SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS

30,390 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS + Intel Arc A350M: A Balanced Mobile Duo with Clear Workload Splits

This laptop pairing combines AMD's Zen 4 Phoenix processor with Intel's entry-level Arc Alchemist GPU, resulting in a system that sits at the 76th percentile overall among all CPU+GPU combinations. The data shows a clear division of labor: the Ryzen 5 7640HS is a strong multi-threaded performer (81st percentile among all CPUs), while the Arc A350M is a serviceable but modest graphics solution (70th percentile among all GPUs). No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than derived from direct gameplay testing. The CPU's 6-core/12-thread Zen 4 design with a 5.00 GHz boost clock provides a solid foundation, but the 4 GB Arc GPU with 64-bit memory interface will be the limiting factor in graphically intensive scenarios.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists for this pairing, gaming performance must be inferred from the GPU's compute capabilities and the CPU's single-thread strength. The Arc A350M delivers 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, 52.80 GPixel/s pixel fill rate, and 105.6 GTexel/s texture rate — figures that place it roughly on par with an AMD Radeon RX 590 (0.4% ahead) and within 1.5% of a GeForce GTX 1630. These are entry-level discrete GPU numbers, suggesting 1080p gaming at medium settings is the realistic target, with high settings achievable in less demanding titles. The 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus providing 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will constrain texture-heavy games and high-resolution assets, particularly at 1440p or above.

The CPU side is more encouraging. The Ryzen 5 7640HS scores 1715.5 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 2093 in Geekbench single-core, both strong figures that indicate the processor will not bottleneck most games at 1080p. The Radeon 760M integrated graphics in the CPU also provides a fallback for lighter titles when the discrete GPU is not engaged, though the Arc A350M is substantially faster. For esports titles like CS:GO, Valorant, or League of Legends, the combination of strong single-thread performance and the Arc's 2200 MHz boost clock should deliver high frame rates at 1080p with competitive settings. For AAA games, the data suggests a 1080p medium preset is the sweet spot, with frame rates dropping at higher quality settings due to the GPU's modest 3.379 TFLOPS and limited memory bandwidth. The pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s is adequate for 1080p but will struggle at 1440p where pixel throughput demands exceed the GPU's capability in demanding scenes.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite paints a picture of a well-rounded mobile processor. In Cinebench R23, it scores 12554 multi-core and 1715.5 single-core, while Geekbench shows 10389 multi-core and 2093 single-core. These results place the Ryzen 5 7640HS at the 81st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 30390. The nearest rival comparisons show it is essentially neck-and-neck with the AMD Ryzen 7 7736U (0.1% ahead), the Intel Core i9-11980HK (0.1% behind), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T (0.3% behind). This clustering indicates the 7640HS delivers performance competitive with higher-tier processors from previous generations, though it is not a class leader.

The GPU benchmarks are more limited, with only Geekbench OpenCL (24546) and Vulkan (24747) scores available. The Arc A350M averages 24647 across these tests, placing it at the 70th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 590 (0.4% ahead), NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (0.5% ahead), AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (0.8% behind), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (1.5% ahead). This positioning confirms the Arc A350M as an entry-level discrete GPU that trades blows with older desktop parts, but it is not competitive with mid-range or high-end mobile GPUs. The combined percentile of 76 reflects the CPU's strength pulling up the GPU's more modest showing; the processor is clearly the stronger component in this pairing.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7640HS compare to the Intel Core i9-11980HK?

A: The two processors are virtually identical in average benchmark scores, with the AMD chip at 30390 and the Intel part at 30422 — a negligible 0.1% difference. Despite the i9 being a higher-tier Intel part, the 7640HS matches it, indicating that Zen 4's efficiency and IPC close the gap against older, higher-power designs.

Q: What kind of gaming performance can I expect from the Arc A350M?

A: Based on its benchmark scores, the Arc A350M performs within 1.5% of a GeForce GTX 1630 and 0.4% of a Radeon RX 590. This suggests 1080p gaming at medium settings is achievable in most titles, with esports games running at higher frame rates. The 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit high-resolution or high-texture workloads.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the stronger component in this laptop?

A: The CPU is significantly stronger relative to its class. The Ryzen 5 7640HS sits at the 81st percentile among all CPUs, while the Arc A350M sits at the 70th percentile among all GPUs. In CPU-bound workloads like productivity and multi-threaded rendering, the processor will excel; in gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor.

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 7640HS supports ECC memory, though it uses DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. This makes it suitable for error-sensitive workloads like data processing or financial modeling, though the laptop form factor may limit ECC module availability.

Q: What is the upgrade path for this platform?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket, so the processor is not upgradeable in a conventional sense. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is standard for mobile discrete GPUs, but again, laptop GPUs are typically soldered and not user-replaceable. The practical upgrade path is to a new laptop rather than component swapping.

Q: How does the Arc A350M compare to the Radeon RX 6600 XT?

A: The Arc A350M trails the RX 6600 XT by 0.8% in average benchmark scores. This is a surprisingly close margin despite the RX 6600 XT being a desktop part with higher power limits, suggesting the Arc's 2200 MHz boost clock and Xe-HPG architecture are efficient at the 25 W TDP.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 7640HS is built on AMD's Socket FP8, a mobile platform that does not support user-level CPU upgrades. The processor is soldered to the motherboard, as is typical for thin-and-light laptops, so the only CPU upgrade path is a full system replacement. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, but the Arc A350M is likewise integrated into the laptop chassis and not field-upgradeable. The platform supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, providing 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth — replacing or adding RAM modules is often the only user-serviceable upgrade on such systems, though the 4 GB GPU memory is fixed.

The CPU's TDP is 35 W, while the GPU's TDP is 25 W, giving a combined thermal envelope of approximately 60 W for the core compute components. The FACT PACK does not list a suggested PSU for this pairing, but given the low TDPs, a standard laptop power adapter is sufficient; no external PSU headroom calculations are applicable. The platform supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is ample for the GPU's x8 interface and NVMe storage. For users considering upgrades, the most impactful change would be increasing system RAM to maximize the 89.6 GB/s dual-channel bandwidth, as the iGPU (Radeon 760M) and CPU both benefit from faster memory. However, the discrete GPU's 4 GB GDDR6 is fixed and cannot be expanded.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 5 7640HS is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. It contains 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, with a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3, which is moderate by modern standards but sufficient for the target mobile segment. The 35 W TDP is efficient for the performance delivered, and the processor supports ECC memory, a feature more common in workstation parts than consumer mobile chips.

Benchmark results confirm the CPU's strength. Cinebench R23 multi-core of 12554 and single-core of 1715.5 indicate strong all-around performance, with the single-core score being particularly notable as it rivals desktop parts from a few generations prior. PassMark scores show 73284 in integer math, 45220 in floating-point math, and 20556 in extended instructions, demonstrating solid compute capability across diverse workloads. The data compression score of 269524 is high, suggesting strong performance in file archiving and compression tasks. The 81st percentile ranking means this CPU outperforms roughly four out of five processors in the database, making it a capable choice for a laptop. In real workloads, this translates to responsive application loading, smooth multitasking across 12 threads, and efficient handling of compile jobs or batch photo processing, though the 16 MB L3 cache is not as generous as larger desktop Zen 4 parts.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A350M's 3.379 TFLOPS and 52.80 GPixel/s pixel rate support 1080p gaming at medium settings with frame rates in the 60-90 FPS range for esports titles, but high-refresh 144Hz monitors will only be fully utilized in undemanding games. The CPU's 1715.5 Cinebench R23 single-core score ensures minimal CPU bottlenecks.

Streaming: The 6-core/12-thread CPU with a 12554 Cinebench R23 multi-core score can handle software encoding for 1080p60 streams, though the GPU's 6 RT cores and Xe-HPG architecture may offload some encoding tasks. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth supports simultaneous gaming and encoding, but the 4 GB VRAM may limit game settings while streaming.

Video editing: The CPU's 12554 multi-core score and 45220 floating-point PassMark score make light 1080p editing feasible, with 12 threads handling timeline scrubbing and export. The GPU's 112.0 GB/s bandwidth and 768 shading units accelerate effects, but 4 GB VRAM limits 4K timelines and complex color grades.

3D rendering: The CPU's 12554 Cinebench R23 score provides solid CPU rendering, but the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS is modest for GPU-accelerated renderers. Expect slower viewport performance in Blender or similar tools compared to higher-tier GPUs, with the CPU carrying most of the rendering load.

Software development: The 73284 integer math PassMark score and 2093 Geekbench single-core score make compilation and code indexing responsive. The 12 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the 269524 data compression score speeds up version control operations and package management.

Student and office work: The 3654 PassMark single-thread score ensures snappy word processing and browser performance, while the 16 MB L3 cache and 5.00 GHz boost clock handle spreadsheet and presentation workloads with ease. The integrated Radeon 760M offers a power-efficient fallback for basic tasks, extending battery life when the discrete GPU is idle.

Who Should Build It

This laptop pairing targets users who need strong CPU performance in a mobile form factor but do not prioritize high-end gaming or GPU compute. Students and office workers will find the Ryzen 5 7640HS's 81st percentile CPU ranking more than adequate for daily tasks, from coding assignments to data analysis in spreadsheets, with the 12 threads handling multitasking smoothly. Small business workstations benefit from the ECC memory support and the CPU's 12554 Cinebench R23 multi-core score for periodic heavy compute tasks like financial modeling or database queries.

Content creators working in 1080p will appreciate the CPU's rendering strength, though the GPU's 70th percentile means they should not expect fast GPU-accelerated effects or 4K video editing. Developers compiling large codebases will see strong performance from the 73284 integer math score and 12 threads, while the 269524 data compression score accelerates build artifacts and repository operations. Gamers at 1080p with medium settings are the target audience for the Arc A350M — those seeking 1440p or high-refresh AAA gaming should look elsewhere, as the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are entry-level figures. The 25 W GPU TDP also suits users who want a discrete GPU without the bulk and fan noise of higher-power gaming laptops.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS (a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 Phoenix processor) with the Intel Arc A350M (an entry-level Xe-HPG discrete GPU with 768 shading units and 4 GB GDDR6). The pairing sits at the 76th combined percentile, indicating it outperforms roughly three-quarters of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU is the standout component, ranking at the 81st percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 30390, while the GPU trails at the 70th percentile with an average score of 24647. This is not a high-end gaming rig, but rather a balanced mobile workstation with a discrete GPU for light gaming and GPU acceleration. The 4 nm CPU and 6 nm GPU both come from TSMC, and the combined 60 W TDP (35 W CPU + 25 W GPU) keeps thermals manageable in a thin chassis. The system is best described as a capable all-rounder for productivity, with modest gaming capability.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance in this pairing is clearly skewed toward the CPU. The Ryzen 5 7640HS at the 81st CPU percentile is significantly stronger relative to its class than the Arc A350M at the 70th GPU percentile. In CPU-bound workloads — multi-threaded rendering, compilation, data compression — the processor will perform admirably, matching the Intel Core i9-11980HK within 0.1% and the Ryzen 7 7736U within 0.1%. The GPU will not bottleneck these tasks, as they rely on the CPU's 12 threads and 5.00 GHz boost clock.

In gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads, the Arc A350M is the limiting factor. Its 3.379 TFLOPS and 4 GB VRAM on a 64-bit bus will cap frame rates at 1080p medium settings, regardless of the CPU's headroom. The GPU's performance relative to the RX 590 (0.4% behind) and GTX 1630 (1.5% ahead) confirms its entry-level status. The 0.8% gap to the RX 6600 XT is misleading; the Arc's low TDP and memory bandwidth will cause it to fall further behind in sustained gaming loads. The CPU will rarely be the bottleneck in gaming, as its 1715.5 single-core score in Cinebench R23 is more than sufficient for 1080p. The practical bottleneck is the GPU, and users should target medium settings at 1080p rather than expecting high-refresh or high-resolution performance. For mixed workloads, the system is well-balanced: the CPU carries productivity tasks, the GPU handles light graphics work, and neither component excessively starves the other in typical laptop usage.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds