SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
98%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7600

26,324 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

77,712 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is a desktop configuration that combines a mainstream six-core processor with a flagship-class graphics card. The measured data places this pairing at the 85th percentile overall, with the GPU performing significantly above the CPU in relative terms. This analysis examines the benchmark results, FPS metrics, and platform characteristics to define what this combination delivers across gaming and professional workloads.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data at ultra settings provides a comprehensive view of this pairing’s gaming capabilities. At 1920x1080, the configuration delivers remarkably high frame rates across most titles: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 866 FPS, Valorant reaches 490 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege runs at 466 FPS. These figures demonstrate that at 1080p, the system is far beyond the threshold for competitive play, with the CPU becoming the limiting factor in many cases.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains substantial. Valorant still holds at 465 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 runs at 260 FPS, and Roblox achieves 338 FPS. More demanding titles show expected scaling: Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 86 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 79 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 36 FPS. The 1440p results indicate that this pairing is well-suited for high-refresh-rate monitors in esports titles, while maintaining smooth frame rates in most AAA games.

At 3840x2160, the GPU’s capabilities become the primary driver. Valorant still manages 431 FPS, while Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege delivers 168 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 reaches 145 FPS. Heavier workloads show the expected degradation: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 57 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 52 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 19 FPS. The data shows that 4K gaming is viable for many titles, but the most demanding games will require settings adjustments to maintain high frame rates.

The average FPS across all measured games is 227.2, placing this pair at rank 49 out of 3732 pairs. This rank, combined with the 92nd percentile GPU performance, indicates that the system excels in overall gaming throughput, particularly in less demanding titles where the CPU can keep pace with the GPU’s output.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks show a processor that performs well in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the Ryzen 5 7600 scores 12735 multi-core and 1852 single-core. The Geekbench results show 13413 multi-core and 2521 single-core. The 3DMark tests reveal scaling from 999 single-thread to 6499 with 16 threads and 6503 with max threads, indicating that the six-core design reaches its performance plateau quickly without significant gains from additional threads beyond the physical cores.

The GPU benchmarks are substantially more impressive. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 14326 places the RTX 5090 D in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs. Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 310674 and 376915 respectively, along with a Passmark G3D score of 44065, confirm the graphics card’s dominant position. The Passmark GPU Compute score of 28396 further validates its computational capability.

The combined picture shows a significant imbalance. The CPU sits at the 78th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26324. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX at 26274 (0.2% slower), the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS at 26402 (0.3% faster), the Intel Core i9-11900KF at 26212 (0.4% slower), and the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U at 26187 (0.5% slower). These small deltas indicate the CPU is a solid mid-range performer.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 77712 places it near the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT at 76904 (1.1% slower), the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT at 78940 (1.6% faster), the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB at 79396 (2.1% faster), and the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB at 79605 (2.4% faster). This clustering shows the RTX 5090 D performs at a level comparable to these high-end alternatives.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates that the CPU is the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios at lower resolutions. At 1920x1080, the difference between games is stark: Valorant reaches 490 FPS while Cyberpunk 2077 only manages 100 FPS. This gap is not explained by GPU capability alone, as the GPU is in the 92nd percentile. Instead, it reflects the CPU’s ability to feed frames to the GPU in less demanding titles.

At 3840x2160, the balance shifts. The frame rates across titles compress: Valorant drops to 431 FPS, Cyberpunk 2077 to 57 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 19 FPS. The GPU becomes the primary constraint at this resolution, as the increased pixel count demands more from the rendering hardware than the CPU’s frame generation limits.

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K provides additional evidence. For example, Counter-Strike 2 drops from 392 to 260 to 145 FPS across the three resolutions. This scaling pattern shows that the CPU can produce roughly 392 FPS in this title, but the GPU cannot maintain that rate at higher resolutions. Conversely, in Cyberpunk 2077, the drop from 100 to 86 to 57 FPS suggests the GPU is more consistently the bottleneck across all resolutions.

The CPU’s percentile rank of 78 versus the GPU’s 92 percentile highlights the imbalance. The 3DMark thread scaling shows the CPU’s performance peaks at 8 threads (5508) and only marginally improves to 6503 at max threads, indicating that the six cores are fully utilized but additional logical threads provide limited benefit. This creates a scenario where the GPU often waits for the CPU in lighter workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The platform also supports ECC memory, which may appeal to users running workstation-class workloads. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, ensuring no bandwidth limitations between the two components.

The CPU has a TDP of 65 watts, while the GPU has a TDP of 575 watts. The suggested PSU for this configuration is 950 watts, which provides substantial headroom for the combined power draw. The GPU requires a single 16-pin power connector. This power configuration suggests that users have room for additional components or overclocking without exceeding the PSU’s capacity.

A sensible next upgrade path would focus on the CPU, as the platform has room for higher-tier AM5 processors. The Ryzen 5 7600’s performance at the 78th percentile leaves significant headroom for improvement, and upgrading to a higher-core-count AM5 CPU would better match the GPU’s capabilities. The platform’s DDR5 memory support and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity ensure that the rest of the system remains current.

The GPU’s successor, the GeForce 60 series, is listed in the data, but the RTX 5090 D remains an active product. The RTX 5090 D’s predecessor is the GeForce 40 series, indicating a generational leap in performance. Users looking to upgrade the GPU further would need to consider the power supply and case dimensions, as the current GPU is 304 mm long, 137 mm high, and 48 mm wide, occupying a dual-slot configuration.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 features 6 cores and 12 threads based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It operates with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The processor is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. This architecture provides strong single-threaded performance, evidenced by the 1852 Cinebench R23 single-core score and 2521 Geekbench single-core score.

The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports the CPU’s strong performance in latency-sensitive workloads. The Passmark tests reveal specific strengths: integer math scores 80581, floating-point math scores 48107, and extended instructions score 23071. Data compression scores 304942, while data encryption scores 17704.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 26324 places it at the 78th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals show very close performance, with the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX just 0.2% slower and the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS just 0.3% faster. This clustering suggests the Ryzen 5 7600 is a well-optimized mid-range chip that competes closely with higher-tier mobile processors.

In real workloads, the CPU’s performance translates to solid multi-threaded capability for its class. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12735 indicates good rendering performance, while the single-core score of 1852 ensures responsive everyday use. The CPU’s 65-watt TDP is notably efficient for its performance level, making it suitable for systems where power consumption is a consideration.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This pairing excels at 1080p and 1440p esports titles. Counter-Strike: Global Offensive achieves 866 FPS at 1080p, Valorant reaches 490 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege hits 466 FPS. At 1440p, Valorant still delivers 465 FPS, making this system ideal for competitive gamers with 240 Hz or higher monitors.

Streaming: The combination of the CPU’s 6 cores and the GPU’s strong compute performance supports streaming workloads. The Passmark GPU Compute score of 28396 indicates the GPU can handle encoding tasks, while the CPU’s 12 threads provide sufficient headroom for game capture and streaming software. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 6499 shows the CPU can maintain game performance while streaming.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12735 and Geekbench multi-core score of 13413 provide reasonable performance for video editing. The GPU’s 32 GB of GDDR7 memory and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth accelerate rendering and effects. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 14326 indicates strong GPU-accelerated rendering capability.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 680 tensor cores make this system exceptionally capable for 3D rendering. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 14326 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 310674 demonstrate the GPU’s dominance in compute-heavy workloads. The CPU’s multi-threaded performance provides adequate support for scene preparation and physics calculations.

Software development: The CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 80581 and data compression score of 304942 support compilation and code analysis tasks. The single-thread score of 3910 in Passmark indicates responsive IDE performance. The system’s 32 GB GPU memory and 83.2 GB/s CPU memory bandwidth provide ample capacity for large codebases and virtual machines.

Student and office work: This configuration is significantly overprovisioned for typical student and office tasks. The CPU’s single-thread performance ensures snappy application responsiveness, while the GPU remains largely idle. The 65-watt CPU TDP keeps power consumption reasonable for a desktop system, though the GPU’s 575-watt TDP means the system is not energy-efficient for basic tasks.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, using the GB202 chip built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The GPU contains 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, with a transistor density of 122.9 million per mm². This massive chip operates with a base clock of 2017 MHz and a boost clock of 2407 MHz.

The memory subsystem is a key strength: 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus provides 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed. This configuration is critical for high-resolution textures and large datasets. The GPU includes 21760 shading units, 680 TMUs, and 176 ROPs, supporting its high pixel rate of 423.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,636.8 GTexel/s.

Ray tracing and tensor capabilities are substantial: 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores. The FP32 throughput of 104.8 TFLOPS and FP16 throughput of 104.8 TFLOPS (1:1) indicate balanced compute performance. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 APIs.

The benchmark results confirm the GPU’s high-end positioning. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 14326 and Passmark G3D score of 44065 place it in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 376915 is particularly strong, indicating excellent graphics API performance. The average benchmark score of 77712 is within 2.4% of the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB, showing the RTX 5090 D competes with professional-grade hardware.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 85th, placing it well above the median for desktop configurations.

Q: How does the CPU perform relative to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 7600 scores 26324 on average, with the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX 0.2% slower, the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS 0.3% faster, the Intel Core i9-11900KF 0.4% slower, and the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U 0.5% slower.

Q: What is the maximum FPS observed in any game at 1080p?

A: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive achieves 866 FPS at 1920x1080, the highest measured value in the dataset.

Q: Does the system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer desktop processor.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The RTX 5090 D has 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, providing 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU scale from 2 threads to max threads in 3DMark?

A: The 2-thread score is 1938, 4-thread is 3686, 8-thread is 5508, 16-thread is 6499, and max-thread is 6503, showing diminishing returns beyond 8 threads.

Q: What power supply is suggested for this configuration?

A: The suggested PSU is 950 watts, which accounts for the CPU’s 65-watt TDP and the GPU’s 575-watt TDP.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets gamers who prioritize high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, particularly in competitive titles. The measured FPS in Counter-Strike 2 (392 at 1080p), Valorant (490 at 1080p), and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege (466 at 1080p) shows the system is optimized for esports. At 1440p, the frame rates remain high enough for 240 Hz displays in many titles.

Content creators working with 3D rendering or GPU-accelerated video editing will benefit from the RTX 5090 D’s 32 GB memory and 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 14326 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 310674 indicate substantial compute capability. Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s strong integer math (80581 in Passmark) and data compression (304942) scores for compilation tasks.

Students and office users should consider this system overkill, as the GPU’s 575-watt TDP makes it inefficient for basic productivity. However, students in graphics-intensive fields like game design or 3D modeling would find the GPU’s capabilities directly applicable. Small business workstations requiring GPU compute for simulation or analysis would also benefit, though the power requirements demand appropriate infrastructure.

Build Overview

This is a desktop class pairing that combines the AMD Ryzen 5 7600, a six-core Zen 4 processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D, a Blackwell 2.0 architecture GPU. The CPU operates with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and boost clock of 5.10 GHz, while the GPU features a 2017 MHz base and 2407 MHz boost clock. The system uses the AM5 socket with dual-channel DDR5 memory support.

The overall tier of this configuration is defined by the combined 85th percentile ranking. The GPU’s 92nd percentile performance dominates the pair, while the CPU’s 78th percentile creates a noticeable bottleneck in CPU-limited scenarios. The measured average FPS of 227.2 across all games places this pair at rank 49 out of 3732 pairs, confirming its high-end gaming capability.

The system’s strengths are clear: exceptional GPU compute and rendering performance, strong single-threaded CPU capability, and high frame rates in most gaming scenarios. The weaknesses are equally apparent: the CPU limits performance in lighter workloads at lower resolutions, and the GPU’s 575-watt TDP demands a robust power supply. This pairing is best suited for users who prioritize GPU-intensive workloads and are willing to accept CPU limitations in less demanding tasks.