SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7540U + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 5 7540U

24,188 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 5 7540U paired with the Intel Arc A350M represents a modern, low-power laptop combination that prioritizes efficiency and balanced everyday performance over raw enthusiast-class output. This pairing combines a 4nm Zen 4 mobile processor with a discrete entry-level Arc GPU, placing the system in the 73rd percentile overall, which indicates a solid mid-range position in the benchmark database. The data for this specific combination is derived from synthetic benchmarks, as no measured frame rate data exists for this exact pairing.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is a discrete mobile GPU built on Intel's Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip fabricated on a 6nm process. It features 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster operation units, along with 6 dedicated ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1150 MHz and can boost up to 2200 MHz, which helps drive its 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 compute performance.

Memory configuration is a notable constraint for this GPU. The Arc A350M comes with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, delivering 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a relatively narrow memory interface that will likely limit performance in high-resolution textures and memory-intensive workloads, despite the respectable clock speeds. The 14 Gbps effective memory speed partially compensates, but the 4 GB capacity and 64-bit bus are the primary bottlenecks for modern gaming at higher detail settings.

In terms of API support, the GPU is fully featured with DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 support. This ensures compatibility with modern rendering techniques, including ray tracing, though the modest 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 6 RT cores suggest ray tracing will be a feature to enable judiciously rather than a default setting. The GPU's pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s and texture rate is 105.6 GTexel/s, which are competitive figures for entry-level discrete graphics.

The benchmark data shows the Arc A350M achieving a Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 and a Vulkan score of 24747. These scores place the GPU in the 70th percentile of all GPUs, indicating it outperforms the majority of integrated graphics and entry-level discrete options. The average benchmark score of 24647 places it in close competition with several established desktop and mobile parts. The nearest rival data shows it is within 0.4% of the AMD Radeon RX 590 and NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, 0.8% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, and 1.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630. This positioning suggests the A350M delivers performance comparable to older desktop mid-range cards, which is impressive given its 25 W TDP.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for this laptop pairing is defined by a 73rd percentile overall position, indicating a well-balanced system that sits above the median but below high-end enthusiast configurations. The CPU, with an average benchmark score of 24188, is the stronger component in absolute terms, while the GPU's average score of 24647 is comparable in the raw benchmark context, though they measure different workloads.

The Ryzen 5 7540U's CPU benchmarks reveal a strong single-threaded and multi-threaded performer. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 10383 in multi-core and 1699 in single-core tests. The Geekbench scores are 7956 multi-core and 2083 single-core, while PassMark tests show 18576 for multithread and 3544 for single-thread performance. The CPU's percentile rank of 76 against all CPUs confirms its position as a capable mid-range mobile processor, sitting just 0.4% below the Intel Core i5-13400 and 0.6% below the Intel Core i7-1360P, while being 0.4% above the AMD Ryzen 5 8600G.

The GPU's benchmark scores of 24546 in OpenCL and 24747 in Vulkan position it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. The gap between the CPU's 76th percentile and GPU's 70th percentile suggests the GPU is slightly more of a limiting factor in graphically intensive workloads, but the overall balance is reasonable for a laptop of this class. The data indicates that for general productivity and CPU-bound tasks, the system performs admirably, while for gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering, it will deliver playable but not exceptional results.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7540U is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix. It is built on TSMC's 4nm process, housing 25,000 million transistors in a 178 mm² die. The base clock is 3.20 GHz with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, which is a substantial boost range that allows for aggressive single-threaded performance when needed. The processor has a 28 W TDP, indicating it is designed for efficient, thin-and-light laptops.

The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration is typical for AMD's modern mobile processors, providing adequate cache for the 6-core design. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and it also supports ECC memory, which is a feature more commonly found in workstation-class hardware.

The benchmark results for the CPU show strong performance across various workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10383 is indicative of solid multi-threaded capability for a 28 W part, while the single-core score of 1699 suggests excellent single-threaded performance, likely due to the high 4.90 GHz boost clock. The PassMark results are particularly telling: integer math scores 60152, floating point math scores 36077, and extended instructions score 15307, showing that the CPU handles a wide range of computational tasks effectively.

The CPU's nearest rivals provide context for its performance. It is essentially matched with the Intel Core i5-13400 and i7-1360P, both being within 0.6% of the 7540U's average score. This suggests that for most productivity workloads, the 7540U will perform on par with these Intel alternatives, despite being a lower-power mobile part. The 0.4% advantage over the AMD Ryzen 5 8600G further reinforces its competitive position. The 76th percentile ranking means the CPU outperforms roughly three-quarters of all processors in the database, making it a strong choice for a mid-range laptop.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A350M's 70th percentile GPU ranking and 3.379 TFLOPS of compute performance suggest it can handle esports titles at high frame rates, likely exceeding 60 FPS in less demanding games. However, the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will likely restrict performance in modern AAA titles, where the GPU may need to compromise on texture quality and resolution to maintain playable frame rates.

Streaming: The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads, combined with its 18576 PassMark multithread score, provide sufficient headroom for encoding and streaming simultaneously. The 12 threads can handle the encoding workload while maintaining game performance, though the GPU's modest capabilities may require lower game settings to ensure smooth streaming output.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10383 indicates strong performance for video encoding and rendering tasks. The GPU's OpenCL score of 24546 suggests it can accelerate effects and transitions, though the 4 GB VRAM may limit the use of high-resolution footage and complex timelines. For 1080p editing, this system should be capable, but 4K projects may strain the GPU memory.

3D rendering: The CPU's multi-threaded performance, evidenced by the 10383 Cinebench R23 score, will handle CPU-based rendering workloads efficiently. The GPU's 6 RT cores and 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance can assist with GPU-accelerated rendering, though the limited VRAM will restrict the complexity of scenes that can be rendered entirely on the GPU.

Software development: The CPU's strong single-threaded score of 1699 in Cinebench R23 and 3544 in PassMark single-thread indicate excellent performance for compilation tasks, which are often single-threaded. The 12 threads will also handle parallel builds effectively, and the 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth supports rapid data access during development.

Student and office work: The 76th percentile CPU ranking ensures smooth performance for productivity applications, web browsing, and document processing. The integrated Radeon 740M graphics provide a backup for light GPU tasks, while the discrete Arc A350M can handle more demanding visual workloads if needed, making this a versatile system for academic and professional use.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 5 7540U is mounted on the AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile-specific socket. This limits the upgrade path for the CPU, as it is soldered or otherwise not user-replaceable in most laptop designs. The platform supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, which allows for fast NVMe SSDs and the discrete GPU connection.

The GPU, Intel Arc A350M, is also an integrated component of the laptop, not a separate card. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface for communication with the CPU. Since this is a laptop build class, the upgrade path is essentially limited to memory and storage. The system can support up to the maximum DDR5 capacity allowed by the memory controller, and PCIe Gen 4 storage can be added for faster data access.

The CPU's 28 W TDP and GPU's 25 W TDP create a combined thermal envelope of 53 W, which is modest for a laptop. This suggests the system has headroom for a more powerful future GPU if the chassis were redesigned, but as it stands, the platform is designed for efficiency rather than extensibility. A sensible next upgrade would be increasing system memory to the maximum supported capacity, as the dual-channel configuration and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth can benefit from additional capacity for multitasking and larger workloads.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than definitive measurements. The GPU's 70th percentile ranking and the CPU's 76th percentile ranking suggest a system that can handle gaming, but with limitations.

Based on the GPU's average benchmark score of 24647 and its proximity to the AMD Radeon RX 590 (within 0.4%), the Arc A350M is likely to deliver playable frame rates at 1080p in most titles. For esports games like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and boost clock of 2200 MHz should push well above 60 FPS, potentially reaching 100+ FPS depending on the game's optimization.

For AAA titles, the 4 GB VRAM will be the primary constraint. Games with high-resolution textures may exceed the memory capacity, causing stuttering or requiring reduced texture quality. The 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, while reasonable, is lower than many competing GPUs, which could limit performance in bandwidth-intensive scenes. The 6 RT cores allow for ray tracing, but the modest FP32 performance means enabling ray tracing will likely cause significant frame rate drops, making it more suitable for games with lighter ray tracing implementations or lower resolutions.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data indicates a reasonably balanced system, but the GPU is marginally more of a limiting factor than the CPU. The CPU's 76th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 70th percentile suggests that in gaming workloads, the GPU will typically be the bottleneck, as it is less capable relative to its respective pool of competing hardware.

In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation or data processing, the CPU's 18576 PassMark multithread score and 3544 single-thread score will shine, with the GPU providing only marginal acceleration. The GPU's OpenCL score of 24546, while respectable, is not exceptional enough to offload significant compute from the CPU in most productivity scenarios.

The FPS scaling evidence, inferred from the GPU's benchmark positioning, suggests that at lower resolutions (720p), the CPU may become more of a bottleneck, as the GPU can render frames quickly but the CPU must keep up with game logic. At 1080p and above, the GPU's limitations in VRAM and bandwidth will become more apparent, creating a GPU-bound scenario. This balance is typical for a laptop of this class, where both components are matched to deliver consistent performance without one dramatically outperforming the other.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this system?

A: The system is in the 73rd percentile overall, indicating it outperforms roughly 73% of all tested configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 7540U is 0.4% behind the Intel Core i5-13400, 0.6% behind the Intel Core i7-1360P, and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 8600G, making it essentially comparable to these parts.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and how does it affect performance?

A: The Arc A350M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth. This limits performance in high-resolution gaming and memory-intensive workloads.

Q: Does this system support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 6 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, though the modest compute performance suggests ray tracing will require reduced settings.

Q: What is the CPU's architecture and process node?

A: The CPU is based on Zen 4 architecture (codenamed Phoenix) and is fabricated on TSMC's 4nm process with 25,000 million transistors.

Q: What type of memory does the system support?

A: The system supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with a maximum bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: Is the GPU performance comparable to any desktop cards?

A: The GPU is within 0.4% of the AMD Radeon RX 590 and 1.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630, indicating performance similar to older mid-range desktop GPUs.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration is best suited for users who need a balance of CPU and GPU performance without sacrificing portability or efficiency. Gamers playing at 1080p with moderate settings will find the Arc A350M sufficient for most titles, particularly esports games where the CPU's strong single-threaded performance (1699 in Cinebench R23) ensures high frame rates. Content creators working with 1080p video will benefit from the CPU's 10383 Cinebench R23 multi-core score for rendering, while the GPU can accelerate effects, though 4K projects may be limited by the 4 GB VRAM.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's 12 threads and high boost clock of 4.90 GHz, which handles compilation tasks efficiently, as evidenced by the 3544 PassMark single-thread score. Students and office workers will find the system more than capable for everyday tasks, with the CPU's 76th percentile ranking ensuring smooth multitasking. Small business workstations requiring ECC memory support will also find this configuration attractive, as the CPU supports ECC DDR5 memory.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class system pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 7540U, a 6-core Zen 4 mobile processor, with the Intel Arc A350M, an entry-level discrete mobile GPU. The CPU is built on a 4nm process and features a base clock of 3.20 GHz with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, while the GPU is based on Xe-HPG architecture with a boost clock of 2200 MHz. The combined 73rd percentile ranking places this system firmly in the mid-range tier, offering solid performance for a wide range of tasks.

The system's overall tier, as indicated by the 73rd percentile, suggests it is a capable all-rounder rather than a specialist. The CPU's 76th percentile and GPU's 70th percentile rankings are closely matched, creating a balanced platform that avoids significant bottlenecks in most workloads. For users seeking a laptop that can handle productivity, creative tasks, and moderate gaming without the expense or bulk of high-end gaming laptops, this pairing represents a sensible and efficient choice.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 5 7540U + Intel Arc A350M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 5 7540U

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds