SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE

27,712 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE + Intel Arc A370M: Benchmark Analysis

This pairing combines AMD’s 6-core Phoenix2 mobile processor with Intel’s entry-level Arc 3 discrete GPU in a laptop configuration. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures below are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of each component. The system holds a combined percentile of 77 across all tested configurations, placing it in the upper-midrange tier for laptop builds.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK. All gaming expectations are estimates based on the CPU’s Cinebench and Passmark scores, the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan results, and the component percentiles. The data indicates this is a 1080p-oriented gaming laptop, not a high-refresh or high-resolution machine.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the Intel Arc A370M’s 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput and 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth suggest playable frame rates in esports titles and older AAA games, but modern demanding titles will likely require medium or high presets. The GPU’s 74th percentile versus all GPUs places it near the AMD Radeon RX 470 (0.6% ahead) and AMD Radeon RX 6800M (1% ahead in average score, though that is a far higher-tier part in other metrics). The 4 GB GDDR6 VRAM on a 64-bit bus will be the primary constraint at 1440p, where texture-heavy scenes can exceed capacity.

The CPU side is strong enough to avoid bottlenecking the GPU at 1080p. The Ryzen 5 8500GE’s single-thread score of 3914 in Passmark and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2532 indicate solid per-core performance for gaming workloads. Multi-threaded titles benefit from the 6 cores and 12 threads, with Cinebench R23 multi-core at 17940. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the clear limiter; the A370M’s memory bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s is roughly one-third of what high-end laptop GPUs offer, and pixel fill rate of 65.60 GPixel/s will struggle with higher resolutions.

Frame rates at 1080p ultra are estimated in the 30-60 FPS range for most AAA titles, with esports titles like CS2 or Valorant potentially exceeding 100 FPS given the CPU’s strong single-thread performance. At 1440p, expect a significant drop, likely below 30 FPS in demanding titles. The lack of measured data means these are qualitative projections, not verified results.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 27712, placing it at the 79th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X scores 27636 (0.3% lower), the Intel Core i5-12600KF scores 27799 (0.3% higher), and both the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and Intel Core i5-12600K score 27578 (0.5% lower). This means the 8500GE sits within a 0.8% performance band of four well-known desktop processors, which is remarkable for a 35 W mobile chip. The data shows this CPU delivers desktop-class multi-threaded throughput in a low-power envelope.

Specific CPU benchmarks: Cinebench R15 multi-core 1808, single-core 255; R20 multi-core 7534, single-core 1063; R23 multi-core 17940, single-core 2532. Passmark results include multi-thread 21135, single-thread 3914, integer math 62666, floating-point math 39065, data compression 246397, data encryption 14197, extended instructions 17962, physics 1150, and random string sorting 29501. The physics score of 1150 is notably low, which may impact gaming physics simulations.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 29175, at the 74th percentile of all GPUs. Geekbench OpenCL scores 29676, and Vulkan scores 28673. Nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (29197, 0.1% higher), AMD FirePro W8000 (29211, 0.1% higher), AMD Radeon RX 470 (28996, 0.6% lower), and AMD Radeon RX 6800M (28874, 1% lower). The proximity to the RX 6800M is misleading given the latter’s far higher memory bandwidth and VRAM, but in synthetic compute tests, the A370M holds its own.

The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms its GPU in relative percentile ranking (79th vs 74th). This suggests the processor is the stronger component, capable of driving more capable GPUs if paired differently. The system’s overall 77th percentile reflects a balanced but GPU-limited configuration.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not recommended. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3914 in Passmark can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, but the GPU’s 74th percentile and 4 GB VRAM will cap performance well below 144 Hz at 1080p in most games. Esports titles may reach 100+ FPS, but sustained high-refresh gaming is unrealistic.

Streaming: The 6-core, 12-thread CPU with Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17940 provides enough headroom for software encoding while gaming, though the GPU’s modest performance means encoding overhead could impact frame rates. The Passmark data compression score of 246397 indicates strong throughput for stream encoding tasks.

Video editing: The CPU’s multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 17940, Passmark multi-thread 21135) are strong for 1080p editing and light 4K work. The GPU’s 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 and 8.397 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) can accelerate effects and rendering in compatible software. The 4 GB VRAM limits scrubbing and effects on large timelines.

3D rendering: CPU rendering is viable; Cinebench R23 multi-core 17940 is competitive with desktop mid-range chips. GPU rendering is limited by the A370M’s 4 GB VRAM and 1024 shading units. Expect long render times for complex scenes. The GPU’s 8 RT cores support ray-traced rendering, but performance will be low.

Software development: Excellent. The CPU’s high single-thread score (3914 Passmark) and multi-thread capability (21135) handle compilation, testing, and container workloads well. The 16 MB L3 cache and DDR5 memory support (83.2 GB/s bandwidth) reduce latency in iterative builds.

Student and office work: Overkill for basic tasks, but the 35 W TDP CPU and 35 W TDP GPU mean efficient operation. The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 3914 ensures snappy responsiveness in office suites. The integrated Radeon 740M provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is disabled for battery savings.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a GPU-limited system for gaming and graphics workloads. The CPU’s 79th percentile versus the GPU’s 74th percentile shows a 5-point gap favoring the processor. In gaming, the A370M’s 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will bottleneck at higher resolutions and texture settings, while the CPU can comfortably feed frames at 1080p.

For CPU-bound tasks like compilation, data encryption (14197 Passmark), and integer math (62666 Passmark), the processor is the active component, and the GPU idles. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS will bottleneck in compute-heavy rendering tasks, while the CPU’s 6 cores handle physics and logic.

FPS scaling estimates: at 1080p, the CPU can push frame rates limited only by the GPU’s fill rate (65.60 GPixel/s) and texture rate (131.2 GTexel/s). At 1440p, the GPU’s memory bandwidth (112.0 GB/s) becomes the hard limit, and the CPU’s advantage is irrelevant. The balanced percentile (77) masks this asymmetry; the CPU is capable of pairing with a GPU one or two tiers higher without bottlenecking.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is built on TSMC’s 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It features 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operations units. Clocks run at 1550 MHz base and 2050 MHz boost. Memory is 4 GB GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth and 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) memory clock.

The 8 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, though with only 4.198 TFLOPS FP32, ray-traced workloads will be slow. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring modern API compatibility. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is adequate for this class of GPU.

Benchmark results: Geekbench OpenCL 29676 and Vulkan 28673. The Vulkan score being lower than OpenCL is unusual and may indicate driver maturity issues on the Alchemist architecture. The 74th percentile places it near the RX 470 (0.6% lower), which is a desktop GPU from 2016 — the A370M matches its compute but lacks its memory bandwidth (112 GB/s vs 224 GB/s for RX 470).

For rendering, the FP16 throughput of 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) can accelerate AI inference and certain graphics effects, but the 4 GB VRAM is the limiting factor for 3D scenes, textures, and render targets. The 45.9M transistors per mm² density indicates a dense, modern design, but the narrow memory bus undermines the compute potential.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5 with DDR5 memory support in dual-channel configuration, providing 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is supported, which benefits workstation use. The platform offers PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes from the CPU. This is a mobile platform (build class: laptop), so upgrades are limited to RAM and storage in most implementations.

The GPU is end-of-life (production status) and uses PCIe 4.0 x8. In a laptop, the GPU is typically soldered and not upgradeable. The 35 W TDP for both CPU and GPU suggests a combined 70 W thermal budget, leaving headroom in most laptop chassis for faster components if the platform allowed it.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a higher-tier GPU if the laptop design permitted MXM or external GPU support — the CPU’s 79th percentile shows it can handle significantly more graphics horsepower. The CPU itself is upgradeable on AM5 in desktop variants, but this mobile package is fixed. Memory upgrades to higher-capacity DDR5 would benefit multitasking, given the dual-channel support. The absence of a suggested PSU and the laptop form factor mean power delivery is fixed by the OEM design.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix2. It operates at 3.40 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost, with a 35 W TDP — exceptionally low for the performance level. Manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process, it packs 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die.

Cache hierarchy: 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. The memory controller supports DDR5 dual-channel with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth and ECC. The 14 PCIe Gen 4 lanes provide adequate connectivity for the GPU (x8) and storage. The integrated Radeon 740M GPU offers a fallback display output.

Benchmark performance is desktop-class: Cinebench R23 multi-core 17940 and single-core 2532. The multi-core score rivals the Intel Core i5-12600K (0.5% difference in average), while consuming a fraction of the power. Passmark multi-thread 21135 and single-thread 3914 confirm this. The data compression score of 246397 is exceptionally high, indicating strong memory subsystem performance. The physics score of 1150 is a weak point, suggesting gaming physics engines may underperform relative to other workloads.

The 79th percentile versus all CPUs places it above 79% of all tested processors. The nearest rival, the Ryzen 5 7600X, is a 105 W desktop part, yet the 8500GE matches it within 0.3%. This indicates the Phoenix2 architecture achieves remarkable efficiency without sacrificing throughput. The multiplier is unlocked, though laptop cooling limits overclocking potential.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The system holds a combined percentile of 77 across all tested laptop configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X?

A: The Ryzen 5 8500GE scores 27712 on average, which is 0.3% higher than the Ryzen 5 7600X’s 27636, despite the 7600X being a higher-power desktop part.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth and 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) memory clock.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE supports ECC memory, along with DDR5 dual-channel memory at 83.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and TDP?

A: The CPU boosts to 5.00 GHz from a 3.40 GHz base clock, with a 35 W TDP. The GPU also has a 35 W TDP, giving a combined 70 W thermal budget.

Q: What APIs does the GPU support?

A: The Intel Arc A370M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the stronger component relative to their respective markets?

A: The CPU is stronger, sitting at the 79th percentile versus the GPU’s 74th percentile, indicating the CPU can handle a more powerful GPU without bottlenecking.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets laptop buyers who need a portable workstation with strong CPU throughput for development, productivity, and light content creation, with gaming as a secondary consideration. The CPU’s 79th percentile and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17940 make it suitable for software developers who compile code, run virtual machines, and process data — the Passmark data compression score of 246397 is particularly strong for database and archive workloads.

Students in engineering or computer science fields benefit from the CPU’s single-thread performance (3914 Passmark) for code editing and the multi-thread capability for simulations. The 35 W CPU and 35 W GPU TDPs enable long battery life in a laptop form factor, ideal for campus use. Office workers get responsive performance for spreadsheets, documents, and web apps, with ECC memory support adding reliability for data-sensitive tasks.

Content creators working with 1080p video will find the CPU’s multi-thread scores adequate for editing, while the GPU’s 4.198 TFLOPS can accelerate effects. The 4 GB VRAM limits high-resolution texture work, so 3D artists should look elsewhere. Gamers at 1080p with medium settings are the target audience; the CPU won’t hold back the GPU, but the GPU’s 74th percentile caps frame rates. Esports players will appreciate the single-thread performance for high FPS in competitive titles.

Small business workstations benefit from the AM5 platform’s DDR5 memory, ECC support, and 14 PCIe Gen 4 lanes for fast storage. The active production status of the CPU ensures long-term availability, though the GPU is end-of-life, which may concern those needing warranty support for the graphics subsystem.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE, a 6-core Zen 4 mobile processor, with the Intel Arc A370M, an entry-level Alchemist discrete GPU. The CPU is on the AM5 socket with DDR5 memory support, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8 and has 4 GB GDDR6. Both components have 35 W TDPs, making this an efficient pairing suited for thin-and-light laptops.

The overall tier is upper-midrange, with a combined percentile of 77. The CPU is the standout component at the 79th percentile, delivering desktop-class multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 17940) in a low-power envelope. The GPU at the 74th percentile is adequate for 1080p gaming at medium settings but constrained by its 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus. The system is best characterized as a productivity-first laptop with gaming capability, not a gaming-first machine. The lack of measured FPS data for this exact pairing means gaming expectations should be tempered, but the benchmark scores indicate a capable, balanced system for mixed workloads.