SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS

26,106 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS + Intel Arc A350M

This combination pairs a 6-core Zen 4 mobile processor with a discrete Intel Arc A350M GPU in a laptop-class build, landing at the 74th percentile overall. The CPU is the stronger component, ranking in the 78th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 70th percentile among all GPUs. The data indicates a balanced but CPU-leaning system, with the Ryzen 5 8640HS providing robust multi-threaded performance and the Arc A350M offering entry-level discrete graphics capability for a portable form factor.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. This is an entry-level discrete GPU with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, delivering 112.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1150 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The shading unit count stands at 768, with 48 texture mapping units and 24 render output units. The A350M includes 6 dedicated ray tracing cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported titles, though the modest compute throughput of 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 and 6.758 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) limits the complexity of ray-traced scenes.

The GPU's benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 24,546 and a Vulkan score of 24,747, producing an average benchmark score of 24,647. This places the Arc A350M at the 70th percentile among all GPUs, which is a respectable position for a mobile entry-level part. The nearest rivals provide context: the AMD Radeon RX 590 scores 24,744 (0.4% higher), the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile scores 24,763 (0.5% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT scores 24,442 (0.8% lower), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 scores 24,277 (1.5% lower). The data shows the Arc A350M sits within a tight performance cluster, essentially matching a desktop RX 590 and a high-end mobile workstation GPU, while slightly trailing both. The pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s and texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s indicate the GPU can handle 1080p rendering at moderate settings, but the 64-bit memory bus and 4 GB VRAM capacity create a hard ceiling for high-resolution textures and large frame buffers.

The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern game engines and graphics features such as variable rate shading and mesh shaders. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which provides adequate bandwidth for the GPU's memory pool. The slot width is listed as IGP (integrated graphics processor), meaning this GPU is designed to be mounted directly on the motherboard in a laptop rather than as a user-replaceable card. The production status is end-of-life, with a release date of March 29, 2022, indicating this is a mature product with established driver support. For rendering workloads, the 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is modest; the data suggests this GPU is suited for light 3D modeling, basic video editing, and casual gaming rather than professional-grade rendering tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS delivers strong CPU benchmark scores across multiple test suites. In Cinebench R15, the processor scores 1,845 points in multi-core and 268 points in single-core. The newer Cinebench R23 test shows 11,486 points multi-core and 1,711 points single-core. Geekbench results are 7,461 multi-core and 1,778 single-core. The PassMark suite provides additional granularity: multi-thread score of 19,889, single-thread score of 3,584, integer math at 68,173, floating-point math at 39,725, and extended instructions at 15,855. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 26,106, placing it at the 78th percentile among all CPUs.

The CPU's nearest rivals show tight competition. The AMD Ryzen 5 8540U scores 26,187 (0.3% higher), the Intel Core i7-14701TE scores 26,013 (0.4% lower), the Intel Core i9-11900KF scores 26,212 (0.4% higher), and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 scores 25,981 (0.5% lower). The data indicates the 8640HS performs virtually identically to these alternatives, with all deltas within half a percentage point. This places the CPU in a highly competitive tier where architectural differences manifest as negligible benchmark deltas. The PassMark data compression score of 226,544 and data encryption score of 13,551 highlight the CPU's strength in data-intensive tasks, while the physics score of 970 and find prime numbers score of 70 indicate balanced general-purpose compute.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 24,647 at the 70th percentile, combined with the CPU's 78th percentile, produces a combined percentile of 74 for this pairing. The combined picture shows a system where the CPU outperforms the GPU in relative standing, but both components sit comfortably above the median. The delta between the CPU and GPU percentiles (8 percentage points) is moderate, suggesting the CPU has slightly more headroom than the GPU. In practical terms, the benchmark scores indicate this laptop build can handle productivity applications, software development, and moderate gaming, with the CPU providing responsive single-threaded performance (1,711 in Cinebench R23 single-core) and the GPU delivering acceptable frame rates at 1080p with reduced settings.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a system where the CPU is the more capable component relative to its peers. The CPU's 78th percentile versus the GPU's 70th percentile creates a natural bottleneck scenario where the GPU will limit performance in graphics-intensive workloads. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are the primary constraints; these figures are substantially lower than what modern AAA titles demand at high detail settings. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics simulation or data processing, the Ryzen 5 8640HS with its 6 cores and 12 threads will utilize its 16 MB of shared L3 cache and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth effectively.

FPS scaling in games will follow the GPU's capabilities. At 1080p with ultra settings, the Arc A350M's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 24 ROPs will produce playable but not high-refresh-rate results. The GPU's texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s supports moderate texture detail, but the 64-bit memory bus limits fill-rate-bound scenarios. When the CPU is the limiting factor, which occurs in lightly threaded titles or at lower resolutions, the 8640HS's single-core score of 1,711 in Cinebench R23 and 3,584 in PassMark single-thread will maintain high frame rates. Conversely, at higher resolutions or with demanding graphical effects, the GPU becomes the bottleneck, as evidenced by its closer competition with older desktop parts like the RX 590.

The balance between components is acceptable for a laptop-class machine. The CPU's TDP of 28 W and the GPU's TDP of 25 W create a combined thermal envelope that is manageable in a thin chassis, and neither component is so powerful that it would starve the other of power or cooling. The data suggests that for gaming, users will experience a GPU-limited system at 1080p, while for productivity tasks like code compilation or spreadsheet analysis, the CPU will be the primary driver of performance. The 8-percentage-point gap in percentiles is not severe; it indicates a reasonably matched pair for the laptop form factor, where thermal and power constraints prevent pairing a much stronger GPU with this CPU.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU combination targets users who need a versatile laptop for mixed workloads. Gamers playing at 1080p with medium to high settings will find the Arc A350M adequate, though those seeking high-refresh-rate eSports performance should note the GPU's 70th percentile ranking places it near desktop parts like the GTX 1630, which is not known for extreme frame rates. Content creators working with light photo editing or 1080p video cuts will benefit from the CPU's 78th percentile performance, particularly the PassMark floating-point score of 39,725 which aids in rendering filters and effects. Software developers will appreciate the 6-core/12-thread configuration with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11,486, which accelerates compilation and test execution.

Students and small business professionals who run office suites, web browsers, and communication tools will find this build more than sufficient; the single-threaded performance of 1,711 in Cinebench R23 ensures responsive application launches and smooth multitasking. The integrated Radeon 760M GPU provides a fallback for basic graphics tasks when the discrete GPU is not needed, potentially saving power. The laptop class designation means this is a portable solution, and the combined TDP of 53 W (28 W CPU + 25 W GPU) fits within standard laptop power delivery systems. The 4 GB VRAM on the GPU suggests users should avoid 1440p or 4K gaming, but for a productivity-focused laptop with casual gaming capability, this pairing is well-suited.

The target audience is broad but skews toward users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU muscle. The 78th percentile CPU ranking places this processor above most mainstream laptops, while the 70th percentile GPU is adequate for entry-level gaming and hardware acceleration. Users who occasionally game but primarily use their laptop for work, study, or content consumption will find this build hits a sweet spot. Those who demand maximum gaming performance should look elsewhere, as the data clearly shows the GPU is the weaker link in this pairing.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 8000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Hawk Point codename. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, containing 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The base clock is 3.50 GHz with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 28 W, making it suitable for thin-and-light laptops. The processor uses AMD Socket FP8 and supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, and includes integrated Radeon 760M graphics as a fallback.

The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports the benchmark results: the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11,486 and single-core score of 1,711 demonstrate strong per-core efficiency, typical of Zen 4's high IPC. The Geekbench scores of 7,461 multi-core and 1,778 single-core corroborate this, showing the processor competes with desktop parts from previous generations. PassMark scores reveal specific strengths: integer math at 68,173 and floating-point math at 39,725 indicate robust ALU and FPU performance, while data compression at 226,544 shows excellent memory subsystem efficiency.

The processor ranks at the 78th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26,106. The nearest rivals are all within 0.5% of this score, indicating the 8640HS is a well-balanced mid-range mobile processor. The 4.90 GHz boost clock is notable for a 28 W part, allowing short bursts of high-performance operation for single-threaded tasks. The production status is active, with a release date of December 5, 2023. The multiplier is locked, preventing overclocking, which is typical for mobile processors. The part numbers include 100-000001373 (FP7r2), 100-000001380 (FP7), and 100-000001358 (FP8), indicating compatibility across multiple socket variants.

For real workloads, the CPU's 12 threads provide solid multi-tasking capability. The PassMark multi-thread score of 19,889 indicates good scaling across cores, while the single-thread score of 3,584 ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday use. The 16 MB L3 cache is shared across all cores, reducing latency for frequently accessed data. The lack of ECC support means this CPU is not suited for mission-critical servers, but for consumer laptops, this is standard. The 4 nm process node contributes to power efficiency, allowing sustained performance within the 28 W TDP envelope.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A350M's 70th percentile ranking and 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will deliver moderate frame rates at 1080p, but high-refresh (144 Hz) gaming will require reduced settings or eSports titles. The CPU's 78th percentile ensures no CPU-side bottlenecks, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM limits texture quality.

Streaming: The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11,486, provide sufficient headroom for encoding while gaming, though the GPU's modest performance may require lowering game settings to maintain stream quality. The integrated Radeon 760M could offload basic encoding tasks.

Video editing: The PassMark floating-point score of 39,725 supports smooth timeline scrubbing and effect rendering in 1080p projects. The 4 GB VRAM on the GPU is sufficient for accelerated previews but may struggle with 4K footage or complex multi-layer compositions.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11,486 will handle CPU-based rendering in Blender or similar software competently, but the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 is not suited for GPU-accelerated rendering. Expect slow GPU render times; use CPU rendering instead.

