SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX

33,668 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This is a laptop pairing of AMD’s Zen 4 Dragon Range CPU and Intel’s entry-level Arc 3 Alchemist GPU. The data shows a system with a high-performance processor and a modest graphics solution, creating a unique balance of capabilities. The CPU is clearly the dominant component, while the GPU serves as a capable entry-level option for gaming and light creative work. The following analysis is based exclusively on the benchmark scores and specifications provided, with all performance comparisons drawn from the nearest rival data.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance profile of this build is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX sits at the 84th percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel Arc A350M is at the 70th percentile among all GPUs. This 14-point gap in percentiles indicates that the processor is significantly stronger relative to its peers than the graphics card is relative to its own class. In practical terms, the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor in a workload; instead, the GPU will cap frame rates in gaming and accelerate tasks like 3D rendering only up to its own limits.

The benchmark scores reinforce this imbalance. The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 26,476 is more than eight times higher than the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 24,546, though these are different tests measuring different things. More telling is the comparison within the CPU’s own benchmark suite: the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13,985 suggests a processor capable of heavy sustained loads, while the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 3.379 TFLOPS places it firmly in entry-level territory. For gaming, this means the Arc A350M will be the bottleneck at essentially every resolution, as even the CPU’s single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,809) is strong enough to feed far more powerful graphics solutions.

The bottleneck shifts depending on the workload. In CPU-bound tasks like software compilation, data compression (PassMark score of 302,256), or encryption (17,900), the GPU is largely irrelevant and the CPU’s 84th percentile ranking ensures smooth operation. In gaming, the GPU’s 70th percentile position and its 4 GB VRAM will constrain performance. The CPU’s 32 MB of L3 cache and 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth are more than adequate for the GPU’s 112.0 GB/s bandwidth, so memory subsystem bottlenecks will not be an issue. The data suggests a system where the CPU has substantial headroom for future GPU upgrades, but as configured, the GPU will limit most graphically intensive tasks.

FAQ

Q: Is this build better for gaming or productivity?

A: The data indicates a productivity-leaning system. The CPU’s 84th percentile rank and strong multicore scores (Cinebench R23 multicore 13,985, Geekbench multicore 11,586) make it excellent for demanding workloads. The GPU’s 70th percentile rank and 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance are adequate for 1080p gaming but will not deliver high-refresh experiences in demanding titles.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 7645HX has an average benchmark score of 33,668, which is essentially identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS (33,667, 0% delta), slightly behind the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT (33,736, -0.2%), and marginally ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 240 (33,542, 0.4%) and Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (33,537, 0.4%). This places it in a very tight performance band with several modern and previous-generation chips.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance class?

A: The Arc A350M’s average benchmark score of 24,647 places it near the AMD Radeon RX 590 (24,744, -0.4% delta), just behind the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (24,763, -0.5%), but ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (24,442, 0.8%) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (24,277, 1.5%). This suggests desktop-class entry-level performance from a few generations ago.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: No. The GPU’s 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth is insufficient for 4K textures and resolutions. The 70th percentile GPU rank and 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput indicate that 1080p is the realistic target, with 1440p possible only in less demanding titles at reduced settings.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 7645HX supports ECC memory. This is a notable feature for workstation use, as it allows for error correction in memory-intensive tasks like financial modeling or scientific computing, where data integrity is critical.

Q: What is the expected FPS in games?

A: There is no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s performance, comparable to an AMD Radeon RX 590, suggests 1080p medium-to-high settings in older titles and low-to-medium settings in modern AAA games. The CPU’s strong single-core score of 1,809 in Cinebench R23 ensures it will not hold the GPU back.

Q: Is the GPU end-of-life?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A350M is listed as end-of-life in production status, with a release date of March 2022. This means it is a previous-generation product, and while still functional, it may not receive the same level of driver optimization as newer parts.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range. It is manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process node, with 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. This is a high-density, efficient design that allows for a 45 W TDP, which is typical for a performance-focused mobile part. The base clock is 4.00 GHz, boosting up to 5.00 GHz, which is a substantial boost window for a laptop chip.

The cache hierarchy is robust: 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB of L3 cache. This 32 MB L3 is crucial for gaming and productivity, as it reduces latency and improves data throughput for frequently accessed information. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, which is ample for feeding both the CPU and the integrated Radeon 610M graphics. It also supports ECC memory, a feature typically found in server and workstation parts.

Benchmark results show a strong all-around performer. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13,985 is high for a 45 W part, indicating sustained performance under load. The single-core score of 1,809 is equally impressive, suggesting excellent responsiveness in everyday tasks and games. Geekbench scores of 11,586 (multicore) and 2,657 (single-core) corroborate this. The PassMark tests reveal specialized strengths: integer math at 77,432 and floating-point math at 48,798 are strong, while the extended instructions score of 22,969 indicates solid AVX-512 or similar capabilities, useful for scientific and financial workloads. The data compression score of 302,256 is particularly high, suggesting strong performance in file archiving and compression tasks.

The CPU’s 84th percentile ranking places it above most desktop and mobile processors. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, which it matches exactly in average score, and the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT, a previous-generation desktop chip, which it trails by only 0.2%. The Intel Core Ultra 7 255H is 0.4% behind. This positioning indicates that the 7645HX offers desktop-class multicore performance in a laptop form factor, making it suitable for demanding professional work.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need strong CPU performance for productivity but are willing to accept entry-level GPU capabilities. The primary audience is professionals and students who run CPU-intensive applications like software development, data analysis, or financial modeling, and who also want to play games occasionally at 1080p. The CPU’s 84th percentile rank and high PassMark multithread score of 26,476 make it a formidable workstation processor, capable of handling large codebases, virtual machines, and complex simulations.

Content creators who work with 2D graphics, audio processing, or light video editing will benefit from the CPU’s speed, but those focused on 3D rendering or heavy video effects will find the GPU’s 70th percentile rank limiting. The 4 GB VRAM on the Arc A350M is a constraint for large textures and complex scenes. Small business users running office suites, databases, or ERP systems will find the CPU more than adequate, with its strong single-core performance (PassMark single-thread score of 3,907) ensuring snappy application responsiveness.

Gamers at 1080p with modest expectations are a secondary audience. The CPU will not bottleneck any modern game, but the GPU will limit settings and frame rates. Students in engineering or computer science programs will appreciate the CPU’s power for compiling code or running simulations, while the GPU is sufficient for basic CAD or light 3D modeling. This is not a system for high-refresh competitive gaming or professional 3D rendering; it is a CPU-first workstation with a decent entry-level GPU for casual gaming.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. Therefore, all FPS figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not measured results. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 24,647 and its proximity to the AMD Radeon RX 590 (delta of -0.4%) provide a reference point for expected performance.

At 1080p, the Arc A350M with 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 4 GB VRAM should handle esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or League of Legends at high settings with frame rates well above 60 FPS. For modern AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield, frame rates would likely fall to the 30-50 FPS range at medium settings, with drops to lower settings needed to maintain 60 FPS. The 4 GB VRAM will be a limitation in newer titles that require more memory for high-resolution textures, potentially forcing players to use lower texture quality settings.

The CPU’s strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,809) ensures it will not constrain the GPU in most scenarios. At 1440p, the GPU will be the definitive bottleneck, and frame rates will likely drop below 30 FPS in demanding titles, making 1080p the only practical resolution for gaming. The GPU’s support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 means it can enable features like ray tracing in supported games, but the 6 RT cores are minimal, and enabling ray tracing will significantly impact performance. Overall, this is a 1080p entry-level gaming system, not a high-refresh or high-resolution one.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is a mobile graphics processor based on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed DG2-128, part of the Alchemist generation. It is manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster operation units, along with 6 dedicated ray tracing cores. Its FP32 compute throughput is 3.379 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance of 6.758 TFLOPS, indicating a 2:1 ratio typical of Intel’s architecture.

The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. This is a modest configuration that will struggle with high-resolution textures and large datasets. The base clock is 1150 MHz, boosting to 2200 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). Power consumption is rated at 25 W, which is very low for a discrete GPU, suggesting it is designed for thin and light laptops where thermal and power constraints are tight.

Benchmark performance shows the GPU at the 70th percentile, with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 24,546 and a Vulkan score of 24,747. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 590, a desktop GPU from 2018, which it trails by 0.4%. It also sits close to the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (0.5% behind) and the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (0.8% ahead). This positions the A350M as a capable entry-level part, roughly equivalent to a mid-range desktop GPU from several years ago, but far behind current desktop offerings.

For rendering workloads, the 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance is adequate for basic 3D modeling and light rendering in applications like Blender or AutoCAD, but long render times will be expected. The 6 RT cores offer hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but performance will be low due to the limited core count and memory bandwidth. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern games and applications. The 4 GB VRAM is the primary limiting factor, as it constrains texture quality and scene complexity.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 33,668, placing it at the 84th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, scores 33,667, a delta of 0%, making them effectively tied. The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT scores 33,736 (-0.2%), while the AMD Ryzen 5 240 scores 33,542 (0.4%) and the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H scores 33,537 (0.4%). This indicates the 7645HX is a solid mid-to-high-end mobile processor that matches or slightly exceeds several notable competitors.

Key CPU benchmark scores include a Cinebench R23 multicore result of 13,985, a single-core result of 1,809, and a Geekbench multicore score of 11,586. The PassMark multithread score is 26,476, with a single-thread score of 3,907. Specialized tests show strong integer math (77,432), floating-point math (48,798), and data compression (302,256), but a lower prime number finding score of 178, which is typical for this type of workload.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 24,647, placing it at the 70th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 590 with a score of 24,744 (-0.4% delta), followed by the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile at 24,763 (-0.5%), the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT at 24,442 (0.8%), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 at 24,277 (1.5%). The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score is 24,546, with a Vulkan score of 24,747.

Combined, the CPU at the 84th percentile and GPU at the 70th percentile yield a combined percentile of 77 for this build. This reflects a system that is well above average overall, driven primarily by the CPU’s strong performance, but held back slightly by the entry-level GPU. The data shows a CPU that can handle heavy professional workloads and a GPU that can manage light gaming and basic creative tasks, making the overall system a versatile but not high-end performer.

Build Overview

This is a laptop build (buildClass: laptop) pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX processor with the Intel Arc A350M graphics card. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 part designed for high-performance mobile computing, while the GPU is an entry-level Arc 3 mobile solution based on the Xe-HPG architecture. The combination represents a CPU-first design, where the processor’s capabilities far outstrip the graphics card’s.

The build’s combined percentile is 77, meaning it outperforms 77% of all recorded CPU+GPU pairings. This is a respectable overall tier, but the imbalance is clear: the CPU’s 84th percentile rank pulls the combined score up, while the GPU’s 70th percentile rank drags it down. For a user prioritizing CPU-heavy tasks like programming, data analysis, or office productivity, this is an excellent pairing. For gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the system will underperform relative to its CPU potential.

The CPU is an active production part with a 45 W TDP, designed for socket FL1, and features a 5 nm TSMC process. The GPU is end-of-life, with a 25 W TDP and a 6 nm TSMC process. This suggests a system that is CPU-forward, possibly a workstation-oriented laptop with a discrete GPU added for basic graphics acceleration. The lack of measured FPS data confirms that this is not a gaming-focused configuration, but rather a productivity system with light gaming capabilities.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not recommended. The GPU’s 70th percentile rank and 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance are insufficient for high-refresh (144Hz+) gaming at 1080p in modern titles. Estimated frame rates in AAA games would likely fall below 60 FPS at medium settings, making 60Hz the practical target.

Streaming: Acceptable for CPU-based encoding. The 6-core, 12-thread CPU with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13,985 can handle x264 encoding at 1080p while gaming, though the GPU’s limited performance may require lower game settings to maintain a stable stream.

Video editing: Good for CPU-bound tasks. The high PassMark multithread score of 26,476 and data compression score of 302,256 indicate fast timeline scrubbing and export times in software like Premiere Pro, especially with effects that rely on the CPU. However, GPU-accelerated effects will be limited by the Arc A350M’s 4 GB VRAM and 70th percentile rank.

3D rendering: CPU rendering is strong, GPU rendering is weak. The CPU’s 84th percentile rank and 13,985 Cinebench R23 multicore score will deliver solid performance in CPU-based renderers like Blender’s Cycles, but the GPU’s 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance will result in slow GPU-accelerated renders.

Software development: Excellent. The CPU’s high single-core performance (PassMark single-thread score of 3,907) and robust multicore scores (Geekbench multicore 11,586) make it ideal for compiling large codebases, running virtual machines, and handling IDE workloads. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks.

Student and office work: Overkill but capable. The CPU’s 84th percentile rank ensures smooth multitasking with dozens of browser tabs, office suites, and communication apps. The GPU is sufficient for basic 2D graphics, video playback, and light image editing, making this a dependable all-rounder for academic or office use.