learning workloads, as the 4 GB VRAM and 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance are entry-level figures.

The combined percentile of 71 indicates this build sits above the median system but below high-performance configurations. It is appropriate for users who prioritize CPU performance for work or study and are willing to accept limited gaming capability. The desktop class designation and AM5 socket provide a solid foundation for future upgrades, which is a key consideration for this type of build.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F uses the AM5 socket, which is AMD's current desktop platform. This socket supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The platform includes ECC memory support, which is a feature typically associated with workstation or server applications, adding to the processor's appeal for professional use. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, offering high-bandwidth connectivity for modern storage and expansion cards.

The system's power requirements are modest, with the CPU rated at 65 W TDP and the GPU at 25 W TDP. The suggested PSU is 200 W, which leaves substantial headroom for the rest of the system components. This low power draw makes the build efficient and suitable for compact or office environments where heat and noise are considerations. The GPU is a single-slot card with no power connectors required, simplifying installation and cable management.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the Arc A350 with a more powerful GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom to support faster graphics cards. The AM5 platform supports the latest Ryzen processors, so a future CPU upgrade is also possible without changing the motherboard. The DDR5 memory support ensures the platform remains current, and the PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide bandwidth for next-generation SSDs and GPUs. The platform's longevity and the CPU's 91st percentile performance make it a forward-looking choice for users who plan incremental upgrades.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350 is based on the DG2-128 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically from the Alchemist generation (Arc 3). It is manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process node, with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 45.9 million per mm². The GPU operates at a base and boost clock of 2000 MHz, with memory clocked at 1937 MHz, translating to 15.5 Gbps effective. The card has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The GPU's compute resources include 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster output units. It has 6 ray tracing cores, which provide hardware support for ray-traced lighting effects, though the implementation is entry-level. The FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance of 6.144 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s, reflecting the card's modest throughput.

The Arc A350 has a 25 W TDP, making it an ultra-low-power GPU that requires no external power connectors. The card uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and has no display outputs, meaning it is not intended for direct video output but rather for compute or auxiliary processing tasks. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring software compatibility with modern APIs. The production status is end-of-life, with Battlemage listed as its successor, indicating this is a mature product at the end of its lifecycle.

The GPU's 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs places it exactly in the middle of the performance distribution. This means it is neither a high-performance part nor a completely inadequate one, but rather an entry-level solution suitable for basic graphical tasks or as a secondary compute device.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming is not a realistic expectation for this pairing. The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 4 GB VRAM are insufficient for driving high frame rates at high settings in modern titles. The CPU could support high-refresh gaming, but the GPU will be the limiting factor, likely capping frame rates well below 144 FPS in most games at 1080p.

Streaming is a mixed scenario. The CPU's strong multi-thread performance (28,312 in PassMark multithread) can handle software encoding at reasonable quality without significant impact on gaming performance. However, the GPU's limited encoding capabilities and lack of display outputs may complicate streaming setups that rely on GPU encoding features.

Video editing in CPU-based workflows would benefit from the processor's 6 cores and 12 threads. The floating-point score of 56,570 supports color grading and effects processing, while the single-thread score of 4,258 ensures responsive timeline scrubbing. GPU-accelerated effects would be limited by the Arc A350's modest compute capability.

3D rendering in CPU-based renderers would perform well, with the multithread score of 28,312 providing solid throughput for tasks like architectural visualization or product renders. GPU-accelerated rendering would be constrained by the 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 4 GB VRAM, limiting scene complexity and resolution.

Software development benefits significantly from this CPU. The high single-thread score accelerates compilation of large codebases, while the data compression score of 325,678 speeds up build artifacts and version control operations. The 12 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the 91st percentile CPU ranking ensures the processor outperforms most alternatives.

Student and office work is handled with ease. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking means it will breeze through document editing, spreadsheet calculations, and web browsing. The GPU's 50th percentile is more than adequate for 2D desktop workloads and basic video playback, making this an efficient and quiet system for academic or professional environments.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile among all CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F is in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, indicating it outperforms 91% of processors in aggregate benchmark scores.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A350 have?

A: The Arc A350 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the difference in average benchmark score between the Ryzen 5 9500F and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X?

A: The Ryzen 5 9500F scores 52,873, while the Ryzen 9 7900X scores 53,288, representing a -0.8% delta, meaning the 9500F is within 1% of the 7900X's average score.

Q: Does the Arc A350 support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A350 has 6 ray tracing cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, though the entry-level compute performance will limit ray tracing quality.

Q: What memory type does the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and includes ECC memory support.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 200 W, which accounts for the CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 25 W TDP, leaving headroom for other components.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear bottleneck in this pairing, with the GPU being the limiting factor in most graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU's 91st percentile rank versus the GPU's 50th percentile rank creates a significant imbalance, where the processor can easily feed the graphics card but cannot compensate for its limited output. In gaming scenarios, the GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 4 GB VRAM will cap frame rates, regardless of the CPU's 5.00 GHz boost capability.

The CPU's single-thread score of 4,258 and multithread score of 28,312 indicate it can handle any game engine's draw calls and physics calculations without becoming a constraint. However, the GPU's 124.0 GB/s bandwidth and 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate will limit resolution and texture quality. The FPS scaling pattern, extrapolated from the benchmark scores, suggests that lowering graphical settings will yield some improvement, but the GPU's absolute compute limits will prevent high frame rates in demanding titles.

For CPU-bound workloads like compilation or data processing, the balance is reversed, with the GPU being largely irrelevant. The CPU's performance in these tasks is competitive with processors like the AMD EPYC 7313P, which scores 53,206, showing the 9500F holds its own in enterprise-class workloads. The combined percentile of 71 reflects this mixed capability profile, where the system excels at CPU-intensive tasks but lags in GPU-accelerated applications.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F with the Intel Arc A350, creating a system where the CPU is clearly the dominant component. The processor's 91st percentile ranking places it among the top 9% of all CPUs, while the GPU's 50th percentile positions it exactly at the median. The combined percentile of 71 indicates the system overall sits in the upper-middle tier of performance.

The Ryzen 5 9500F is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 5 processor on the AM5 platform, with a 5.00 GHz boost clock and 65 W TDP, making it a powerful and efficient choice for productivity workloads. The Intel Arc A350 is an entry-level Alchemist GPU with 4 GB GDDR6 memory, 768 shading units, and a 25 W TDP, suitable for basic graphical tasks but not for high-end gaming. This pairing is best suited for users who prioritize CPU performance for work, study, or development, and who have modest graphics requirements or plan to upgrade the GPU in the future.