SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX

33,668 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX + Intel Arc A370M

This pairing combines AMD's Zen 4 mobile architecture with Intel's entry-level Arc 3 discrete graphics in a laptop build class. The CPU sits at the 84th percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at the 74th percentile among all graphics cards, making this a system that prioritizes compute throughput over graphical headroom. The data shows a platform capable of serious multi-threaded workloads, but the GPU's 4 GB memory footprint and 64-bit bus position it as a 1080p-class solution rather than a high-resolution performer.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range, and fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process with 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. It belongs to the 7000 series and features a base clock of 4.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The CPU is designed for the mobile segment, drawing a 45 W TDP, and uses the AMD Socket FL1. Cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The memory controller supports DDR5 in dual-channel mode, delivering 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and the CPU includes ECC memory support. Integrated graphics come in the form of the Radeon 610M, though this system pairs the CPU with a discrete Intel Arc A370M.

Benchmark results indicate a strong all-around performer. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 13,985 in multi-core and 1,809 in single-core tests. The multi-core score reflects a 12-thread design that handles heavily parallel workloads effectively, while the single-core score of 1,809 demonstrates solid per-thread performance for everyday responsiveness. Cinebench R15 results show 2,276 multi-core and 289 single-core, consistent with the R23 scaling. Geekbench scores of 11,586 multi-core and 2,657 single-core reinforce this picture, with the single-core result indicating strong IPC from the Zen 4 architecture.

Passmark results add granularity. The CPU achieves 77,432 in integer math, 48,798 in floating-point math, and 22,969 in extended instructions, showing balanced ALU and FPU capabilities. Data compression scores 302,256, while encryption hits 17,900 — the compression figure particularly benefits from the large L3 cache and high memory bandwidth. Prime number finding scores 178, physics 1,497, random string sorting 34,434, and single-thread performance 3,907. The multithread score of 26,476 places the CPU in the upper tier of mobile processors, with average benchmark score of 33,668 against all CPUs and an 84th percentile ranking. Compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, the 7645HX is effectively identical at a 0% delta (33,668 vs 33,667), meaning the two trade blows within noise. The Ryzen 9 3900XT, a desktop part, edges ahead by 0.2%, while the AMD Ryzen 5 240 trails by 0.4% and the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H matches at 0.4% ahead. This places the 7645HX in the company of recent mid-range and older high-end desktop chips, an impressive feat for a 45 W mobile processor.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 33,668 places it at the 84th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU's average score of 29,175 places it at the 74th percentile of all GPUs. The combined system percentile is 79, reflecting a configuration where the CPU outperforms the GPU in relative standing. The CPU's nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, scores 33,667 with a 0% delta, indicating these processors are functionally equivalent in aggregate performance. The Ryzen 9 3900XT scores 33,736, a 0.2% advantage, while the Ryzen 5 240 and Intel Core Ultra 7 255H score 33,542 and 33,537 respectively, both 0.4% behind.

GPU benchmarks show the Intel Arc A370M achieving 29,676 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28,673 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its average score of 29,175 puts it near the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (29,197, 0.1% ahead), the AMD FirePro W8000 (29,211, 0.1% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 470 (28,996, 0.6% behind), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (28,874, 1% behind). The proximity to the RX 6800M, a high-end mobile GPU, is notable — it suggests the A370M punches above its class in synthetic compute, though the RX 6800M's delta of 1% is within measurement variance. The combined picture shows a system where CPU-bound tasks will shine, while GPU-bound workloads will be limited by the A370M's modest specifications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the Dragon Range mobile platform. This socket supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and the platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU. The memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s is adequate for the 6-core design, and ECC support adds reliability for workstation-style tasks. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for its 4 GB GDDR6 memory and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth.

The CPU's 45 W TDP and GPU's 35 W TDP combine for a modest total power draw, making this a laptop configuration that does not require an oversized power supply. The GPU's suggested PSU is not specified, and its slot width is listed as IGP (integrated graphics package), indicating a compact design. A sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU, as the CPU has headroom — its 84th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 74th suggests the processor can drive a more capable graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface on the GPU is a limitation for future upgrades, but the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide ample bandwidth for a faster discrete GPU if the laptop chassis allows it. Memory upgrades to higher-capacity DDR5 modules would also benefit the CPU's multi-threaded workloads, though the dual-channel 83.2 GB/s bandwidth is already competitive.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination; the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows. All frame rate expectations are therefore estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 28,673 indicates it can handle modern titles at 1080p with medium to high settings, but its 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will limit texture quality and resolution. The 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is a critical constraint — modern games at 1080p ultra often exceed 4 GB VRAM, which will cause stuttering or texture pop-in. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s suggest it can push frames at 1080p, but the ROP count of 32 and TMU count of 64 will cap fill-rate intensive scenes. The CPU's strong single-core score of 1,809 in Cinebench R23 ensures it won't bottleneck the GPU in most titles, but the GPU itself will be the limiting factor. Expect 1080p gaming at medium settings for AAA titles, with esports titles potentially reaching high refresh rates. At 1440p, the GPU will struggle due to VRAM and bandwidth constraints.

Balance and Bottleneck

The system's balance is skewed toward the CPU. The processor's 84th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 74th percentile indicates a 10-point gap in relative performance, meaning the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU's average score of 33,668 versus the GPU's 29,175 reinforces this — the CPU is roughly 15% stronger in aggregate benchmark terms. In gaming, the CPU's single-core performance of 3,907 in Passmark single-thread and 1,809 in Cinebench R23 will handle game logic and physics, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus will cap frame rates at 1080p. In productivity, the CPU's multi-core score of 13,985 in Cinebench R23 will accelerate rendering and compilation, while the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 will handle GPU-accelerated tasks like video encoding or light 3D work. The data shows no scenario where the CPU bottlenecks the GPU; rather, the GPU limits the system's overall gaming and graphics performance. The FPS scaling is not available, but the GPU's nearest rival, the RX 6800M, scores 1% higher, suggesting the A370M is a competent 1080p GPU, not a high-refresh or high-resolution solution.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need strong CPU compute in a laptop form factor. The 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 processor with a 45 W TDP suits developers compiling code, students running simulations, and small business users handling spreadsheets and databases — the Passmark data compression score of 302,256 and multithread score of 26,476 indicate rapid data processing. Gamers at 1080p with medium settings will find the GPU adequate, but those seeking 1440p or high refresh rates should look elsewhere. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's multi-threaded muscle, though the GPU's 4 GB VRAM limits GPU-accelerated rendering complexity. The system's 79th combined percentile places it above average for a laptop, making it a reasonable choice for mobile professionals who prioritize CPU performance over gaming. The CPU's ECC memory support is a differentiator for workstation tasks where data integrity is critical.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap performance at 1080p medium; esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant may reach high frame rates due to the CPU's strong single-core performance, but AAA games will hover around 60 FPS at medium settings.

Streaming: The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads with a 13,985 Cinebench R23 multi-core score can handle encoding overhead, but the GPU's modest FP32 and lack of dedicated tensor cores means software encoding may be preferable; the 45 W TDP keeps thermals manageable for extended sessions.

Video editing: The CPU's multithread score of 26,476 in Passmark and 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth will accelerate timeline scrubbing and export, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM limits effects and 4K previews; expect smooth 1080p editing with occasional stutters at higher resolutions.

3D rendering: The CPU's 12 threads deliver strong CPU-based rendering performance — a 13,985 Cinebench R23 multi-core score means Blender or V-Ray CPU renders will be quicker than most mobile systems, but GPU rendering with the A370M will be constrained by its 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 and 4 GB memory.

Software development: The CPU's 84th percentile ranking and 3,907 Passmark single-thread score provide snappy compilation and IDE responsiveness; the 12 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and ECC memory support protects against corruption in long compile sessions.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core performance of 1,809 in Cinebench R23 ensures smooth web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet use; the GPU is overkill for office tasks but provides hardware acceleration for browser-based content, and the 45 W TDP means long battery life is possible.

FAQ

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS?

A: The Ryzen 5 7645HX scores 33,668 on average, while the Ryzen 7 8840HS scores 33,667, a 0% delta. The two processors are effectively identical in aggregate benchmark performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and how does it affect gaming?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth. This limits texture quality and resolution, capping practical gaming at 1080p medium settings for most titles.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a mobile processor and beneficial for workstation tasks where data integrity is critical.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and what does it mean for upgrades?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FL1, designed for the Dragon Range mobile platform. This socket supports DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes, but is not compatible with desktop sockets.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6800M?

A: The Arc A370M scores 29,175 on average, while the RX 6800M scores 28,874, making the A370M 1% ahead in aggregate benchmarks. However, the RX 6800M has significantly more VRAM in practice, which the synthetic scores do not capture.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined percentile is 79, meaning this laptop outperforms 79% of all systems in the benchmark database, with the CPU contributing more to this ranking than the GPU.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck for gaming?

A: The GPU is the bottleneck. The CPU sits at the 84th percentile while the GPU sits at the 74th percentile, and the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus limit frame rates at 1080p, whereas the CPU's single-core performance is more than adequate.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed Alchemist, and is part of the Arc 3 Mobile generation. It uses the DG2-128 chip fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 45.9 million per mm². The GPU has a base clock of 1550 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). Memory configuration is 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, delivering 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU features 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units, plus 8 ray tracing cores. Pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. Compute performance is rated at 4.198 TFLOPS for FP32 and 8.397 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and connects via PCIe 4.0 x8. Power draw is 35 W, and it is classified as an end-of-life product.

Benchmark results show the GPU scoring 29,676 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28,673 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average score of 29,175 and a 74th percentile ranking. This places it slightly ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (1% delta) and the AMD Radeon RX 470 (0.6% delta), and marginally behind the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH and AMD FirePro W8000 (both 0.1% delta). For rendering, the 8 RT cores enable ray-traced effects in supported titles, but the 4 GB VRAM limits the complexity of ray-traced scenes. The FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS handles GPU compute tasks like video encoding or basic 3D rendering, but the 64-bit memory bus is a severe constraint — 112.0 GB/s is roughly a third of what modern mid-range GPUs offer. The 2:1 FP16 ratio of 8.397 TFLOPS provides headroom for AI-accelerated workloads, though the lack of dedicated tensor cores means this is generic compute rather than optimized machine learning. In practice, the A370M is a 1080p gaming GPU and a competent accelerator for light GPU-compute tasks, but its memory configuration caps its potential in both gaming and rendering scenarios.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds