SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE

27,712 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE + Intel Arc A350M: A Low-Power Laptop Duo with Surprising Reach

This build pairs AMD's 6-core Zen 4 mobile processor with Intel's entry-level Arc 3 discrete GPU in a laptop configuration. The combined percentile rank of 75 places this system in the upper quarter of all tested hardware pairings, though the data clearly shows a CPU-heavy imbalance where the processor outperforms the graphics solution in raw compute potential. The Ryzen 5 8500GE, with its 35W TDP and Phoenix2 architecture, delivers desktop-class multi-threaded performance in a power-constrained mobile envelope, while the Arc A350M provides modest 1080p-class graphics capability. The benchmark data reveals a system that excels at productivity and content creation tasks but requires careful expectation-setting for high-end gaming workloads.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on TSMC's 4nm process node, featuring the Zen 4 architecture under the Phoenix2 codename. It operates with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, drawing a remarkably low 35W TDP for a chip with this performance envelope. The CPU includes a Radeon 740M integrated GPU, though this build pairs it with the discrete Intel Arc A350M. Memory support includes dual-channel DDR5 with an 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. The processor connects via PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes from the CPU.

The benchmark results position this CPU at the 79th percentile among all tested processors, with an average benchmark score of 27712. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 17940 and single-core score of 2532 demonstrate strong all-around capability. The single-core score is particularly notable, placing it in contention with desktop parts for lightly-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R20 results reinforce this picture: 7534 multicore and 1063 single-core. The R15 scores of 1808 multicore and 255 single-core complete the consistent performance picture across three generations of the Cinebench test.

The nearest rival comparison shows this CPU trading blows with established desktop processors. The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X scores 27636 on average, a mere 0.3% difference from the 8500GE. The Intel Core i5-12600KF averages 27799, which is 0.3% higher than the 8500GE's average. The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and Intel Core i5-12600K both average 27578, putting them 0.5% behind the 8500GE. This clustering within a 0.8% band demonstrates that the 8500GE's low-power design does not sacrifice meaningful performance relative to these higher-TDP desktop parts.

PassMark tests reveal workload-specific strengths. The multithread score of 21135 and integer math score of 62666 indicate strong general-purpose compute. Floating point math reaches 39065, while extended instructions (SIMD-heavy workloads) score 17962. The data encryption score of 14197 and data compression score of 246397 show the CPU handles cryptography and compression tasks efficiently. Physics simulation scores 1150, while random string sorting reaches 29501. The single-thread score of 3914 matches the Cinebench single-core results, confirming strong per-thread performance. The find prime numbers score of 79 is modest, reflecting the CPU's design priorities toward standard workloads rather than extreme number-crunching.

For real-world productivity, these numbers translate to snappy application launches, responsive multitasking across 12 threads, and quick compilation of code or rendering of documents. The 16 MB shared L3 cache, while smaller than some desktop parts, works well with the dual-channel DDR5 memory subsystem. The 4nm process and 35W TDP make this an efficient engine for sustained workloads in thin-and-light chassis, though the boost clock of 5.00 GHz suggests thermal headroom is available for short bursts.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data shows a clear performance asymmetry between the CPU and GPU in this pairing. The CPU sits at the 79th percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 70th percentile among all graphics cards. This 9-percentage-point gap indicates the CPU has more relative compute headroom than the GPU can utilize in graphics-bound scenarios. For gaming workloads, the Arc A350M will be the limiting factor in most cases, as the CPU's single-thread performance is sufficient to feed even demanding game engines.

The combined percentile of 75 sits between the individual component percentiles, reflecting how the system performs as a whole. The CPU's 0.3% advantage over the Ryzen 5 7600X and 0.5% advantage over the Ryzen 7 5700X in average benchmark score means the processor will not bottleneck any application the GPU can handle. Conversely, the GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 590 (0.4% faster), NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (0.5% faster), AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (0.8% slower), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (1.5% slower). This places the Arc A350M in the performance class of older desktop GPUs, which will constrain frame rates in modern titles.

For CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data compression, or spreadsheet calculations, the system performs at its peak with no meaningful bottleneck. For GPU-bound tasks like 3D rendering in real-time or high-resolution gaming, the Arc A350M's 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth will be the limiting factor. The 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus further constrains texture-heavy workloads, particularly at higher resolutions where memory capacity becomes a factor.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured directly, can be inferred from the component benchmarks. The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2532 indicates it can maintain high frame rates in CPU-limited scenarios. However, the GPU's modest fill rates of 52.80 GPixel/s pixel rate and 105.6 GTexel/s texture rate suggest that resolution scaling will show diminishing returns quickly as pixel counts increase.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers an average benchmark score of 27712, placing it at the 79th percentile among all CPUs. This score puts it within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X and Intel Core i5-12600KF, and 0.5% ahead of both the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and Intel Core i5-12600K. The multicore performance is particularly strong for a 35W part: Cinebench R23 multicore hits 17940, while the single-core score of 2532 is competitive with desktop parts. The PassMark multithread score of 21135 and single-thread score of 3914 reinforce this dual-strength profile.

The GPU posts an average benchmark score of 24647, placing it at the 70th percentile among all GPUs. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 24546, while the Vulkan score reaches 24747. The nearest rival comparisons show the Arc A350M trailing the AMD Radeon RX 590 by 0.4% and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile by 0.5%, while leading the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT by 0.8% and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 by 1.5%. This places the GPU in a performance tier roughly equivalent to a mid-range desktop card from several generations ago, adequate for 1080p gaming at medium settings.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is clearly the stronger component relative to its peers. The 79th percentile CPU paired with a 70th percentile GPU creates a combined percentile of 75. For productivity tasks that leverage the CPU's 12 threads and high single-core performance, this system performs well above its class. For gaming, the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth will deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with adjusted settings, but the system will not compete with higher-tier GPU pairings.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the data. The benchmark scores provide the basis for estimated frame rates, but these figures are estimates rather than measured results. The CPU's strong single-core performance suggests it can handle game logic and physics without bottlenecking the GPU. The GPU's performance class, as indicated by its 70th percentile ranking and rivalry with the RX 590 and GTX 1630, points to 1080p gaming as the primary target.

At 1080p with ultra settings, modern AAA titles will likely run between 30-50 FPS based on the GPU's compute capabilities. The 4 GB VRAM capacity may cause texture streaming issues in games that require more memory, particularly at higher quality presets. The 64-bit memory bus and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit performance in bandwidth-sensitive titles, while the 768 shading units and 24 ROPs provide moderate rasterization throughput.

Esports and competitive titles like first-person shooters or MOBAs, which are typically CPU-bound, should perform well due to the Ryzen 5 8500GE's 2532 single-core Cinebench R23 score. Frame rates in these titles could exceed 60 FPS at 1080p with competitive settings. The 2200 MHz boost clock on the GPU helps maintain responsiveness in less demanding scenes.

For 1440p gaming, the GPU will struggle to maintain consistent frame rates in demanding titles, as the pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s and memory bandwidth become limiting factors. The system is better suited to 1080p gaming with settings adjusted to medium or high, depending on the title. The directx 12 Ultimate support with feature level 12_2 ensures compatibility with modern rendering techniques, though the modest hardware may require reduced settings to enable these features.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need strong CPU performance in a laptop form factor with moderate graphics capability. Content creators working with video editing, 3D modeling, or software development will benefit from the CPU's 12 threads and high single-core performance. The 17940 Cinebench R23 multicore score supports rendering tasks, while the 2532 single-core score ensures responsive application interactions.

Students and professionals who need a portable workstation for programming, data analysis, or office productivity will find the CPU's performance sufficient for compilation, spreadsheet calculations, and multitasking. The PassMark data compression score of 246397 indicates efficient handling of archived files, while the encryption score of 14197 supports secure communications and file protection.

Gamers targeting 1080p resolution with moderate settings will find the Arc A350M adequate for most titles. The GPU's performance class, comparable to a desktop RX 590 or GTX 1630, supports esports gaming and older AAA titles well. Users who prioritize frame rates over visual fidelity can achieve playable performance in modern games at reduced settings.

Small business workstations that require dependable performance for productivity applications, web development, or database management will benefit from the CPU's efficiency. The 35W TDP enables thin laptop designs with long battery life, while the 79th percentile CPU performance ensures no productivity bottleneck.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Socket AM5 platform provides a clear upgrade path for the CPU. The Ryzen 5 8500GE is a Zen 4 part, and the socket supports newer processors within the same generation and architecture. Users can upgrade to higher-core-count Ryzen processors on the same AM5 socket without changing the motherboard. The dual-channel DDR5 memory support means existing memory can be retained when upgrading the CPU.

The PCIe Gen 4 interface with 14 lanes from the CPU supports current-generation storage and GPU connectivity. The integrated Radeon 740M GPU provides a fallback if the discrete GPU fails or is removed. The 35W CPU TDP means the motherboard's power delivery system has substantial headroom for higher-TDP processors, making a future CPU upgrade straightforward.

The Intel Arc A350M, being an end-of-life product, has no upgrade path within the same form factor. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which limits bandwidth compared to x16 connections but is sufficient for this performance class. The 25W GPU TDP leaves thermal headroom in the laptop chassis, though the 4 GB VRAM capacity is the primary limiting factor for future gaming demands. A sensible next upgrade would focus on the CPU, leveraging the AM5 platform's longevity, while accepting the GPU's limitations for the laptop's lifespan.

The suggested PSU is not specified in the data, but the combined CPU TDP of 35W and GPU TDP of 25W totals 60W for the core components, indicating a low-power system that can be supported by standard laptop power adapters. The memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s from the CPU and 112.0 GB/s from the GPU provide balanced data throughput for the system's performance class.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile among all processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE ranks at the 79th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27712.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X?

A: The Ryzen 5 8500GE has an average benchmark score of 27712, which is 0.3% higher than the Ryzen 5 7600X's 27636 average score.

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity and type?

A: The Intel Arc A350M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 75, placing the system in the upper quarter of all tested hardware pairings.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE supports ECC memory, along with dual-channel DDR5 at 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 compute performance?

A: The Intel Arc A350M delivers 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, with 768 shading units and 24 ROPs.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630?

A: The Arc A350M has an average benchmark score of 24647, which is 1.5% higher than the GTX 1630's 24277 average score.

Build Overview

This build represents a laptop-class system pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE processor with the Intel Arc A350M graphics. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 part on the AM5 socket with a 35W TDP, while the GPU is an Xe-HPG architecture chip with 4 GB GDDR6 memory and a 25W TDP. The combined percentile of 75 indicates the system outperforms 75% of all tested CPU+GPU combinations, driven primarily by the CPU's strong showing at the 79th percentile.

The system's class is laptop, and the component balance favors CPU-intensive workloads. The processor's average benchmark score of 27712 places it in the same performance tier as desktop parts like the Ryzen 5 7600X and Core i5-12600K, while the GPU's 24647 average score aligns with older desktop discrete graphics. This is a productivity-first build with gaming capability at 1080p with adjusted settings.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's 2532 single-core Cinebench R23 score supports high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, but the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth limit overall performance. Esports titles can exceed 60 FPS at 1080p, while demanding AAA games will require medium settings for playable frame rates.

Streaming: The 12 threads and 17940 Cinebench R23 multicore score handle encoding workloads alongside gaming. The CPU's 14197 PassMark encryption score supports secure streaming protocols, though the GPU's modest performance may require reduced game settings to maintain stream quality.

Video Editing: The CPU's multicore strength accelerates video encoding, rendering, and export tasks. The 39065 floating-point math score supports color grading and effects processing. The GPU provides hardware acceleration for effects and playback, though 4 GB VRAM limits working with large timelines.

3D Rendering: CPU-based rendering benefits from the 12 threads and 21135 PassMark multithread score. GPU-accelerated rendering in applications that support DirectX 12 Ultimate can leverage the Arc A350M's 6 ray tracing cores, though the 3.379 TFLOPS compute limits complex scenes.

Software Development: Compilation and build tasks scale well with the CPU's 12 threads and 62666 integer math score. The 246397 data compression score speeds up package management and build artifact handling. The single-thread performance ensures responsive IDE interactions and fast test runs.

Student and Office Work: The 35W CPU TDP enables long battery life for portable use. The 3914 PassMark single-thread score handles office applications, web browsing, and document processing without delay. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM supports multiple displays and hardware-accelerated video playback for presentations.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6nm process. It contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1150 MHz and boosts to 2200 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus provides 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is modest for modern gaming but adequate for the GPU's performance class.

The GPU includes 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster operations units, along with 6 ray tracing cores. The pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 105.6 GTexel/s. FP32 performance reaches 3.379 TFLOPS, while FP16 reaches 6.758 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (feature level 12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern rendering APIs.

The benchmark results place this GPU at the 70th percentile among all graphics cards, with an average score of 24647. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 and Vulkan score of 24747 show consistent performance across different compute APIs. The nearest rival comparisons reveal the GPU's position: 0.4% behind the AMD Radeon RX 590, 0.5% behind the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, 0.8% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, and 1.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630.

For rendering workloads, the 6 ray tracing cores provide entry-level hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, though the 3.379 TFLOPS compute limits complex scenes. The 24 ROPs and 52.80 GPixel/s pixel rate deliver adequate fill for 1080p gaming, and the 105.6 GTexel/s texture rate supports detailed textures at moderate resolutions. The GPU's 25W TDP makes it suitable for thin laptops, though the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus constrain performance in memory-intensive scenarios. The production status is end-of-life, with a release date of March 2022, indicating this is a mature product with established driver support.