SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX

33,668 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX paired with the Intel Arc A570M is an unusual cross-vendor laptop combination: a high-performance mobile Ryzen chip from the Dragon Range family teamed with Intel's Alchemist-generation discrete graphics. The data shows a build that sits in the combined 86th percentile, with a CPU in the 84th percentile against all CPUs and a GPU in the 88th percentile against all GPUs — a genuinely well-matched upper-mid-tier mobile pairing rather than a lopsided one. No measured frame rates exist for this exact combination in the database, so all gaming discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than drawn from recorded gameplay tests.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 5 7645HX is a Zen 4 part built on TSMC's 5 nm process, carrying 6 cores and 12 threads with a 4.00 GHz base clock and a 5.00 GHz boost clock. The cache layout is generous for a six-core mobile chip: 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core, plus a shared 32 MB L3 pool — the kind of cache that keeps game engines and compilers fed without hammering main memory. Memory support is DDR5 over a dual-channel bus delivering 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC is supported, a notable trait that broadens the chip's appeal beyond gaming into workstation-adjacent territory.

The silicon itself is compact and efficient: 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. PCIe connectivity is a standout for a mobile platform — Gen 5 with 28 CPU lanes — which matters for feeding a discrete GPU and fast storage simultaneously without lane contention.

Benchmark results indicate a processor that punches well above its core count. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13,985 and single-core score of 1,809 show a balanced profile: strong per-thread throughput from the 5.00 GHz boost, and multi-thread scaling that keeps pace with chips carrying more cores. Geekbench reinforces this with 2,657 single-core and 11,586 multi-core scores. Against its nearest rivals, the picture is remarkably tight: the Ryzen 7 8840HS sits at a 0 percent delta, the Ryzen 9 3900XT at -0.2 percent, the Ryzen 5 240 at 0.4 percent, and Intel's Core Ultra 7 255H at 0.4 percent. In other words, the 7645HX trades blows with an eight-core Ryzen 7 and a twelve-core desktop Ryzen 9 in aggregate scoring — evidence that the 5 nm Zen 4 design compensates for its six-core configuration with clock speed and per-clock efficiency.

The PassMark subscores fill in the workload-specific detail. Integer math lands at 77,432 and floating point at 48,798, while the extended instructions test scores 22,969 — indicating solid AVX throughput for a mobile part. Data compression at 302,256 and encryption at 17,900 show capable memory-and-ALU-bound throughput. The single-thread figure of 3,907 and multi-thread figure of 26,476 put the chip at an average benchmark score of 33,668, right in that 84th-percentile band. One limitation worth noting: the multiplier is locked, so sustained performance depends on the laptop's firmware and cooling rather than user tuning.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's complete benchmark set is as follows:

| Test | Score |

|---|---|

| Cinebench R15 Multi-Core | 2,276 |

| Cinebench R15 Single-Core | 289 |

| Cinebench R23 Multi-Core | 13,985 |

| Cinebench R23 Single-Core | 1,809 |

| Geekbench Multi-Core | 11,586 |

| Geekbench Single-Core | 2,657 |

| PassMark Multi-Thread | 26,476 |

| PassMark Single Thread | 3,907 |

| PassMark Physics | 1,497 |

| PassMark Integer Math | 77,432 |

| PassMark Floating Point | 48,798 |

| PassMark Extended Instructions | 22,969 |

| PassMark Data Compression | 302,256 |

| PassMark Data Encryption | 17,900 |

| PassMark Find Prime Numbers | 178 |

| PassMark Random String Sorting | 34,434 |

The GPU side is thinner on recorded tests, but the single Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239 is informative because of who it places next to. The Arc A570M's nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT at a -0.3 percent delta, the Radeon RX 5600 OEM at 0.3 percent, the NVIDIA P102-100 at -0.5 percent, and the Radeon PRO V710 at -0.7 percent. In OpenCL compute scoring, this 75 W mobile GPU sits statistically level with desktop-class and professional parts — an aggregate metric that reflects the chip's 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput and 2,048 shading units rather than pure rasterization gaming speed, but a strong 88th-percentile signal regardless.

Read together, the two components produce a combined percentile of 86. Neither component embarrasses the other: the CPU's 84th percentile and the GPU's 88th percentile sit within a few points of each other, which is the statistical signature of a balanced pairing rather than one where money was dumped into one component while the other drags.

Balance and Bottleneck

The percentile spread is the first evidence of balance: 84 versus 88, with a combined 86. When one component sits twenty or more percentile points above the other, the lower one becomes the definitive ceiling; here, the gap is small enough that the limiting factor shifts by workload rather than being fixed.

In CPU-bound scenarios — simulation-heavy games, high-refresh competitive titles at reduced settings, code compilation, physics-heavy rendering — the 7645HX is the constraint, and it is a good constraint to have: a 13,985 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 3,907 PassMark single-thread score put it within 0.4 percent of the Core Ultra 7 255H and dead level with the Ryzen 7 8840HS. That means frame pacing and draw-call throughput will not fall off a cliff in CPU-heavy titles.

In GPU-bound scenarios at higher resolutions and ultra settings, the Arc A570M's hardware defines the ceiling. With 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus delivering 224.0 GB/s, and a 1,300 MHz boost clock feeding 83.20 GPixel/s of pixel rate and 166.4 GTexel/s of texture rate, the chip has the fill rate for high-detail rendering but a memory subsystem that will be the first thing to saturate when texture pools grow. The 16 ray-tracing cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support mean ray-traced effects are technically on the menu, though the GPU percentile suggests enabling them fully will cost significant performance.

Because the CPU sits at the 84th percentile and the GPU at the 88th, GPU-bound gaming is the more common state for this pairing, but the margin is narrow enough that neither component is being wasted. That is the practical takeaway: this is a build where upgrading either component alone yields real gains, which is rarer than it sounds.

Upgrade Path and Platform

This is a laptop-class pairing — buildClass is laptop — so the traditional upgrade calculus changes. The CPU uses AMD Socket FL1, and the Arc A570M connects over PCIe 4.0 x8 (the GPU's own interface), while the CPU itself exposes Gen 5 with 28 CPU lanes. In practice, the realistic upgrade levers are memory and storage, not silicon swaps: DDR5 dual-channel support with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth means fully populating both channels is the single most impactful configuration decision, particularly for the GPU's OpenCL workloads and the CPU's 302,256 compression score, which both scale with memory bandwidth.

Power envelopes are modest. The CPU carries a 45 W TDP and the GPU a 75 W TDP — figures that, in a laptop chassis, translate to meaningful thermal headroom compared with thinner machines, but which also mean sustained all-core performance depends heavily on the specific laptop's cooling design. The HX-series designation and 45 W TDP indicate this chip is intended for larger, performance-oriented chassis rather than thin-and-lights, which is the right home for a 5.00 GHz boost clock. There is no suggestedPsu field for the GPU (it is an IGP-form-factor mobile part with no external power connectors), consistent with a soldered mobile configuration where the system board handles power delivery.

A sensible next upgrade within a laptop context: maximize DDR5 capacity and speed, add fast Gen 4/Gen 5 storage on those abundant CPU lanes, and rely on the platform's longevity — a 2023-era Zen 4 and Alchemist pairing with Gen 5 PCIe, DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6 support has API and interface headroom for years. The integrated Radeon 610M graphics also exist as a fallback, useful for battery-saving light workloads without waking the discrete GPU.

Gaming Performance

To state it plainly once: no measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the database, and dataIsMeasured is false. Everything in this section is therefore an estimate framed from the benchmark scores, not recorded gameplay data.

What the scores suggest: with the GPU at the 88th percentile and OpenCL scoring within 0.3 percent of the Radeon RX 6950 XT, the Arc A570M has genuine rendering muscle for a 75 W mobile part. Estimated from that percentile band, high-refresh 1080p gaming at high settings should be the natural habitat for this pairing — the 166.4 GTexel/s texture rate and 83.20 GPixel/s pixel rate are comfortably in the territory of smooth frame delivery at that resolution. At 1440p, the estimate shifts to playable-with-adjustments: the 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM buffer are adequate for most titles at reduced presets but will be the first bottleneck in texture-heavy scenes. Ultra-settings 1440p with ray tracing enabled is where estimates become cautious, as the 16 RT cores carry the full lighting load.

The CPU supports these estimates well: a 3,907 PassMark single-thread score and a 1,497 physics score indicate the CPU side will not cap frame rates in esports-style titles, where the GPU percentile suggests triple-digit frame rates at 1080p competitive settings are a reasonable expectation. Treat all of these as informed estimates anchored to the percentile data, and seek per-title reviews for measured numbers.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7645HX compare to its rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score of 33,668 places it statistically level with the Ryzen 7 8840HS (0 percent delta), 0.2 percent behind the Ryzen 9 3900XT, and 0.4 percent ahead of both the Ryzen 5 240 and Intel Core Ultra 7 255H — a remarkably tight cluster.

Q: Is 6 cores enough in this tier?

A: The data says yes for this class: 13,985 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 26,476 in PassMark multi-thread show the six Zen 4 cores at 5.00 GHz boost keeping pace with higher-core-count rivals in aggregate scoring.

Q: Is this build CPU- or GPU-limited?

A: Neither decisively. The CPU sits in the 84th percentile and the GPU in the 88th, with a combined 86th percentile — a balanced pairing where the limiting factor depends on the workload.

Q: How much memory does the Arc A570M have, and is it enough?

A: 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That is sufficient for 1080p and adjusted 1440p gaming, and it is the component most likely to saturate first in texture-heavy ultra-settings scenarios.

Q: Does this build support ray tracing?

A: Yes. The Arc A570M has 16 ray-tracing cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support, plus Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6. Performance estimates when ray tracing is fully enabled should be tempered by the GPU's overall percentile.

Q: What memory should be used?

A: DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, which delivers 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. Filling both channels matters for the CPU's bandwidth-sensitive workloads and the GPU's compute tasks.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No — the multiplier is unlocked: false. Performance tuning is limited to what the laptop's firmware and cooling allow.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: With the GPU at the 88th percentile and a CPU single-thread score of 3,907, 1080p high-refresh play is the strongest estimated fit. The 166.4 GTexel/s texture rate supports high frame delivery, and the CPU's near-level standing with the Core Ultra 7 255H means frame pacing holds up in fast titles.

Streaming: The 12-thread CPU is the key asset here. A 13,985 Cinebench R23 multi-core score leaves headroom to run an encoder alongside gameplay, and the 32 MB of shared L3 cache helps game and encoder threads coexist without thrashing memory.

Video editing: The 26,476 PassMark multi-thread score and 48,798 floating-point result indicate capable timeline scrubbing and export performance for a laptop, while the GPU's 58,239 OpenCL score — within 0.3 percent of the RX 6950 XT — supports GPU-accelerated effects and previews.

3D rendering: Viable at moderate scale. The CPU's 0-percent delta against the Ryzen 7 8840HS shows it holds its own in multi-core rendering, and the GPU's Xe-HPG architecture with 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 offers a compute path, though long production renders favor higher-core-count hardware.

Software development: Strong fit. The 2,657 Geekbench single-core score makes IDE responsiveness excellent, and compile times benefit from 12 threads and 77,432 integer-math performance. The 34,434 string-sorting score is directly relevant to build tools and data processing. ECC support adds a reliability argument for backend or data work.

Student and office work: Overkill in the best way. Single-thread dominance at the 84th percentile means browser, office suites, and video calls feel instant, and the integrated Radeon 610M can handle light duties for efficiency. The pairing will remain comfortable through years of heavier coursework.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class pairing — a mobile Ryzen 5 7645HX (Zen 4, Dragon Range, 5 nm, 6C/12T) combined with Intel's Arc A570M (Xe-HPG, Alchemist, 6 nm, DG2-256). Its tier, read strictly from the percentiles, is upper-mid: 84th percentile CPU, 88th percentile GPU, 86th percentile combined. That places it above the large majority of systems in the database on both axes simultaneously, which is the meaningful signal — many builds cluster high on one axis and mid on the other. The platform fundamentals are modern and deep: Gen 5 PCIe with 28 CPU lanes, DDR5 dual-channel at 83.2 GB/s, DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 on the graphics side, and a 45 W CPU plus 75 W GPU power profile suited to performance laptop chassis. Both parts remain in active production status per the data.

Who Should Build It

Strictly from the measured performance, the target user is the performance-laptop buyer who wants balanced capability rather than a single-domain specialist. Gamers focused on 1080p and adjusted 1440p — the resolutions implied by the GPU's percentile and memory subsystem — get the most from the graphics side. Content creators benefit from the triple combination of a 13,985 multi-core Cinebench score, a 58,239 OpenCL result, and 8 GB of VRAM for GPU-accelerated work. Developers — including professionals, since ECC is supported — get compile throughput that matches an eight-core Ryzen 7 8840HS and single-thread snappiness at the 84th percentile. Students and small-business workstation users get a machine that handles office workloads trivially and has margin for heavier work later. The buyer to reconsider: anyone whose priority is ultra-settings ray-traced play at high resolutions, where the 8 GB VRAM buffer and 128-bit bus are the estimated ceiling, or anyone needing maximum multi-core rendering throughput beyond what six cores at 5.00 GHz deliver. For everyone in between, the data describes a coherent, balanced, modern laptop platform in the mid-80s percentiles across the board.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds