SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS

30,390 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS paired with the Intel Arc A550M is a laptop-class configuration that reaches the 84th combined percentile in the benchmark database. The CPU is a 6-core/12-thread Zen 4 mobile processor in AMD’s 7000 series, while the GPU is Intel’s Xe-HPG Alchemist mobile design. The data set contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data — so frame-rate conclusions here are estimates derived from synthetic benchmark scores rather than observed results. The data shows a system with a CPU at the 81st all-CPU percentile and a GPU at the 86th all-GPU percentile, suggesting the graphics side is the stronger half of the pairing.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Ryzen 5 7640HS is built around the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix, on TSMC’s 4 nm process. The chip contains 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, with 6 cores and 12 threads. Each core carries 64 KB of L1 cache and 1 MB of L2 cache, with a shared 16 MB L3 pool. Its base clock is 4.30 and its boost clock is 5.00, with a TDP of 35. The socket is AMD Socket FP8, and memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and ECC enabled. The CPU also exposes Gen 4 PCIe with 20 lanes on the CPU side, and it includes a Radeon 760M integrated GPU as a secondary display solution.

Single-thread performance is the CPU’s notable strength. Cinebench R23 single-core yields 1715.5, Cinebench R15 single-core yields 269.5, Geekbench single-core yields 2093, and Passmark single-thread yields 3654. Those numbers indicate responsive per-core behavior in lightly threaded workloads such as everyday applications, code editing, and game logic. Multi-threaded results are equally substantial: Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 12554, Cinebench R15 multi-core scores 1978, Geekbench multi-core scores 10389, and Passmark multithread scores 22979. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 30390, placing it at the 81st percentile of all CPUs. It sits 0.1% above the AMD Ryzen 7 7736U and 0.4% above the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U, while running 0.1% below the Intel Core i9-11980HK and 0.3% below the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T. In real workloads, that places the 7640HS in a tightly packed mobile-performance tier, effectively matching a high-end Core i9 laptop chip while holding a slight edge over a recent Ryzen 5 PRO part.

The 16 MB shared L3 and dual-channel DDR5 memory path give the chip a balanced cache-and-memory subsystem for processor-heavy tasks. The CPU’s Passmark extended instructions score of 20556 and data encryption score of 15867 show that security and modern instruction-set workloads are handled competently. The 6-core/12-thread layout means heavy parallel rendering or compilation will use all available threads, but the chip remains a mobile processor first, with a 35 TDP guiding its sustained performance envelope.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-core scores (Geekbench single-core 2093, Cinebench R23 single-core 1715.5, Passmark single-thread 3654) supply the responsiveness that high-refresh gaming needs, while the GPU’s 86th percentile and 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth provide the rendering muscle. Because no measured FPS exists, this is an estimate rather than a measured verdict.
Streaming: The 12 threads and Passmark multithread score of 22979 give the Ryzen 5 enough parallel capacity to run game logic alongside a stream encode. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12554 reinforces that headroom, though actual streaming smoothness is not measured in this data.
Video editing: Mixed workloads benefit from the CPU’s integer math score of 73284 and floating-point math score of 45220, while the GPU’s OpenCL score of 49894 accelerates effects and rendering tasks. DDR5 dual-channel at 89.6 GB/s keeps data moving through the memory subsystem.
3D rendering: The CPU’s multi-core performance (R23 multi-core 12554) and the GPU’s Vulkan score of 49580 are both relevant to rendering. The Arc A550M also lists 16 RT cores for ray-traced workloads.
Software development: Compilation and scripting exercise both integer throughput and single-thread latency; the CPU scores 73284 in Passmark integer math and 2093 in Geekbench single-core, with Passmark data compression at 269524 and data encryption at 15867.
Student and office work: The lightweight workload profile is well served by the Passmark single-thread score of 3654 and Geekbench single-core score of 2093, and the 35 TDP keeps the platform modest under sustained use.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s synthetic suite averages to 30390, at the 81st percentile of all CPUs. Individual CPU scores include Cinebench R23 multi-core 12554, Cinebench R23 single-core 1715.5, Cinebench R15 multi-core 1978, Cinebench R15 single-core 269.5, Geekbench multi-core 10389, Geekbench single-core 2093, Passmark multithread 22979, Passmark single-thread 3654, Passmark integer math 73284, Passmark floating-point math 45220, Passmark data compression 269524, Passmark data encryption 15867, Passmark extended instructions 20556, Passmark physics 1155, and Passmark random string sorting 31654.

The Intel Arc A550M averages 49737 across its benchmark results, placing it at the 86th percentile of all GPUs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 49894 and its Geekbench Vulkan score is 49580. Relative to nearest rivals, the GPU is 0.4% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, 0.5% below the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, and 2.4% below the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT, while sitting 2.6% above the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT.

The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pairing is 84. That is a strong overall position. The GPU holds a higher relative standing than the CPU, which means this is a configuration whose graphics performance is its most distinctive quality. The CPU is not a weak point, but the average benchmark gap between the two components shows that the Arc A550M is closer to the top of its own field than the Ryzen 5 7640HS is to the top of the CPU field. Those rankings are compute rankings, not game-frame rankings, because no measured FPS exists for this exact combination.

Who Should Build It

This platform suits laptop buyers who want a balanced mobile system with above-average graphics. The 86th GPU percentile and 49737 average GPU score indicate a machine for users who spend a meaningful portion of their day in GPU-accelerated applications, not just casual browsing.

Gamers at high refresh rates can look at the CPU single-core scores and the GPU’s 86th percentile as an estimate of gaming capability. The lack of measured FPS means they should treat the frame-rate expectation as derived rather than observed.
Content creators editing video or working with effects can use the CPU’s multi-thread score of 12554, integer math 73284, and floating-point math 45220, alongside the GPU’s OpenCL 49894 and Vulkan 49580 results.
Developers benefit from high integer throughput, Passmark data compression 269524, and 12 threads for parallel builds. The Geekbench single-core score of 2093 supports fast interactive tooling.
Students and office users get a responsive desktop experience from Passmark single-thread 3654 and Geekbench single-core 2093, with the 35 TDP keeping the system appropriate for mobile use.
Small business workstations can rely on the CPU’s ECC memory support, dual-channel DDR5 at 89.6 GB/s, and PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes for storage expansion.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is an Alchemist-generation mobile GPU built on Xe-HPG architecture using DG2-512 silicon. It is manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process and contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 16 RT cores; no tensor core count is listed in the data. Clocks are 900 MHz base and 2050 MHz boost, with memory at 1750 MHz and 14 Gbps effective. Memory capacity is 8 GB of GDDR6 across a 128-bit bus, yielding 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. Pixel rate is 131.2 GPixel/s, texture rate is 262.4 GTexel/s, FP32 throughput is 8.397 TFLOPS, and FP16 throughput is 16.79 TFLOPS.

The GPU is rated at 60 W and uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. Its slot width is listed as IGP, and display outputs are portable-device-dependent, confirming that this is a mobile-integrated implementation rather than a user-serviceable desktop card. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The benchmark results place it at the 86th percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 49737. In Geekbench OpenCL it scores 49894; in Vulkan, 49580.

Those compute scores put it only 0.4% behind a GeForce RTX 5070 Ti in the database average and 0.5% behind a Radeon RX Vega 64. It trails the Radeon RX 6900 XT by 2.4% while leading the Radeon RX 6800 XT by 2.6%. For rendering workloads, the 8 GB frame buffer and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are the practical limits; the compute scores say the silicon itself sits in a high-midrange position rather than an entry-level one.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The data set contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, no game-by-game frame rates or resolution-specific FPS can be listed here. All gaming discussion on this page is an estimate built from the benchmark scores.

Qualitatively, the GPU’s 86th percentile, 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth point to a graphics solution that should handle modern gaming loads with quality settings applied. The CPU’s single-core scores are high enough to avoid being an obvious weak link in most graphical workloads. The absence of measured FPS means the exact performance tier, especially at high refresh rates, cannot be confirmed from this data. The compute picture suggests a machine that is well above entry-level gaming, but exact frame rates would require measured data that is not present in the FACT PACK.

Balance and Bottleneck

The percentile gap is the clearest evidence of balance: the CPU sits at the 81st percentile, while the GPU sits at the 86th. That means the Arc A550M is relatively stronger than the Ryzen 5 7640HS is within their respective pools. In GPU-bound tasks such as modern gaming with high graphics settings and GPU-accelerated rendering, the Arc A550M is the primary performance engine. In CPU-bound tasks such as compression, encryption, and physics, the Ryzen 5 defines the ceiling; the CPU’s Passmark physics score is 1155 and its data compression score is 269524, both of which depend on the 6-core/12-thread Zen 4 design and its 16 MB L3 cache.

Without measured FPS scaling, the exact balance point cannot be quantified. The data supports the interpretation that high graphics settings lean on the GPU, while lower graphics loads and high-refresh scenarios lean on the CPU. The CPU’s single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core 2093) is strong enough that the processor should not be the dominant constraint in most graphical workloads, but the 6-core/12-thread limit remains relevant for heavily threaded non-graphics tasks. In video editing or 3D rendering, both sides contribute: the CPU handles scene preparation and logic while the GPU handles rasterization and effects acceleration.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around AMD Socket FP8, with dual-channel DDR5 memory support and ECC enabled. The memory controller is rated for 89.6 GB/s. CPU-side PCIe is Gen 4 with 20 lanes, and the GPU attaches through PCIe 4.0 x16. The CPU’s production status is Active, while the GPU’s production status is End-of-life. The data does not list a suggested PSU for either component, but the CPU’s TDP is 35 and the GPU’s is 60 W, so the platform’s power requirements are modest for a laptop.

Because the GPU is listed with an IGP slot width and portable-device-dependent display outputs, the Arc A550M is not a user-swappable discrete card in the conventional sense. The realistic next upgrade is a system-level move to a newer laptop platform with an active GPU. Within this platform, the remaining upgrade headroom is memory and storage via DDR5 and PCIe Gen 4, rather than a CPU or GPU swap.

FAQ

Q: Is there measured gaming FPS for this exact CPU-GPU pairing?

A: No. The data set contains no measuredFps rows, and dataIsMeasured is false. Any FPS figures for this combination would be estimates.

Q: What socket does the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS use?

A: It uses AMD Socket FP8.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes. The data lists eccMemory as true, with dual-channel DDR5 support and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth.

Q: What are the Intel Arc A550M’s memory specifications?

A: It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth, a memory clock of 1750 MHz, and 14 Gbps effective speed.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7640HS compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 7736U?

A: The Ryzen 5 7640HS has an average benchmark score of 30390, which is 0.1% higher than the Ryzen 7 7736U’s average score of 30364.

Q: What graphics APIs does the Intel Arc A550M support?

A: It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A550M still in production?

A: No. Its production status is End-of-life, while the Ryzen 5 7640HS is listed as Active.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS + Intel Arc A550M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds