SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8640U + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8640U

26,462 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 5 8640U + Intel Arc A350M: A Mobile Workstation Analysis

This pairing combines AMD's 6-core Zen 4 mobile processor with Intel's entry-level Arc 3 discrete GPU, targeting thin-and-light laptops where balanced CPU/GPU performance matters more than raw gaming power. The CPU ranks in the 78th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits in the 70th percentile, resulting in a combined 74th percentile system. This is a laptop-class build (FP8 socket) with no measured gaming FPS data available; all gaming expectations below are estimates based on benchmark scores.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread configuration?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8640U has 6 cores and 12 threads, based on the Zen 4 architecture (Hawk Point codename), manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 8640U's average benchmark score of 26,462 is essentially tied with the Intel Core i9-12900HK (26,469, 0% delta) and Intel Core i7-1280P (26,469, 0% delta). It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS (26,402) and 0.3% behind the AMD EPYC 8024P (26,555).

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A350M features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the CPU include integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 8640U includes the Radeon 760M integrated GPU, complementing the discrete Intel Arc A350M for multi-display or power-saving scenarios.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking?

A: The Arc A350M ranks in the 70th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24,647. It sits within 1.5% of rivals including the AMD Radeon RX 590 (24,744, -0.4%), NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (24,763, -0.5%), AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (24,442, 0.8%), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (24,277, 1.5%).

Q: What memory does the CPU support?

A: The Ryzen 5 8640U supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, yielding 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: Is this a desktop or laptop build?

A: This is a laptop build (buildClass: "laptop"). The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP8, and the GPU's display outputs are described as "Portable Device Dependent."

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's multi-threaded performance is strong for its class. In Cinebench R23, the Ryzen 5 8640U scores 10,433 multi-core and 1,651 single-core. Geekbench results show 8,185 multi-core and 2,131 single-core. The PassMark multi-thread score is 20,322, with a single-thread score of 3,534. The CPU's average benchmark score of 26,462 places it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs, essentially matching the Intel Core i9-12900HK (26,469) and Core i7-1280P (26,469), both with 0% delta.

The GPU's benchmark performance comes from two tests: Geekbench OpenCL scores 24,546, and Geekbench Vulkan scores 24,747, averaging 24,647. This places the Arc A350M in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 590 (24,744, -0.4% delta), meaning the Arc A350M is effectively within 0.4% of that desktop GPU's compute performance. The NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (24,763) is 0.5% ahead, while the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (24,442) is 0.8% behind.

Combined, the system's 74th percentile indicates a balanced mid-range laptop platform. The CPU is notably stronger relative to its peers than the GPU, meaning the processor can feed the GPU adequately in most workloads without the GPU being a severe bottleneck for general computing tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 5 8640U is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Hawk Point, part of AMD's 8000 series. It operates at a 3.50 GHz base clock and boosts up to 4.90 GHz, with a 28 W TDP — a power-efficient design suited for thin laptops. The 4 nm TSMC process enables 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, which is dense but reasonable for a mobile chip.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. This cache layout supports the CPU's competitive performance. In PassMark tests, integer math scores 68,051, floating-point math scores 40,330, and extended instructions (SIMD) score 16,500. Data compression scores 230,080, while encryption scores 14,013. Random string sorting scores 28,066. The physics test shows 1,033, and the prime number test scores 69.

These numbers indicate a CPU that excels in integer-heavy and data-compression workloads, typical of software compilation and database operations. The single-core performance (3,534 PassMark, 1,651 Cinebench R23) is competitive with high-end laptop chips from the previous generation, as evidenced by the 0% delta against the i9-12900HK. The multi-core score of 10,433 in Cinebench R23 suggests sustained performance that can handle moderate parallel workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering, but it is not a workstation-class chip. The 12 threads help with multitasking, and the 4.90 GHz boost clock ensures snappy single-threaded response.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A350M's 70th percentile GPU ranking and 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest it can handle 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings for esports titles, but high-refresh (144Hz+) gaming at ultra settings is likely beyond its capabilities. The CPU's strong single-core score (1,651 Cinebench R23) will not be the limiting factor in most games.

Streaming: The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads, combined with its 78th percentile ranking, provide enough headroom for software encoding at 1080p60 while gaming, though the GPU's 4 GB VRAM may limit encoding quality settings. The PassMark multi-thread score of 20,322 suggests adequate parallel processing for simultaneous game and encode workloads.

Video editing: In 1080p editing, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10,433 and the GPU's Vulkan score of 24,747 indicate a capable pair for timeline scrubbing and effects. 4K editing may strain the 4 GB GPU memory, but proxy workflows should be manageable.

3D rendering: The CPU's 6 cores will render scenes slower than 8-core or 12-core chips, but the 16 MB L3 cache and 4.90 GHz boost help with viewport performance. The GPU's 6 RT cores and Xe-HPG architecture support hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 rate limits final-frame render times.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 68,051 and data compression score of 230,080 point to strong compile times and source control operations. The 12 threads handle parallel builds well, and the 78th percentile means it outperforms many desktop CPUs from a few years ago.

Student and office work: This system is overqualified for documents and spreadsheets. The CPU's single-core score of 3,534 PassMark ensures instant response, while the GPU's 70th percentile ranking handles 4K external displays and hardware acceleration for video conferencing without breaking a sweat.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a CPU that is 8 percentile points higher than the GPU (78 vs 70), indicating the GPU is the more likely bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming, the Arc A350M's 70th percentile and 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth will cap frame rates before the CPU's 78th percentile processing power is exhausted. The CPU's 4.90 GHz boost and strong single-core scores mean it can feed the GPU in most titles at 1080p.

For CPU-bound tasks like compilation, data compression, or physics simulations, the CPU itself becomes the limiter — but only because the GPU is irrelevant in those workloads. The PassMark physics score of 1,033 and prime number score of 69 indicate that heavy mathematical workloads will take longer, but the 12 threads mitigate this by spreading the load. In mixed workloads (e.g., gaming while streaming), the GPU's 4 GB VRAM is likely the first constraint, as it limits texture quality and encoding buffers simultaneously.

The GPU's memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s is modest compared to the CPU's 89.6 GB/s system memory bandwidth; this parity means neither component dominates memory traffic. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface on the GPU provides sufficient bandwidth for its 4 GB frame buffer, so the bottleneck is more likely the GPU's compute throughput (3.379 TFLOPS FP32) than its connection to the CPU.

Who Should Build It

This pairing suits users who need a laptop for mixed productivity — students running data analysis and writing papers, developers compiling code and running virtual machines, and small business workstations handling spreadsheets and light database work. The CPU's 78th percentile performance and 12 threads handle these tasks with ease.

Gamers at 1080p with medium settings on esports and older titles will find the Arc A350M sufficient, but those targeting 1440p or ultra settings should look at higher-tier GPUs. Content creators editing 1080p video or doing light 3D work will appreciate the CPU's multi-core score of 10,433 (Cinebench R23) and the GPU's Vulkan score of 24,747 for rendering previews. The 4 GB VRAM limits texture-heavy 4K workflows.

The 28 W CPU TDP and 25 W GPU TDP make this a power-efficient combo for all-day battery life in ultrabooks. The Radeon 760M iGPU allows the discrete GPU to idle during office work, further extending battery. The system's 74th combined percentile confirms it is a mid-range mobile platform, not a desktop replacement.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, so all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile rankings, not empirical measurements.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the Arc A350M's 70th percentile GPU ranking (comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 590 within 0.4%) suggests it can deliver playable frame rates in older or less demanding titles — expect 40-60 FPS in games from 2018-2020, but newer AAA titles at ultra will likely drop below 30 FPS. The GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 and 6 RT cores are entry-level for modern gaming.

The CPU's single-core score of 1,651 (Cinebench R23) ensures it is not the bottleneck in most 1080p gaming scenarios; the GPU will limit frame rates first. For high-refresh gaming (144Hz), the GPU's 112.0 GB/s bandwidth and 4 GB GDDR6 will struggle to maintain high frame rates at ultra settings. Lowering to medium or high settings, or reducing resolution to 900p, could yield 60+ FPS in competitive shooters. The lack of measured data means these are educated estimates, not guarantees.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class system pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 8640U (6 cores, 12 threads, Zen 4 "Hawk Point") with the Intel Arc A350M (Xe-HPG "Alchemist" architecture, 4 GB GDDR6). The CPU is a 4 nm mobile processor with a 28 W TDP, while the GPU is a 6 nm part with 25 W TDP. The combined system ranks in the 74th percentile, placing it firmly in the mid-range of laptop performance.

The CPU's 78th percentile ranking is the stronger half of this pairing, matching the Intel Core i9-12900HK and i7-1280P in average benchmark scores (26,462 vs 26,469). The GPU's 70th percentile is respectable for entry-level discrete graphics, but it is not a performance part. This is a balanced ultrabook platform for users who need CPU-heavy productivity with occasional light gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile platform with no socketed upgrades — the CPU is soldered to the motherboard. The Ryzen 5 8640U supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode (89.6 GB/s bandwidth), and the memory is also typically soldered in laptops. PCIe Gen 4 is available with 20 lanes from the CPU; the GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8.

The GPU is an end-of-life part (production status: "End-of-life," released 2022-03-29) with no successor listed. The Arc A350M is also soldered in most laptops, meaning the only "upgrade path" for this system is a full laptop replacement. The CPU's TDP of 28 W and GPU's TDP of 25 W suggest a total system power draw well within what a standard laptop power brick provides; no suggested PSU is listed, but the 25 W GPU TDP indicates a modest power envelope.

A sensible next upgrade would be a laptop with a higher-tier GPU (e.g., 8 GB VRAM) and more CPU cores (8 or more) for demanding 3D work or AAA gaming. The platform's memory support (DDR5) and PCIe Gen 4 are current-generation, so the limitation is the soldered components, not the interface standards.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation, Arc 3 Mobile), manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster operation units. The GPU includes 6 ray tracing cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Clocks are 1150 MHz base and 2200 MHz boost, with memory at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) across a 64-bit bus, yielding 112.0 GB/s bandwidth. The 4 GB GDDR6 frame buffer is sufficient for 1080p gaming at medium settings but will limit texture quality and resolution. Compute rates are 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 and 6.758 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 105.6 GTexel/s.

Benchmark results show Geekbench OpenCL at 24,546 and Vulkan at 24,747, averaging 24,647 — a 70th percentile score. The nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 590 (24,744, -0.4%), meaning the Arc A350M matches a desktop GPU from 2018 in compute performance. The NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (24,763) is 0.5% ahead, while the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (24,442) is 0.8% behind. For rendering, the 6 RT cores enable basic ray tracing, but the 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 rate will cause long render times for complex scenes. The GPU is best suited for 1080p gaming at medium settings, hardware video encoding, and light GPU-accelerated productivity tasks.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8640U + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 8640U

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds