SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7640U + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7640U

25,485 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7640U and Intel Arc A370M pairing represents a specific configuration found in thin-and-light laptops, combining a modern 6-core Zen 4 processor with a discrete entry-level Arc GPU. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and hardware specifications, not direct gaming test results.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists for this CPU+GPU pairing, gaming performance must be inferred from the silicon's capabilities. The Intel Arc A370M sits at the 74th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29175, placing it within 1% of the AMD Radeon RX 6800M in the nearest rivals list — a surprising proximity that suggests the A370M punches above its class in synthetic workloads. However, its 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth is a hard constraint for modern titles, particularly at higher resolutions where texture data exceeds that capacity.

For 1080p gaming at ultra settings, the A370M's 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 65.60 GPixel/s pixel rate indicate playable but not high-refresh frame rates in esports titles, while demanding AAA games will likely require medium or low presets to maintain smoothness. The 6-core Ryzen 5 7640U, with its 78th percentile CPU ranking, provides sufficient single-thread performance — evidenced by a Geekbench single-core score of 2127 — to avoid heavily bottlenecking the GPU in most scenarios. The memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s for the CPU and 112.0 GB/s for the GPU means both components share a similar data throughput ceiling, which could limit performance in texture-heavy scenes.

At 1440p, the A370M's 4 GB VRAM becomes a serious limitation, likely causing texture pop-in or reduced draw distances in modern games. The 64-bit memory bus and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are roughly half of what mid-range discrete GPUs typically offer, so resolution scaling will be poor. The pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s suggest that fill-rate-bound scenarios, such as particle effects or heavy post-processing, will degrade more gracefully than memory-bound scenarios. Given the absence of measured data, these figures should be treated as directional estimates: expect 1080p gaming capability with compromises, and treat 1440p as a stretch goal for older or less demanding titles.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 25485 places it at the 78th percentile of all CPUs, with nearest rivals including the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 (deltaPct -0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (deltaPct 0.2%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U (deltaPct 0.2%). This clustering within 0.2% of three different Ryzen 7 parts indicates that the 7640U delivers performance statistically indistinguishable from those higher-tier chips in aggregate workloads, despite having two fewer cores than the Ryzen 7 5700. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17936 and single-core score of 2532 reinforce this picture: the single-core result is strong for a 15W mobile part, while the multicore figure benefits from Zen 4's efficiency.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 29175 places it at the 74th percentile of all GPUs, with nearest rivals being the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (deltaPct -0.1%), the AMD FirePro W8000 (deltaPct -0.1%), the AMD Radeon RX 470 (deltaPct 0.6%), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (deltaPct 1%). The Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and Vulkan score of 28673 show a slight preference for OpenCL workloads, which may influence rendering and compute applications. The combined percentile of 76 for the pairing suggests that the system as a whole sits comfortably above the median hardware configuration, but neither component is a top-tier performer.

The PassMark suite reveals the CPU's workload-specific strengths: integer math scores 70483, floating point math scores 41093, and extended instructions score 17019. The data compression score of 240032 is notably strong, indicating robust memory subsystem performance, while the find prime numbers score of 74 is modest, reflecting the absence of specialized integer-heavy optimizations. The multithread score of 21115 and single-thread score of 3524 together show a balanced profile that favors mixed workloads over pure throughput.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture using TSMC's 6 nm process, with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It features 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units, paired with 8 ray tracing cores. The absence of tensor cores in the FACT PACK means AI-accelerated workloads will rely on the shader array, potentially limiting performance in applications that leverage dedicated tensor hardware. The FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS and FP16 of 8.397 TFLOPS (at a 2:1 ratio) provide a baseline for compute tasks, but the lack of tensor cores is a notable omission for a GPU marketed with modern feature support.

The memory subsystem is the A370M's most significant constraint: 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus yields 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is adequate for 1080p gaming at moderate settings but becomes a bottleneck in texture-heavy scenes or when running applications that exceed 4 GB of VRAM usage. The 14 Gbps effective memory clock and 1750 MHz memory base clock are typical for this class, but the narrow bus width limits aggregate throughput. The pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s are respectable for a 35W part, suggesting that fill-rate-bound operations will perform better than memory-bound ones.

The GPU's API support is comprehensive: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This positions the A370M for modern game engines and graphics APIs, but the hardware's 74th percentile ranking indicates that real-world performance will be closer to entry-level discrete GPUs than mid-range offerings. The nearest rival comparison to the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (deltaPct 1%) is misleading in terms of gaming performance, as the 6800M typically commands much higher frame rates in practice; the similarity in synthetic scores likely reflects the A370M's strong compute efficiency rather than rasterization prowess. The GPU's production status is end-of-life, which may affect driver optimization and long-term support.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU at the 78th percentile and GPU at the 74th percentile are closely matched in relative standing, but their workload characteristics differ significantly. The Ryzen 5 7640U's single-thread strength — a Geekbench single-core score of 2127 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 2532 — ensures that CPU-bound scenarios like game logic and physics calculations proceed without stalling. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS of compute and 65.60 GPixel/s pixel rate are sufficient for most rendering tasks at 1080p, but the 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 4 GB capacity create a bottleneck in high-resolution or high-texture settings.

In gaming, the bottleneck shifts based on resolution. At 1080p with low to medium settings, the CPU's strong single-core performance keeps frame times consistent, and the GPU becomes the limiting factor only in shader-heavy scenes. At 1080p ultra or 1440p, the GPU's memory bandwidth and VRAM capacity become the primary constraint, causing frame rate drops regardless of CPU headroom. The CPU's memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is slightly lower than the GPU's 112.0 GB/s, but for gaming, the GPU's bandwidth is more critical because it directly affects texture streaming and frame buffer access.

For productivity workloads, the balance reverses. The CPU's Cinebench R20 multicore score of 7533 and PassMark multithread score of 21115 indicate strong multi-threaded performance for a 15W part, while the GPU's compute capabilities are more limited. Video encoding, for instance, would rely heavily on the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads, with the GPU providing only modest acceleration via its shader array. The data compression score of 240032 suggests that storage and memory-intensive tasks are well-handled by the CPU, but the absence of tensor cores on the GPU means AI-accelerated tasks will be slower than on competing hardware with dedicated tensor units.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The A370M's 74th percentile ranking and 4 GB VRAM cap frame rates in esports titles, where 1080p at high settings may reach 60-90 FPS, but the 112.0 GB/s bandwidth limits sustained high-refresh output above 144 Hz. The CPU's single-core score of 2532 in Cinebench R23 ensures no CPU-induced frame pacing issues in these scenarios.

Streaming: The 6-core, 12-thread CPU with a PassMark multithread score of 21115 can handle encoding at moderate bitrates, but the GPU's lack of tensor cores means no dedicated hardware encoding acceleration beyond the shader array. The combined percentile of 76 suggests adequate headroom for 1080p streaming with a game running, but 1440p streaming would strain the memory subsystem.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R20 multicore score of 7533 and PassMark floating point math of 41093 provide solid performance for timeline editing and effects, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 29676 aids render previews. The 4 GB VRAM limits the size of GPU-accelerated effects and 4K timelines.

3D rendering: The GPU's 8 ray tracing cores and 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 compute offer entry-level ray tracing capability, but the 64-bit memory bus bottlenecks complex scenes. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17936 handles CPU-based rendering well for a mobile part, making this a viable option for occasional rendering rather than professional workloads.

Software development: The CPU's Geekbench multicore score of 8595 and PassMark integer math of 70483 provide strong compilation and testing performance, while the GPU's Vulkan 1.4 support enables graphics debugging. The 15W TDP ensures sustained performance in thin chassis without thermal throttling.

Student and office work: The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3524 and data compression score of 240032 handle document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing with ease. The GPU is largely idle in these workloads, but the integrated Radeon 760M provides backup graphics if the discrete GPU is disabled.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need a portable laptop with discrete graphics for light gaming and content creation, without the weight or power draw of a full gaming notebook. Gamers at 1080p who accept medium settings in modern titles and high settings in older ones will find the A370M adequate, especially given its 74th percentile ranking. The 4 GB VRAM is suitable for esports and indie games, but players of AAA titles with high-resolution textures will need to manage settings carefully.

Content creators working with 1080p video or 2D graphics will benefit from the CPU's strong multicore performance — Cinebench R23 multicore of 17936 — and the GPU's OpenCL compute for render acceleration. Software developers compiling code will appreciate the 6 cores and 12 threads, with the PassMark integer math score of 70483 indicating solid build performance. Students and office workers gain from the CPU's efficiency at 15W TDP, which extends battery life without sacrificing responsiveness — the Geekbench single-core score of 2127 ensures snappy interactions.

Small business workstations that handle spreadsheets, databases, and light CAD work will find the CPU's data compression score of 240032 and the GPU's 4 GB VRAM sufficient for most tasks. However, users requiring AI acceleration, high-resolution gaming, or heavy 3D rendering should look elsewhere due to the GPU's lack of tensor cores and limited memory bandwidth. The end-of-life production status of the A370M means buyers should verify driver support and consider long-term usability.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7640U is a 6-core, 12-thread mobile processor from the 7000 series, built on Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix codename. It uses TSMC's 4 nm process with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, which is notable for a processor with a 15W TDP. The base clock of 3.50 GHz boosts to 4.90 GHz, and the CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, along with ECC memory support. The integrated Radeon 760M provides fallback graphics, and the CPU connects via PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

The benchmark data shows a processor that excels in single-threaded tasks relative to its power envelope. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2532 and Geekbench single-core of 2127 place it ahead of many desktop processors from a few generations prior, making it responsive for everyday use. The multicore scores — Cinebench R23 multicore of 17936 and Geekbench multicore of 8595 — demonstrate that the 6 cores are efficient, but the 15W TDP caps sustained all-core performance compared to higher-power parts. The PassMark results reveal workload-specific strengths: data compression at 240032 and integer math at 70483 are strong, while find prime numbers at 74 is weak, indicating a design optimized for general-purpose computing rather than specialized math operations.

The nearest rival comparisons show the 7640U within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 7 7825U and Ryzen 7 7840U, both of which have 8 cores. This suggests that the 7640U's higher boost clock of 4.90 GHz compensates for its lower core count in many benchmarks, making it a compelling choice for workloads that favor single-thread performance over raw core counts. The 16 MB of shared L3 cache and 1 MB L2 per core provide adequate data locality, though not exceptional for a modern CPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance tier of the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U?

A: The CPU sits at the 78th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25485. It performs within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U and Ryzen 7 7840U in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A370M have, and why does it matter?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth. This capacity limits texture quality and resolution, as modern games may exceed 4 GB at high settings.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 7640U supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a mobile processor and may appeal to users running error-sensitive workloads.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 76, placing the system above the median hardware configuration but below high-end gaming laptops.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon RX 470?

A: The A370M has an average benchmark score of 29175, which is 0.6% higher than the RX 470's score of 28996. However, the RX 470 typically has more VRAM in most implementations.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU respectively?

A: The CPU has a 15W TDP, while the GPU has a 35W TDP. This combined 50W thermal budget is typical for thin-and-light laptops with discrete graphics.

Q: Are there measured FPS results for this specific pairing?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for the Ryzen 5 7640U with the Arc A370M. All gaming performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores and specifications.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U, a 6-core Zen 4 mobile processor with a 15W TDP, with the Intel Arc A370M, a 35W entry-level discrete GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture. It is classified as a laptop build, targeting users who need balanced performance in a portable form factor. The combined percentile of 76 indicates a system that outperforms roughly three-quarters of all configured hardware, placing it in the upper-mid tier of laptop performance.

The CPU's 78th percentile ranking and the GPU's 74th percentile ranking are closely aligned, suggesting a well-matched pairing where neither component dramatically overshadows the other. The CPU's strengths in single-threaded tasks and data compression complement the GPU's compute efficiency in OpenCL workloads, making this a versatile configuration for mixed productivity and light gaming. The A370M's end-of-life status and 4 GB VRAM cap its long-term viability for modern gaming, but the CPU's Zen 4 architecture ensures the system remains responsive for several years. This is a build for users who prioritize portability and efficiency over raw gaming performance, accepting 1080p medium-settings gaming as a reasonable expectation.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7640U + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7640U

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds