SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8600G + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

85%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8600G

24,089 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 8600G and Intel Arc A310 pairing is a desktop configuration that combines a high-performance 6-core Zen 4 processor with a low-power entry-level dedicated graphics card. The CPU is the dominant component, sitting at the 76th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 40th percentile. This analysis examines the pairing based on synthetic benchmark data; no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This pairing is not suited for high-refresh gaming at demanding settings. The Arc A310’s Passmark G3D score of 5433 places it at the 40th percentile, and its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, which it trails by 1%. With only 4 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 64-bit memory bus, the GPU will bottleneck the CPU in most gaming workloads, making high frame rates at 1080p in modern titles unlikely. The Ryzen 5 8600G has the single-thread headroom, with a Passmark single-thread score of 3878, but the GPU will cap performance.

Streaming: The CPU’s 12 threads and strong multi-core scores provide a solid foundation for software encoding. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21503 and Passmark multithread score of 25294 indicate that the Ryzen 5 8600G can handle encoding workloads while gaming, though the Arc A310’s low compute throughput (FP32 of 2.688 TFLOPS) means it will not assist with hardware encoding effectively. The 65W TDP of the CPU suggests thermal headroom for sustained streaming sessions, but the overall experience will be limited by the GPU’s ability to render the game at acceptable quality.

Video Editing: The CPU is the workhorse here, with a Geekbench multi-core score of 10850 and a 3dmark max threads score of 6161. These figures indicate solid performance for timeline editing and effects processing in 1080p projects. The Arc A310’s Passmark GPU compute score of 2157 is low, so GPU-accelerated effects and rendering will be slow. The 16 MB of shared L3 cache on the CPU helps with the working set of video editing applications, but the 4 GB GPU memory is a hard limit for larger projects.

3D Rendering: The Ryzen 5 8600G delivers respectable CPU-based rendering performance, as shown by its Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9031. For GPU rendering, the Arc A310’s 768 shading units and 2.688 TFLOPS of FP32 performance are entry-level, meaning render times will be high. The GPU’s 6 ray tracing cores are present, but the low shader count and memory bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s will severely limit ray-traced workloads. This is a configuration for light, occasional rendering, not professional production.

Software Development: The CPU’s strong single-thread and multi-thread balance is well-suited for compilation and code analysis. The Passmark integer math score of 77042 and data compression score of 293306 show strong throughput for build tasks. The 12 threads handle parallel compilation jobs efficiently, as indicated by the 3dmark 16 threads score of 6199. The GPU is largely irrelevant for this workload, meaning the development experience will be smooth and responsive.

Student and Office Work: This pairing is overkill for basic productivity but has headroom for more demanding academic tasks. The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 3878 and the GPU’s Passmark G2D score of 625 ensure snappy UI responsiveness for office suites and web browsing. The 65W TDP of the CPU and 30W TDP of the GPU mean the system will run cool and quiet, making it suitable for a dorm room or shared workspace. The Arc A310’s 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs support multi-monitor setups for research and writing.

Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile for this build is 58, indicating an overall mid-range tier. The CPU, AMD Ryzen 5 8600G, has an average benchmark score of 24089 and sits at the 76th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: it trails the AMD Ryzen 5 7540U by 0.4% (24188 avg score), leads the AMD Ryzen 7 8840U by 0.4% (23982 avg score), and trails the Intel Core i5-13400 by 0.8% (24280 avg score). This places it in the same performance class as those processors.

The GPU, Intel Arc A310, has an average benchmark score of 7550 and sits at the 40th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show it is closely matched with legacy parts: it trails the AMD Radeon R7 250 by 0.1% (7557 avg score), trails the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 by 0.4% (7580 avg score), leads the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 by 1% (7472 avg score), and leads the AMD Radeon HD 8850M by 1.4% (7447 avg score). The combined picture is a system where the CPU is a modern, high-performance part, while the GPU is an entry-level accelerator that will dominate the bottleneck in graphics-intensive tasks.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8600G is built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix codename, manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process node. It has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The die size is 178 mm² and contains 25,000 million transistors. The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache.

Benchmark results show a balanced performance profile. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21503 and single-core score of 3035 highlight its strength in both all-core and lightly-threaded workloads. The Geekbench multi-core score of 10850 and single-core score of 2433 corroborate this. The Passmark tests show specific strengths: integer math at 77042, floating-point math at 47919, and data encryption at 17181. The 3dmark multi-thread scores scale well, from 1869 at 2 threads to 6199 at max threads, indicating good thread scaling efficiency.

The integrated Radeon 760M graphics are present, but with the dedicated Arc A310 installed, they are secondary. The CPU’s memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s over a dual-channel DDR5 interface is sufficient for its 6 cores, but the 16 MB L3 cache is modest compared to larger Zen 4 parts. The unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, though the 65W TDP limits headroom without adequate cooling. The 4 nm process node contributes to the efficient power envelope.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 8600G uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is a modern, forward-looking socket. The CPU supports DDR5 memory via a dual-channel bus, with a peak bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for storage and add-in cards. The Arc A310 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is well-matched to the platform.

The system’s power requirements are modest. The CPU has a TDP of 65W, and the GPU has a TDP of 30W with a suggested PSU of 200W. This leaves significant headroom in any standard desktop power supply, making the platform easy to build and quiet to run. The GPU is a single-slot card with no power connectors, drawing all its power from the slot.

The most sensible next upgrade is the GPU. The CPU is a high-performer at the 76th percentile, and it can easily feed a much more powerful graphics card. Upgrading from the Arc A310 to a higher-tier GPU would remove the primary performance bottleneck. The CPU’s 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes and the platform’s DDR5 support ensure that a modern GPU will not be starved for data. The 200W suggested PSU would need to be revisited for a more powerful GPU, but the CPU’s 65W TDP leaves ample power budget for a mid-range card.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8600G has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and type?

A: The Intel Arc A310 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 64-bit bus width.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i5-13400?

A: The Ryzen 5 8600G has an average benchmark score of 24089, which is 0.8% lower than the Intel Core i5-13400’s average score of 24280.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The boost clock is 5.00 GHz, with a base clock of 4.30 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc A310 sits at the 40th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: What socket does the CPU use?

A: The Ryzen 5 8600G uses the AMD Socket AM5.

Q: Is there any measured FPS data for this CPU and GPU combination?

A: No, the data pack contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates from benchmark scores.

Gaming Performance

There is no measured FPS data for this exact combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 8600G and Intel Arc A310. The following frame rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as qualitative guidance. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance, with a Passmark single-thread score of 3878 and a 3dmark single-thread score of 985, is more than capable of feeding a high-refresh gaming experience. However, the GPU’s low compute throughput and memory bandwidth will be the limiting factor.

The Arc A310’s Passmark G3D score of 5433 places it in the 40th percentile, near the level of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, which it leads by 1% in average benchmark score. Based on this, the GPU is only suitable for low-to-medium settings at 1080p in most modern games. In less demanding esports titles, such as competitive shooters, the GPU may deliver playable frame rates, but it will not achieve high-refresh rates (above 100 FPS) in demanding scenarios. The 4 GB memory capacity will cause stuttering and texture pop-in in newer titles with large assets.

The CPU’s integrated Radeon 760M is not used when the Arc A310 is installed, so the system’s gaming performance is entirely dependent on the discrete GPU. The 16 MB L3 cache and 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth on the CPU side help reduce latency, but they cannot compensate for the GPU’s 124.0 GB/s bandwidth and 2.688 TFLOPS of compute. For 1080p gaming at medium settings, users can expect a playable but modest experience. For 1440p or high-refresh 1080p, the GPU will be the definitive bottleneck.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance of this build is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The Ryzen 5 8600G at the 76th CPU percentile is a modern, capable processor, while the Arc A310 at the 40th GPU percentile is an entry-level part. In gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads, the GPU will be the limiting component. The CPU’s benchmark scores, such as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21503, will be largely idle in frame-limited scenarios, as the GPU cannot process frames fast enough to utilize the CPU’s full throughput.

In CPU-bound workloads, such as software compilation, data processing, and office productivity, the balance is reversed. The GPU’s Passmark G2D score of 625 and compute score of 2157 are sufficient for basic display tasks, but the CPU will do the heavy lifting. The Passmark integer math score of 77042 and data compression score of 293306 indicate the CPU will handle these tasks with ease.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent due to no measured data, but the benchmark scores indicate that the GPU will cap performance in any graphics-intensive scenario. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3878 in Passmark and 985 in 3dmark shows it can push high frame rates in CPU-bound games, but the GPU’s pixel rate of 28.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 56.00 GTexel/s are too low to translate that into high FPS. The upgrade path is clear: replacing the Arc A310 with a higher-percentile GPU would rebalance the system and unlock the CPU’s potential.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build consisting of the AMD Ryzen 5 8600G CPU and the Intel Arc A310 GPU. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 part with a 4.30 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost clock, targeting the mainstream performance segment. The GPU is a low-power, single-slot card with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, targeting entry-level discrete graphics. The combined percentile for the build is 58, placing it in the mid-range tier of overall system performance.

The CPU’s 76th percentile ranking makes it a standout component in this pairing, placing it above most processors in the database. The GPU’s 40th percentile ranking is below average, making it the weak link. The system is best described as a high-performance CPU paired with a basic GPU, which is a common configuration for office systems, light content creation, or as a placeholder for a future GPU upgrade. The 65W CPU TDP and 30W GPU TDP make this an energy-efficient desktop setup.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU performance for productivity over gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks. Gamers at 1080p with low-to-medium settings will find it usable, but those seeking high-refresh or high-detail gaming should look for a stronger GPU. Content creators working on 1080p video editing or CPU-based rendering will benefit from the Ryzen 5 8600G’s strong multi-core scores, such as the Cinebench R23 score of 21503.

Software developers will appreciate the fast compilation speeds, evidenced by the Passmark integer math score of 77042 and 3dmark 16 threads score of 6199. Students and office workers will find the system more than adequate for their needs, with the CPU’s single-thread performance ensuring responsive applications. Small business workstations that run productivity suites, databases, or light virtualization will also be well-served by the 12 threads and 65W power envelope. This is not a build for high-end gaming or professional 3D rendering, but it is a solid foundation for a CPU-centric workload.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8600G + Intel Arc A310

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 8600G

Intel Arc A310

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds