SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7640U + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7640U

25,485 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7640U and Intel Arc A350M form a laptop pairing that prioritizes efficiency and modern features over raw enthusiast performance. The data shows a system built for balanced productivity and entry-level gaming, though the CPU is clearly the dominant partner in this relationship. Benchmark results indicate that the processor holds a significant performance lead over the graphics solution in synthetic tests, which shapes the expected experience across various workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data clearly indicates a system where the CPU is the stronger component relative to the GPU. The Ryzen 5 7640U achieves an average benchmark score of 25485, placing it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs. In contrast, the Intel Arc A350M has an average score of 24647, sitting in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. While both are above the median, the CPU's higher percentile position suggests it has more headroom relative to its respective market segment.

This imbalance is particularly relevant for gaming. The Arc A350M's 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth is a limiting factor for high-resolution textures and demanding titles. The CPU, with its 6 cores and 12 threads boosting up to 4.90 GHz, is unlikely to be the primary constraint in most gaming scenarios. Instead, the GPU will be the bottleneck, especially at higher graphical settings. The GPU's FP32 performance of 3.379 TFLOPS and texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s are indicative of an entry-level solution that will cap frame rates well before the processor is fully utilized.

For CPU-intensive workloads like video encoding or software compilation, the balance shifts. The Ryzen 5 7640U's multi-core performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17936, is substantial. In these tasks, the GPU is largely idle, and the CPU's Zen 4 architecture and 16 MB of shared L3 cache will be the determining factors. The system is therefore well-balanced for productivity, where the CPU does the heavy lifting, but GPU-bound in gaming, where the Arc A350M is the limiting factor. The data shows that the CPU is the more capable component, and users should expect the GPU to be the primary constraint in graphics-intensive applications.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks for the Ryzen 5 7640U show a strong performer in both single and multi-threaded tasks. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 17936 multi-core and 2532 single-core. This multi-core result is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, with the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 showing a deltaPct of -0.1 and the Intel Xeon D-2752TER at -0.2. The single-core score of 2532 is a significant strength, indicating excellent responsiveness in everyday tasks and applications that rely on single-thread performance. Geekbench results reinforce this, with a multi-core score of 8595 and a single-core score of 2127.

The Intel Arc A350M's benchmark scores are modest in comparison. It achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 and a Vulkan score of 24747. These results place it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 24647. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 590, has a virtually identical average score of 24744, a deltaPct of -0.4. This indicates that the Arc A350M's raw compute performance is comparable to an older desktop GPU, though its mobile form factor and power constraints mean actual gaming performance will differ. The combined picture is a system where the CPU is a clear standout, performing at a level that rivals more expensive desktop processors, while the GPU is a competent entry-level mobile part that will handle esports and older titles well but struggle with modern AAA games at high settings.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Arc A350M's performance level, comparable to an AMD Radeon RX 590, suggests that high-refresh gaming is only achievable in less demanding titles. The GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is sufficient for esports titles at lower settings, but the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit texture quality and resolution. The CPU's strong single-core performance, with a Geekbench score of 2127, ensures that it will not hold back the GPU in these scenarios, but the frame rates will ultimately be capped by the graphics solution.

Streaming: The Ryzen 5 7640U is well-equipped for streaming. Its 6 cores and 12 threads provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17936 indicates that the CPU can handle the additional load of x264 encoding without severely impacting game performance. The integrated Radeon 760M could also be used for Quick Sync-style encoding, although the dedicated Arc A350M's capabilities would be the primary option. The system's efficiency, with a CPU TDP of 15 W, is a benefit for sustained streaming sessions on battery power.

Video Editing: This workload benefits from both the CPU and GPU. The CPU's multi-core strength, shown by a Passmark multi-thread score of 21115, will accelerate rendering and export times. The GPU's support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 means it can assist with effects and decoding, though its 4 GB VRAM may be a limitation for large projects. The system is a capable entry-level video editing machine, suitable for 1080p projects, but it will be slower than systems with more powerful GPUs for complex timelines and effects.

3D Rendering: The CPU will be the primary workhorse for 3D rendering. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 7533 is a solid result for a 15 W mobile processor. The GPU's compute performance, with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546, can assist in viewport rendering and certain render engines, but its 4 GB VRAM is a constraint for complex scenes. This system is suitable for hobbyist 3D work and basic architectural visualization, but professional users with demanding scenes would need a more powerful GPU.

Software Development: The Ryzen 5 7640U is an excellent choice for software development. The high single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 score of 2532, ensures fast compilation of individual files and responsive IDE interactions. The multi-core score of 17936 accelerates parallel builds. The support for ECC memory is a notable feature for developers who require data integrity. The 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU provide ample bandwidth for fast NVMe storage, improving project load times.

Student and Office Work: This system is overqualified for basic office tasks. The CPU's single-core performance, with a Passmark single-thread score of 3524, ensures snappy application launches and smooth multitasking. The integrated Radeon 760M can handle everyday graphics tasks, and the Arc A350M is only needed for more demanding applications. The low CPU TDP of 15 W contributes to excellent battery life, making it a portable option for students. The Passmark data encryption score of 14954 also indicates strong performance for security-related tasks.

Who Should Build It

The primary audience for this build is a user seeking a thin, efficient laptop for productivity and light gaming. The CPU's 78th percentile rank makes it a compelling choice for students and professionals who need strong multi-threaded performance for compiling code, editing documents, or running virtual machines. The specific CPU benchmarks, such as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17936, demonstrate that it can handle demanding productivity workloads.

Gamers at 1080p with moderate settings expectations are a secondary audience. The Arc A350M's performance, which is on par with an AMD Radeon RX 590, is suitable for esports titles and older games. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM is a limitation, so users should stick to lower texture settings in newer games. This is not a system for high-refresh 1440p gaming.

Content creators working on shorter projects, such as YouTube videos or podcast editing, will find the system's CPU performance beneficial. The strong multi-core scores will speed up exports, and the GPU can handle basic effects in editing software. This is not a workstation for professional 3D artists or video editors working with complex timelines. The combination of a high-performing CPU and a modest GPU makes it a well-suited choice for a small business workstation, where tasks like database management, spreadsheet analysis, and light photo editing are common. The ECC memory support is a bonus for data-critical applications.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU and GPU combination. All frame rate figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the Intel Arc A350M. The GPU's average benchmark score of 24647 and its similarity to the AMD Radeon RX 590 (deltaPct of -0.4) provide a reference point for expected performance.

In esports titles like Counter-Strike 2, Valorant, or League of Legends, the Arc A350M should deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with medium settings. The GPU's 105.6 GTexel/s texture rate is sufficient for these less demanding titles. The CPU's strong single-core performance will ensure that frame times are consistent.

For older AAA games, such as Grand Theft Auto V or The Witcher 3, the system can achieve 60 FPS at 1080p with a mix of medium and low settings. The 4 GB VRAM will require users to reduce texture quality to avoid stuttering. The GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is the limiting factor here.

Modern AAA titles, such as Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield, will be a challenge. The Arc A350M will likely struggle to maintain 30 FPS at 1080p with low settings. The 4 GB VRAM is insufficient for high-resolution textures found in these games. The GPU's 6 RT cores are present, but the overall performance level is too low for meaningful ray tracing at playable frame rates. The estimates suggest this is a system for gaming on the go, not for maxing out the latest releases.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed Alchemist, and fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It features 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs. The GPU has 6 dedicated RT cores for ray tracing. The card operates at a base clock of 1150 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz. Memory is 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, running at 1750 MHz with an effective data rate of 14 Gbps, providing a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s.

The GPU's FP32 performance is 3.379 TFLOPS, and its pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s. These specifications place it in the entry-level segment. The benchmark results confirm this, with Geekbench scores of 24546 in OpenCL and 24747 in Vulkan. Its performance is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX 590, a desktop GPU from a previous generation. The 4 GB VRAM is a significant limitation for modern games, as it will require users to lower texture detail and resolution. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, which ensures compatibility with modern APIs. For rendering workloads, the GPU's compute power is modest, but it can assist with GPU-accelerated effects in applications that support them.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7640U is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix. It is fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process and has a die size of 178 mm², containing 25,000 million transistors. The base clock is 3.50 GHz, with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The CPU has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and includes ECC memory support. The CPU has 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes and a TDP of 15 W.

The benchmark data shows a very strong mobile processor. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17936 is a high result for a 15 W part, placing it on par with desktop processors like the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 (deltaPct of -0.1). The single-core score of 2532 is also excellent, making it highly responsive for everyday tasks. The Geekbench scores of 8595 multi-core and 2127 single-core corroborate this strong performance. The Passmark integer math score of 70483 and floating-point math score of 41093 are indicative of robust processing power for both general and scientific workloads. This CPU is a clear highlight of the build, offering desktop-class performance in a very power-efficient package.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Arc A350M good for gaming?

A: The data shows it is an entry-level GPU with an average benchmark score of 24647. It is comparable to an AMD Radeon RX 590 and is suitable for esports and older AAA games at 1080p, but its 4 GB VRAM and FP32 performance of 3.379 TFLOPS will limit performance in modern titles.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7640U compare to other CPUs?

A: The CPU has an average benchmark score of 25485, placing it in the 78th percentile. Its performance is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 5700, with a deltaPct of -0.1, and the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, with a deltaPct of 0.2.

Q: What is the CPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The Ryzen 5 7640U supports dual-channel DDR5 memory and has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A350M has 6 RT cores. However, given its overall performance level, ray tracing is unlikely to be playable at high frame rates.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 74.

Q: What is the GPU's memory size and type?

A: The Intel Arc A350M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-core performance compare to its rivals for productivity?

A: In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the CPU scores 17936. This is effectively tied with the Intel Xeon D-2752TER, which has a deltaPct of -0.2, indicating the Ryzen 5 is a very capable productivity processor.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 7640U is an integrated component on an AMD Socket FP8 platform. This is a mobile socket, meaning the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and is not upgradeable. The system's memory support is for DDR5, which is the current standard, but the modules are also likely soldered or limited to laptop form factors. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which connect to the GPU and NVMe storage. The Intel Arc A350M has a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which provides sufficient bandwidth for its performance level.

The CPU has a TDP of 15 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 25 W, making this a very power-efficient system. There is no suggested PSU in the data, but the low TDPs mean a modest power adapter is sufficient. The GPU is listed as "End-of-life," which indicates that this is a final configuration rather than a platform with a future. A sensible next upgrade for a user with this system would be to move to a new laptop with a more powerful GPU, such as one from the next generation of Intel Arc or a higher-tier NVIDIA or AMD mobile GPU. The strong CPU performance means that a user could also consider an external GPU enclosure to bypass the Arc A350M's limitations, though this is not a standard laptop upgrade path. The platform itself is not designed for component-level upgrades.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7640U + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7640U

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds