SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + Intel Arc B580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

25,005 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B580

23,021 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and Intel Arc B580 form a desktop pairing that targets a specific performance window. The CPU, built on Zen 4 architecture, offers six cores and twelve threads with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU brings 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and Xe2-HPG architecture to the table. Together, this build sits at the 73rd combined percentile across all CPU-GPU pairings, with measured 1080p ultra settings averaging 98.3 FPS across a broad game library. This analysis examines the platform, benchmark data, and real-world implications of this combination.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which provides a clear path for future CPU upgrades without changing the motherboard. The socket supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The CPU itself provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is sufficient for a modern graphics card and an NVMe SSD. The 65 W TDP means the CPU does not demand an aggressive cooling solution, and the system's power supply requirements are largely dictated by the GPU.

The Intel Arc B580 has a suggested PSU rating of 450 W, which indicates the entire system can run on a modest power supply. The GPU itself has a 190 W TDP and uses a single 8-pin power connector. This leaves headroom for CPU upgrades within the same TDP envelope, though a higher-core-count AM5 CPU might have a higher TDP. The platform supports DDR5 memory, but the CPU does not support ECC memory, so users should plan for standard unbuffered DIMMs.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a higher-core-count AM5 CPU, as the socket supports the full range of Ryzen 7000 and 8000 series processors. The PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU are adequate for the Arc B580, which uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. Since the GPU's bus interface is x8 rather than x16, the available CPU lanes are more than enough. The 450 W suggested PSU also provides a clear limit for future GPU upgrades—moving to a higher-tier card would likely require a PSU upgrade, but the current headroom is comfortable for the B580.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores place it in the 77th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25005. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, which scores 24964, a delta of only 0.2%. This means the 8400F is effectively tied with that chip in aggregate performance. The Intel Core i7-11850H and i7-13620H are also close, with deltas of 0.3% and 0.4% respectively, indicating the 8400F trades blows with mobile H-series parts from Intel.

Looking at specific CPU tests, the Cinebench R23 multicore score is 20851, while the single-core score is 2943. The 3DMark 16-thread score is 6091, and the single-thread score is 951. These numbers show a strong balance between single-threaded and multi-threaded performance, which is typical for a six-core Zen 4 part. In PassMark, the multithread score is 24389, and the single-thread score is 3685. The floating-point math score is 46217, while integer math hits 74021. Data compression scores 288158, encryption 16646, and extended instructions 22175.

The GPU sits in the 68th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 23021. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, which scores 23061, a delta of -0.2%. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 is 0.6% behind, while the RTX 3080 is 0.7% ahead. This places the Arc B580 in a strange neighborhood—it outperforms the RTX 2080 slightly but trails the RTX 3080, despite those cards being from different generations. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 3068, which is a modern stress test. Geekbench OpenCL scores 92821, and Vulkan reaches 109672. PassMark G3D scores 15748, while GPU compute hits 7729.

The combined picture shows a CPU that is slightly above average and a GPU that is above average but not exceptional. The pair ranks 2823 out of 3732 pairings by FPS, with an average of 98.3 FPS across all tested games. This places it in the lower-middle tier of all possible CPU-GPU combinations, but the average FPS figure is still respectable for 1080p gaming.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates that the GPU is more likely to be the limiting factor in most gaming workloads. The CPU's 77th percentile ranking is higher than the GPU's 68th percentile, suggesting the CPU has more headroom than the GPU. In games that are heavily threaded, the CPU's six cores and twelve threads can keep up, but the GPU will hit its limits at higher resolutions.

Evidence from the FPS scaling supports this. In Call of Duty: Warzone, the frame rate drops from 142.5 at 1080p to 126.5 at 1440p and 105.9 at 4K. This scaling is less than linear, indicating the GPU is the primary constraint. In Cyberpunk 2077, the drop is steeper: 45.4 at 1080p, 35.1 at 1440p, and 20.6 at 4K. The CPU is not the bottleneck here because the GPU's compute resources are saturated. In Counter-Strike 2, which is lightly threaded, the 1080p score of 149.1 drops to 99.4 at 1440p and 55.3 at 4K, again showing GPU scaling.

For CPU-bound scenarios, the single-thread performance is strong enough to avoid major bottlenecks in most games. The 3DMark single-thread score of 951 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 2943 indicate solid per-core performance. However, in games that are extremely CPU-heavy, such as simulation titles, the six-core count might limit maximum FPS. The PassMark physics score of 1332 suggests moderate physics performance, which could be a constraint in some titles.

Who Should Build It

This pairing suits gamers who prioritize 1080p and 1440p gaming with high frame rates. The measured FPS across the game library shows that most titles exceed 60 FPS at 1080p ultra settings, and many exceed 100 FPS. Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20851 adequate for moderate workloads, while the GPU's 12 GB VRAM helps with texture-heavy tasks.

Software developers will benefit from the CPU's passmark multithread score of 24389, which handles compilation and testing efficiently. Students and small business users who need a reliable desktop for office work, web browsing, and light productivity will find the pair more than capable, though the GPU is overkill for those tasks. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps power consumption reasonable for a small form factor or office environment.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this build delivers. Valorant hits 337.8 FPS at 1080p, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 332 FPS. These numbers comfortably drive 144Hz or even 240Hz monitors. At 1440p, Valorant still manages 286.4 FPS, so competitive shooters are well covered.

Streaming while gaming is feasible because the CPU has enough threads for encoding, though the 65 W TDP limits sustained multi-threaded loads. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM helps with game capture and streaming overlays, but the lack of dedicated tensor cores means AI-based upscaling is not available.

Video editing in software like Premiere or DaVinci Resolve will rely on the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20851 for timeline scrubbing and export. The GPU's 456.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerate effects and color grading. 3D rendering in Blender or similar tools will use the GPU's compute capabilities, with PassMark GPU compute scoring 7729.

Software development benefits from the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads, with PassMark integer math at 74021 and data compression at 288158 for build and archive tasks. The single-thread score of 3685 ensures fast code compilation in single-threaded stages.

Student and office work is trivial for this hardware. The CPU's single-thread performance and the GPU's 2D score of 709 handle spreadsheets, documents, and web browsing without issue. The system's 450 W PSU requirement means it can fit into standard office setups without special electrical infrastructure.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B580 uses the BMG-G21 chip with Xe2-HPG architecture, built on a 5 nm process with 19,600 million transistors. The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base and boost clocks are both 2670 MHz, with memory running at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). The shading units number 2560, with 160 TMUs and 80 ROPs. There are 20 ray tracing cores, though tensor core count is not specified.

The pixel rate is 213.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 427.2 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 13.67 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 27.34 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3068 indicates modern DirectX 12 performance that places it near the RTX 2080 in aggregate benchmarks. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 109672 shows strong compute performance, which is useful for rendering tasks.

The 12 GB VRAM is a significant advantage for 1440p and 4K textures, though the measured FPS at 4K is often below 60 in demanding titles. The memory bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s supports high-resolution textures without stuttering. The ray tracing cores (20) provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, though the overall RT performance is not top-tier given the 68th percentile ranking. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring broad API compatibility.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking for this CPU-GPU pair?

A: The pair ranks at the 73rd percentile among all CPU-GPU combinations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Ryzen 5 8400F scores 25005, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F's score of 24964.

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games?

A: The average FPS across games is 98.3 at 1080p ultra settings.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have?

A: The Intel Arc B580 has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 20 ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU wattage is 450 W.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F with the Intel Arc B580. The CPU is a six-core, twelve-thread Zen 4 part on the AM5 socket, while the GPU is Intel's Battlemage architecture with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile ranking of 73 indicates this is a mid-range-to-upper-mid-range system, sitting above the median but below high-end configurations.

The CPU's 77th percentile and the GPU's 68th percentile combine to create a system that is stronger in CPU-bound tasks than GPU-bound ones. The pair ranks 2823 out of 3732 by FPS, with an average of 98.3 FPS, which is a solid result for 1080p gaming. The build class is desktop, so it is intended for stationary use rather than portable applications.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is a six-core, twelve-thread processor based on Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix codename. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The base clock is 4.20 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 4.70 GHz. The TDP is 65 W, which is modest for a desktop CPU. The L1 cache is 64 KB per core, L2 is 1 MB per core, and L3 is 16 MB shared. Memory support is DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth.

The benchmark scores show strong single-threaded performance, with a PassMark single-thread score of 3685 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2943. Multi-threaded performance is respectable for six cores, with Cinebench R23 multicore at 20851 and PassMark multithread at 24389. The CPU's 3DMark scores scale well from two threads (1874) to sixteen threads (6091), with a max-thread score of 6165. The single-thread score of 951 is lower than the multi-thread scores, indicating that the CPU is not heavily dependent on high clocks for its overall performance.

In real workloads, the CPU handles data compression at 288158, encryption at 16646, and extended instructions at 22175 in PassMark. Floating-point math scores 46217, and integer math reaches 74021. The Find Prime Numbers score is 89, which is low but reflects the specific workload. The CPU is unlocked for overclocking, though the base and boost clocks are already close to the maximum for the architecture.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data covers 54 games at three resolutions with ultra settings. At 1080p, the average across all games is 98.3 FPS, with some titles exceeding 300 FPS and others dropping below 30. The highest performers are Valorant at 337.8 FPS and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 332 FPS. Competitive shooters like Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege hit 178 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone reaches 142.5 FPS. Roblox and Minecraft also perform well at 194 and 148 FPS respectively.

At 1440p, the average drops, but many games remain playable. Valorant still hits 286.4 FPS, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 228 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone manages 126.5 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege hits 117 FPS. More demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 35.1 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 falls to 29.7 FPS. Ark: Survival Ascended is particularly demanding at 16.2 FPS.

At 4K, the GPU struggles with modern titles. Cyberpunk 2077 scores 20.6 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 gets 23.1 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 9.4 FPS. However, less demanding games remain playable: Valorant hits 231.1 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 135 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone manages 105.9 FPS. The Medium is the most demanding game in the list, scoring 21 FPS at 4K, which is borderline playable.

For 1080p gaming, this build is excellent for esports titles and good for AAA games, though some titles like Cyberpunk 2077 and Red Dead Redemption 2 will require lower settings to hit 60 FPS. At 1440p, the system is suitable for competitive shooters but will struggle with the most demanding AAA games at ultra settings. The data is measured, not estimated, so these figures reflect real-world performance.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + Intel Arc B580

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

Intel Arc B580

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds