SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS

33,244 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS + Intel Arc A370M: A Mobile Pairing with Clear Strengths

This laptop-class pairing combines AMD’s Zen 4-based Ryzen 5 8645HS processor with Intel’s Alchemist-generation Arc A370M discrete GPU. The CPU sits at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU lands at the 74th percentile among all GPUs, giving the combination a 79th-percentile overall standing. It is a balanced mid-tier mobile platform aimed at mainstream gaming and productivity, though there are notable asymmetries in compute capability that shape its real-world behavior.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS is built on the AMD Socket FP8 platform, a mobile-only socket that is not designed for user-level processor swaps. The chip uses the Zen 4 architecture under the Hawk Point codename, fabricated on TSMC’s 4 nm process with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. Memory support is limited to DDR5, running on a dual-channel bus with a peak bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported, and the processor provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for a discrete GPU and one or two NVMe drives but not expandable beyond that.

The Intel Arc A370M GPU uses the DG2-128 chip on a 6 nm TSMC process, with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, leaving the rest of the CPU’s lanes for storage and other devices. Its TDP is rated at 35 W, and while the FACT PACK lists no suggested PSU, the combined 45 W CPU TDP plus 35 W GPU TDP (80 W total) indicates that a laptop power adapter in the 100–130 W range would be typical for such a platform, though no specific adapter wattage is provided in the data. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, so future driver support and availability may be limited.

For an upgrade path, the data shows that the CPU is the stronger component (83rd percentile) relative to the GPU (74th percentile). A sensible next step within the same platform would be to pair the Ryzen 5 8645HS with a more capable discrete GPU, since the CPU has headroom to feed faster graphics hardware. However, because the GPU is soldered in a laptop, any upgrade would require a new machine rather than a component swap. The platform itself offers no user-accessible upgrade path beyond memory and storage, both of which are limited by the dual-channel DDR5 and 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 5 8645HS delivers strong CPU benchmark results across synthetic workloads. In Cinebench R23, it scores 13,220 points in multi-core and 1,714 points in single-core. Its Cinebench R15 results are 2,094 multi-core and 270 single-core. The PassMark suite shows a multi-thread score of 22,586, a single-thread score of 3,653, and an average benchmark score of 33,244 across all tests. The CPU’s percentile rank against all CPUs is 83, placing it in the upper tier of mobile processors.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 8645HS is essentially tied with the Intel Core i7-14701E (deltaPct 0.1) and the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H (deltaPct 0.1), while slightly trailing the Intel Core i5-12600HX by 0.4 percent. It leads the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX by 0.5 percent. These deltas are within noise, so the CPU is competitively positioned against those four alternatives.

The Intel Arc A370M GPU scores 29,676 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28,673 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average benchmark score of 29,175. Its percentile rank against all GPUs is 74. Against its nearest rivals, the Arc A370M is essentially even with the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (deltaPct -0.1) and the AMD FirePro W8000 (deltaPct -0.1), while slightly ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 470 by 0.6 percent and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M by 1.0 percent. The GPU’s FP32 compute is 4.198 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1).

The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms its GPU in relative standing. The CPU is 9 percentile points higher than the GPU, indicating that the processor is the stronger half of this pairing. The combined percentile of 79 reflects a system that is solidly mid-to-upper tier, though not flagship-class in either component.

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark results indicate an asymmetric balance where the CPU is the more capable component. The Ryzen 5 8645HS sits at the 83rd CPU percentile, while the Arc A370M sits at the 74th GPU percentile. This 9-point gap suggests that in CPU-bound workloads, the processor will perform near its full potential, but in GPU-bound tasks, the graphics card will limit overall throughput relative to what the CPU could theoretically feed.

In gaming, where the GPU typically dominates, the Arc A370M is the bottleneck. Its 74th-percentile standing and 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 compute are modest for modern titles at high settings. The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 1,714 in Cinebench R23 (and 3,653 in PassMark single-thread) means it will not hold back frame rates in most games, but the GPU will cap performance at lower settings and resolutions.

In productivity workloads, the CPU is the limiting factor. The multi-thread score of 13,220 in Cinebench R23 and 22,586 in PassMark multi-thread are respectable for a 6-core/12-thread part, but the GPU’s compute capability (4.198 TFLOPS) is far below what a high-end laptop GPU offers, so any GPU-accelerated rendering or compute task will be constrained. The data shows that the CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 72,640 and floating-point math score of 44,833 indicate strong general computation, but the GPU’s 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus (112.0 GB/s bandwidth) is a clear limitation for large datasets.

The FPS scaling picture, though not measured directly, can be inferred from the percentile gap. In GPU-bound scenarios, the Arc A370M will deliver frame rates consistent with its 74th-percentile position, while the CPU’s 83rd percentile ensures it is not the constraining factor. The reverse is true for CPU-bound tasks like physics simulation, where the PassMark physics score of 1,095 is modest and could bottleneck in complex scenes.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions. The Arc A370M’s 4 GB GDDR6 memory and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth, combined with its 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 compute, place it in the entry-to-mid range of laptop GPUs. At 1080p with high settings, this GPU would be expected to handle esports titles and older AAA games at playable frame rates, but modern AAA games at ultra settings would likely fall below 60 FPS.

At 1080p ultra settings, the GPU’s 74th-percentile rank suggests performance comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 470 (deltaPct 0.6) and AMD Radeon RX 6800M (deltaPct 1.0), though those are desktop and high-end mobile parts respectively. The 4 GB VRAM is a hard limit for texture-heavy games, and the 64-bit memory bus will constrain bandwidth-intensive scenes. At 1440p, the GPU would struggle to maintain playable frame rates in demanding titles, and at 4K, it would be unsuitable for anything beyond very light or older games.

For competitive shooters and lighter titles, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 1,714) will help maintain high frame rates, but the GPU will still be the ceiling. The combined percentile of 79 suggests that this system is best suited for 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings rather than high-refresh or high-resolution play. Since these figures are estimates, actual performance will vary by title and driver maturity, but the benchmark data clearly indicates a mid-tier gaming experience.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need a capable laptop for mixed productivity and light-to-moderate gaming. The CPU’s 83rd percentile makes it suitable for content creators working with multi-threaded applications like video encoding (Cinebench R23 multi-core 13,220) and data compression (PassMark data compression 265,483). The 6-core/12-thread configuration is adequate for software development, including compiling and running virtual machines, with PassMark integer math at 72,640 and extended instructions at 20,003 indicating solid general compute.

Students and office workers will find the Ryzen 5 8645HS more than sufficient for document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, where the single-thread score of 3,653 in PassMark ensures snappy responsiveness. Small business workstations could use this for database management and light data analysis, leveraging the CPU’s data encryption score of 15,588 and random string sorting score of 31,748.

Gamers at 1080p with modest expectations will be the primary beneficiaries, as the Arc A370M provides entry-level discrete graphics without the power draw of larger GPUs. The GPU’s 74th percentile is enough for esports and older titles, but not for maxing out the latest AAA releases. Users who prioritize CPU-heavy tasks over gaming will find this pairing well-balanced, while those seeking high-end gaming should look elsewhere.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s architecture and process node?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS uses the Zen 4 architecture under the Hawk Point codename, fabricated on TSMC’s 4 nm process with 25,000 million transistors.

Q: How much memory does the GPU have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Is the CPU’s multi-thread performance competitive with similar chips?

A: The Ryzen 5 8645HS scores 13,220 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, placing it within 0.5 percent of the Intel Core i7-14701E and AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H, and 0.4 percent behind the Intel Core i5-12600HX.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 79, with the CPU at 83rd percentile and the GPU at 74th percentile among all components.

Q: Are there measured FPS data for this combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing, so all frame rate discussions are estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported by the Ryzen 5 8645HS.

Q: What is the GPU’s production status?

A: The Intel Arc A370M is marked as end-of-life, meaning it is no longer in active production.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS is a 6-core, 12-thread mobile processor from the 8000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Hawk Point codename. It operates at a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a TDP of 45 W. The chip is fabricated on TSMC’s 4 nm process with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, giving it a high transistor density for a mobile part.

The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is DDR5 only, using a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes and includes integrated Radeon 760M graphics, though the discrete Arc A370M will typically be used for demanding tasks. The processor is not multiplier-unlocked and has a release date of December 5, 2023, with active production status.

Benchmark results show a well-rounded performer. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13,220 indicates strong multi-threaded capability for a 6-core part, while the single-core score of 1,714 is competitive for daily tasks. PassMark tests reveal specific strengths: data compression scores 265,483, data encryption 15,588, and extended instructions 20,003. The floating-point math score of 44,833 and integer math score of 72,640 are solid for their class. The average benchmark score of 33,244 places the CPU at the 83rd percentile, with nearest rivals including the Intel Core i7-14701E (deltaPct 0.1) and AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H (deltaPct 0.1). For real workloads, this means the CPU can handle video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation without being the bottleneck in most laptop systems.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class pairing (buildClass: laptop) consisting of the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS CPU and Intel Arc A370M GPU. The CPU is a 6-core/12-thread Zen 4 part with a 45 W TDP, while the GPU is a 35 W Alchemist-generation part with 4 GB GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile of 79 places this system in the upper-mid tier of laptop configurations, with the CPU at 83rd percentile being the stronger component and the GPU at 74th percentile being the weaker link.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 33,244 is closely matched by its nearest rivals, including the Intel Core i7-14701E (33,206) and AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H (33,201), with deltas of 0.1 percent. The GPU’s average score of 29,175 is similarly competitive with the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (29,197) and AMD FirePro W8000 (29,211), both within 0.1 percent. This pairing is best described as a balanced mid-tier mobile platform, capable of mainstream gaming and productivity but not designed for high-end or enthusiast workloads.

The GPU is marked as end-of-life, which is a consideration for long-term support, though the CPU remains in active production. The system’s overall tier, based on the 79th combined percentile, is above average but not top-tier, making it a sensible choice for users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU power in a portable form factor.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A370M’s 74th-percentile GPU standing and 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 compute make 1080p high-refresh gaming possible only in less demanding titles, with estimated frame rates likely below 144 FPS in most AAA games at high settings. The CPU’s strong single-thread score (1,714 in Cinebench R23) helps maintain frame pacing, but the GPU is the limiting factor.

Streaming: The CPU’s 12 threads and 45 W TDP provide enough headroom for software encoding at moderate bitrates, but the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus may struggle with simultaneous gaming and encoding. A dedicated streaming setup would benefit from a stronger GPU, though the CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 22,586 supports basic streaming workloads.

Video editing: With a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13,220 and PassMark floating-point math of 44,833, the CPU can handle 1080p and light 4K video editing in software, but GPU-accelerated effects will be limited by the Arc A370M’s compute capability. The 4 GB VRAM is sufficient for short timelines but not complex multi-layer projects.

3D rendering: The CPU’s multi-thread performance (13,220 in Cinebench R23) is adequate for CPU-based rendering, but the GPU’s 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 and 4 GB memory will limit GPU-accelerated renderers. Expect longer render times compared to higher-end GPUs, with the 74th-percentile GPU rank indicating mid-tier output.

Software development: The 6-core/12-thread CPU with 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is well-suited for compiling, running containers, and local development servers. PassMark integer math of 72,640 and data encryption of 15,588 indicate strong general compute for build tools and cryptographic operations.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3,653 in PassMark ensures responsive application switching and web browsing, while the integrated Radeon 760M provides a fallback GPU for basic tasks. The 4 GB Arc A370M adds light gaming and GPU acceleration for office presentations, making this a capable all-around laptop for students and professionals.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds