SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX

33,668 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX and Intel Arc A550M pairing represents a mobile platform built around a 45 W CPU and a 60 W GPU. The data shows a combined percentile of 85, placing this laptop configuration above the vast majority of systems in the benchmark database. This is a laptop-class build, and the absence of measured FPS data for this exact combination means all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the individual component scores.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A550M is a mobile graphics processor built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation (Arc 5 Mobile). It is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, containing 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The GPU packs 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units, giving it a pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 262.4 GTexel/s. The chip operates at a base clock of 900 MHz and boosts to 2050 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz, translating to 14 Gbps effective.

Memory configuration is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. This is a modest memory bandwidth figure relative to the GPU’s compute capabilities, but it is sufficient for the target resolution and settings this card is designed to handle. For rendering workloads, the Arc A550M offers 16 ray tracing cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported titles. The FP32 performance is 8.397 TFLOPS, while FP16 performance reaches 16.79 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs.

Benchmark results for the Arc A550M come from two synthetic tests: Geekbench OpenCL scores 49894, and Geekbench Vulkan scores 49580. The average benchmark score is 49737, which places the GPU at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. This percentile position indicates strong performance relative to the broader GPU landscape. The nearest rivals provide context: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti scores 49957, a delta of -0.4%, meaning the Arc A550M is essentially neck-and-neck with that card in these synthetic benchmarks. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 scores 50001 (-0.5%), and the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT scores 50951 (-2.4%), meaning the Arc A550M trails those cards by roughly half a percent and 2.4%, respectively. Conversely, the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT scores 48477, which is 2.6% lower than the Arc A550M, meaning the Intel card leads that rival. For rendering, these scores suggest the Arc A550M can handle 1080p and some 1440p workloads, with ray tracing available but likely requiring reduced settings in demanding scenes.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX are extensive. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2276 in multi-core and 289 in single-core. Cinebench R23 results are 13985 multi-core and 1809 single-core. Geekbench shows 11586 multi-core and 2657 single-core. PassMark tests include data compression at 302256, data encryption at 17900, extended instructions at 22969, find prime numbers at 178, floating point math at 48798, integer math at 77432, multithread at 26476, physics at 1497, random string sorting at 34434, and single thread at 3907. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 33668, placing it at the 84th percentile among all CPUs.

The nearest CPU rivals show how tightly grouped this processor is. The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS scores 33667, a delta of 0%, meaning the 7645HX is statistically identical to that chip. The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT scores 33736, a delta of -0.2%, so the 7645HX is only 0.2% behind that desktop-class processor. The AMD Ryzen 5 240 scores 33542, a delta of 0.4%, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H scores 33537, also a delta of 0.4%. This indicates the 7645HX is essentially performance-equivalent to a range of both mobile and desktop CPUs, with differences well under 1%.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 49737, at the 86th percentile. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 85, which is slightly below the GPU’s individual percentile but above the CPU’s individual percentile, indicating a balanced system where neither component dramatically drags the other down. The combined picture is one of a capable laptop that performs well above average in both compute and graphics tasks, with the CPU and GPU each contributing roughly comparable levels of performance relative to their respective markets.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with the codename Dragon Range. It uses a 5 nm process at TSMC, containing 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. The base clock is 4.00 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.00 GHz. The TDP is 45 W, which is standard for high-performance mobile processors. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is supported. The CPU connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes (CPU only). It includes integrated Radeon 610M graphics, though the discrete Arc A550M will handle graphics duties in this build.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1809 points to strong per-core performance, driven by the 5.00 GHz boost clock and Zen 4 architecture. This translates to snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and solid performance in lightly threaded applications like web browsing, office productivity, and some legacy software. The multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 13985, combined with the Geekbench multi-core score of 11586, indicates that the 6-core/12-thread configuration handles heavily threaded workloads well. PassMark integer math at 77432 and floating point math at 48798 show strong arithmetic throughput, while data compression at 302256 and random string sorting at 34434 suggest good performance in data-intensive tasks.

The 84th percentile ranking means this CPU outperforms roughly 84% of all processors in the database. The near-zero deltas to rivals like the Ryzen 7 8840HS and Ryzen 9 3900XT indicate that in real-world usage, users would be hard-pressed to notice differences between these chips. For content creation, the multi-threaded scores suggest the 7645HX can handle video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation competently, though it will not match higher-core-count desktop parts. For developers, the data encryption score of 17900 and extended instructions score of 22969 indicate reasonable performance in cryptographic workloads and SIMD-heavy code. The processor’s 45 W TDP means it is suitable for laptops that balance performance with thermal constraints, making it a solid choice for mobile workstations.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX uses the AMD Socket FL1, which is the platform for Dragon Range mobile processors. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, delivering 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory support is available, which is a notable feature for users who require data integrity in professional workloads. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes, which is forward-looking for storage and GPU connectivity, though the discrete GPU in this system uses PCIe 4.0 x16 via the Arc A550M’s bus interface.

There is no suggested PSU value in the data for the GPU, and the GPU TDP is 60 W, while the CPU TDP is 45 W. This is a laptop build, so power delivery is handled by the system’s internal power supply and battery, not a desktop PSU. The combined thermal and power envelope of roughly 105 W for the CPU and GPU suggests the laptop requires adequate cooling and a battery/charger capable of sustaining this load. The GPU is marked as "End-of-life" production status, meaning it is not a current-generation part, but it remains functional and supported. The CPU is marked as "Active" production status.

A sensible next upgrade path for this platform would focus on the GPU, as the CPU has headroom relative to its rivals. The CPU’s nearest rivals include the Ryzen 7 8840HS and Ryzen 9 3900XT, both of which score within 0.2% of the 7645HX. This means the CPU is not a bottleneck for most workloads. The GPU, however, sits at the 86th percentile and has rivals like the RX 6800 XT (2.6% slower) and RX 6900 XT (2.4% faster). Upgrading to a GPU with a higher percentile would yield noticeable gains in graphics-bound tasks. However, since this is a laptop, the GPU is typically soldered and not user-replaceable. Memory upgrades from DDR5 are possible if the laptop has SODIMM slots, and storage can be upgraded via PCIe Gen 5 M.2 slots. The platform also supports ECC memory, so users who value data integrity could upgrade to ECC DDR5 modules if the laptop BIOS permits it.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 85, placing this laptop configuration above the vast majority of systems in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7645HX compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS?

A: The Ryzen 5 7645HX has an average benchmark score of 33668, while the Ryzen 7 8840HS scores 33667, resulting in a delta of 0%. They are performance-equivalent.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Arc A550M?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the Ryzen 5 7645HX support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is useful for professional workloads requiring data integrity.

Q: What is the socket type for the Ryzen 5 7645HX?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FL1, which is the platform for Dragon Range mobile processors.

Q: How does the Arc A550M perform relative to the Radeon RX 6800 XT?

A: The Arc A550M scores 49737 on average, which is 2.6% higher than the RX 6800 XT’s score of 48477.

Q: What is the production status of the Intel Arc A550M?

A: The GPU is marked as "End-of-life," while the CPU is marked as "Active."

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

There is no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 49580 and OpenCL score of 49894, combined with its 86th percentile ranking, indicate that the Arc A550M is capable of handling modern titles at 1080p with high settings in most cases. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory is sufficient for 1080p textures, though some games with very large texture packs may require reducing settings. The 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming.

Based on the GPU’s proximity to the RX 6800 XT (2.6% slower) and RX 6900 XT (2.4% slower), users can expect frame rates in the range of those desktop cards at 1080p, though laptop thermal constraints may reduce sustained performance. At 1440p, the GPU’s memory bandwidth and 8 GB capacity will become limiting factors, especially in VRAM-heavy titles. Ray tracing performance is possible given the 16 RT cores, but the FP32 throughput of 8.397 TFLOPS suggests that ray-traced scenes will require DLSS or FSR upscaling to maintain playable frame rates. Esports titles and older games will run at high frame rates at 1080p, while demanding AAA releases will require medium-to-high settings for smooth gameplay. These are estimates, not measured results.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The CPU and GPU are closely matched in terms of percentile rankings: the CPU sits at the 84th percentile, and the GPU at the 86th percentile, with a combined percentile of 85. This near-equal positioning indicates that neither component is a dominant bottleneck in most workloads. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics simulation (PassMark physics score of 1497), the processor’s 6 cores and 12 threads handle the load adequately, but the 45 W TDP limits sustained all-core boost clocks compared to higher-wattage desktop parts. The single-thread score of 3907 in PassMark ensures that games relying on a few fast cores will perform well.

In GPU-bound scenarios, the Arc A550M’s 8.397 TFLOPS and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are the limiting factors. The GPU’s nearest rivals include the RX Vega 64 and RTX 5070 Ti, both scoring within 0.5% of the Arc A550M. This means that in graphics-heavy workloads, the GPU will be the primary constraint, especially at higher resolutions. The CPU’s multi-core performance is sufficient to feed the GPU in most games, but in titles with heavy AI or physics, the CPU may cause frame dips. The FPS scaling evidence is absent due to no measured data, but the percentile gap of 2 points between CPU and GPU suggests that upgrading either component would yield modest gains, with the GPU being the slightly more impactful upgrade for gaming. For content creation, the CPU’s multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core 13985) will be the bottleneck in rendering tasks, while the GPU accelerates effects and previews.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a laptop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field. The pairing consists of the AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX, a 6-core/12-thread Zen 4 mobile processor, and the Intel Arc A550M, a discrete mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture. The combined percentile of 85 places this system in the upper tier of the benchmark database, meaning it outperforms roughly 85% of all tested configurations. The CPU’s 84th percentile and GPU’s 86th percentile are both strong, individually ranking above most components in their respective categories.

The system is designed for users who need a balance of CPU and GPU performance in a mobile form factor. The 45 W CPU TDP and 60 W GPU TDP indicate a power-efficient design that is suitable for laptops with moderate cooling solutions. The CPU’s Dragon Range codename and the GPU’s Alchemist generation suggest this is a mid-to-high-end mobile platform from the 2023 era. The CPU is in active production, while the GPU is end-of-life, meaning the platform is mature and drivers are well-established. The overall tier is best described as "upper-midrange mobile," capable of handling most productivity tasks and gaming at 1080p, with the caveat that it is not a flagship configuration.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This CPU+GPU pairing suits gamers who primarily play at 1080p resolution. The GPU’s 86th percentile and its performance within 2.4% of the RX 6900 XT indicate that it can handle modern titles at high settings in this resolution, with ray tracing available at reduced settings. Gamers who prefer esports titles will find the CPU’s single-thread score of 3907 (PassMark) and boost clock of 5.00 GHz provide high frame rates in CPU-bound games. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 13985 and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 49894, which accelerate effects and rendering previews. The 8 GB of VRAM is adequate for 1080p editing timelines.

Developers will appreciate the CPU’s support for ECC memory, which ensures data integrity in long-running builds, and the PCIe Gen 5 lanes for fast storage access. The CPU’s data encryption score of 17900 and extended instructions score of 22969 indicate solid performance in cryptographic operations and SIMD-heavy code compilation. Students in STEM fields will find the system handles simulations, data analysis, and programming workloads comfortably, given the CPU’s 84th percentile and the GPU’s parallel compute capabilities. Small business workstations that run office productivity suites, database management, and light CAD software will perform well, as the CPU’s data compression score of 302256 and multithread score of 26476 demonstrate strong throughput in common business tasks. The system is not suited for 4K gaming or heavy 4K rendering, as the GPU’s 224.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM will constrain performance at that resolution.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX + Intel Arc A550M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

FAQ

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds