SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

87%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7600

26,324 Benchmark Score

Top 13% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

43,223 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER form a desktop pairing that targets the upper mid-range of performance, with the combined system sitting at the 81st percentile against all other CPU-GPU combinations. The CPU, a 6-core/12-thread Zen 4 part on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, delivers an average benchmark score of 26324, placing it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU, built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, achieves an average benchmark score of 43223, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. This data reveals a system where the graphics card is the stronger component relative to its peers, a balance that shapes its behavior across gaming and productivity workloads.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It operates with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process with 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 cache. Memory support is limited to DDR5, running on a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the processor itself and includes integrated Radeon Graphics, though the discrete GPU makes that secondary.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales predictably with thread count. In 3DMark tests, the score climbs from 999 in single-thread to 1938 with 2 threads, 3686 with 4 threads, 5508 with 8 threads, and 6499 with 16 threads, with max-thread performance essentially flat at 6503. This indicates that the 6-core/12-thread configuration is fully utilized by 12 threads, and adding more virtual threads yields no benefit. Cinebench R23 scores of 1852 single-core and 12735 multi-core show strong per-core efficiency, which is critical for lightly-threaded tasks. The single-thread score in PassMark is 3910, while the multi-thread score reaches 27058, and integer math hits 80581, indicating robust general-purpose compute.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 7600 sits in a tight cluster. The data shows it is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i9-11900KF, and 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U, while being 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS. These deltas are negligible in real-world terms, meaning the 7600 trades blows with high-end laptop chips and a previous-generation desktop Core i9. For productivity, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12735 suggests the CPU can handle substantial rendering workloads, though it will lag behind higher-core-count desktop parts. The PassMark data compression score of 304942 and encryption score of 17704 indicate strong performance for archive management and secure data tasks. The 65 W TDP is a key differentiator, as this level of performance comes at a relatively modest power envelope compared to higher-core alternatives.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD104 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It packs 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. The GPU features 7168 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output pipelines. Critically, it includes 56 ray tracing cores and 224 tensor cores, which are the dedicated hardware for ray-traced lighting and AI-accelerated features like DLSS. The memory subsystem consists of 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. The base clock is 1980 MHz with a boost clock of 2475 MHz, and the memory runs at an effective 21 Gbps. The GPU has a TDP of 220 W and requires a 550 W power supply.

The compute throughput is substantial: FP32 performance is 35.48 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 35.48 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 198.0 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 554.4 GTexel/s. These figures translate directly into fill-rate capabilities for high-resolution rendering. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 4627, which is a modern test of DX12 gaming performance. Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 172795 and 205624 respectively, showing strong compute and graphics API performance. PassMark G3D score of 29995 confirms its position, and the GPU compute score of 17108 indicates solid non-graphics compute ability.

The percentile ranking of 83 places it above most GPUs, and the nearest rivals show it is 0.1% behind the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB and the RTX 5050 Mobile, 0.2% behind the Quadro M6000, and 1% behind the RTX 4090 Mobile. The negative deltas here are small, meaning the 4070 SUPER is effectively at parity with a high-end workstation card from a previous generation and a mobile flagship. The 12 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for high-resolution textures, and the 504.2 GB/s bandwidth supports demanding rendering workloads without becoming a bottleneck. The 56 ray tracing cores and 224 tensor cores are the hardware foundation for the measured FPS in ray-traced titles and for AI-based upscaling, which is a notable advantage over non-RT competitors.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the data shows this pairing is exceptionally strong. In Counter-Strike 2, the system achieves 283.8 FPS at 1920x1080, and in Valorant it hits 490 FPS at the same resolution. These frame rates far exceed the 144 Hz or 240 Hz refresh rates common in competitive monitors. The 6-core CPU with its strong single-thread score of 1852 in Cinebench R23 ensures the GPU is fed adequately in esports titles, where frame rates are often CPU-limited.

Streaming and content creation benefit from the 12 threads and the GPU's NVENC encoder, though the data does not specify encoder quality. The CPU's multi-thread score of 12735 in Cinebench R23 allows for simultaneous game capture and encoding, while the PassMark integer math score of 80581 indicates solid general processing for streaming software overlays. The 12 GB VRAM on the GPU prevents memory-related stutters when running a game and a streaming application simultaneously.

Video editing workflows rely on both CPU and GPU. The Geekbench multicore score of 13413 and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score suggest the CPU can handle timeline scrubbing and effect processing. The GPU's 35.48 TFLOPS of FP32 and 224 tensor cores accelerate effects and AI-based tools, and the 504.2 GB/s memory bandwidth facilitates large frame buffers. This combination is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p video editing, where the CPU handles decoding and the GPU accelerates rendering.

3D rendering and CAD workloads see a strong contribution from the GPU. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 4627 and the GPU compute score of 17108 indicate that viewport performance and final-frame rendering will be responsive. The 56 ray tracing cores provide dedicated hardware for accelerated ray-traced previews, which is a significant advantage over GPUs without such cores. The CPU's 6 cores are adequate for the simulation and physics aspects of rendering, though they will not match higher-core parts in pure CPU-based rendering.

Software development benefits from the CPU's 12 threads and fast single-thread performance. The PassMark single-thread score of 3910 and the 3DMark single-thread score of 999 ensure quick compilation of single-threaded build steps, while the multi-thread score of 27058 in PassMark handles parallel builds. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth and DDR5 support reduce latency for large codebases.

Student and office work is a lighter load that this system handles with ease. The CPU's integrated Radeon Graphics provides a fallback, and the discrete GPU is overkill for documents and spreadsheets. However, the 78th percentile CPU rank and the 81st combined percentile mean this system will breeze through multitasking, with the 12 threads ensuring responsive operation across many open applications.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a system where the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, with a GPU percentile of 83 versus a CPU percentile of 78. This suggests that in gaming workloads, the CPU is more likely to be the limiting factor at lower resolutions, while the GPU becomes the limit at higher resolutions. The FPS scaling across resolutions supports this: in Counter-Strike 2, the frame rate drops from 283.8 FPS at 1080p to 186.9 FPS at 1440p and 107.4 FPS at 4K. The 1080p figure is likely constrained by the CPU's single-thread limits, as the GPU has ample headroom to render more frames but the CPU cannot issue draw calls fast enough.

In contrast, a heavily GPU-bound title like Cyberpunk 2077 shows a different pattern: 83 FPS at 1080p, 62 FPS at 1440p, and 41 FPS at 4K. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is a 25% drop, which is more consistent with GPU limitations. The CPU is not the bottleneck here; the GPU's raw performance determines the frame rate. This bifurcation is typical of a balanced pairing where the CPU handles esports and the GPU handles AAA titles.

The pair rank by FPS places this combination at rank 602 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS across games of 178.5. This rank indicates that while the system is above average, it is not in the top tier of performance pairs, which would feature higher-end CPUs and GPUs. The 0.2% delta to the Ryzen 9 6900HX and the 1% delta to the RTX 4090 Mobile show that the components are competitive with mobile flagship parts but not with top desktop parts. The bottleneck analysis points to the CPU being the primary limiter in high-FPS scenarios, while the GPU is the limiter in high-resolution, graphically intensive scenarios.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is a current-generation socket. This provides a clear upgrade path: users can move to higher-core-count Ryzen 7000 series or future Zen 4-based processors without changing the motherboard. The platform supports DDR5 memory exclusively, with dual-channel support and a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, which future-proofs for next-generation storage and GPUs, though the current GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The GPU requires a 550 W power supply, and the CPU has a 65 W TDP. This leaves substantial headroom for upgrades. A user could install a higher-end GPU that requires more power, as the 550 W PSU is a baseline suggestion and many builds have larger units. The GPU is dual-slot and 267 mm long, fitting most mid-tower cases. The 1x 16-pin power connector is standard for the 40-series.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count CPU on the AM5 socket, such as a Ryzen 7 or Ryzen 9 part, which would alleviate the CPU bottleneck seen in esports titles. The data shows the 7600 is within 0.3% of the Ryzen 7 7435HS, so moving to an 8-core or 12-core desktop part would provide a meaningful multi-thread uplift. The motherboard's PCIe Gen 5 support means a future GPU upgrade would not be bandwidth-limited. The 12 GB VRAM is adequate for current games, but a future GPU with more memory would be the other logical upgrade path, though the power supply would need to be checked against the new GPU's requirements.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 81, meaning this system outperforms 81% of all CPU-GPU combinations in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX?

A: The Ryzen 5 7600 has an average benchmark score of 26324, which is 0.2% higher than the Ryzen 9 6900HX's score of 26274.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and size?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR4 memory?

A: No, the Ryzen 5 7600 only supports DDR5 memory, running on a dual-channel bus.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking and how does it compare to the RTX 4090 Mobile?

A: The GPU is in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. It is 1% behind the RTX 4090 Mobile in average benchmark score.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 4070 SUPER is 550 W.

Q: How many ray tracing cores and tensor cores does the GPU have?

A: The GPU has 56 ray tracing cores and 224 tensor cores.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 26324, with a percentile rank of 78 against all CPUs. The GPU's average benchmark score is 43223, with a percentile rank of 83 against all GPUs. These scores place the CPU in the same performance class as the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (deltaPct 0.2), the Intel Core i9-11900KF (deltaPct 0.4), and the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U (deltaPct 0.5), while being slightly behind the Ryzen 7 7435HS (deltaPct -0.3). The GPU is effectively at parity with the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (deltaPct -0.1) and the RTX 5050 Mobile (deltaPct -0.1), while being 1% behind the RTX 4090 Mobile.

In gaming, the measured FPS across a wide range of titles shows strong performance. At 1080p, the system averages over 100 FPS in most titles, with esports games like Valorant reaching 490 FPS and CS:GO hitting 624.6 FPS. At 1440p, frame rates remain playable, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 62 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 57.2 FPS. At 4K, the system delivers 60 FPS in Control and 60.9 FPS in Microsoft Flight Simulator, though more demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 41 FPS and Ark: Survival Ascended to 13.4 FPS. The average FPS across all tested games is 178.5, with the pair ranking 602 out of 3732 pairs.

The combined picture is one of a capable gaming system that excels at 1080p and 1440p, with playable 4K performance in less demanding titles. The CPU's strong single-thread performance ensures high frame rates in esports, while the GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth handle modern AAA titles at high settings. The system's 81st combined percentile confirms its position above the majority of builds, though it is not at the extreme high end.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: "desktop") pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 processor on the AM5 socket, and the GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture card with 12 GB of GDDR6X memory. The combined percentile of 81 places this system in the upper tier of all benchmarked pairs, and the pair rank by FPS of 602 out of 3732 confirms its position in the top 16% of pairs.

The overall tier is mid-to-high range. The CPU's 78th percentile and the GPU's 83rd percentile indicate that the graphics card is the more premium component. This is a system designed for high-refresh gaming at 1080p and 1440p, with the capability to handle 4K in optimized titles. The 65 W TDP of the CPU and 220 W TDP of the GPU make it an efficient pairing that does not require extreme cooling or power delivery. The 550 W suggested PSU is a standard requirement for this class of GPU.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who prioritize high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p. The data shows 283.8 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 490 FPS in Valorant at 1080p, making it ideal for competitive shooters where refresh rate matters. For AAA gaming at 1440p, the system delivers 62 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 and 57.2 FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2, which is smooth for immersive single-player experiences.

Content creators who work with video editing and 3D rendering will find this system capable. The CPU's multi-thread score of 12735 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU's compute score of 17108 in PassMark indicate it can handle 1080p video editing and moderate 3D workloads. The 12 GB VRAM allows for larger textures and longer render sequences without running out of memory.

Software developers benefit from the 12 threads and fast single-thread performance. The PassMark single-thread score of 3910 and multi-thread score of 27058 ensure quick builds, and the 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth reduces data-transfer bottlenecks. The ECC memory support is a plus for data integrity in development environments.

Students and office workers will find this system vastly overqualified for their needs. The CPU's integrated Radeon Graphics provides a fallback, and the discrete GPU is more than sufficient for any productivity tasks. The 81st combined percentile means this system will never feel slow, even under heavy multitasking loads. Small business workstations that run virtual machines or database applications will benefit from the 12 threads and fast DDR5 memory, though the GPU is unnecessary for most office tasks.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data (dataIsMeasured: true) shows how this system performs across a wide range of games at ultra settings. At 1920x1080, the system achieves exceptionally high frame rates in esports titles: Valorant hits 490 FPS, CS:GO reaches 624.6 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X achieves 337.6 FPS. These numbers indicate the CPU is not a bottleneck in these titles, as the frame rates exceed what most monitors can display.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong. Counter-Strike 2 drops to 186.9 FPS, while Valorant remains high at 465 FPS. AAA titles see more significant drops: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 62 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 57.2 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 135 FPS. These are playable frame rates for high-refresh monitors, though not at the extreme levels seen at 1080p.

At 3840x2160, the system's limits become apparent. Control runs at 60 FPS, Microsoft Flight Simulator at 60.9 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 115 FPS, which are smooth experiences. However, demanding titles struggle: Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 41 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 36.1 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 13.4 FPS, which is not playable. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K textures in most games, but the GPU's raw compute is not enough for the most graphically intensive titles at 4K ultra settings.

The average FPS across all games is 178.5, which reflects the strong performance at lower resolutions. The pair rank of 602 out of 3732 places this system in the top 16% of all pairs, indicating that it outperforms the vast majority of CPU-GPU combinations in gaming. For users who primarily game at 1080p or 1440p, this is an excellent system; for 4K gaming, it is suitable for less demanding titles or with settings adjustments.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7600

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds