SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7545U + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
87%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7545U

26,849 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7545U and Intel Arc A550M pairing represents a laptop-class configuration aimed at balancing CPU efficiency with discrete GPU performance. Notably, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, meaning all gaming and frame-rate analysis presented here is estimated from the aggregate benchmark scores of each component rather than direct testing of the pairing.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance between the Ryzen 5 7545U and the Arc A550M is characterized by a significant disparity in their respective benchmark percentiles. The CPU sits at the 79th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU commands a higher position at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. This seven-point gap suggests that in graphics-intensive workloads, the CPU is more likely to be the limiting factor, whereas in compute-heavy tasks that rely on the processor, the GPU will have headroom to spare.

The CPU’s multi-threaded performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17253, indicates a strong capability for sustained workloads, but its single-core score of 2435 in the same test suggests that frame pacing in lighter-threaded games could be constrained. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 49737 across Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan tests places it in the upper echelon of mobile graphics, but the CPU’s 28-watt TDP envelope means it will generate less heat and power draw, potentially allowing the GPU to maintain boost clocks for longer in thermally constrained laptop chassis.

The data suggests that in 1080p gaming scenarios, the Arc A550M will often be waiting on the CPU to feed it draw calls, particularly in esports titles where high frame rates expose processor limitations. Conversely, in 4K or heavily detailed scenes, the GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth will become the primary constraint, shifting the bottleneck back to the graphics card. This is a classic balanced pairing for high-refresh 1080p gaming, where the CPU can keep up with the GPU’s output, but it is not an ideal match for maximizing frame rates at lower resolutions where the CPU’s single-thread performance becomes the ceiling.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 5 7545U delivers an average benchmark score of 26849, placing it at the 79th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i7-1370P, which scores 26900, a difference of only -0.2 percent, indicating the two processors are statistically tied in aggregate performance. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 sits at 26936 (-0.3 percent), while the AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT and AMD EPYC 9554 both score lower at 26748 and 26743 respectively, giving the 7545U a 0.4 percent advantage over each.

In individual CPU tests, the processor demonstrates robust multi-threading with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17253 and a PassMark multi-thread score of 20298. Single-thread performance is respectable at 3673 in PassMark single-thread tests and 2435 in Cinebench R23 single-core. The CPU’s integer math score of 60206 in PassMark is notably strong, while its floating-point math score of 36754 is more moderate, suggesting a skew toward integer-heavy workloads like database operations rather than scientific floating-point calculations.

The Intel Arc A550M GPU posts an average benchmark score of 49737, ranking at the 86th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest competitor is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti at 49957 (-0.4 percent), followed by the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at 50001 (-0.5 percent). The GPU is 2.4 percent behind the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (50951) but 2.6 percent ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (48477). In Geekbench compute tests, the GPU scores 49894 in OpenCL and 49580 in Vulkan, showing nearly identical performance across the two APIs.

The combined picture shows a system that is well above average for a laptop, with the CPU ranking higher than 79 percent of all processors and the GPU outranking 86 percent of all graphics cards. The combined percentile of 83 reflects a configuration that will handle modern gaming at high settings and productivity tasks without major compromises.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture and fabricated on TSMC’s 6 nm process. The chip, designated DG2-512, contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, with a transistor density of 53.4 million per square millimeter. The GPU operates with a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, providing a substantial overclocking headroom out of the box.

Memory configuration consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, running at an effective 14 Gbps and delivering a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. This bandwidth is adequate for 1080p gaming but may become a constraint at higher resolutions or with heavy texture streaming. The GPU features 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, along with 16 ray tracing cores. The FP32 throughput is rated at 8.397 TFLOPS, with FP16 reaching 16.79 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio, indicating strong compute capability for AI inference and shader-heavy effects.

Pixel and texture rates are rated at 131.2 GPixel/s and 262.4 GTexel/s respectively, which are healthy figures for a mobile GPU of this class. The API support is comprehensive, including DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with the latest gaming titles and modern rendering techniques. The benchmark scores, with an OpenCL result of 49894 and Vulkan at 49580, place the GPU in contention with desktop-class cards like the Radeon RX 6800 XT, which it trails by only 2.6 percent in average score. For rendering tasks, the 16 ray tracing cores will enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 figure suggests that rasterized workflows will see the most benefit.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets laptop buyers who need a strong balance of CPU and GPU horsepower for 1080p high-refresh gaming and content creation on the go. Gamers playing at 1080p with high refresh rate displays will find the pairing suitable, as the CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3673 and the GPU’s 86th percentile ranking can drive high frame rates in competitive titles. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for modern games at 1080p with high texture quality, though users should avoid 4K gaming where the memory bandwidth will be strained.

Content creators working with video editing software will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17253, which accelerates rendering and export times. The GPU’s 16.79 TFLOPS FP16 performance supports hardware-accelerated encoding and effects processing. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 60206 and data compression score of 238345, both indicating strong throughput for build and compression tasks. Students and small business workstation users will find the configuration capable for office productivity, with the CPU’s 12 threads handling multitasking and the GPU providing acceleration for any graphical applications. The 28-watt CPU TDP and 60-watt GPU TDP keep the system within a power envelope suitable for a laptop, making it a portable yet capable workstation.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7545U is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix2. It is manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process, with 20,900 million transistors occupying a 137 mm² die. The base clock is 3.20 GHz, boosting up to 4.90 GHz, which is a substantial boost range that allows the chip to scale from power-efficient idle states to high-performance bursts. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache, providing adequate low-latency storage for active data.

Memory support is limited to DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, yielding a maximum memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is supported, making this chip suitable for reliability-conscious workloads. PCIe connectivity is provided via Gen 4 with 14 lanes from the CPU, sufficient for a discrete GPU and one or two NVMe SSDs. The integrated Radeon 740M graphics provide a fallback for basic display output when the discrete GPU is not in use.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in multi-threaded tasks relative to its mobile class. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17253 is strong for a 28-watt part, indicating efficient power scaling. The PassMark data encryption score of 14202 and extended instructions score of 17865 highlight strong cryptography and SIMD performance. The find prime numbers score of 68 is notably low, suggesting that the processor is not optimized for pure integer latency-bound loops, but this is unlikely to impact real-world applications. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 1739 and R20 multi-core score of 7246 show consistent scaling across benchmark versions, confirming the chip’s architectural efficiency. For real workloads, this translates to snappy application launches, fast code compilation, and smooth multitasking with multiple virtual machines running.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 5 7545U uses the AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile-specific socket with no traditional upgrade path for end users. The platform supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, and the 89.6 GB/s bandwidth provides a solid foundation for the current CPU. The PCIe Gen 4 interface with 14 CPU lanes allows for a modern discrete GPU and fast NVMe storage, but the lane count limits expansion to a single high-bandwidth device and one or two additional peripherals.

Memory is the most practical upgrade for this platform, as increasing capacity from a baseline configuration to 32 GB or 64 GB of DDR5 will benefit multi-tasking and content creation workloads. The CPU supports ECC memory, which is rare in mobile platforms and can be leveraged for data integrity in workstation use. The GPU, Intel Arc A550M, is soldered in a laptop configuration, so the only meaningful upgrade is the storage, which can be swapped for a larger or faster Gen 4 NVMe drive.

The system’s power requirements are modest, with the CPU drawing 28 watts TDP and the GPU rated at 60 watts TDP. This leaves substantial headroom within a typical laptop power budget, allowing for aggressive boost behavior from both components. A sensible next upgrade for a user of this platform would be to increase system memory to maximum supported capacity and ensure the storage subsystem is populated with the fastest Gen 4 NVMe drive available, as these will yield the most noticeable performance gains without changing the core silicon.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 83, placing this configuration above the majority of laptop systems.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-1370P?

A: The Ryzen 5 7545U scores 26849 on average, which is 0.2 percent lower than the i7-1370P’s 26900, making them effectively equivalent in aggregate performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A550M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with an effective speed of 14 Gbps providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 5 7545U supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for a mobile processor.

Q: What is the GPU’s average benchmark score and how does it rank?

A: The GPU scores 49737 on average, placing it at the 86th percentile of all GPUs, and it trails the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT by 2.4 percent.

Q: Are there measured FPS results for this exact CPU and GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this pairing, so all gaming performance is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and multi-threaded Cinebench R23 score?

A: The CPU boosts up to 4.90 GHz and scores 17253 in Cinebench R23 multi-core tests.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 7545U with the Intel Arc A550M in a laptop-class configuration. The CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 part with a 28-watt TDP and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, while the GPU is an Xe-HPG architecture part with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 60-watt TDP. The combined percentile of 83 indicates this system sits above the vast majority of laptops, with the GPU’s 86th percentile ranking contributing more to the overall tier than the CPU’s 79th percentile.

The configuration is best described as a high-end mobile gaming and content creation platform, capable of handling 1080p gaming at high settings and accelerating productivity tasks. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 26849 places it in the upper mid-range of processors, while the GPU’s 49737 average score puts it in contention with desktop cards like the Radeon RX 6800 XT. The lack of measured FPS data means the exact gaming experience is estimated, but the component-level scores suggest a system that will deliver smooth frame rates in most titles.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, this pairing is well-suited for high-refresh displays, with the GPU’s 86th percentile ranking providing ample frame throughput and the CPU’s single-thread score of 3673 in PassMark ensuring draw calls are processed quickly. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for modern textures at this resolution, and the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth prevents bottlenecks in most scenes. Users can expect playable frame rates in esports titles, though the CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2435 may limit maximum FPS in CPU-bound scenarios.

Streaming: The CPU’s 12 threads and PassMark multi-thread score of 20298 allow for simultaneous gaming and encoding, while the GPU’s 16.79 TFLOPS FP16 performance supports hardware-accelerated encoding via its Xe-HPG architecture. The combined percentile of 83 indicates the system can handle the dual load of gameplay and stream encoding without major frame drops.

Video Editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17253 accelerates timeline rendering and export, while the GPU’s 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 throughput speeds up effects processing and previews. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth supports smooth playback of high-bitrate footage, and the 8 GB VRAM handles 4K previews without excessive swapping.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads provide solid CPU-based rendering performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 7246. The GPU’s 16 ray tracing cores and 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 performance enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and GPU-based rendering in compatible applications, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity.

Software Development: The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 60206 and data compression score of 238345 indicate strong performance for code compilation and archive operations. The 12 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the 4 nm process node ensures power efficiency for long compile sessions on battery power.

Student and Office Work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3673 in PassMark ensures snappy response in office applications, while the 12 threads handle multitasking across multiple documents and browser tabs. The integrated Radeon 740M provides a power-efficient fallback for lighter tasks, extending battery life when the discrete GPU is not needed.