Software development: The 12 threads and 16 MB L3 cache accelerate compilation, with the PassMark integer math score of 68,173 indicating strong code execution. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth reduces build times for large projects.

Student and office work: The single-thread score of 1,711 in Cinebench R23 ensures fast application launches and smooth document editing. The 28 W TDP enables long battery life, and the combined CPU+GPU performance handles spreadsheets, presentations, and web browsing effortlessly.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS uses AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket, meaning CPU upgrades are typically not user-serviceable in laptops. The platform supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, and the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, leaving additional lanes for storage or other peripherals. The GPU's TDP is 25 W, and no suggested PSU is listed, indicating this is a laptop component that draws power from the system's internal power delivery. The combined TDP of 53 W is modest, leaving headroom for additional components like NVMe SSDs or higher-capacity batteries.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing system memory to the maximum supported by the DDR5 dual-channel configuration, as the 89.6 GB/s bandwidth is a shared resource between CPU and GPU workloads. The GPU's end-of-life status means future driver optimizations may be limited, but the 4 GB VRAM is the primary constraint; users should plan for external GPU solutions if they need more graphics power. The CPU's active production status suggests continued BIOS and driver support for the platform. The PCIe Gen 4 lanes allow for fast NVMe storage, which would improve load times and virtual memory performance. The 16 MB L3 cache is fixed, so no cache upgrades are possible.

For users seeking more performance, the platform's socket is not forward-compatible with newer AMD mobile processors, as the FP8 socket is specific to this generation. The upgrade path is therefore limited to memory and storage improvements within the laptop's serviceable components. The lack of a suggested PSU rating confirms this is a mobile build where power is managed by the laptop's adapter and battery. The 28 W CPU TDP and 25 W GPU TDP create a conservative power envelope, allowing for potential thermal headroom if the laptop's cooling solution can sustain higher loads.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS, a 6-core/12-thread Zen 4 mobile processor, with the Intel Arc A350M, an entry-level Xe-HPG discrete GPU, in a laptop-class configuration. The CPU ranks at the 78th percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 26,106, while the GPU ranks at the 70th percentile with an average score of 24,647. The combined percentile is 74, placing this build in the upper-middle tier of all systems. The CPU is the stronger component, with its 78th percentile outperforming the GPU's 70th percentile, indicating a CPU-focused build.

The build is designed for users who need strong processor performance for productivity, development, and moderate gaming. The GPU, while not top-tier, is competitive with desktop parts like the RX 590 and GTX 1630, as shown by the nearest rival deltas of -0.4% and 1.5%, respectively. The 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus are the limiting factors for modern games at high settings. The laptop class designation means this is a portable system, and the combined TDP of 53 W fits within standard laptop power budgets. Overall, this build represents a balanced mobile solution with a clear CPU advantage, suitable for users who prioritize compute over graphics.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS scores 11,486 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which places it at the 78th percentile among all CPUs, just 0.3% below the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A350M have?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, which is adequate for 1080p gaming at moderate settings.

Q: Is this build suitable for 4K gaming?

A: No. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput are insufficient for 4K gaming; the data shows the GPU ranks at the 70th percentile, comparable to older desktop parts like the RX 590.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock?

A: The Ryzen 5 8640HS has a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, which contributes to its single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1,711 points, ranking at the 78th percentile.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined TDP of this build?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 28 W and the GPU has a TDP of 25 W, resulting in a combined 53 W thermal envelope, suitable for laptop cooling solutions.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630?

A: The Arc A350M scores 24,647 on average, which is 1.5% higher than the GTX 1630's 24,277, according to the nearest rivals data.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps entries, so all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores. The GPU's 70th percentile ranking, with an average benchmark score of 24,647, places it in the same performance tier as the AMD Radeon RX 590 and NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, which are within 0.5% of its score. The CPU's 78th percentile ensures it will not be a bottleneck in most gaming scenarios.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the Arc A350M's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 24 ROPs will deliver playable frame rates in older or less demanding titles, but modern AAA games will likely require medium or low settings to maintain 30-60 FPS. The 4 GB VRAM is the primary limitation; games with high-resolution textures will exceed this capacity, causing stuttering or texture pop-in. The GPU's 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports 1080p resolution adequately, but the 64-bit bus limits performance in bandwidth-intensive scenes. For eSports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, the CPU's single-thread score of 1,711 in Cinebench R23 will drive high frame rates, but the GPU may cap these at around 100-144 FPS depending on the game's optimization. At 1440p, the GPU will struggle to maintain 30 FPS in most modern games, and 4K gaming is not viable with this GPU. The data suggests this build is best suited for 1080p gaming at medium settings, with frame rate estimates ranging from 30-60 FPS in demanding titles and 100+ FPS in lighter eSports games.