SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8540U + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8540U

26,187 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 8540U and Intel Arc A350M form a mobile-focused pairing that prioritizes efficiency and everyday capability over raw desktop-class performance. The data shows a balanced laptop combination where the CPU is the stronger partner, holding a higher benchmark percentile than the GPU. This is a mid-range mobile setup designed for portable productivity and light-to-moderate creative work, not for pushing maximum frames at high resolutions.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8540U is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 8000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture under the Hawk Point codename. Fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process, it packs 20,900 million transistors into a 137 mm² die. The base clock sits at 3.20 GHz with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, and the chip carries a 28 W TDP, indicating a design tuned for thin-and-light laptops. Memory support is DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, yielding a theoretical bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 78th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26187. Its nearest rivals show how tightly contested this segment is. The Intel Core i9-11900KF scores 26212, just 0.1% higher, while the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX is 0.3% ahead at 26274. The AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS is 0.3% behind, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 trails by 0.5%. These deltas are negligible in real-world terms, meaning the 8540U trades blows with last-generation desktop flagships and current mobile parts, an impressive feat for a 28 W chip.

Looking at the workload scores, the Cinebench R23 multicore result of 9721.5 indicates a capable multi-threaded performer that can handle video encoding and compilation without grinding to a halt. The single-core R23 score of 1714.5, alongside a Passmark single-thread score of 3639, shows strong per-thread performance that will keep everyday applications snappy. The Passmark multithread score of 18332 reinforces the multicore picture, while the data compression score of 208619 suggests rapid archival tasks. Encryption scores of 12245 and extended instructions of 14900 point to solid security and AVX-related throughput. Integer math at 57755 and floating-point math at 34958 are respectable for the power envelope, though not class-leading. The physics score of 1028 and prime number finding of 69 are lower, reflecting the mobile thermal constraints under sustained heavy loads.

For real workloads, this CPU can handle 1080p gaming without bottlenecking the GPU in most titles, but its real strength lies in productivity. The 12 threads and high boost clock make it a solid choice for software development, office multitasking, and photo editing, where the combination of single-thread speed and multicore headroom pays off. The 4 nm process and 28 W TDP mean the laptop chassis can stay cool and quiet, a practical benefit for users who carry their machines daily.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is an entry-level mobile GPU from the Alchemist generation, built on the Xe-HPG architecture using the DG2-128 chip. TSMC's 6 nm process houses 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². The GPU runs at a base clock of 1150 MHz and boosts to 2200 MHz. Memory is 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, delivering 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth, a figure that will limit performance at higher resolutions and texture settings.

The compute configuration includes 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster output units. The A350M has 6 ray tracing cores, though no dedicated tensor cores are listed. Pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 105.6 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 3.379 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 6.758 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio. The 25 W TDP classifies it as an IGP slot-width part, meaning it is designed for slim laptops rather than bulky gaming rigs. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is sufficient for this class of GPU. DirectX 12 Ultimate support with feature level 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 ensure modern API compatibility.

Benchmark data shows the A350M sits in the 70th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 24647. Its nearest rivals are a mixed bag. The AMD Radeon RX 590 scores 24744, just 0.4% higher, while the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile is 0.5% ahead at 24763. The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is 0.8% behind at 24442, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 trails by 1.5% at 24277. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 and Vulkan score of 24747 are nearly identical, indicating balanced performance across compute APIs.

In rendering workloads, the A350M is a modest performer. The FP32 throughput of 3.379 TFLOPS is sufficient for light 3D modeling and basic video effects, but the 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth will become bottlenecks in complex scenes or when using large texture packs. The 6 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing capability, but users should expect significant performance drops when enabling RT effects in demanding games. The 25 W TDP means the GPU will not sustain high clocks for long periods under full load, which the benchmark deltas against desktop cards like the RX 590 reflect.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 8540U compare to the Core i9-11900KF in CPU performance?

A: The average benchmark scores are nearly identical. The Ryzen 5 8540U scores 26187, while the Core i9-11900KF scores 26212, a 0.1% difference that is statistically insignificant.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A350M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, offering 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is adequate for 1080p gaming with reduced textures but will limit performance at higher settings.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the A350M includes 6 ray tracing cores based on the Xe-HPG architecture. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate with feature level 12_2, allowing for ray-traced effects in compatible games, though performance impact is expected to be significant given the modest compute resources.

Q: What is the CPU's memory support?

A: The Ryzen 5 8540U supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing a theoretical bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: How does the Arc A350M compare to the Radeon RX 6600 XT?

A: The A350M has an average benchmark score of 24647, while the RX 6600 XT scores 24442. This puts the A350M 0.8% ahead, a marginal lead that places them in the same performance tier despite their different form factors and power draws.

Q: What is the production status of the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A350M is listed as end-of-life, having been released on 2022-03-29. It is a mobile-only part with a 25 W TDP and IGP slot width.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Ryzen 5 8540U and Arc A350M is 74, indicating it outperforms roughly three-quarters of all tested laptop configurations.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need a portable laptop that can handle daily productivity and light creative tasks without demanding a thick, heavy chassis. The Ryzen 5 8540U, with its 78th percentile CPU ranking, serves students and office workers who run spreadsheets, browsers, and document editors simultaneously. The 12 threads and 4.90 GHz boost clock handle compilation and scripting for software developers, making it a viable choice for coding on the go. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth and DDR5 support ensure fast data access for these workloads.

Content creators who work with photos or short video clips will find the CPU capable, with Cinebench R23 multicore score of 9721.5 indicating reasonable render times for 1080p exports. The GPU, however, is the limiting factor for heavy 3D work. The Arc A350M's 70th percentile ranking and 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance are enough for basic modeling and effects, but professionals rendering complex scenes should look elsewhere. This build is not aimed at gamers seeking high refresh rates or high-resolution play; it is a generalist machine that handles a broad range of tasks competently.

Small business workstations might use this for point-of-sale systems, data entry, or light inventory management, where the CPU's 78th percentile single-thread performance (3639 Passmark score) ensures smooth interface response. The 28 W CPU and 25 W GPU TDPs make this an efficient pairing for battery-conscious users who need all-day operation.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Arc A350M is not suited for high-refresh gaming. With 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth, it will struggle to maintain high frame rates in modern titles at 1080p. The 70th percentile GPU ranking suggests it can manage esports titles at lower settings, but a 144 Hz display would likely go underutilized.

Streaming: The CPU's 12 threads and strong multicore score of 18332 in Passmark provide headroom for software encoding while gaming. The GPU lacks tensor cores and has modest compute resources, so hardware encoding via the integrated Radeon 740M or the Arc's media engine would be preferable. Expect stream quality to be acceptable for 1080p60, but not for high-bitrate 4K.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 9721.5 makes the CPU capable of handling 1080p timelines with multiple layers and effects. The GPU's 6.758 TFLOPS FP16 performance can accelerate previews and exports in applications that leverage DirectX 12 Ultimate, but the 4 GB VRAM will limit work with high-resolution source footage.

3D Rendering: This is a weak point. The GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 6 RT cores are entry-level, suitable for simple scenes or draft renders. The CPU can assist with CPU-based renderers, but the 28 W TDP will lead to thermal throttling under sustained loads, extending render times.

Software Development: The Ryzen 5 8540U is a strong fit. The Passmark single-thread score of 3639 and multithread score of 18332 allow for fast code compilation and responsive IDE performance. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth helps with large codebases and containerized workloads.

Student and Office Work: This pairing excels here. The CPU's 78th percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking across office suites, web browsers, and communication tools. The GPU's 70th percentile is overkill for spreadsheets but provides acceleration for video calls and presentations. The low TDPs contribute to long battery life and quiet operation.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination. All gaming frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not directly measured results. The data confirms that the Arc A350M holds a 70th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average score of 24647, placing it roughly on par with the Radeon RX 590 and slightly above the GTX 1630.

Estimated 1080p performance at ultra settings would likely see this GPU delivering playable frame rates in older or less demanding titles, but modern AAA games would require reduced settings to maintain 30-60 FPS. The 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth are the primary constraints, causing texture pop-in and stuttering in games that use more than 4 GB of VRAM. Ray tracing, enabled via the 6 RT cores, would likely halve frame rates, making it impractical for smooth gameplay. For esports titles like CS2 or Valorant, the CPU's strong single-core performance of 3639 in Passmark would help push frame rates higher, but the GPU would still cap performance around 60-90 FPS at competitive settings. At 1440p, the A350M would fall below 30 FPS in most modern games, making 1080p the maximum viable resolution.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates an asymmetric pairing where the CPU is the stronger component. The Ryzen 5 8540U sits in the 78th percentile, while the Arc A350M is in the 70th. The CPU's nearest rivals include desktop parts like the Core i9-11900KF, showing it can keep pace with much higher power draw chips. In gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor in almost every scenario. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are more than sufficient to feed the GPU, and the 4.90 GHz boost clock ensures no frame pacing issues from the processor side.

In productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU is the primary performer for tasks like video encoding, data compression (208619 Passmark score), and encryption (12245 score). The GPU will only matter for GPU-accelerated effects or rendering, where its 70th percentile ranking is adequate but not exceptional. The 25 W TDP of the GPU means it cannot sustain high clocks under load, creating a bottleneck in sustained rendering tasks where the CPU might also throttle due to thermal limits. The combined percentile of 74 reflects this middle-ground positioning, indicating that neither component drags the system down severely, but the GPU is the more likely upgrade target for gaming or heavy graphics work.

Build Overview

This is a laptop build class configuration pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U with the Intel Arc A350M. The CPU is a mobile part from the 8000 series, released on 2023-12-05, with a 28 W TDP and AMD Socket FP7. The GPU is an end-of-life mobile part from Intel's Alchemist generation, released on 2022-03-29, with a 25 W TDP and IGP slot width. The combined percentile is 74, placing this build above the median laptop configuration but below high-end gaming or workstation machines.

The overall tier is upper-midrange for mobile computing. The CPU delivers desktop-competitive performance in an efficient package, while the GPU provides entry-level discrete graphics that outpace most integrated solutions but fall far short of dedicated gaming GPUs. This is a versatile laptop for users who need a strong CPU for work and a discrete GPU for light gaming or creative tasks, without the bulk and power draw of a full gaming rig.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 5 8540U achieves an average benchmark score of 26187, placing it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs. Its Cinebench R23 scores are 9721.5 multicore and 1714.5 single-core, with Cinebench R15 scores of 1557.5 multicore and 253 single-core. Passmark results show a multithread score of 18332, single-thread score of 3639, data compression of 208619, data encryption of 12245, extended instructions of 14900, floating-point math of 34958, integer math of 57755, physics of 1028, and random string sorting of 24375. The nearest rival is the Intel Core i9-11900KF, which scores 26212, a 0.1% difference.

The Arc A350M averages 24647 across its benchmarks, placing it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 24546, and its Vulkan score is 24747. The closest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 590 at 24744, a 0.4% difference, while the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile is 0.5% ahead at 24763. The GPU's FP32 performance is 3.379 TFLOPS, and it has 6 RT cores for ray tracing.

The combined picture shows a laptop that is CPU-heavy in terms of relative performance. The 4-point percentile gap between CPU and GPU means the processor outperforms a larger share of its peers than the graphics card does. This makes the build better suited for CPU-bound tasks like programming, office work, and photo editing, while gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering will be constrained by the Arc A350M's modest compute resources and 4 GB VRAM. The combined percentile of 74 confirms this is a solid, balanced laptop for general use, not a specialized tool for any single demanding workload.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8540U + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 8540U

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds